info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: would chad fight for the u.s. if we had a war?
115 views
Skip to first unread message
The Chad
Apr 10, 2017, 8:41:45 PM4/10/17
to
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:57:49 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
> Yes?
I already served 6.5 years.
> Yes?
I already served 6.5 years.
The Chad
Apr 10, 2017, 10:33:34 PM4/10/17
to
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:06:03 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
> What if war broke out?
I already served during an armed campaign.
> What if war broke out?
I already served during an armed campaign.
%
Apr 10, 2017, 11:06:40 PM4/10/17
to
in fact you may as well die it's the only thing left ,
that you haven't done at some time
Janithor
Apr 11, 2017, 2:37:24 AM4/11/17
to
x-no-archive: yes
How many years did Alex serve?
The Chad
Apr 11, 2017, 8:35:57 PM4/11/17
to
is less related to him than a second cousin.
Janithor
Apr 13, 2017, 4:28:25 AM4/13/17
to
x-no-archive: yes
Smackdown!
The Chad = 1
Dink = virgin
The Chad = 1
Dink = virgin
]v[etaphoid
Apr 13, 2017, 9:52:13 PM4/13/17
to
The Chad explained on 11/04/2017 :
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:06:03 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
Isn't false valor a crime in the US now?
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
]v[etaphoid
Apr 13, 2017, 9:53:25 PM4/13/17
to
Janithor laid this down on his screen :
If he falsely claimed to have served in armed combat as you have, would
that make him less of a social misfit like you, Chadlee?
that make him less of a social misfit like you, Chadlee?
]v[etaphoid
Apr 13, 2017, 9:58:20 PM4/13/17
to
After serious thinking The Chad wrote :
valour warrior...
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 14:57:49 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
>
>> Yes?
>
> I already served 6.5 years.
Guarding the Salt Lake City mess hall is not "serving" you stolen
>
>> Yes?
>
> I already served 6.5 years.
valour warrior...
]v[etaphoid
Jun 8, 2019, 5:48:59 AM6/8/19
to
The Chad explained on 11/04/2017 :
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:06:03 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
Are you still sticking by this claim Chad?
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
Not that every single person here knows you are lying, but why don't
you elaborate on when and where you served in armed conflict?
]v[etaphoid
Jan 23, 2020, 8:48:26 AM1/23/20
to
]v[etaphoid formulated the question :
Chad, Arvid, Lou?
Are you still claiming to have served in an armed conflict?
Hoist by his own petard, once again...
Are you still claiming to have served in an armed conflict?
Hoist by his own petard, once again...
Davey Zimmerman #274
Jan 23, 2020, 3:37:19 PM1/23/20
to
]v[etaphoid <m...@phoid.com> wrote in
]news:mn.c0307e413a...@phoid.com:
Scott Oof certainly would. Every war needs latrine orderlies.
]news:mn.c0307e413a...@phoid.com:
]v[etaphoid
Jan 24, 2020, 5:56:33 PM1/24/20
to
]v[etaphoid
Jul 21, 2020, 9:50:18 AM7/21/20
to
]v[etaphoid explained on 8/06/2019 :
We all knew you were lying then. And we know that you lie constantly
now.
Real veterans will not be amused...
now.
Real veterans will not be amused...
]v[etaphoid
Dec 5, 2020, 3:45:25 AM12/5/20
to
The Chad explained on 11/04/2017 :
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:06:03 -0700, robert stickler wrote:
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
>
>> What if war broke out?
>
> I already served during an armed campaign.
Are you still sticking by this claim Chad?
Why don't you elaborate on when and where you served in armed conflict?
--
Here endeth the lesson...
dolf
Jan 29, 2021, 8:00:09 PM1/29/21
to
We’ve added some Russian groups so that there is some context for your
statement...
-- IS THE AUSTRALIAN FIRST FLEET DELAY OF 4.5 DAYS BEFORE AUSTRALIA DAY
FOUNDING THEN EVIDENCE OF #81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE DEPLOYING
QUADRANTS TO A TRINOMIAL PARADIGM [#205 / #164] OF #369 - NATURE?
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 January, 2021
The First Fleet arrived over the period of 18-20 January 1788, taking 250
to 252 days from departure to final arrival.
During the period 25-26 January 1788 the fleet moved from Botany Bay to
present-day Sydney.
A 4.5 day duration places one in a different quadrant of the trinomial
paradigm [#205 / #164] of #369 - nature as #81 - sovereign juxtaposition
principle.
<https://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
It could then be postulated relating to the date of 26 JANUARY 1788 being
established:
a) By a mechanism of SAPIENT CONSCIOUSNESS derived from antiquity (dawn of
time);
b) Deploys the same TRINOMIAL ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY of our
CONSTITUTION and CITIZENSHIP IDEA TEMPLATE as the defining principle for a
#322 - DEMOCRACY by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900;
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Union%20Jack.jpeg>
c) TRINOMIAL TECHNOLOGY RELEVANT TO #369 [#205 / #164] - NATURE, #71 -
CONSTITUTION, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Superseding%20Letters%20Patent%2020201107.pdf>
A TRINOMIAL NUMBER PARADIGM IS EVIDENT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA OF 1783:
CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT* *OF*
*CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49 {7x7:
#175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 - *MISTRUST* *OF*
*DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150 -
ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}
We have therefore made two assumptions about the #298 - *IMPETUS* of Kant's
PROLEGOMENA being itself a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 -
FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} as value centered upon the
#9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE. Namely that he seems acquainted with the
meta-descriptor prototypes assigned to a trinomial number paradigm to which
as a starting point he then designates to various sections of his
PROLEGOMENA (@1 + @41 + @81 + @369) AS COSMOLOGICAL VIEW:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 - METHODOLOGY
+ @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO
(#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
Our provisional conclusion is that the PROLEGOMENA includes a margin metric
for example [4:318] that then concords with IDEAS and these are derived
from a HEBREW / GREEK lexicon hierarchy which he smugly conceals from his
readers, as to its deployment as the scaffolding and the reference object
for his most influential text in the entire history of moral philosophy.
But which is most suitable in our view for the providing the quintessential
grounding framework for any sapient / cognitive requirement of
CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION within TEMPORALITY and methodology requisite
for the formulation of *CONSTITUTION*:
"THAT WE THINK THE WORLD AS IF IT DERIVES FROM A SUPREME REASON, AS REGARDS
ITS EXISTENCE AND INNER DETERMINATION; WHEREBY WE IN PART COGNIZE THE
*CONSTITUTION* BELONGING TO IT (THE WORLD) ITSELF, WITHOUT PRESUMING TO
WANT TO DETERMINE THAT OF ITS CAUSE IN ITSELF, AND, ON THE OTHER HAND, WE
IN PART POSIT THE BASIS OF THIS *CONSTITUTION* [IDEA: @360 - ROMAN
GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #EIGHT AS METALOGIC AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER
TRANSFORMATIVE CENTRE] (THE RATIONAL FORM OF THE WORLD) IN THE RELATION OF
THE HIGHEST CAUSE TO THE WORLD, NOT FINDING THE WORLD BY ITSELF SUFFICIENT
THERETO." [PROLEGOMENA SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO
CHANGE; I-CHING: H43 - RESOLUTION, DISPLACEMENT, PARTING, BREAK-THROUGH;
TETRA: 29 - DECISIVENESS (TUAN), page 110]
From memory Kant considers the noumenon as a reference object which is then
relative to an experience being a thing as it is in itself, as distinct
from a thing as it is knowable by the senses through phenomenal attributes.
He does not perceive of cognition as a noumenon centred process to any
perception, sensation, idea, or intuition resulting from such.
