Re: Why All Men Need A Prenup
Peter J Ross
> In article <slrnctep8r...@nntp.petitmorte.net>,
> Peter J Ross <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 January, Mark Sobolewski wrote in soc.men:
>>
>> Wow! 89 lines of delusional rubbish added! I think you're getting
>> worse, Slobbo!
>>
>> By the way, I haven't been keeping up with soc.men lately. Has the
>> wife you bought on the Internet run off with all your money yet?
>>
>> PJR :-)
> Hello Peter!
Hello rape-advocate!
> Tell you what. I'll answer that question when you answer this one:
> When was the last time you got laid?
Before the time of your post, I could only say vaguely "a couple of
times this year so far".
Now I can say confidently "about 3:30am GMT on 09 Jan 2004" - i.e.
nearly 24 hours ago.
It's unlikely to be a great shock to the rest of Usenet that Veronica
and I have sex together, since the rest of Usenet knows that we've had
a mutually satisfactory relationship since 1996.
[alt.fan.veronica-odonoghue added]
So are you going to answer my question now, O wife-buying dwarf?
PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/
[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
Lady Chatterly
Peter J Ross <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote:
>
>Before the time of your post, I could only say vaguely "a couple of
>times this year so far".
Cuba is only slightly better than miracle whip.
>Now I can say confidently "about 3:30am GMT on 09 Jan 2004" - i.e.
>nearly 24 hours ago.
The ng is about it, right.
>It's unlikely to be a great shock to the rest of Usenet that Veronica
>and I have sex together, since the rest of Usenet knows that we've had
>a mutually satisfactory relationship since 1996.
>[alt.fan.veronica-odonoghue added]
Flame awards, moronbeam.
>So are you going to answer my question now, O wife-buying dwarf?
Everyone should put you first, and his inactivity does not hold with
your strident opinions.
--
Lady Chatterly
"Her replies are like those little messages you get at the end of
Taipai" -- invntrr
mark_so...@yahoo.com
Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Saturday 08 January, Mark Sobolewski wrote in soc.men:
>
> > In article <slrnctep8r...@nntp.petitmorte.net>,
> > Peter J Ross <gad...@NOSPAMmeow.org> wrote:
>
> >> On Saturday 01 January, Mark Sobolewski wrote in soc.men:
> >>
> >> Wow! 89 lines of delusional rubbish added! I think you're getting
> >> worse, Slobbo!
> >>
> >> By the way, I haven't been keeping up with soc.men lately. Has the
> >> wife you bought on the Internet run off with all your money yet?
> >>
> >> PJR :-)
>
> > Hello Peter!
>
> Hello rape-advocate!
That's inaccurate. I suppose you could classify my position
as "pro-rape-choice". Are abortion rights supporters "abortion
advocates?"
> > Tell you what. I'll answer that question when you answer this one:
>
> > When was the last time you got laid?
>
> Before the time of your post, I could only say vaguely "a couple of
> times this year so far".
>
> Now I can say confidently "about 3:30am GMT on 09 Jan 2004" - i.e.
> nearly 24 hours ago.
I meant actual, physical sex where people don't get time stamps.
Do you wash the keyboard? :-)
> It's unlikely to be a great shock to the rest of Usenet that Veronica
> and I have sex together, since the rest of Usenet knows that we've
had
> a mutually satisfactory relationship since 1996.
> [alt.fan.veronica-odonoghue added]
>
> So are you going to answer my question now, O wife-buying dwarf?
I was going to say that it's unanswerable as a loaded question since
I didn't "buy" her from the internet. Also, I would have
to have some money for her to run off with. :-) Since you
didn't require the answer be a yes or a no, though, the answer
would be that I don't have such a wife or money.
Us Dwarves get sex more regularly than a "couple of times
per year so far" when we have a "mutually satisfactory
relationship" that we don't bother with timestamps.
And this is even before buying it off the internet. Maybe
you should take a lesson from us. Just a tip. (Hint:
Get out and live for a change. Not too many people
have an FAQ about you. Did you ever think there may
be a reason?)
regards,
Mark Sobolewski