info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: "Conan" reviews
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Duggy
Aug 20, 2011, 4:12:10 AM8/20/11
to
On Aug 20, 5:06 pm, grinningdemon <grinningde...@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:10:12 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 20, 6:57 am, Joe Snodgrass <joe.s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Considerable upper female nudity."
>
> >What is a upper female?
>
> Maybe they're taller...or they float.
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 22:10:12 -0700 (PDT), Duggy
>
> <p.allan.dug...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 20, 6:57 am, Joe Snodgrass <joe.s...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Considerable upper female nudity."
>
> >What is a upper female?
>
> Maybe they're taller...or they float.
The females or their breasts?
===
= DUG.
===
grinningdemon
Aug 20, 2011, 5:35:45 AM8/20/11
to
Could work either way, I suppose.
nick
Aug 20, 2011, 8:54:50 PM8/20/11
to
Is the considerable upper female nudity Rachel Nichols'? Because if
it isn't, I don't care. If it is, I'll go see the movie tonight and
buy the bootleg tomorrow.
grinningdemon
Aug 20, 2011, 10:01:04 PM8/20/11
to
If it's Rose McGowan, then that's one reason to NEVER watch it at
all...that chick's picture out to be in the dictionary next to the
word "skanky."
0 new messages