... SEE ALSO TEST OF #268 - DECREE OF RESTRICTION RELATIVE TO 1, 2, 3
On September 17, 1787, after three months of debate moderated by convention
president George Washington, the new U.S. constitution, which created a
strong federal government with an intricate system of checks and balances,
was signed by 38 of the 41 delegates present at the conclusion of the
convention. As dictated by Article VII, the document would not become
binding until it was ratified by *NINE* of the 13 states.
Beginning on December 7, five states—Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey,
Georgia, and Connecticut—ratified it in quick succession. However, other
states, especially Massachusetts, opposed the document, as it failed to
reserve undelegated powers to the states and lacked constitutional
protection of basic political rights, such as freedom of speech, religion,
and the press.
In February 1788, a compromise was reached under which Massachusetts and
other states would agree to ratify the document with the assurance that
amendments would be immediately proposed. The Constitution was thus
narrowly ratified in Massachusetts, followed by Maryland and South
Carolina.
On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the *NINTH* state to ratify the
document, and it was subsequently agreed that government under the U.S.
Constitution would begin on March 4, 1789. In June, Virginia ratified the
Constitution, followed by New York in July.
[<https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-constitution-ratified>]
----------
Thusly there is a possibility to exploit Dutch Sovereignty (ie. THEIR
NULLIUS AS NOBODY AND NOT THERE) from 1616 and VAN DIEMAN's LAND (ie. SO
NAMED AFTER THE GOVERNOR GENERAL THEN SUBJECT TO A SOVEREIGN) to then argue
against DEPRAVITY OF BRITISH IMPERIALISM WHICH IS AN ISSUE OF NON
CONFORMITY to such by especially the IRISH AND SCOTTISH ROMAN CATHOLICS who
have a disdain for #27 - DUTY as regard for #902 - RULE OF LAW and pursue
their own #38 - WORLDVIEW relative to Australia Day as #68 - RIGHTS
PREROGATIVE.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Australia_Day_Mind.png>
IN THE PROMULGATING OF #446 - *PROPAGANDA* GIVING A #491 - PATER FAMILIAS
HISTORICAL REVISIONIST PERSPECTIVE OF ANZAC HERITAGE EXHIBITING BOTH A
MENTAL AND DYSTOPIAN DERANGEMENT (ie. BINOMIAL #38 - apparatus -->
*COERCED* *UPON* --> the TRINOMIAL #369 [#205 / #164] - *NATURE*, #71 -
*CONSTITUTION*, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - *CAUSE* *OF* *REASON* AS
PRINCIPLES OF VIABILITY FOR #500 - *LIFE*) SPECIFICALLY:
TRINOMIAL SCHEMA IMPETUS: #70 - SEVERANCE (KE) --> NOUS #62 (#509 / #383 -
ECLIPSE ON 4 FEBRUARY 1916 (AEST)) AS #413 - DEVICE {#383} FOR IMPROPER
POPPY WREATH AT BOER WAR MEMORIAL ON 8 JUNE 2017 AND BEERSHEBA CENTENNIAL
ON 28 OCTOBER 2017
FOR EXPLANATION SEE: "RISKY PRECIPICE"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Risky%20Precipice%20383-509.pdf>
AND DISINFORMATION AS #129 - *WARFARE* (ie. ICONOCLASM AGAINST ANY
BENEVOLENCE OF STATE #491 - *AGENCY* TOWARDS A CIVIL, DECENT AND JUST
SOCIETY) IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF A CAUSEA COMMUNI HAVING A RELIANCE ON #48 -
RITUAL (LI) / #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) AS GROUNDING.
There is no need for conflict but to formulate the reasonable argument of
claim that Dutch a priori discovery bestows a sovereign / autonomy and by
its *GNOME* *PRINCIPLE* {ie. its mapping and naming} is then subject to law
and justice even though no Dutch persons were continuously present to
enforce such since the DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY (VOC) as an institution had
equivalent STATE prerogatives as did Captain Cook.
DOLF @ 1109 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2021: "COMMENT ON GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY / PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*) AS
GRUMBLE PROTOTYPE PROGRESS UPDATE ON TOWARDS REASON AND ASSAYING MEMEBRAIN
PRINCIPLES AS CRITERIA:
This comment is only a spontaneous and conjectural (as a philosophical
perspective since I am neither a psychiatrist, psychologist nor behavioural
analyst) as an informal research opinion on the topic of GNOSIS EX MACHINA
which is relative to both the consideration of DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY
and PERSONALISITICS OF BEING.
PERSONALISM
1. The quality of being characterized by purely personal modes of
expression or behaviour: idiosyncrasy or impulsivity.
2. Philosophy Any of various theories regarding the person, value system or
personality as the key to the interpretation of reality.
According to Wikipedia, Personalism is an intellectual stance that
emphasizes the importance of human persons. Various conceptualizations have
been explored, so personalism exists in many different versions, and this
makes it somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological
movement. Friedrich Schleiermacher first used the term personalism (German:
Personalismus) in print in 1799. One can trace the concept back to earlier
thinkers in various parts of the world.
Writing in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Thomas D. Williams and
Jan Olof Bengtsson cite a plurality of "schools" holding to a "personalist"
ethic and "*WELTANSCHAUUNG*", arguing:
Personalism exists in many different versions, and this makes it somewhat
difficult to define as a philosophical and theological movement. Many
philosophical schools have at their core one particular thinker or even one
central work which serves as a canonical touchstone. Personalism is a more
diffused and eclectic movement and has no such common reference point. It
is, in point of fact, more proper to speak of many personalisms than one
personalism. In 1947 Jacques Maritain could write that there are at least
"a dozen personalist doctrines, which at times have nothing more in common
than the word 'person.'" Moreover, because of their emphasis on the
subjectivity of the person, some of the more important exponents of
personalism have not undertaken systematic treatises of their theories.
It is perhaps more proper to speak of personalism as a "current" or a
broader "worldview", since it represents more than one school or one
doctrine while at the same time the most important forms of personalism do
display some central and essential commonalities. Most important of the
latter is the general affirmation of the centrality of the person for
philosophical thought. Personalism posits ultimate reality and value in
personhood – human as well as (at least for most personalists) divine. It
emphasizes the significance, uniqueness and inviolability of the person, as
well as the person's essentially relational or social dimension. The title
"personalism" can therefore legitimately be applied to any school of
thought that focuses on the centrality of persons and their unique status
among beings in general, and personalists normally acknowledge the indirect
contributions of a wide range of thinkers throughout the history of
philosophy who did not regard themselves as personalists. Personalists
believe that the person should be the ontological and epistemological
starting point of philosophical reflection. Many are concerned to
investigate the experience, the status, and the dignity of the human being
as person, and regard this as the starting-point for all subsequent
philosophical analysis.
Thus, according to Williams, one ought to keep in mind that although there
may be dozens of theorists and social activists in the West adhering to the
rubric "personalism," their particular foci may, in fact, be asymptotic,
and even diverge at material junctures.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personalism>]
Firstly our #71 - WORLDVIEW is TRINOMIAL and we note the possibility of a
BINOMIAL #38 - WORLDVIEW being capable of making a coercion against the
condition of being (*OUSIA*) and it's ONTIC capacity for #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL (12 x #41) as its #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
THUSLY @1 - SEMINAL + ONTIC @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS GROUNDING IS
THE PROBABLE AGENCY FOR SAFE-GUARDING #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
We recognise that there is a premise for an ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@168 = 24 HOURS x 7 DAYS which is also capable of a BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE
OF IMPEDANCE.
Secondly QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT defines an ANTHROPOCENTRIC reality
which conforms to the #298 - IMPETUS of a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <-- FORMULA OF
PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} as value
centered upon the #9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE.
