Re: The Jason Gortician Drug Test Challenge
subRoutine
message news:Xns972BDA5F5...@207.14.113.17...
> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
> news:a92dnRTg7IC...@rogers.com:
>
> > "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
> > wrote in message news:Xns972BD8004...@207.14.113.17...
> >> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
> >> news:7t2dnUSsRsN...@rogers.com:
> >>
> >> > "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
> >> > wrote in message news:Xns972BBC3D8...@207.14.113.17...
> >> >> "subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
> >> >> news:a5udnZN2pOC3zALe...@rogers.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> > "...You're on drugs!" Is that the best
> >> >> > you can do?
> >> >>
> >> >> PKB.
> >> >
> >> > Unlikely.
> >>
> >>
> >> 5 years, is it? You still don't know what those three letters mean?
> >>
> >> Saying "You're on drugs" is the best you can do, James. That's a PKB
> >> when you say someone else is lame for doing the same thing you do.
> >
> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
>
> Care to put your money where your mouth is? I'll wager anything you'd
> like, against anything you'd care to lose.
>
> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's no wager
unless you're willing to pay up now.
> > Therefore no PKB.
>
> No, dildo. This has nothing to do with doing drugs. It has to do with you
> calling someone lame for saying the same thing you say.
But you do use drugs and have admitted to taking them.
[...] Jason smokes pot.
_-
-_
subRoutine <http://www.softtargets.com>
Overunity Energy Mechanism
0,0,1
Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III
news:_v6dnf3DF5S...@rogers.com:
You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
Do you have trouble with past tense, present tense?
>> > Therefore no PKB.
>>
>> No, dildo. This has nothing to do with doing drugs. It has to do with
>> you calling someone lame for saying the same thing you say.
>
> But you do use drugs and have admitted to taking them.
What does that have to do with your silly PKB, backpedaller?
> [...] Jason smokes pot.
Then you'll have no problem winning this drug test bet, eh?
--
People think I'm a snob, but it's just because I'm better than they are.
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
<KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:"subRoutine" <s007ii@ca> wrote in
Are you fucking blind?
-----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
From: Tupac Chopra <mas...@mason.snuh>
<Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
I heard a good one about Gibby of the Surfers, after he cut that track
with Ministry. As several people have noted, when Gibby came back from
Chicago, he was doing every drug he could get his hands on, all the time.
So, the kid says he went to some dope house or another, I guess in Texas.
As he was coming in, he says, someone stood up and blew the biggest cloud
of crack smoke he had ever seen in his life and walked out. And this kid
has probably seen a few. The exhaler was of course, Gibby.
I had a pot and acid dealer I worked with in Baton Rouge. He was bi, and
he sold to skinheads. He was a weird chap. Anyway, he gets a call "HR
from Bad Brains is in town, and he wants some pot."
Well, send him over...
So HR comes, and, we'll call him "Bob", puts down a QP or whatever in
front of him. "Help yourself, man".
HR rolled grabbed a huge handful and threw it into a piece of newspaper.
Rolled it up into a cone, and smoked the whole thing. Then he left
without ever saying a word.
A few years later, I saw HR in New Orleans, so I related the tale to him
and asked him about it.
He STILL didn't say a single word. I still don't know if he doesn't talk
to white people, or if he was on acid.
---------------------------------------------
<Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
"Everyone who's anyone knows I was a rather notorious acid
and pot dealer myself, at one time. I had a good deal of Baton Rouge
tripping their asses off. But that was nearly 20 years ago."
--------------------------------------------
"King of Brawl Hall" <mas...@mason.snuh>
<Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
"I've only done coke with an escort I had in L.A. that did couples. She
tittered "Someone just gave me an ounce of coke", and dumped about 5 grams
on the coffee table."
--------------------------------------------
[...] Loopy loops
Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire
news:kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com:
I take it that's a "no".
>:>> I'll wager anything
>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
Scared.
>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's
>:> no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:
>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>
> Are you fucking blind?
