Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Google recognises priority of Jean Paul Turcaud's claim to Telfer discovery

1 view
Skip to first unread message

George

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 10:03:59 PM4/5/07
to

"Linc Madison" <news...@lincmad.example.com> wrote in message
news:050420071827436251%news...@lincmad.example.com...
> In article <1175813922.1...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, don
> findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
>
>> http://tinyurl.com/yvczf7
>
> Google doesn't "recognise" any such thing. Having your link come up
> first on a Google search just means that your link comes up first on
> that Google search -- nothing beyond that. That's how, during the 2004
> election cycle, a Google search on the phrase "miserable failure"
> called up first a link to the official White House web page for
> President George W. Bush.
>
> That would be why people are calling you a dumbass -- because you are.
>
> Please note and respect the redirection of followups to this thread.

These guys (DF and Turdhard, et al) have never spoken the truth about
anything. I don't know why they would expect anyone to believe they are
telling the truth now.

George


don findlay

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 10:21:48 PM4/5/07
to

Linc Madison wrote:
> In article <1175813922.1...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, don
> findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
>
> > http://tinyurl.com/yvczf7
>
> Google doesn't "recognise" any such thing. Having your link come up
> first on a Google search just means that your link comes up first on
> that Google search -- nothing beyond that. That's how, during the 2004
> election cycle, a Google search on the phrase "miserable failure"
> called up first a link to the official White House web page for
> President George W. Bush.
>
>

Well, . ...I rest my case. Anybody wanting to know about' miserable
failures' comes right up with the Shrub. Is that right? Is it the
talk of the net? I don't know. I *do know that anyone wanting to
know about *Newmont's *Discovery of *Telfer comes up with JPT. (not
Newmont) So I guess we could say that Google falls into line with the
growing consensus, ... Eh? That right?

No, ..it just means I know how to come up first on google where it
counts. (Thanks for your help.)

I think Newmont (Newcrest; ...Name changed to protect the guilty by
the way, ..should probably know about this) What bertter way than to
advertise it globally through google, for anyone wanting to know if
Newmont discovered Telfer or not? Probably write and tell them. Go
ahead.

Potter Partners got $15m dollars in that deal, for underwriting the
share float and the new name change at the time, (because 'Newmont
Australia' was already on the nose). And Narla, their Joint Venture
partners on Telfer got shoved aside. (I wonder how many of their
shareholders at the time, knew about that) (Some you win, some you
lose, eh?)


> That would be why people are calling you a dumbass -- because you are.

That's just your opinion, mate. Google doesn't agree with you.
(And just you leave my ass alone, hey?) Did you ever hold any shares
in Narla by the way? If you did then you might have a different take
on the complexion of my ass. Or maybe your brother or your old man
did, and you don't get on with them and that sort of deprivation
sounds really good to you, as it does re JPT, and all the other
prospectors who fall foul of corporate machinations.

These prospectors and explorers and general indomitables who progress
the leaden feet of disgruntled humanity, ..fuck em all. Is that
right? They've no right to be out there ahead of you (...Mate..).
(Hey, ..You have a nice day, won't you.) (sure you will, ..It's Easter
after all (when we celebrate resurrection from the Dead....and
everybody gets an opportunity to contemplate martyrdom and the stink
that goes with it)


> Please note and respect the redirection of followups to this thread.

Come on Woof, ..George, .. Stu, ..Jo, .. Sky-w. (Gee, ..we've
thinned them right out, ..have we not? - can we not maybe rustle some
up from t.o.? ....put JP (and me) in our place. ( Idiots that we
are, ... with a view to reminding people of their humanity, and what
they might become..)

sir.jp...@neuf.fr

unread,
Apr 5, 2007, 11:09:04 PM4/5/07
to
On 6 avr, 03:27, Linc Madison <news20...@lincmad.example.com> wrote:
> In article <1175813922.118684.224...@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, don

>
> findlay <d...@tower.net.au> wrote:
> >http://tinyurl.com/yvczf7
>
> Google doesn't "recognise" any such thing. Having your link come up
> first on a Google search just means that your link comes up first on
> that Google search -- nothing beyond that. That's how, during the 2004
> election cycle, a Google search on the phrase "miserable failure"
> called up first a link to the official White House web page for
> President George W. Bush.
>
> That would be why people are calling you a dumbass -- because you are.
>
> Please note and respect the redirection of followups to this thread.

The fact of calling someone a dumbass is precisely the privilege of
those who are so .... indeed, and this a well documented Human trait,
people tend to identify others with what they are themselves.
Hence dumbasses see dumbasess everywhere, and bring down gentlemen
of great value to their Villain's & Dumbass ' indeed level !

... and this as well another well noted trait of Human behaviour,
which is that the mean, the vile, the abject & the cowards are
constantly shooting at the stars, and are further completely
impervious to qualities, virtues & excellence which honour the few as
Dr Don Findlay by example.

jpturcaud


0 new messages