We have then relative to those LETTERS PATENT's notion defined an ONTIC
conception of ANTHROPOLOGY of #1329 - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AS *OFFICERS*
*WITHOUT* *CHARGE* as conforming to a default DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY /
PERSONALISITICS OF BEING as providing a #473 - SENTINEL imperative being a
legislative requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA and consciousness
instantiation:
@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE
@215 <— MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 {#48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6 -
CONTRARIETY (LI)} - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}
@157 <— #360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL 2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT {#360 -
#157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203 % #41 =
#39} 1) well, pit, spring}
@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA
@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)
@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)
@139 <-- THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT IS *CONSTITUTED*
@45 = #1329 as [#200, #600, #70, #30, #1, #7, #70, #50, #300, #1] =
scholázō (G4980): {UMBRA: #9 as #1708 - THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT IS
*CONSTITUTED**THAT* *BY* *THE* *RIGHT* *USE* *OF* *THE* *AIDS* *OFFERED*
*IT* *BY* *GOD* *IT* *CAN* *ATTAIN* *ITS* *HIGHEST* *END* % #41 = #27} 1)
to cease from labour, to loiter; 2) to be free from labour, to be at
leisure, to be idle; 2a) to have leisure for a thing; 2b) *TO* *GIVE*
*ONE'S* *SELF* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) of things; 3a) of places, to be
unoccupied, empty; 3b) of a centurion's vacant office; 3c) of vacant
ecclesiastical offices; 3d) *OF* *OFFICERS* *WITHOUT* *CHARGE*;
THE HYPOTHETICAL PROPOSITION IS THIS:
Given the DEAD SEA SCROLLS #509 - YAHAD COMMUNITY as SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION
were CONCERNED WITH CONCEPTIONS OF REALITY (ie. THE WAY THINGS ARE) and had
a particular mode of enquiry for a temporal (3 x #364 = 'OTH CYCLE + 2 x
#364 + #182 - POINT OF CALIBRATION ON 12 SEPTEMBER 2001) calibration which
has an ONTIC association.
YOUTUBE: "ADIR BAMAROM - MESHORERIM CHOIR (MIGHTY IN HEAVEN - POETS - THE
CHILD OF WONDER)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBLT2YCcqb0>
The consideration is whether this might serve as our starting point for an
appraisal made of each ONTIC criteria being relative to temporal context
(ie. implicit within the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGENIC PRINCIPLE AS
ANTHROPOMORPHIC: as then relative to any time unit such as milli-seconds,
seconds, minutes, hours, days, years).
THUSLY:
@182 - 12 SEPTEMBER 2001
On the basis of our informal philological research, we reasonably conclude
that PLEONEXIA {ie. AS A NATURAL STATE, UPON WHICH JUSTICE IS AN UNNATURAL
RESTRAINT} is a characteristic exhibited by a breach of ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181
and that the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 *SEPTEMBER* 2001 is therefore (ie.
WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 days + #181 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001) an
IMPIETY due to exhibiting such behaviour as consequential to its dependancy
upon a *LOGICAL* *FALLACY* which is inherent to the PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS AS HETEROS #38 - WORLDVIEW.
@45 (@137) - 28 JUNE 2001
@68 (#114 - ONTIC SUBSTITUTION BY ROMAN PROTOTYPE #SIX {#38} / TORAH
PROTOTYPE #FIVE {#38}) - 21 JULY 2001
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.4.5](2 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.4](19 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.4.5](3 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.6.4](20 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.8.9](1 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.2.5](13 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.8.8](28 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.4.5](5 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.5.2](12 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.5](4 April),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.3](15 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.4.5](6 August),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.5], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.9.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.1.7], @GIZMO{*HETEROS*}:[8.4.8]
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.3]
@68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.8.8](26 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.7.4](29 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.5.8](1 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.4](21 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.7](24 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.8](29 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.8](11 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.5.6](22 September),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.4](10 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.2], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.2.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.3],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.8],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.2.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.3.5]
@137 - MALE DEME (GOING FORTH OF A COMMAND)
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.3.5](22 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.3](14 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.9.5](20 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.2.3](2 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.3.9](13 July),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.4.2](31 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.8](10 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.7.3](25 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.4](9 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.6](19 May),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.3.9](15 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.3](4 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.9.7](4 March),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.5](15 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.4](21 June),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.4.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.5.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.4.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.5.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.7.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.3], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.8.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.2.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.7.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.8.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.9]
If I then make my appraisals of @45 + @68 on those temporal designates so
as to determine any cogent capacity and veracity for @113 - ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 - METHODOLOGY
+ @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
If I am making a GAMBIT of #77 days from 3 JANUARY to 21 MARCH as the
grounding basis for #48 - RITUAL (LI), then I am doing so as a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL made against the #9 - AUTONOMY, #391 - IDENTITY and
#492 - FREE WILL of all persons by the imposition of a chimeric artifice to
reality...
THE PROBLEM UNDERLYING THE MYTHOS / #48 - RITUAL (LI) IS A COMPLEX QUESTION
OF EQUIVALENCE RELATING TO THE PLATONIC NOTION: OF ANAMNESIS {ie. a
recollection as especially of a supposed previous existence v's Ahnenerbe
Organisation as the quest for German Ancestry as intellectual historical
research into a prehistory of MIND} AS LITURGICAL STATEMENT IN WHICH THE
CHURCH REFERS TO THE #288 - MEMORIAL {6 x #48 - RITUAL (LI)} CHARACTER OF
THE #1827 - *EUCHARIST* {ie.
As a *SOLAR* *DISC* which is indistinguishable from THE SOLAR CROSS OF ODIN
given the #CENTRE OF VALUE: #5 x 365.4 is derived from the ecclesiastical
calendar 4 x #364 + #371 days as its *CAUSAE* *COMMUNI*:
21 MARCH (disc top left) minus
#77 - COMPLIANCE (H2 - EARTH / PASSIVE PRINCIPLE) equals
3 JANUARY (disc top right)
Being thereby familiar to PYTHAGORAS / PLATO whom studied with the priests
of HELIOPOLIS (*ON*) as the "CITY OF THE SUN" which was important to the
solar cults of RA / BAAL represented by a TRINITY:
KHABEER: THE GOD OF THE RISING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SCARAB.
RA: the sun god from morning to evening, symbolized by the stork (Bennu).
ATUM: GOD OF THE SETTING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SNAKE OR THE LOTUS FLOWER.
} OR TO THE PASSION, RESURRECTION AND ASCENSION OF CHRIST.