I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff, and
claiming I "do drugs".
Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and you're
merely stupid.
Very good James. You've worked out 'past tense'.
Now, please explain how that translates into 'present tense', and why
you're so scared to make a simple bet with me?
--
http://beosnews.com/
http://www.bedoper.com
http://www.cafepress.com/angeldevil
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:"subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know how attribs work?
:>:>> I'll wager anything
:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
:
:Scared.
Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering nervously
aloud to himself.
:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
:
:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this conversation for
a little while longer...
:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's
:>:> no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>:
:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
:>
:> Are you fucking blind?
:
:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff, and
:claiming I "do drugs".
:
:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
:
:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and you're
:merely stupid.
And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking flake?
:
:> -----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
"Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Cloe Webb as Nancy
Spungen
Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire
news:1f8vp1h5e91vqj8o8...@4ax.com:
> On 14 Dec 2005 04:32:35 GMT, in alt.flame "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:"subRoutinč@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
>:>:>> I'll wager anything
>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
>:
>:Scared.
>
> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
> nervously aloud to himself.
Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
>:
>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>
> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
> conversation for a little while longer...
A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:>:
>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>:>
>:> Are you fucking blind?
>:
>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff, and
>:claiming I "do drugs".
>:
>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
>:
>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
>:you're merely stupid.
>
> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
> flake?
I'm talking to you, cornflake.
So you're scared to take a bet because you're sure you'll win?
In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:> On 14 Dec 2005 04:32:35 GMT, in alt.flame "Sir Terrance N.
:> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>
:>:> On 14 Dec 2005 04:04:10 GMT, in alt.flame "Ralph Waldo Emerson
:>:> Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>:>
:>:>:> "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com>
:>:>:> wrote in message news:Xns972BDA5F5...@207.14.113.17...
:>:>:>
:>:>:>> > "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III"
:>:>:>> > <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
:>:>:>> > news:Xns972BD8004...@207.14.113.17...
:>:>:>> >
:>:>:>> >> > "Ralph Waldo Emerson Winchester, III"
:>:>:>> >> > <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
:>:>:>> >> > news:Xns972BBC3D8...@207.14.113.17...
:>:>:>> >> >
:>:>:>> >> >> > "...You're on drugs!" Is that the best
:>:>:>> >> >> > you can do?
:>:>:>> >> >>
:>:>:>> >> >> PKB.
:>:>:>> >> >
:>:>:>> >> > Unlikely.
:>:>:>> >>
:>:>:>> >>
:>:>:>> >> 5 years, is it? You still don't know what those three letters
:>:>:>> >> mean?
:>:>:>> >>
:>:>:>> >> Saying "You're on drugs" is the best you can do, James. That's
:>:>:>> >> a PKB when you say someone else is lame for doing the same
:>:>:>> >> thing you do.
:>:>:>> >
:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
:>:>:>>
:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
:>:
:>:I take it that's a "no".
:>
:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know how
:> attribs work?
:
:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
Tsk. Tsk. You're guilty of a cowardly post edit, I already responded to this
drek before you rearranged the post to suit your cowardly ways, thusly...
----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's no wager
unless you're willing to pay up now.
----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
:>:
:>:Scared.
:>
:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
:> nervously aloud to himself.
:
:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
See restored text you cowardly post editor.
:
:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
:>:
:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
:>
:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
:> conversation for a little while longer...
:
:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
Refer back to article <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>, before you
made the cowardly post edit rearrangement.
:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>:>:
:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
:>:>
:>:> Are you fucking blind?
:>:
:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff, and
:>:claiming I "do drugs".
:>:
:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
:>:
:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
:>:you're merely stupid.
:>
:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
:> flake?
:
:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught chattering
nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny. HAHAHAHA.
:
:>:> -----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's no wager
unless you're willing to pay up now.
:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
<Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
<Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
<Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
Idiot.
Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire
news:ugs0q15fhbrjjinrt...@4ax.com:
What's it like to be so stupid, James?
