"-= Spudley =-" <-= Spudley =-@cun*
20plus.com> wrote in message
news:6sOwf.213036$V7.5...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> ]v[etaphoid wrote:
>> "-= Spudley =-" <-= Spudley =-@cun*
20plus.com> wrote in message
>> news:bMiwf.211483$V7.7...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>>>>>> You have no power over me! You loose!
>>>>>
>>>>> "You lose" as in "loser", without the "r" on the end.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He has no power over you, save that what you give him.
>>>>> Up to this point you have given him very little but if you continue
>>>>> to allow him to bother you then you are giving him what he really
>>>>> wants.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What makes you think the original spelling was a mistake? Maybe I
>>>> know more about Nigel that you think.
>>>
>>> It's an instinct, I know you too well, ED.
>>> Like when you say "that" where you meant to say "than", as in the
>>> case just above.
>>>
>>>
>>> ps
>>> I might be shit house at grammar
>>
>> Agreed.
>
> *YAWN* Your agreement is neither desired nor is it a requirement, just
> like your pathetic follow-ups, Megaroid.
> ====> alt.flame.net.illiterates
You might say it is about as necessary as an invitation from you to comment
on any given matter.
I agree with the other posters who've been saying what a boring pedant
you've always been...