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO
(#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
As that which is capable of being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for delivery and staging which then becomes
an acute and risky precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and thusly my reasonable objection has always been
ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 - 2017 AS #371 - SAINT ANDREWS
CAUSE CÉLÈBRE / #33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS
ethic upon our {#390 - WREATHS & SOVEREIGNTY / #288 - MEMORIAL &
ANTI-SEMITISM / #419 - SLAUGHTER} war dead and usurping the @1 -
SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance
which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 -
SOVEREIGN'S APO (G575) RIGHT AS THE RESERVE (APODIDOMI: G591) ENTITLEMENT
AUTHORITY OF SECTION IX / #37} by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as the
INSTRUMENTATION (GREEK LEXICON CIRCUMSCRIBED) OF FEDERATION INTO A NATION.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
Thusly if we ask a prudent question as to the veracity of #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY pertaining to the fidelity and nature of #288 - REMEMBRANCE
relative to the ANOMALOUS HETEROS (#TWO) / TORAH (#SIX) CONDITIONAL
PAIRING: #18, #42, #66 x 2 = #252 - REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA
@252 - RELATIONS WITH THE FOREIGN PRESS / MISERLY OUTLOOK OF OUR PRESS
CHIEF ON 6 JULY 1942, we then affect these TORAH PROTOTYPES: #SIX {#17, #41
and #65} and #THREE {#9, #33 and #57} and thereby wreak a complete
destruction against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS dynamic of the PYTHAGOREAN
onomantic binomial stasis @1 / @5 notion as the #38 - WORLDVIEW of ROMAN
CATHOLIC / EMPIRE GOVERNANCE:
[#17, {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#17); Ego: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN
(#17)}
#41, {@2: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#75); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#58)}
#65] {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#117); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI
(#123)}
GRUMBLE (#117, #123)@[17, 17, 58, 41, 42, 65]
[#9, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#9)}
#33, {@2: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#51); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI
(#42)}
#57] {@3: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#69); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#99)}
GRUMBLE (#69, #99)@[9, 9, 42, 33, 18, 57]
#68 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#1, #2, #50, #10, #5] /
#83 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #1, #2, #700] / [#20, #1, #2,
#50, #10] /
#89 - SATURDAY 30 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#6, #30, #1, #2, #700] / [#6, #1,
#2, #50, #10, #500] /
#103 - SATURDAY 23 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#40, #1, #2, #50, #10] / [#1, #2,
#50, #10, #600] /
#105 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #THREE /
TORAH #FOUR as [#2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#108 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FOUR as
[#1, #2, #50, #10, #5, #600] /
#111 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FIVE as
[#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#133 - kôhên (H3548): *PRIEST*-*KING* (*MELCHIZEDEK*, *MESSIAH*) /
*HIGH* *PRIEST* / *PRINCIPAL* *OFFICER* *OR* *CHIEF* *RULER* / gâdaph
(H1442): *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD* as [#30, #1, #2, #50, #10,
#600] /
#99 as [#6, #30, #1, #2, #50, #10] /
#123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY* as [#20, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ʼeben
(H68): {UMBRA: #53 % #41 = #12} 1) *STONE* (*LARGE* *OR* *SMALL*); 1a)
common stone (in natural state); 1b) stone, as material; 1b1) of tablets;
1b2) marble, hewn stones; 1c) precious stones, stones of fire; 1d) stones
containing metal (ore), *TOOL* *FOR* *WORK* *OR* *WEAPON*; 1e) weight; 1f)
*PLUMMET* (*STONES* *OF* *DESTRUCTION*) also made of metal; 1g) stonelike
objects, eg hailstones, stony heart, ice; 1h) sacred object, as memorial
Samuel set up to mark where God helped Israel to defeat the Philistines;
1i) (simile); 1i1) sinking in water, motionlessness; 1i2) strength,
firmness, solidity; 1i3) commonness; 1j) (metaph); 1j1) petrified with
terror; 1j2) *PERVERSE*, *HARD* *HEART*;
YOUTUBE: "Peter Gabriel - Heroes (Live in Verona 2010)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSX9F6ETTDQ>
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {A ROCK OR A STONE}, AND
UPON THIS ROCK {A ROCK, A LARGE STONE; METAPHOR: A MAN LIKE A ROCK, BY
REASON OF HIS FIRMNESS AND STRENGTH OF SOUL} I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH; AND
THE GATES OF HELL {THE LOWER REGIONS; THE NETHER WORLD; THE GRAVE, DEATH,
HELL} SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
#137 - *MALE* *DEME* *ONTIC* *CRITERIA* FOR @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT as
[#40, #6, #90, #1] /
#159 - *SATURDAY* 30 JANUARY 2021 as [#6, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10, #6] /
#167 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#20, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10] /
#171 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #40, #90, #1, #10] /
#177 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#40, #40, #6, #90, #1] / [#30, #40,
#6, #90, #1, #10] = môwtsâʼ (H4161): {UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14} 1) act or
place of going out or forth, issue, export, source, spring; 1a) a going
forth; 1a1) *RISING* (*SUN*), *GOING* *FORTH* *OF* *A* *COMMAND*; 1a2)
goings forth, those going forth; 1a3) way out, exit; 1b) that which goes
forth; 1b1) utterance; 1b2) export; 1c) place of going forth; 1c1) source
or spring (of water); 1c2) place of departure; 1c3) east (of sun); 1c4)
mine (of silver);
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>
[IMAGE: THAT THE TRINOMIAL TETRA #44 - *STOVE* (TSAO), #48 - *RITUAL* (LI),
#77 - *COMPLIANCE* (HSUN) RELATED TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL STASIS (@1 /
@5) ONOMANTIC DEFINITION OF NUMBER RELATING TO THE STATE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC
/ EMPIRE GOVERNANCE AS A #269 - CONCEPT OF #312 - CONTRADICTION BY A
FAILURE OF #27 - *DUTIES* (SHIH) AS INFIDELITY TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL
COMMEMORATIONS AS #30 - *BOLD* *RESOLUTION* (YI) IS THEN A CAUSE FOR A
LOGICAL FALLACY]
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM REGARDING THE ROMAN BINOMIAL STASIS (@1 / @5)
DEFINITION OF FASCISM ON 5 / 21-22 JULY 1941 {#48 - RITUAL (LI): 21 - 25
JULY --> vEVENT --> #77 - COMPLIANCE (HSUN): 22 JULY}: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH
BETWEEN THE FASCIST POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 -
*CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*} MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @1, Saturday 5 July 1941]
'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was one
of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir of the
great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians have so
many qualities that make us like them.
ITALY IS THE COUNTRY WHERE INTELLIGENCE CREATED THE NOTION OF THE *STATE*.
THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF ALL.'
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @5, 21-22 July 1941]
Given that ONTIC GROUNDING is then optimal necessity for the circumscribing
of any human experience and the absence of such is only a SUPERFICIALITY,
is it then possible to determine any probability for the DIALECTICS OF
IMPULSIVITY by a measured conformity to an equivalent temporal process of
appraisal for each of the ONTIC stratum which comprise such DIALECTIC
progression.
Is it also then possible to view any divergence to such default DIALECTIC
PROGRESSION which apart from the SEMINAL LIMIT {#9 - AUTONOMY} against the
#72 - UNLIMITED is then a SAPIENT determination made and expressive as
PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*?
To ask such questions, is then a starting place for solving the rubric of
personalism...
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Apple%20Exclusion%2020210126.pdf>
Initial Post: 26 January 2021
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
statement...
FOUNDING THEN EVIDENCE OF #81 - SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE DEPLOYING
QUADRANTS TO A TRINOMIAL PARADIGM [#205 / #164] OF #369 - NATURE?
(c) 2021 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 30 January, 2021
The First Fleet arrived over the period of 18-20 January 1788, taking 250
to 252 days from departure to final arrival.
During the period 25-26 January 1788 the fleet moved from Botany Bay to
present-day Sydney.
A 4.5 day duration places one in a different quadrant of the trinomial
paradigm [#205 / #164] of #369 - nature as #81 - sovereign juxtaposition
principle.