There was no question of "You have done drugs in the past". You claim I
do drugs, in the present.
And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
running. Away.
>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
>:>:
>:>:Scared.
>:>
>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
>:> nervously aloud to himself.
>:
>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
>
> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
>:>:
>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>:>
>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
>:> conversation for a little while longer...
>:
>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
>
> Refer back to article <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>,
> before you made the cowardly post edit rearrangement.
Refer back to your two previous referrals.
>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>:>:>
>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
>:>:
>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff,
>:>:and claiming I "do drugs".
>:>:
>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
>:>:
>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
>:>:you're merely stupid.
>:>
>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
>:> flake?
>:
>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
>
> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny. HAHAHAHA.
This is why you're the resident mascot.
In what sense does that mean I do drugs?
Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the past. It
means you currently get spanked.
>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
>
> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
In other words, never.
> Idiot.
What's a junkie, James?
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:"subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how stupid it made
you look? :)
:> Tsk. Tsk. You're guilty of a cowardly post edit, I already responded
:> to this drek before you rearranged the post to suit your cowardly
:> ways, thusly...
:>
:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
:>
:> <_v6dnf3DF5S...@rogers.com>
:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's no
:> wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>
:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
:
:
:What's it like to be so stupid, James?
Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for a conundrum?
:There was no question of "You have done drugs in the past". You claim I
:do drugs, in the present.
To which I already answered:
Queues soundbyte:
"Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Chloe Webb as Nancy
Spungen.
If you're not satisfied with that answer then I'm afraid you have a problem. And
unfortunately for you, it's my final answer.
:And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
:running. Away.
When did I run away? I'm right here laughing at your current humiliation.
:>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
:>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
:>:>:
:>:>:Scared.
:>:>
:>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
:>:> nervously aloud to himself.
:>:
:>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
:>
:> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
:
:Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
Sure it does, it says quite plainly that since you've already admitted to drug
use and molesting skanky ho's, you've already autospanked on a point that has
previously been decided and settled.
:>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
:>:>:
:>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
:>:>
:>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
:>:> conversation for a little while longer...
:>:
:>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
:>
:> Refer back to article <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>,
:> before you made the cowardly post edit rearrangement.
:
:Refer back to your two previous referrals.
What for? I'm not the one clumsily rearranging text.
:
:>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
:>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
:>:>:>
:>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
:>:>:
:>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff,
:>:>:and claiming I "do drugs".
:>:>:
:>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
:>:>:
:>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
:>:>:you're merely stupid.
:>:>
:>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
:>:> flake?
:>:
:>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
:>
:> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
:> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny. HAHAHAHA.
:
:This is why you're the resident mascot.
What a.f. thinks of me in their current vote for their 2005 Special O-lame-pics,
is an excellent demonstration of the effect my flames have had on these voters.
:>:>:> -----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
In the same sense that you take them for recreational use.
:
:Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
:
:You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the past. It
:means you currently get spanked.
:
:
:>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
:>
:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
:
:In other words, never.
Denial is not just a river
:
:> Idiot.
:
:What's a junkie, James?
A narcotics addict, you silly git. Look it up in the dictionary.
n 1: a narcotics addict [syn: drug addict, junky] 2: someone who is so ardently
devoted to something that it resembles an addiction;
Twat.
Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire
news:vbd1q1t1q9k0nrnb3...@4ax.com:
> On 15 Dec 2005 00:01:13 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:"subRoutinč@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
>:> Tsk. Tsk. You're guilty of a cowardly post edit, I already responded
>:> to this drek before you rearranged the post to suit your cowardly
>:> ways, thusly...
>:>
>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
>:>
>:> <_v6dnf3DF5S...@rogers.com>
>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's
>:> no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:>
>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
>:
>:
>:What's it like to be so stupid, James?
>
> Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for a
> conundrum?
Masterful.
>:There was no question of "You have done drugs in the past". You claim
>:I do drugs, in the present.
