Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: *SPOILER*: The villain in Abrams' Trek sequel movie (Trek 12)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Duggy

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 6:07:54 PM10/28/10
to
On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll <wickeddoll1958noeffings...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
> >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
> >wrote:
> >> Smart ass.
> >Nah.  Smart brain.
> >Cute ass.
> I'll be the judge of that.

How many judges does this need?

===
= DUG.
===

Duggy

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 6:11:52 PM10/28/10
to
On Oct 29, 7:25 am, Wickeddoll <wickeddoll1958noeffings...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:42:38 +0000, "Steven L."

> >> >> that is all complete gibberish to me
> >> >See if your fancy dancy new newsreader has a ROT13 option.
> >> Say what?

> >>  I clicked the link and got the story, but I don't even know what that
> >> crap is - it's not Russian, because Babel Fish couldn't translate it,
> >> so it must just be symbols?

> >It's ROT13 encoding. Each letter is translated 13 more in the alphabet,
> >which wraps around symmetrically. So "a" is encoded as "n," b is encoded
> >as "o", "n" is encoded as "a", "o" is encoded as "b", etc.
> Anim8r told me all of this elsewhere, but thanks.

> You have to remember that not all users know all of this obscure
> stuff.  Further, if they *do* know about it, they're smart enough to
> know to avoid a post that says "spoiler" in it, I should think.

Elsewhere? Further up the same branch of the thread. You were told
it was ROT-13 and were still unable to look it up yourself.

Not all newsreaders work the same, so just adding the word "Spoilers"
isn't always enough. Plus you have to assume a certain level of
stupid. Like not knowing what the internet is.

===
= DUG.
===

Anim8rFSK

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 6:12:45 PM10/28/10
to
In article
<66ce249f-c915-41de...@j2g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>,
Duggy <Paul....@jcu.edu.au> wrote:

Let's call her Judge "fWapner"

Gur ovt dhrfgvba vf, jvyy fur qrpbqr guvf abj gung fur xabjf ubj?

--
"Please, I can't die, I've never kissed an Asian woman!"
Shego on "Shat My Dad Says"

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 8:26:30 PM10/28/10
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:06:58 -0700 (PDT), Duggy wrote:

>On Oct 29, 7:21 am, Wickeddoll
>> >It's a shame you don't have an internet connection or you could look
>> >up "ROT-13".
>> Never heard of that before now.  Cut me some slack.
>
>You've never heard of the internet before?
>
>===
>= DUG.
>==

You are SO asking for it.

Natalie
--
Conventions! Photos! More!
http://www.supernaturalusa.net
http://www.wegrokspock.net

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 8:26:58 PM10/28/10
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>> >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
>> >wrote:
>> >> Smart ass.
>> >Nah.  Smart brain.
>> >Cute ass.
>> I'll be the judge of that.
>
>How many judges does this need?
>
>===
>= DUG.
>===

Just me. Now, drop trou.

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 8:27:38 PM10/28/10
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:45 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM...@cox.net>
> Duggy
>> On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
>> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>> > >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
>> > >wrote:
>> > >> Smart ass.
>> > >Nah.  Smart brain.
>> > >Cute ass.
>> > I'll be the judge of that.
>>
>> How many judges does this need?
>>
>> ===
>> = DUG.
>> ===
>
>Let's call her Judge "fWapner"
>
>Gur ovt dhrfgvba vf, jvyy fur qrpbqr guvf abj gung fur xabjf ubj?

GAH!

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 8:28:57 PM10/28/10
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>On Oct 29, 7:25 am, Wickeddoll
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:42:38 +0000, "Steven L."
>
>> >> >> that is all complete gibberish to me
>> >> >See if your fancy dancy new newsreader has a ROT13 option.
>> >> Say what?
>
>> >>  I clicked the link and got the story, but I don't even know what that
>> >> crap is - it's not Russian, because Babel Fish couldn't translate it,
>> >> so it must just be symbols?
>
>> >It's ROT13 encoding. Each letter is translated 13 more in the alphabet,
>> >which wraps around symmetrically. So "a" is encoded as "n," b is encoded
>> >as "o", "n" is encoded as "a", "o" is encoded as "b", etc.
>> Anim8r told me all of this elsewhere, but thanks.
>
>> You have to remember that not all users know all of this obscure
>> stuff.  Further, if they *do* know about it, they're smart enough to
>> know to avoid a post that says "spoiler" in it, I should think.
>
>Elsewhere? Further up the same branch of the thread. You were told
>it was ROT-13 and were still unable to look it up yourself.

I didn't see that until *after* I saw posts on another NG. :-P


>
>Not all newsreaders work the same, so just adding the word "Spoilers"
>isn't always enough. Plus you have to assume a certain level of
>stupid. Like not knowing what the internet is.
>
>===
>= DUG.
>===

:-Þ

So there!