<https://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
It could then be postulated relating to the date of 26 JANUARY 1788 being
established:
a) By a mechanism of SAPIENT CONSCIOUSNESS derived from antiquity (dawn of
time);
b) Deploys the same TRINOMIAL ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY of our
CONSTITUTION and CITIZENSHIP IDEA TEMPLATE as the defining principle for a
#322 - DEMOCRACY by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT dated 29 OCTOBER 1900;
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Union%20Jack.jpeg>
c) TRINOMIAL TECHNOLOGY RELEVANT TO #369 [#205 / #164] - NATURE, #71 -
CONSTITUTION, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - CAUSE OF REASON
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Superseding%20Letters%20Patent%2020201107.pdf>
A TRINOMIAL NUMBER PARADIGM IS EVIDENT FROM KANT'S PROLEGOMENA OF 1783:
CONST KANT_SECTIONS_1783 = {
1: {idea: [265 - *THE* *KEY*, 266], page: [15, 15]},
2: {idea: [267, 268 - *JUDGMENTS* *OF* *EXPERIENCE*, 269 - *CONCEPT* *OF*
*CONTRADICTION* {#1 + #25 {5x5: #65 - SOLDIER / DODECAHEDRON} + #49 {7x7:
#175 - MARRIAGE / ICOSAHEDRON} x 2 = #150}, 272, 273, 274 - *MISTRUST* *OF*
*DOGMATISM*], page: [16, 17, 18, 20, 20, 21]},
3: {idea: [270 - *AUSTRALIA* *DAY*], page: [22]},
6: {}, // <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE
SURMOUNTS NATURE})
9: {}, // <-- AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE
18: {IDEA: [298], PAGE: [50]}, // <-- QUEEN VICTORIA'S APO: G575 (@150 -
ONTIC JURISPRUDENT CRITERIA) RIGHT GRANTING DIDOMI: G1325 (@104 - PRESENTS)
27: {idea: [311], page: [62]}, // #27 - *DUTIES* (*SHIH*)
54: {idea: [348], page: [99]} // #54 - UNITY
}
We have therefore made two assumptions about the #298 - *IMPETUS* of Kant's
PROLEGOMENA being itself a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <-- FORMULA OF PROGRESSION {@6 -
FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} as value centered upon the
#9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE. Namely that he seems acquainted with the
meta-descriptor prototypes assigned to a trinomial number paradigm to which
as a starting point he then designates to various sections of his
PROLEGOMENA (@1 + @41 + @81 + @369) AS COSMOLOGICAL VIEW:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 - METHODOLOGY
+ @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO
(#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
Our provisional conclusion is that the PROLEGOMENA includes a margin metric
for example [4:318] that then concords with IDEAS and these are derived
from a HEBREW / GREEK lexicon hierarchy which he smugly conceals from his
readers, as to its deployment as the scaffolding and the reference object
for his most influential text in the entire history of moral philosophy.
But which is most suitable in our view for the providing the quintessential
grounding framework for any sapient / cognitive requirement of
CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION within TEMPORALITY and methodology requisite
for the formulation of *CONSTITUTION*:
"THAT WE THINK THE WORLD AS IF IT DERIVES FROM A SUPREME REASON, AS REGARDS
ITS EXISTENCE AND INNER DETERMINATION; WHEREBY WE IN PART COGNIZE THE
*CONSTITUTION* BELONGING TO IT (THE WORLD) ITSELF, WITHOUT PRESUMING TO
WANT TO DETERMINE THAT OF ITS CAUSE IN ITSELF, AND, ON THE OTHER HAND, WE
IN PART POSIT THE BASIS OF THIS *CONSTITUTION* [IDEA: @360 - ROMAN
GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #EIGHT AS METALOGIC AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER
TRANSFORMATIVE CENTRE] (THE RATIONAL FORM OF THE WORLD) IN THE RELATION OF
THE HIGHEST CAUSE TO THE WORLD, NOT FINDING THE WORLD BY ITSELF SUFFICIENT
THERETO." [PROLEGOMENA SECTION #58 - POLITICAL REVERSAL, ADAPTATION TO
CHANGE; I-CHING: H43 - RESOLUTION, DISPLACEMENT, PARTING, BREAK-THROUGH;
TETRA: 29 - DECISIVENESS (TUAN), page 110]
From memory Kant considers the noumenon as a reference object which is then
relative to an experience being a thing as it is in itself, as distinct
from a thing as it is knowable by the senses through phenomenal attributes.
He does not perceive of cognition as a noumenon centred process to any
perception, sensation, idea, or intuition resulting from such.
... SEE ALSO TEST OF #268 - DECREE OF RESTRICTION RELATIVE TO 1, 2, 3
On September 17, 1787, after three months of debate moderated by convention
president George Washington, the new U.S. constitution, which created a
strong federal government with an intricate system of checks and balances,
was signed by 38 of the 41 delegates present at the conclusion of the
convention. As dictated by Article VII, the document would not become
binding until it was ratified by *NINE* of the 13 states.
Beginning on December 7, five states—Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey,
Georgia, and Connecticut—ratified it in quick succession. However, other
states, especially Massachusetts, opposed the document, as it failed to
reserve undelegated powers to the states and lacked constitutional
protection of basic political rights, such as freedom of speech, religion,
and the press.
In February 1788, a compromise was reached under which Massachusetts and
other states would agree to ratify the document with the assurance that
amendments would be immediately proposed. The Constitution was thus
narrowly ratified in Massachusetts, followed by Maryland and South
Carolina.
On June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the *NINTH* state to ratify the
document, and it was subsequently agreed that government under the U.S.
Constitution would begin on March 4, 1789. In June, Virginia ratified the
Constitution, followed by New York in July.
[<https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/u-s-constitution-ratified>]
----------
Thusly there is a possibility to exploit Dutch Sovereignty (ie. THEIR
NULLIUS AS NOBODY AND NOT THERE) from 1616 and VAN DIEMAN's LAND (ie. SO
NAMED AFTER THE GOVERNOR GENERAL THEN SUBJECT TO A SOVEREIGN) to then argue
against DEPRAVITY OF BRITISH IMPERIALISM WHICH IS AN ISSUE OF NON
CONFORMITY to such by especially the IRISH AND SCOTTISH ROMAN CATHOLICS who
have a disdain for #27 - DUTY as regard for #902 - RULE OF LAW and pursue
their own #38 - WORLDVIEW relative to Australia Day as #68 - RIGHTS
PREROGATIVE.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Australia_Day_Mind.png>
IN THE PROMULGATING OF #446 - *PROPAGANDA* GIVING A #491 - PATER FAMILIAS
HISTORICAL REVISIONIST PERSPECTIVE OF ANZAC HERITAGE EXHIBITING BOTH A
MENTAL AND DYSTOPIAN DERANGEMENT (ie. BINOMIAL #38 - apparatus -->
*COERCED* *UPON* --> the TRINOMIAL #369 [#205 / #164] - *NATURE*, #71 -
*CONSTITUTION*, CONSCIENCE AND THE #421 - *CAUSE* *OF* *REASON* AS
PRINCIPLES OF VIABILITY FOR #500 - *LIFE*) SPECIFICALLY:
TRINOMIAL SCHEMA IMPETUS: #70 - SEVERANCE (KE) --> NOUS #62 (#509 / #383 -
ECLIPSE ON 4 FEBRUARY 1916 (AEST)) AS #413 - DEVICE {#383} FOR IMPROPER
POPPY WREATH AT BOER WAR MEMORIAL ON 8 JUNE 2017 AND BEERSHEBA CENTENNIAL
ON 28 OCTOBER 2017
FOR EXPLANATION SEE: "RISKY PRECIPICE"
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Risky%20Precipice%20383-509.pdf>
AND DISINFORMATION AS #129 - *WARFARE* (ie. ICONOCLASM AGAINST ANY
BENEVOLENCE OF STATE #491 - *AGENCY* TOWARDS A CIVIL, DECENT AND JUST
SOCIETY) IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF A CAUSEA COMMUNI HAVING A RELIANCE ON #48 -
RITUAL (LI) / #6 - CONTRARIETY (LI) AS GROUNDING.
