Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Good news, Bob August!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

BrentAr...@hotmail.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2006, 3:04:00 PM11/19/06
to

John Griffin wrote:
> Crapulous Cretin/Crybaby Cranston, cowering behind the lame
> anonym miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Good news, Bob August!
> >
> > OJ has a new book out entitled "If I did it." Do you know what
> > this means?
> >
> > It means that OJ is absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY. When OJ says
> > "If I did it" that means he didn't really do it.
> >
> > This all goes back to when the great Johnny Cochrane said to
> > Judge Lance Ito "absolutely, 100% NOT GUILTY."
> >
> > OJ said it then, and he's saying it now.
> >
> > NOT GUILTY.
>
> The dwarf hope Bob August has left USENET. For those who don't
> know, Bob August was one of the instruments of one of faggy chump
> Mike Cranston's many humiliations. Kicked his ass all over a
> couple of newsgroups. In fact, August might be second only to
> cretin/crybaby Cranston himself in whipping the sorry little
> minikin.
>


stupidarse joan griffinTHAL, you're stupid.


try some math out, moron.

Orenthal was acquitted because in 1995 he was absolutely, 100% NOT
GUILTY

11 years later, adding 1% a year makes orenthal ABSOLUTELY, 111% NOT
GUILTY


it's true, stupidarse joan griffinTHAL, it's true


Now make sure you get your copy signed by OJ himself-not only is he an
Amercan hero, he's YOUR hero!

> For added humor, note that the fool thinks a jury's job is to
> determine whether or not the accused did the deed, and that it
> assigns a percentage of guilt.
>
> Cranston, you fucking moronic twit, a not guilty verdict is just
> paperwork. It does nothing except end the criinal court's
> interest in the defendant. Any verdict merely tells whose
> lawyers were more appealing to the jurors. From your viewpoint
> down there, the Simpson case's carefully selected mentally
> deficient jurors seemed intelligent, of course. Example: One of
> the jurors said something like "One in seventy million don't mean
> nothin'. If they had said one in a thousand, I would have been
> impressed." You said "Fuckin-A right on!" You also believe that
> Oral Roberts's 900-foot Jesus conspired with Fox News and the
> Kamikaze Cameljumpers in the World Trade Center attack.
>
> Cranston's stupidity knows no bounds. He can wax idiotic on any
> topic, including his stupidity. There is no particular growing
> season for his stupidity. Even in the dead of winter, new shoots
> of stupidity pop up all around him almost every day.
>
> Cranston's next tantrum posting will be funny as hell. The only
> thing that will minimize the laughter will be its familiarity. A
> better man would have it memorized by now, but he'll have to copy
> and paste as usual.

0 new messages