Anim8rFSK

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 9:19:48 PM10/28/10
to
In article <075kc65anq744cus6...@4ax.com>,
Wickeddoll <wickeddoll195...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:45 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM...@cox.net>
> > Duggy
> >> On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
> >> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
> >> > >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >> Smart ass.
> >> > >Nah.  Smart brain.
> >> > >Cute ass.
> >> > I'll be the judge of that.
> >>
> >> How many judges does this need?
> >>
> >> ===
> >> = DUG.
> >> ===
> >
> >Let's call her Judge "fWapner"
> >
> >Gur ovt dhrfgvba vf, jvyy fur qrpbqr guvf abj gung fur xabjf ubj?
>
> GAH!
>
> Natalie

Come on. You've got to at least love "Judge "fWapner""

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 28, 2010, 10:29:55 PM10/28/10
to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 18:19:48 -0700, Anim8rFSK
> Wickeddoll
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:45 -0700, Anim8rFSK
>> > Duggy
>> >> On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
>> >> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>> >> > >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
>> >> > >wrote:
>> >> > >> Smart ass.
>> >> > >Nah.  Smart brain.
>> >> > >Cute ass.
>> >> > I'll be the judge of that.
>> >>
>> >> How many judges does this need?
>> >>
>> >> ===
>> >> = DUG.
>> >> ===
>> >
>> >Let's call her Judge "fWapner"
>> >
>> >Gur ovt dhrfgvba vf, jvyy fur qrpbqr guvf abj gung fur xabjf ubj?
>>
>> GAH!
>>
>> Natalie
>
>Come on. You've got to at least love "Judge "fWapner""

Yeah, that was cute.
--
Natalie

Your Name

unread,
Oct 29, 2010, 12:10:19 AM10/29/10
to
In article <ANIM8Rfsk-CBAB0...@news.dc1.easynews.com>,
Anim8rFSK <ANIM...@cox.net> wrote:

> In article <075kc65anq744cus6...@4ax.com>,
> Wickeddoll <wickeddoll195...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:12:45 -0700, Anim8rFSK <ANIM...@cox.net>
> > > Duggy
> > >> On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
> > >> > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
> > >> > >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
> > >> > >wrote:
> > >> > >> Smart ass.
> > >> > >Nah.  Smart brain.
> > >> > >Cute ass.
> > >> > I'll be the judge of that.
> > >>
> > >> How many judges does this need?
> > >

> > >Let's call her Judge "fWapner"
> > >
> > >Gur ovt dhrfgvba vf, jvyy fur qrpbqr guvf abj gung fur xabjf ubj?
> >
> > GAH!
> >
> > Natalie
>
> Come on. You've got to at least love "Judge "fWapner""

Nope. It's Judge ROTner. ;-)

Anim8rFSK

unread,
Oct 29, 2010, 12:51:53 AM10/29/10
to
In article
<your.name-291...@203-109-169-238.dial.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
your...@isp.com (Your Name) wrote:

Natalie is famous for her FWAP-ing people, as she will now demonstrate -
on YOU

Duggy

unread,
Oct 29, 2010, 8:34:04 PM10/29/10
to
On Oct 29, 10:26 am, Wickeddoll <wickeddoll1958noeffings...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
> >On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
> >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
> >> >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
> >> >wrote:
> >> >> Smart ass.
> >> >Nah.  Smart brain.
> >> >Cute ass.
> >> I'll be the judge of that.
>
> >How many judges does this need?
>
> >===
> >= DUG.
> >===
>
> Just me.  Now, drop trou.

At work?

===
= DUG.
===

Wickeddoll

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 7:46:59 PM10/31/10
to
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>On Oct 29, 10:26 am, Wickeddoll
>wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>>
>> >On Oct 29, 7:22 am, Wickeddoll
>> >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>> >> >On Oct 28, 3:16 pm, Wickeddoll
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> Smart ass.
>> >> >Nah.  Smart brain.
>> >> >Cute ass.
>> >> I'll be the judge of that.
>>
>> >How many judges does this need?
>>
>> >===
>> >= DUG.
>> >===
>>
>> Just me.  Now, drop trou.
>
>At work?
>
>===
>= DUG.
>===

Unless you work at Chippendale's, probably not.

Natalie
--
Natalie

Duggy

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 9:38:58 PM10/31/10
to
On Nov 1, 9:46 am, Wickeddoll <wickeddoll1958noeffings...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT), Duggy

> >> Just me.  Now, drop trou.
> >At work?


> Unless you work at Chippendale's, probably not.

The place they make furniture?

===
= DUG.
===

Your Name

unread,
Oct 31, 2010, 11:08:51 PM10/31/10
to
In article
<840d008d-5e23-43fe...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, Duggy
<Paul....@jcu.edu.au> wrote:

> On Nov 1, 9:46=A0am, Wickeddoll <wickeddoll1958noeffings...@yahoo.com>


> wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:34:04 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>

> > >> Just me. =A0Now, drop trou.


> > >At work?
> > Unless you work at Chippendale's, probably not.
>
> The place they make furniture?

Nope. Chippendale are the two chipmunks who often annoy Donald Duck ...
but you'd have to be nuts to work at their house. ;-)

0 new messages