There is no need for conflict but to formulate the reasonable argument of
claim that Dutch a priori discovery bestows a sovereign / autonomy and by
its *GNOME* *PRINCIPLE* {ie. its mapping and naming} is then subject to law
and justice even though no Dutch persons were continuously present to
enforce such since the DUTCH EAST INDIA COMPANY (VOC) as an institution had
equivalent STATE prerogatives as did Captain Cook.
DOLF @ 1109 HOURS ON 29 JANUARY 2021: "COMMENT ON GNOSIS EX MACHINA
(DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY / PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*) AS
GRUMBLE PROTOTYPE PROGRESS UPDATE ON TOWARDS REASON AND ASSAYING MEMEBRAIN
PRINCIPLES AS CRITERIA:
This comment is only a spontaneous and conjectural (as a philosophical
perspective since I am neither a psychiatrist, psychologist nor behavioural
analyst) as an informal research opinion on the topic of GNOSIS EX MACHINA
which is relative to both the consideration of DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY
and PERSONALISITICS OF BEING.
PERSONALISM
1. The quality of being characterized by purely personal modes of
expression or behaviour: idiosyncrasy or impulsivity.
2. Philosophy Any of various theories regarding the person, value system or
personality as the key to the interpretation of reality.
According to Wikipedia, Personalism is an intellectual stance that
emphasizes the importance of human persons. Various conceptualizations have
been explored, so personalism exists in many different versions, and this
makes it somewhat difficult to define as a philosophical and theological
movement. Friedrich Schleiermacher first used the term personalism (German:
Personalismus) in print in 1799. One can trace the concept back to earlier
thinkers in various parts of the world.
Writing in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Thomas D. Williams and
Jan Olof Bengtsson cite a plurality of "schools" holding to a "personalist"
ethic and "*WELTANSCHAUUNG*", arguing:
Personalism exists in many different versions, and this makes it somewhat
difficult to define as a philosophical and theological movement. Many
philosophical schools have at their core one particular thinker or even one
central work which serves as a canonical touchstone. Personalism is a more
diffused and eclectic movement and has no such common reference point. It
is, in point of fact, more proper to speak of many personalisms than one
personalism. In 1947 Jacques Maritain could write that there are at least
"a dozen personalist doctrines, which at times have nothing more in common
than the word 'person.'" Moreover, because of their emphasis on the
subjectivity of the person, some of the more important exponents of
personalism have not undertaken systematic treatises of their theories.
It is perhaps more proper to speak of personalism as a "current" or a
broader "worldview", since it represents more than one school or one
doctrine while at the same time the most important forms of personalism do
display some central and essential commonalities. Most important of the
latter is the general affirmation of the centrality of the person for
philosophical thought. Personalism posits ultimate reality and value in
personhood – human as well as (at least for most personalists) divine. It
emphasizes the significance, uniqueness and inviolability of the person, as
well as the person's essentially relational or social dimension. The title
"personalism" can therefore legitimately be applied to any school of
thought that focuses on the centrality of persons and their unique status
among beings in general, and personalists normally acknowledge the indirect
contributions of a wide range of thinkers throughout the history of
philosophy who did not regard themselves as personalists. Personalists
believe that the person should be the ontological and epistemological
starting point of philosophical reflection. Many are concerned to
investigate the experience, the status, and the dignity of the human being
as person, and regard this as the starting-point for all subsequent
philosophical analysis.
Thus, according to Williams, one ought to keep in mind that although there
may be dozens of theorists and social activists in the West adhering to the
rubric "personalism," their particular foci may, in fact, be asymptotic,
and even diverge at material junctures.
[<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personalism>]
Firstly our #71 - WORLDVIEW is TRINOMIAL and we note the possibility of a
BINOMIAL #38 - WORLDVIEW being capable of making a coercion against the
condition of being (*OUSIA*) and it's ONTIC capacity for #492 - VOLUNTARY
FREEWILL (12 x #41) as its #9 - PRINCIPLE OF AUTONOMY:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31 = #369 BEING THE WORLDVIEW [#205 / #164] OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT AS BASIS FOR #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
@1 - SEMINAL
@41 - ONTIC DIALECTIC (eg: @660)
@81 - REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR / SOVEREIGN JUXTAPOSITION PRINCIPLE
@369 - [#205 - PRINCIPLE OF PERSISTENT SUBSTANCE / #164 - PRINCIPLE OF
MATERIALITY]
@491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY {@84 + @86 + @102 + @104 - *PRESENTS*
(DIDOMI: G1325) + @115 - *DIGNITY* *ROYAL*}
THUSLY @1 - SEMINAL + ONTIC @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY AS GROUNDING IS
THE PROBABLE AGENCY FOR SAFE-GUARDING #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL
We recognise that there is a premise for an ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
@168 = 24 HOURS x 7 DAYS which is also capable of a BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE
OF IMPEDANCE.
Secondly QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT defines an ANTHROPOCENTRIC reality
which conforms to the #298 - IMPETUS of a #1 #2 #3 = #6 <-- FORMULA OF
PROGRESSION {@6 - FORM OF NATURE / @3 - NATURE SURMOUNTS NATURE} as value
centered upon the #9 - AUTONOMOUS PRINCIPLE.
We have then relative to those LETTERS PATENT's notion defined an ONTIC
conception of ANTHROPOLOGY of #1329 - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AS *OFFICERS*
*WITHOUT* *CHARGE* as conforming to a default DIALECTICS OF IMPULSIVITY /
PERSONALISITICS OF BEING as providing a #473 - SENTINEL imperative being a
legislative requisite for GNOSIS EX MACHINA and consciousness
instantiation:
@168 <— BINOMIAL STASIS SOURCE OF IMPEDANCE
@215 <— MEMORIAL #288 - REMEMBRANCE {#288 {#48 - RITUAL (LI) x #6 -
CONTRARIETY (LI)} - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}
@157 <— #360 - ANNUAL / CENTENNIAL 2018 ASSEMBLY AS BEER-SHEBA PLOT {#360 -
#157 = #203 as [#2, #1, #200] = bᵉʼêr (H875): {UMBRA: #8 as #203 % #41 =
#39} 1) well, pit, spring}
@130 <— I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3} AS MENS REA
@175 <— MARRIAGE OATH (SHEBA)
@185 <-- EMPOWERMENT
@115 <-- HOSPITABLE (POTUS / MOSES SEAT / DIGNITY ROYAL)
@139 <-- THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT IS *CONSTITUTED*
@45 = #1329 as [#200, #600, #70, #30, #1, #7, #70, #50, #300, #1] =
scholázō (G4980): {UMBRA: #9 as #1708 - THE (HUMAN) SOUL IN SO FAR AS IT IS
*CONSTITUTED**THAT* *BY* *THE* *RIGHT* *USE* *OF* *THE* *AIDS* *OFFERED*
*IT* *BY* *GOD* *IT* *CAN* *ATTAIN* *ITS* *HIGHEST* *END* % #41 = #27} 1)
to cease from labour, to loiter; 2) to be free from labour, to be at
leisure, to be idle; 2a) to have leisure for a thing; 2b) *TO* *GIVE*
*ONE'S* *SELF* *TO* *A* *THING*; 3) of things; 3a) of places, to be
unoccupied, empty; 3b) of a centurion's vacant office; 3c) of vacant
ecclesiastical offices; 3d) *OF* *OFFICERS* *WITHOUT* *CHARGE*;
THE HYPOTHETICAL PROPOSITION IS THIS:
Given the DEAD SEA SCROLLS #509 - YAHAD COMMUNITY as SECTARIAN ASSOCIATION
were CONCERNED WITH CONCEPTIONS OF REALITY (ie. THE WAY THINGS ARE) and had
a particular mode of enquiry for a temporal (3 x #364 = 'OTH CYCLE + 2 x
#364 + #182 - POINT OF CALIBRATION ON 12 SEPTEMBER 2001) calibration which
has an ONTIC association.
