Ping Veronica! A naughty socman is whining about you! (was: Re: Gay Marriage is finally legalized in Canada!)
PJR
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 01:45:52 GMT, Ken Chaddock
> <chad...@hfx.eastlink.ca> got double secret probation because:
>
>> Does Veronica peer over his shoulder while he's on UseNet to make sure
>>he's being a good, politically correct, little doormat of a
>>feminist...dam it's a real shame what some "men" have to do to get a
>>little pussy ;-)
>
> TSK TSK TSK
> Dissing teh Veronica.
>
> Every one please don protective garments.
Fortunately for Kenny, Veronica might not see his post unless somebody
accidentally draws attention to it in some way.
Oops!
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
Ken Chaddock
> Fortunately for Kenny, Veronica might not see his post unless somebody
> accidentally draws attention to it in some way.
What, you mean she hasn't been looking over your shoulder making sure
you tow the line "Peter" ? ...seem pretty trusting to me...she must be
pretty sure that she has you well trained...
> Oops!
Oh GOD...now I'm afraid ;-)
...Ken
Fred
clingy; crap in bed but thinks he is a stud; likes to call his penis his
'cock of death'", secreted:
> What, you mean she hasn't been looking over your shoulder making sure
> you tow the line "Peter"?
I meant exactly what was written, Chaddock. What you think it means is
irrelevant, as are you.
> ...seem pretty trusting to me...she must be Oh
> GOD...now I'm afraid.
Why are you afraid, Chaddock?
> [IDIOTICON] ...Ken.
That [IDIOTICON] is just so you, Chaddock.
Ken Chaddock
> Ken Chaddock, wrote:
>>What, you mean she hasn't been looking over your shoulder making sure
>>you tow the line "Peter"?
> I meant exactly what was written, Chaddock. What you think it means is
> irrelevant, as are you.
You really DO have a reading comprehension problem don't you ?
>>...seem pretty trusting to me...she must be Oh
>>GOD...now I'm afraid.
> Why are you afraid, Chaddock?
Well (psss...I'm NOT really)...that was just (you know)...scarasm :-o !
>>[IDIOTICON] ...Ken.
You've demonstrated a failure to understand subtle scarasm...but when
it jumps up and hits you in the face as this bit did and you still don't
get it...pathetic really...and you tag ME IDIOTICON...<grin>
...Ken
Fred
> You really DO have a reading comprehension problem don't you?
How long have you been suffering the problem?
> Well (psss...I'm NOT really)...that was just
> (you know)...
Just imagine.
> scarasm :-o!
I haven't noticed. You know, Chaddock, those who claim to have
been using sarcasm are those who are least likely to actually be
able to use it. If someone does not detect your supposed sarcasm
it's either because they don't care or because you're not very
good at it. I care, Chaddock, so that means you're no good at
sarcasm. Sorry to break the news to you but someone has to do the
dirty work.
> You've demonstrated a failure to understand subtle
> scarasm...but when it jumps up and hits you in the face as
> this bit did and you still don't get it...pathetic
> really...and you tag ME IDIOTICON...[STUPID GRIN].
The failing is all yours. Your posts are littered with silly ASCII faces,
gormless grins and long sequences of full stops. Your mania has escaped into
full public view yet you blame someone else for it. Does that strike you as
odd in any way, Chaddock? It tells me that you would not know sarcasm if it
rammed a fist up your arse, caused pains to shoot up your spine and made
your eyes pop out of your head.
> ...Ken.
You never stop, do you?
Ken Chaddock
> Ken Chaddock, <chad...@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:
>>Well (psss...I'm NOT really)...that was just
>>(you know)...
> Just imagine.
>>scarasm :-o!
> I haven't noticed. >
I realize you have limitations...
> You know, Chaddock, those who claim to have
> been using sarcasm are those who are least likely to actually be
> able to use it. If someone does not detect your supposed sarcasm
> it's either because they don't care or because you're not very
> good at it.
Don't try to blame me for you failings Freddie boy...the fact that you
can't see sarcasm that's so blatant that ti will smack you "up side the
head" if you don't look out isn't *my* fault...
> I care, Chaddock, so that means you're no good at
> sarcasm.
Or, more likely, you have a reading comprehension problem...that will
happen when you hang out in rec-arts.poems too long :-o !
> Sorry to break the news to you but someone has to do the
> dirty work.
When you find someone with the intellectual capacity...I'll be pleased
to entertain them with respect...
>>You've demonstrated a failure to understand subtle
>>scarasm...but when it jumps up and hits you in the face as
>>this bit did and you still don't get it...pathetic
>>really...and you tag ME IDIOTICON...
> The failing is all yours. Your posts are littered with silly ASCII faces,
> gormless grins and long sequences of full stops. Your mania has escaped into
> full public view yet you blame someone else for it.
Actually *you* seem to be the one "blaming" someone else for your
failure to understand, or even to recognize some fairly blatant
sarcastic comments...
> Does that strike you as
> odd in any way, Chaddock? It tells me that you would not know sarcasm if it
> rammed a fist up your arse, caused pains to shoot up your spine and made
> your eyes pop out of your head.
Well there's your problem Fred...you're confusing sarcasm with sexual
assault ! If I'd known that for you, sarcasm has to be that forceful
before you recognize it I probably wouldn't have bothered...
...Ken
Fred
sex partner; is confused about sexual orientation; has problems with leaving
jailbait alone", protested:
> Don't try to blame me for you failings Freddie boy...the
> fact that you can't see sarcasm that's so blatant that ti will smack you
> "up side Or, more likely, you have a reading comprehension
> problem...that will happen when you hang out in
> rec-arts.poems too long :-o!
Why can't I see sarcasm that is so blatant that it will smack me "up side
or,
Chaddock?
> When you find someone with the intellectual capacity...I'll
> be pleased Actually *you* seem to be the one "blaming" someone else for
> your failure to understand, or even to recognize some fairly blatant Well
> there's your problem Fred...you're confusing sarcasm with
> sexual assault!
You're welcome. [Dark sarcasm]
> If I'd known that for you, sarcasm has to be that forceful
> ...Ken.
Sarcasm is a talent that must be wielded with skill, Chaddock. You have
neither talent not skill.