>
> To which I already answered:
>
> Queues soundbyte:
>
> "Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Chloe Webb
> as Nancy Spungen.
>
> If you're not satisfied with that answer then I'm afraid you have a
> problem. And unfortunately for you, it's my final answer.
Sure it is.
I do drugs, currently, because you saw "Sid and Nancy".
Priceless.
>:And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
>:running. Away.
>
> When did I run away? I'm right here laughing at your current
> humiliation.
Is that your final answer?
>:>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
>:>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:Scared.
>:>:>
>:>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
>:>:> nervously aloud to himself.
>:>:
>:>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
>:>
>:> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
>:
>:Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
>
> Sure it does, it says quite plainly that since you've already admitted
> to drug use and molesting skanky ho's, you've already autospanked on a
> point that has previously been decided and settled.
Ah, so I do drugs. Because you say so.
But you won't actually back up your words.
You, on the other hand, have claimed to have banged 1000 women. All
virgins, apparently.
>:>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>:>:>
>:>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
>:>:> conversation for a little while longer...
>:>:
>:>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
>:>
>:> Refer back to article <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>,
>:> before you made the cowardly post edit rearrangement.
>:
>:Refer back to your two previous referrals.
>
> What for? I'm not the one clumsily rearranging text.
No, you're just writing it. Clumsily.
>:>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>:>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
>:>:>:
>:>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff,
>:>:>:and claiming I "do drugs".
>:>:>:
>:>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
>:>:>:
>:>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
>:>:>:you're merely stupid.
>:>:>
>:>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
>:>:> flake?
>:>:
>:>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
>:>
>:> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
>:> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny.
>:> HAHAHAHA.
>:
>:This is why you're the resident mascot.
>
> What a.f. thinks of me in their current vote for their 2005 Special
> O-lame-pics, is an excellent demonstration of the effect my flames
> have had on these voters.
Clearly, they have always feared you.
I do?
Then how can I pass any drug test?
>:Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
>:
>:You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the past.
>:It means you currently get spanked.
>:
>:
>:>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
>:>
>:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
>:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
>:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
>:
>:In other words, never.
>
> Denial is not just a river
Care to make a bet with me, then?
; )
>:> Idiot.
>:
>:What's a junkie, James?
>
> A narcotics addict, you silly git. Look it up in the dictionary.
>
> n 1: a narcotics addict [syn: drug addict, junky] 2: someone who is so
> ardently devoted to something that it resembles an addiction;
>
> Twat.
Ah, I'm a "narcotics addict", but you're scared to prove it.
Interesting route you're taking, here.
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
activities.
:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
:>:>:>:>:>>
:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
:>:>:>
:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know how
:>:>:> attribs work?
:>:>:
:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
:>
:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how stupid
:> it made you look? :)
:
:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
And you're an autospank commando. :)
:>:> Tsk. Tsk. You're guilty of a cowardly post edit, I already responded
:>:> to this drek before you rearranged the post to suit your cowardly
:>:> ways, thusly...
:>:>
:>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
:>:>
:>:> <_v6dnf3DF5S...@rogers.com>
:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers. There's
:>:> no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>:>
:>:> ----------------restored in its rightful place------------------
:>:
:>:
:>:What's it like to be so stupid, James?
:>
:> Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for a
:> conundrum?
:
:Masterful.
Gracias, bendeco.
:>:There was no question of "You have done drugs in the past". You claim
:>:I do drugs, in the present.
:>
:> To which I already answered:
:>
:> Queues soundbyte:
:>
:> "Once a junkie always a junkie. Never trust a junkie." -- Chloe Webb
:> as Nancy Spungen.
:>
:> If you're not satisfied with that answer then I'm afraid you have a
:> problem. And unfortunately for you, it's my final answer.
:
:Sure it is.
:
:I do drugs, currently, because you saw "Sid and Nancy".
:
:Priceless.
Actually it's an ancient proverb quoted from the movie, dingbat.