YOUTUBE: "ADIR BAMAROM - MESHORERIM CHOIR (MIGHTY IN HEAVEN - POETS - THE
CHILD OF WONDER)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBLT2YCcqb0>
The consideration is whether this might serve as our starting point for an
appraisal made of each ONTIC criteria being relative to temporal context
(ie. implicit within the #2184 - ANTHROPOCENTRIC COSMOGENIC PRINCIPLE AS
ANTHROPOMORPHIC: as then relative to any time unit such as milli-seconds,
seconds, minutes, hours, days, years).
THUSLY:
@182 - 12 SEPTEMBER 2001
On the basis of our informal philological research, we reasonably conclude
that PLEONEXIA {ie. AS A NATURAL STATE, UPON WHICH JUSTICE IS AN UNNATURAL
RESTRAINT} is a characteristic exhibited by a breach of ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181
and that the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 *SEPTEMBER* 2001 is therefore (ie.
WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 + 5 x #364 days + #181 = 11 SEPTEMBER 2001) an
IMPIETY due to exhibiting such behaviour as consequential to its dependancy
upon a *LOGICAL* *FALLACY* which is inherent to the PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL
STOICHEION OF THE KOSMOS AS HETEROS #38 - WORLDVIEW.
@45 (@137) - 28 JUNE 2001
@68 (#114 - ONTIC SUBSTITUTION BY ROMAN PROTOTYPE #SIX {#38} / TORAH
PROTOTYPE #FIVE {#38}) - 21 JULY 2001
@45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.4.5](2 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.4](19 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.4.5](3 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.6.4](20 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.8.9](1 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.2.5](13 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.8.8](28 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.4.5](5 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.5.2](12 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.1.5](4 April),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.3](15 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.4.5](6 August),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.5], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.6.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.9.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.1.7], @GIZMO{*HETEROS*}:[8.4.8]
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.3]
@68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.8.8](26 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.7.4](29 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.5.8](1 October), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.4](21 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.7](24 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.6.4](22 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.8](29 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.3.8](11 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.5.6](22 September),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.4](10 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.2], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.2.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.3],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.8],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.2.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.3.5]
@137 - MALE DEME (GOING FORTH OF A COMMAND)
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.3.5](22 June), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.6.3](14 October),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[1.9.5](20 February),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.2.3](2 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[2.3.9](13 July),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.4.2](31 August), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.6.8](10 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[3.7.3](25 November),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.4](9 May), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.2.6](19 May),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.3.9](15 July), @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.8.3](4 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[4.9.7](4 March),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[5.8.5](15 January),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.1.9], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.4](21 June),
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.3.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.4.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.5.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.8.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[6.9.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.6], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.1.7], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.3.7],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.4.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.5.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.7.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[7.8.2],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.3.1], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.3], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.4.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[8.8.9],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.2.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.5.8], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.7.6],
@GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.8.4], @GIZMO{GENIUS}:[9.9.9]
If I then make my appraisals of @45 + @68 on those temporal designates so
as to determine any cogent capacity and veracity for @113 - ETHICAL
ENGAGEMENT:
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW (HEAVEN): +0, 27 - *DUTIES*, 54 - *UNITY*
<-- #41 - EMANATION PRINCIPLE: @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT {@45 - METHODOLOGY
+ @68 - RIGHTS}
FORMULA OF HUMANITY (EARTH): +0, 9, 18
<-- #82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE: SECTION IX {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN
(#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239)} / @491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY
If I am making a GAMBIT of #77 days from 3 JANUARY to 21 MARCH as the
grounding basis for #48 - RITUAL (LI), then I am doing so as a #231 -
JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL made against the #9 - AUTONOMY, #391 - IDENTITY and
#492 - FREE WILL of all persons by the imposition of a chimeric artifice to
reality...
THE PROBLEM UNDERLYING THE MYTHOS / #48 - RITUAL (LI) IS A COMPLEX QUESTION
OF EQUIVALENCE RELATING TO THE PLATONIC NOTION: OF ANAMNESIS {ie. a
recollection as especially of a supposed previous existence v's Ahnenerbe
Organisation as the quest for German Ancestry as intellectual historical
research into a prehistory of MIND} AS LITURGICAL STATEMENT IN WHICH THE
CHURCH REFERS TO THE #288 - MEMORIAL {6 x #48 - RITUAL (LI)} CHARACTER OF
THE #1827 - *EUCHARIST* {ie.
As a *SOLAR* *DISC* which is indistinguishable from THE SOLAR CROSS OF ODIN
given the #CENTRE OF VALUE: #5 x 365.4 is derived from the ecclesiastical
calendar 4 x #364 + #371 days as its *CAUSAE* *COMMUNI*:
21 MARCH (disc top left) minus
#77 - COMPLIANCE (H2 - EARTH / PASSIVE PRINCIPLE) equals
3 JANUARY (disc top right)
Being thereby familiar to PYTHAGORAS / PLATO whom studied with the priests
of HELIOPOLIS (*ON*) as the "CITY OF THE SUN" which was important to the
solar cults of RA / BAAL represented by a TRINITY:
KHABEER: THE GOD OF THE RISING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SCARAB.
RA: the sun god from morning to evening, symbolized by the stork (Bennu).
ATUM: GOD OF THE SETTING SUN, SYMBOLIZED BY THE SNAKE OR THE LOTUS FLOWER.
} OR TO THE PASSION, RESURRECTION AND ASCENSION OF CHRIST.
FORMULA OF AUTONOMY (MAN / SEA): +0, 3, 6
<-- #123 - JUDGMENT SENSIBILITY: SECTION III {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO
(#551); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)} / @2188 - JURISPRUDENT OVERSIGHT
As that which is capable of being hosted upon the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE
VOLUNTĀTIS as it's mechanism for delivery and staging which then becomes
an acute and risky precipice consideration that is accorded entirely by my
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY and thusly my reasonable objection has always been
ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 - 2017 AS #371 - SAINT ANDREWS
CAUSE CÉLÈBRE / #33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS
ethic upon our {#390 - WREATHS & SOVEREIGNTY / #288 - MEMORIAL &
ANTI-SEMITISM / #419 - SLAUGHTER} war dead and usurping the @1 -
SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 - HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance
which is defined as a PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 -
SOVEREIGN'S APO (G575) RIGHT AS THE RESERVE (APODIDOMI: G591) ENTITLEMENT
AUTHORITY OF SECTION IX / #37} by QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT as the
INSTRUMENTATION (GREEK LEXICON CIRCUMSCRIBED) OF FEDERATION INTO A NATION.
