"Calvin" <
cal...@phlegm.com> wrote in message
news:op.v3n83...@04233-26jz62s.staff.ad.bond.edu.au...
# "Archibald and the Masses" was published (in "Young Men in Spats") in the
pre-war year of 1936, and we may wonder if PG felt the need to make some
kind of political statement?
Not that he was noted for any involvement in politics, but doubtless had
some private views.
The Masses may be not be quite the "martyred proletariat" of propaganda
leaflets, as Archibald found out, but personal encounters do not go to the
crux of the matter - which is institutionalized "wage slavery" inherent in
corporate structure ("There are those who do the work, and those who get the
profit" - ie. employees versus external shareholders).
Bertrand Russell may have been guilty of similar superficiality, in his
essay "The Superior Virtue of the Oppressed" (in "Unpopular Essays").
Industrial Democracy is the solution to this lack of franchise, and is
independent on the virtues or vices of bosses or workers, collectively or as
individuals.
As Winston Churchill put it : "It is not that democracy is ideal, but
that the alternatives are worse" (or words to that effect).
And while Plum and Bertie may not like it, they were both literary
workhorses, and thus qualified to be Proles - living by sale of their
labour.