:>:And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
:>:running. Away.
:>
:> When did I run away? I'm right here laughing at your current
:> humiliation.
:
:Is that your final answer?
I'll take "Autospanking Snuhtard" for $200, Alex.
:>:>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
:>:>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:Scared.
:>:>:>
:>:>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by chattering
:>:>:> nervously aloud to himself.
:>:>:
:>:>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
:>:>
:>:> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
:>:
:>:Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
:>
:> Sure it does, it says quite plainly that since you've already admitted
:> to drug use and molesting skanky ho's, you've already autospanked on a
:> point that has previously been decided and settled.
:
:Ah, so I do drugs. Because you say so.
You do drugs because you admit to taking addictive narcotics.
:
:But you won't actually back up your words.
Here we go again; please see "reposting Jason's autospank again" below for
further information.
:You, on the other hand, have claimed to have banged 1000 women. All
:virgins, apparently.
I never said anything about virgins...post proof.
:>:>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
:>:>:>
:>:>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
:>:>:> conversation for a little while longer...
:>:>:
:>:>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
:>:>
:>:> Refer back to article <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>,
:>:> before you made the cowardly post edit rearrangement.
:>:
:>:Refer back to your two previous referrals.
:>
:> What for? I'm not the one clumsily rearranging text.
:
:No, you're just writing it. Clumsily.
Poor Jason, reduced to IKYABWAI's.
:>:>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
:>:>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
:>:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
:>:>:>:>
:>:>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old stuff,
:>:>:>:and claiming I "do drugs".
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
:>:>:>:you're merely stupid.
:>:>:>
:>:>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you fucking
:>:>:> flake?
:>:>:
:>:>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
:>:>
:>:> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
:>:> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny.
:>:> HAHAHAHA.
:>:
:>:This is why you're the resident mascot.
:>
:> What a.f. thinks of me in their current vote for their 2005 Special
:> O-lame-pics, is an excellent demonstration of the effect my flames
:> have had on these voters.
:
:Clearly, they have always feared you.
Actually whatever they think is not my problem.
:>:>:>:> -----reposting Jason's autospank again-----
I recommend you either take the piss out of your mom, or maybe a pregnant
sister. :)
:>:Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
:>:
:>:You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the past.
:>:It means you currently get spanked.
:>:
:>:
:>:>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
:>:>
:>:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
:>:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
:>:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
:>:
:>:In other words, never.
:>
:> Denial is not just a river
:
:Care to make a bet with me, then?
You've already autospanked on a point that has previously been decided and
settled. So pay up now.
:; )
:
:
:>:> Idiot.
:>:
:>:What's a junkie, James?
:>
:> A narcotics addict, you silly git. Look it up in the dictionary.
:>
:> n 1: a narcotics addict [syn: drug addict, junky] 2: someone who is so
:> ardently devoted to something that it resembles an addiction;
:>
:> Twat.
:
:Ah, I'm a "narcotics addict", but you're scared to prove it.
:
:Interesting route you're taking, here.
Narcotics addict and junkie is the same thing, you dolt.
Scott Campbell
> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>>>> What's it like to be so stupid, James?
>>>
>>> Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for a
>>> conundrum?
>>
>> Masterful.
>
> Gracias, bendeco.
Koput, usted pronuncía jodiendo imbécil. Apenas cuando yo le pensé
ha escrito la cosa más estúpida posible, usted insiste en mecanografía más.
--
Scott Campbell
Sir Terrance N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire
news:3th1q1prah6lbmst4...@4ax.com:
> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> [...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
> activities.
>
>:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
>:>:>:>:>:>>
>:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know
>:>:>:> how attribs work?
>:>:>:
>:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
>:>
>:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how
>:> stupid it made you look? :)
>:
>:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
>
> And you're an autospank commando. :)
Am I an award-winning autospank commando?
Bear in mind, James, that any "stupidity" on my part stems from
interacting with you.
Keep a little perspective when claiming "autospank".
