Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Firebrick software status

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Hodgson

unread,
May 5, 2006, 6:02:04 PM5/5/06
to
Hi,

I don't have any problems with the current factory release, but note
it hasn't been updated since late October, and the beta on the site is
a few months old now also.

Will the beta ever be pushed to release status or is there some reason
it is still in beta?

Thanks,
Andrew.
--
Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK.
My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>.

Carl Hibbard

unread,
May 6, 2006, 3:19:47 AM5/6/06
to
On Fri, 05 May 2006 23:02:04 +0100, Andrew Hodgson <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I don't have any problems with the current factory release, but note
>it hasn't been updated since late October, and the beta on the site is
>a few months old now also.
>
>Will the beta ever be pushed to release status or is there some reason
>it is still in beta?
>
>Thanks,
>Andrew.

It would be nice to get more details on the Teudsindis build

In particular can this fix be 'expanded' on a little:-

DHCP ranges consisting of a single IP were in some situations being
mishandled, and not offered to the client.

Some situations would be what?

Cheers

Ben Mack

unread,
May 9, 2006, 6:07:56 AM5/9/06
to
In article <hbjo52hgpqb4t25kq...@4ax.com>, Carl Hibbard
<ca...@woodcube.com> writes

>On Fri, 05 May 2006 23:02:04 +0100, Andrew Hodgson <m...@privacy.net>
>wrote:
>>Will the beta ever be pushed to release status or is there some reason
>>it is still in beta?

It will be released, the reason for the delay relates to an internal
procedure we (FireBrick) want to do at the same time as releasing it.
The beta has been stable for some time, and if you want the latest
firmware I would use the beta.

>In particular can this fix be 'expanded' on a little:-
>
>DHCP ranges consisting of a single IP were in some situations being
>mishandled, and not offered to the client.
>
>Some situations would be what?

I had an unusual situation - a subnet with DHCP client allocating a
single address restricted to my laptop MAC, if my laptop declined the
address (which it shouldn't have), the FireBrick marked it declined and
wouldn't offer it again until I killed the entry in the DHCP table.

HTH
--
Ben Mack
Watchfront Electronics - Bespoke R&D - http://www.watchfront.co.uk/
Watchfront Internet - ADSL, Colo - http://www.watchfront.net/
Are you bricking it? - Firewalls - http://www.firebrick.co.uk/

0 new messages