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%201.png>
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Papal%20War%20Commemorations%20Intellectual%20Property%20Theft%202.png>
Thusly if we ask a prudent question as to the veracity of #123 - JUDGEMENT
SENSIBILITY pertaining to the fidelity and nature of #288 - REMEMBRANCE
relative to the ANOMALOUS HETEROS (#TWO) / TORAH (#SIX) CONDITIONAL
PAIRING: #18, #42, #66 x 2 = #252 - REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM AS TABLE TALK IDEA
@252 - RELATIONS WITH THE FOREIGN PRESS / MISERLY OUTLOOK OF OUR PRESS
CHIEF ON 6 JULY 1942, we then affect these TORAH PROTOTYPES: #SIX {#17, #41
and #65} and #THREE {#9, #33 and #57} and thereby wreak a complete
destruction against the SOVEREIGN / AUTONOMOUS dynamic of the PYTHAGOREAN
onomantic binomial stasis @1 / @5 notion as the #38 - WORLDVIEW of ROMAN
CATHOLIC / EMPIRE GOVERNANCE:
[#17, {@1: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#17); Ego: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN
(#17)}
#41, {@2: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#75); Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#58)}
#65] {@3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#117); Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI
(#123)}
GRUMBLE (#117, #123)@[17, 17, 58, 41, 42, 65]
[#9, {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU
(#9)}
#33, {@2: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#51); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI
(#42)}
#57] {@3: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#69); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#99)}
GRUMBLE (#69, #99)@[9, 9, 42, 33, 18, 57]
#68 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#1, #2, #50, #10, #5] /
#83 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #1, #2, #700] / [#20, #1, #2,
#50, #10] /
#89 - SATURDAY 30 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#6, #30, #1, #2, #700] / [#6, #1,
#2, #50, #10, #500] /
#103 - SATURDAY 23 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#40, #1, #2, #50, #10] / [#1, #2,
#50, #10, #600] /
#105 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #THREE /
TORAH #FOUR as [#2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#108 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FOUR as
[#1, #2, #50, #10, #5, #600] /
#111 - *ONTIC* *SUBSTITUTION* FOR ROMAN GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE #FIVE as
[#6, #2, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#133 - kôhên (H3548): *PRIEST*-*KING* (*MELCHIZEDEK*, *MESSIAH*) /
*HIGH* *PRIEST* / *PRINCIPAL* *OFFICER* *OR* *CHIEF* *RULER* / gâdaph
(H1442): *TO* *REVILE* *MEN*, *BLASPHEME* *GOD* as [#30, #1, #2, #50, #10,
#600] /
#99 as [#6, #30, #1, #2, #50, #10] /
#123 - *JUDGEMENT* *SENSIBILITY* as [#20, #1, #2, #50, #10, #600] = ʼeben
(H68): {UMBRA: #53 % #41 = #12} 1) *STONE* (*LARGE* *OR* *SMALL*); 1a)
common stone (in natural state); 1b) stone, as material; 1b1) of tablets;
1b2) marble, hewn stones; 1c) precious stones, stones of fire; 1d) stones
containing metal (ore), *TOOL* *FOR* *WORK* *OR* *WEAPON*; 1e) weight; 1f)
*PLUMMET* (*STONES* *OF* *DESTRUCTION*) also made of metal; 1g) stonelike
objects, eg hailstones, stony heart, ice; 1h) sacred object, as memorial
Samuel set up to mark where God helped Israel to defeat the Philistines;
1i) (simile); 1i1) sinking in water, motionlessness; 1i2) strength,
firmness, solidity; 1i3) commonness; 1j) (metaph); 1j1) petrified with
terror; 1j2) *PERVERSE*, *HARD* *HEART*;
YOUTUBE: "Peter Gabriel - Heroes (Live in Verona 2010)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSX9F6ETTDQ>
"AND I SAY ALSO UNTO THEE, THAT THOU ART PETER {A ROCK OR A STONE}, AND
UPON THIS ROCK {A ROCK, A LARGE STONE; METAPHOR: A MAN LIKE A ROCK, BY
REASON OF HIS FIRMNESS AND STRENGTH OF SOUL} I WILL BUILD MY CHURCH; AND
THE GATES OF HELL {THE LOWER REGIONS; THE NETHER WORLD; THE GRAVE, DEATH,
HELL} SHALL NOT PREVAIL AGAINST IT." [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]
#137 - *MALE* *DEME* *ONTIC* *CRITERIA* FOR @113 - ETHICAL ENGAGEMENT as
[#40, #6, #90, #1] /
#159 - *SATURDAY* 30 JANUARY 2021 as [#6, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10, #6] /
#167 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#20, #40, #6, #90, #1, #10] /
#171 - FRIDAY 29 *JANUARY* 2021 as [#30, #40, #90, #1, #10] /
#177 - *SUNDAY* 24 JANUARY 2021 as [#40, #40, #6, #90, #1] / [#30, #40,
#6, #90, #1, #10] = môwtsâʼ (H4161): {UMBRA: #137 % #41 = #14} 1) act or
place of going out or forth, issue, export, source, spring; 1a) a going
forth; 1a1) *RISING* (*SUN*), *GOING* *FORTH* *OF* *A* *COMMAND*; 1a2)
goings forth, those going forth; 1a3) way out, exit; 1b) that which goes
forth; 1b1) utterance; 1b2) export; 1c) place of going forth; 1c1) source
or spring (of water); 1c2) place of departure; 1c3) east (of sun); 1c4)
mine (of silver);
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>
[IMAGE: THAT THE TRINOMIAL TETRA #44 - *STOVE* (TSAO), #48 - *RITUAL* (LI),
#77 - *COMPLIANCE* (HSUN) RELATED TO THE PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL STASIS (@1 /
@5) ONOMANTIC DEFINITION OF NUMBER RELATING TO THE STATE OF ROMAN CATHOLIC
/ EMPIRE GOVERNANCE AS A #269 - CONCEPT OF #312 - CONTRADICTION BY A
FAILURE OF #27 - *DUTIES* (SHIH) AS INFIDELITY TO BOER WAR MEMORIAL
COMMEMORATIONS AS #30 - *BOLD* *RESOLUTION* (YI) IS THEN A CAUSE FOR A
LOGICAL FALLACY]
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM REGARDING THE ROMAN BINOMIAL STASIS (@1 / @5)
DEFINITION OF FASCISM ON 5 / 21-22 JULY 1941 {#48 - RITUAL (LI): 21 - 25
JULY --> vEVENT --> #77 - COMPLIANCE (HSUN): 22 JULY}: 'WE MUST DISTINGUISH
BETWEEN THE FASCIST POPULAR MOVEMENT AND THE POPULAR {#312 -
*CONTRADICTION* *DIALECTIC*} MOVEMENT IN RUSSIA. THE FASCIST MOVEMENT IS A
SPONTANEOUS RETURN TO THE TRADITIONS OF ANCIENT ROME' [HITLER'S TABLE TALK
IDEA @1, Saturday 5 July 1941]
'If the Duce were to die, it would be a great misfortune for Italy. As I
walked with him in the gardens of the Villa Borghese, I could easily
compare his profile with that of the Roman busts, and I realised he was one
of the *CAESARS*. There's no doubt at all that Mussolini is the heir of the
great men of that period. Despite their weaknesses, the Italians have so
many qualities that make us like them.
ITALY IS THE COUNTRY WHERE INTELLIGENCE CREATED THE NOTION OF THE *STATE*.
THE ROMAN EMPIRE IS A GREAT POLITICAL CREATION, THE GREATEST OF ALL.'
[HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @5, 21-22 July 1941]
Given that ONTIC GROUNDING is then optimal necessity for the circumscribing
of any human experience and the absence of such is only a SUPERFICIALITY,
is it then possible to determine any probability for the DIALECTICS OF
IMPULSIVITY by a measured conformity to an equivalent temporal process of
appraisal for each of the ONTIC stratum which comprise such DIALECTIC
progression.
Is it also then possible to view any divergence to such default DIALECTIC
PROGRESSION which apart from the SEMINAL LIMIT {#9 - AUTONOMY} against the
#72 - UNLIMITED is then a SAPIENT determination made and expressive as
PERSONALISITICS OF BEING: *WELTANSCHAUUNG*?
To ask such questions, is then a starting place for solving the rubric of
personalism...
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Apple%20Exclusion%2020210126.pdf>
Initial Post: 26 January 2021
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May,
2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an
Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Family Guy
Dec 9, 2021, 11:59:45 PM12/9/21
to
0 new messages