And how did this movie teach you that I now do drugs?
>:>:And, in typical Koput fashion, you claim immediate victory. While
>:>:running. Away.
>:>
>:> When did I run away? I'm right here laughing at your current
>:> humiliation.
>:
>:Is that your final answer?
>
> I'll take "Autospanking Snuhtard" for $200, Alex.
Your final answer seems to go on and on.
>:>:>:>:>:>> I'll wager anything
>:>:>:>:>:>> you'd like, against anything you'd care to lose.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:Scared.
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> Again. Jason demonstrates the mark of a lonely loser by
>:>:>:> chattering nervously aloud to himself.
>:>:>:
>:>:>:Why are you so scared to accept a friendly wager, James?
>:>:>
>:>:> See restored text you cowardly post editor.
>:>:
>:>:Your restored text doesn't answer the question, James.
>:>
>:> Sure it does, it says quite plainly that since you've already
>:> admitted to drug use and molesting skanky ho's, you've already
>:> autospanked on a point that has previously been decided and settled.
>:
>:Ah, so I do drugs. Because you say so.
>
> You do drugs because you admit to taking addictive narcotics.
No, James. I admit that I have done drugs in the past. I do not do drugs
now.
Are you really this thick?
Aside from being prissy and prudish, I mean?
>:But you won't actually back up your words.
>
> Here we go again; please see "reposting Jason's autospank again" below
> for further information.
Again, thicky. How does an admission that I've (gasp!) done drugs somehow
prove that I currently do drugs, and am a "junkie"?
>:You, on the other hand, have claimed to have banged 1000 women. All
>:virgins, apparently.
>
> I never said anything about virgins...post proof.
None of them were "skanky", right?
How about you post a shred of proof of your now legendary claim that
you've had over 1000 women?
How many have you had this month, James?
; )
>:>:>:>:>:>> All you have to do is pay for a drug test. Coward.
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:A cheap coward, I'm sure.
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> This is getting creepy. I predict the two of him will have this
>:>:>:> conversation for a little while longer...
>:>:>:
>:>:>:A whackingly huge, cheap coward.
>:>:>
>:>:> Refer back to article
>:>:> <kq7vp11v8dvsn7gq3...@4ax.com>, before you made the
>:>:> cowardly post edit rearrangement.
>:>:
>:>:Refer back to your two previous referrals.
>:>
>:> What for? I'm not the one clumsily rearranging text.
>:
>:No, you're just writing it. Clumsily.
>
> Poor Jason, reduced to IKYABWAI's.
How is it that you don't know what word mean, after five, and some say
ten years on Usenet?
>:>:>:>:>:> You've already admitted to doing drugs with skanky hookers.
>:>:>:>:>:> There's no wager unless you're willing to pay up now.
>:>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:>:You keep saying I "do" drugs. Yet you won't back your words.
>:>:>:>:>
>:>:>:>:> Are you fucking blind?
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:I must be, James. Because all I see is you posting very old
>:>:>:>:stuff, and claiming I "do drugs".
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:Not "did drugs". Not "have done drugs".
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:However, there is the slight possibility that I'm not blind, and
>:>:>:>:you're merely stupid.
>:>:>:>
>:>:>:> And you talking to yourself above resolves this issue, you
>:>:>:> fucking flake?
>:>:>:
>:>:>:I'm talking to you, cornflake.
>:>:>
>:>:> And I'm trying to ignore the hilarious bit where you were caught
>:>:> chattering nervously aloud to yourself. But it's too funny.
>:>:> HAHAHAHA.
>:>:
>:>:This is why you're the resident mascot.
>:>
>:> What a.f. thinks of me in their current vote for their 2005 Special
>:> O-lame-pics, is an excellent demonstration of the effect my flames
>:> have had on these voters.
>:
>:Clearly, they have always feared you.
>
> Actually whatever they think is not my problem.
...said the laughingstock.
Ah, yes. Modern drug testing requires identification, in a tamper-proof
environment. But, seeing that you're extremely ignorant, and seem to have
acquired the sum total of your knowledge from "Cheech and Chong" movies,
I suppose I can't expect you to know how drug tests are conducted.
In summation, you're either brain-dead, or just manking excuses. Sort
of...running away from your claims. While, at the same time, claiming
victory.
Which is it?
>:>:Here's an example, since you have real trouble with simple things.
>:>:
>:>:You get spanked. That doesn't mean you have been spanked in the
>:>:past. It means you currently get spanked.
>:>:
>:>:
>:>:>:In what sense was I ever a "junkie", BoyScout?
>:>:>
>:>:> <Xns95397A2B99FF8s...@207.14.113.17>
>:>:> <Xns9559A2E40E75s...@207.14.113.17>
>:>:> <Xns96106909D63D1s...@207.14.113.17>
>:>:
>:>:In other words, never.
>:>
>:> Denial is not just a river
>:
>:Care to make a bet with me, then?
>
> You've already autospanked on a point that has previously been decided
> and settled. So pay up now.
So I've taken a drug test and failed?
Or "James said so"?
>:; )
>:
>:
>:>:> Idiot.
>:>:
>:>:What's a junkie, James?
>:>
>:> A narcotics addict, you silly git. Look it up in the dictionary.
>:>
>:> n 1: a narcotics addict [syn: drug addict, junky] 2: someone who is
>:> so ardently devoted to something that it resembles an addiction;
>:>
>:> Twat.
>:
>:Ah, I'm a "narcotics addict", but you're scared to prove it.
>:
>:Interesting route you're taking, here.
>
> Narcotics addict and junkie is the same thing, you dolt.
Correct, Koput. I'm neither. If I am, accept my challenge and claim any
prize you wish.
But we both know you don't have any balls, right?
The U.S. Constitution
news:dnqjgv$as6$0...@pita.alt.net:
The accent marks really make it come alive.
--
I'm just a goddamned piece of paper.
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:"subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
:news:3th1q1prah6lbmst4...@4ax.com:
:
:> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
:> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>
:> [...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
:> activities.
:>
:>:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
:>:>:>:>:>:>>
:>:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
:>:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
:>:>:>:>
:>:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know
:>:>:>:> how attribs work?
:>:>:>:
:>:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
:>:>
:>:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how
:>:> stupid it made you look? :)
:>:
:>:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
:>
:> And you're an autospank commando. :)
:
:Am I an award-winning autospank commando?
:
:Bear in mind, James, that any "stupidity" on my part stems from
:interacting with you.
:
:Keep a little perspective when claiming "autospank".
"Autospank" is your middle name, snuhtard.
[...]
:
:I admit that I have done drugs
See?
[...] Jason repeats & loops among other drug addled craziness.
subRoutinи@s!0.0^7ii
<KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:"Scott Campbell" <thunderin...@msn.com> wrote in
:news:dnqjgv$as6$0...@pita.alt.net:
:
:> subRoutinè@s!0.0^7ii wrote:
:>> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance
:>> N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>
:> [...]
:>
:>>>>> What's it like to be so stupid, James?
:>>>>
:>>>> Well let's see, since I'm so smart I wouldn't know. How's that for
:>>>> a conundrum?
:>>>
:>>> Masterful.
:>>
:>> Gracias, bendeco.
:>
:> Koput, usted pronuncía jodiendo imbécil. Apenas cuando yo le pensé
:> ha escrito la cosa más estúpida posible, usted insiste en mecanografía
:> más.
:
:The accent marks really make it come alive.
Please wipe your chin afterwards.
The U.S. Constitution
news:2sl1q192bie4sat4k...@4ax.com:
After what?
The U.S. Constitution
news:vrk1q1lqeqjmj6bgt...@4ax.com:
> On 15 Dec 2005 02:13:55 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>:"subRoutinč@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
>:news:3th1q1prah6lbmst4...@4ax.com:
>:
>:> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance
N.
>:> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>:>
>:> [...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
>:> activities.
>:>
>:>:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
>:>:>:>:>:>:>>
>:>:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
>:>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
>:>:>:>:>
>:>:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know
>:>:>:>:> how attribs work?
>:>:>:>:
>:>:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
>:>:>
>:>:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how
>:>:> stupid it made you look? :)
>:>:
>:>:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
>:>
>:> And you're an autospank commando. :)
>:
>:Am I an award-winning autospank commando?
>:
>:Bear in mind, James, that any "stupidity" on my part stems from
>:interacting with you.
>:
>:Keep a little perspective when claiming "autospank".
>
> "Autospank" is your middle name, snuhtard.
I thought my middle name started with a Z. Crummy Mexican birth
certificate.
> [...]
>:
>:I admit that I have done drugs
>
> See?
>
> [...] Jason repeats & loops among other drug addled craziness.
Q: How can you tell when James is losing?
A: He snips and runs.
(I also would have accepted "He's posting to alt.flame".)
Congratulations, James. You've lost the Jason Gortician challenge.
--
I'm just a goddamned piece of paper.
http://beosnews.com/
http://www.bedoper.com
http://www.cafepress.com/angeldevil
Bill Cleere
news:vrk1q1lqeqjmj6bgt...@4ax.com...
> On 15 Dec 2005 02:13:55 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> :news:3th1q1prah6lbmst4...@4ax.com:
> :
> :> On 15 Dec 2005 00:51:01 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance N.
> :> Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> [...] Jason does drugs and admits to doing drugs among other criminal
> :> activities.
> :>
> :>:>:>:>:>:>> > I don't do drugs, Jason. You do.
> :>:>:>:>:>:>>
> :>:>:>:>:>:>> Care to put your money where your mouth is?
> :>:>:>:>:
> :>:>:>:>:I take it that's a "no".
> :>:>:>:>
> :>:>:>:> Why are you responding to your own lame mess? Do you not know
> :>:>:>:> how attribs work?
> :>:>:>:
> :>:>:>:Because you're too much of a chickenshit to respond.
> :>:>
> :>:> Why did you stop talking to yourself? Because I pointed out how
> :>:> stupid it made you look? :)
> :>:
> :>:Talking to you is probably stupid, so you're close to correct.
> :>
> :> And you're an autospank commando. :)
> :
> :Am I an award-winning autospank commando?
> :
> :Bear in mind, James, that any "stupidity" on my part stems from
> :interacting with you.
> :
> :Keep a little perspective when claiming "autospank".
>
> "Autospank" is your middle name, snuhtard.
>
> [...]
> :
> :I admit that I have done drugs
>
> See?
>
> [...] Jason repeats & loops among other drug addled craziness.
Jason.......tell....him......he......has......won......please.....I....beg...you....
He right ever took drugs means addict obviously pleasepleaseplease....
The U.S. Constitution
I've sealed this area off. Nothing more to see here, folks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bill Cleere" <bcl...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote in
news:LsSdncMSteHKaT3e...@comcast.com:
> "subRoutinè@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in message
> news:vrk1q1lqeqjmj6bgt...@4ax.com...
>> On 15 Dec 2005 02:13:55 GMT, in alt.flame.james-koput "Sir Terrance
>> N. Philip-Glasscock, Esquire" <KILLFIL...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> :"subRoutinè@s!0.0^7ii" <s00...@vxsubroutine.ca> wrote in
Damnit! How did this underground magazine reporter get past the
barricades?
>> [...] Jason repeats & loops among other drug addled craziness.
>
> Jason.......tell....him......he......has......won......please.....I....
> beg...you....
He spanked off already. I guess that means he did win.
> He right ever took drugs means addict obviously pleasepleaseplease....
That would set a nasty precedent, wouldn't it?
--
I'm just a goddamned piece of paper.
http://beosnews.com/
http://www.bedoper.com
http://www.cafepress.com/angeldevil