Something Jews Can't Refute - 3
freedom...@my-deja.com
By K-Cloud
"The great masses of people ... will more easily fall
victims to a big lie than to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to
portray this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy
or strategy. But if we read this selection in context, we
find that he is speaking of the Jews who had ruined his
country, and he is trying to explain how the German people
fell victim to Jewish lies.
In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great lie is
that duped the German people into being controlled by the
Jews. He continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the
application of untruth and defamation, however, were at
all times the Jews; for their entire existence is built on
one single great lie, namely, that here one had to deal
with a religious brotherhood, while in fact one has to deal
with a race - what a race! As such they have been nailed
down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of
fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind;
he called them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does
not realize this or does not want to believe this will
never be able to help truth to victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the
eminent 19th century German philosopher who was outspoken
regarding the true nature of Jews. In the 20th Century the
Jews would go on to force a great many myths upon their
gullible White sheep. Each Jewish myth stings with the same
poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th
century was Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare
genius who drastically changed the field of theoretical
physics. As such, he is made an idol to young people and
his very name has become synonymous with genius. The truth,
however, is very different. The reality is that Einstein
was an inept, moronic Jew who could not even tie his own
shoelaces; he contributed nothing original to the field of
quantum mechanics or any other science, but on the contrary
he stole the ideas of other men and the Jewish media made
him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we
find that his only brilliance lies in his ability to
plagiarize and steal other people's ideas, passing them off
as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part
of this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of
Einstein's early education that he "showed little
scholastic ability." It also says that at the age of
15, "with poor grades in history, geography, and languages, he left
school with no diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of
his "lack of imagination and practical
ability."
In 1895, Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an
engineering school in Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of
mathematical problems, and Einstein showed himself to be
mathematically inept in this exam. He then entered a lesser
school hoping to use it as a stepping stone to the
engineering school he could not get into, but after
graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position at
the engineering school!
Unable to go to the school as he had wanted, he got a job
(with the help of a friend) at the patent office in Bern.
He was to be a technical expert third class, which meant
that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
position. Even after publishing his so-called
groundbreaking papers of 1905 and after working in the
patent office for six years, he was only elevated to a
second class standing. Remember, the work he was doing at
the patent office, for which he was only rated third class,
was not quantum mechanics or theoretical physics, but was
reviewing technical documents for patents of every day
things; yet he was barely qualified. He would work at the
patent office until 1909, all the while continuously trying
to get a position at a university, but without success. All
of these facts are true, but now begins the Jewish myth.
Supposedly, while working a full time job, without the aid
of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a
laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with
an academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four
ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics
and quantum mechanics that were published in 1905.
Many people have recognized the impossibility of such a
feat, including Einstein himself, and therefore Einstein
has led people to believe that many of these ideas came to
him in his sleep, out of the blue, because indeed that is
the only logical explanation of how an admittedly inept
moron could have written such documents at the age of 26
without any real education. However, a simpler explanation
exists: he stole the ideas and plagiarized the papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover
the source of each. It should be remembered that these
ideas are presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally
new and completely different, each of which would change
the landscape of science. These four papers dealt with the
following four ideas, respectively:
1. The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2. The equivalence of energy and mass;
3. The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4. The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory
of relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely
attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt
with what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity
(the General Theory would come in 1915).
This theory contradicted the traditional Newtonian
mechanics and was based upon two premises: 1) in the
absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the same
for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is
independent of the motion of its source, then the time
interval between two events is longer for an observer in
whose frame of reference the events occur at different
places than for an observer in whose frame of reference the
events occur in the same place. This is basically the idea
that time passes more slowly as one's velocity approaches
the speed of light, relative to slower velocities where
time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is
the basis for modern physics. But these two premises are
far from being originally Einstein's. First of all, the
idea that the speed of light was a constant and was
independent of the motion of its source was not Einstein's
at all, but was proposed by the Scottish scientist James
Maxwell.
Maxwell studied the phenomenon of light extensively and
first proposed that it was electromagnetic in nature. He
wrote an article to this effect for the 1878 edition of the
Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas prompted much debate,
and by 1887, as a result of his work and the ensuing
debate, the scientific community, particularly Lorentz,
Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the
velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer.
Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity was
known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and
Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of
which could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They
observed a phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not
understand relativity. They had attempted to detect the
motion of the earth through ether, which was a medium
thought to be necessary for the propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist
George FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism
for producing radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that
the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment could be
explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as
they are moving through the ether or across it, by an
amount depending on the square of the ratio of their
velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before
Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The
Netherlands, proposed the same solution and began to
greatly expand the idea. All throughout the 1890's, both
Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on these ideas and wrote
articles strangely similar to Einstein's Special Theory
detailing what is now known as the Lorentz-FitzGerald
Contraction.
In 1898, the Irishman Joseph Larmor wrote down equations
explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald contraction and its
relativistic consequences, 7 years before Einstein's paper.
By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the series of equations
explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They
describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length,
and the time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to
the velocity of light.
In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper regarding
the Special Theory of Relativity had already been published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper
unifying many of these ideas. He stated seven years before
Einstein's paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two
time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order
of their succession, as well as the equality of two time
intervals, must be defined in such a way that the
statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately
recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the
part of Einstein. Thus we see that the only thing original
about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of
Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized.
Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most
important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but
he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned
Albert Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing
the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding
relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office
in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it
necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's
work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a
fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the
subject of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian
motion describes the irregular motion of a body arising
from the thermal energy of the molecules of the material
in which the body is immersed.
The movement had first been observed by the Scottish
botanist Robert Brown in 1827. The explanation of this
phenomenon has to do with the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and
it was the American Josiah Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig
Boltzmann who first explained this occurrence, not Albert
Einstein. In fact, the mathematical equation describing the
motion contains the famous Boltzmann constant, k. Between
these two men, they had explained by the 1890s everything
in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was
contained in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905.
This concept is expressed by the famous equation E=mc².
Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous
and most spectacular conclusion."
Even though this idea is an obvious conclusion of
Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it was not included in
that paper but was published as an afterthought later in
the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass equivalence was
not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had
been shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J.
Thomsom of Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In
1900, Poincaré had shown that there was a mass relationship
for all forms of energy, not just electromagnetic energy.
Yet, the most probable source of Einstein's plagiarism was
Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of the most brilliant, yet
unappreciated physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists
who would later become famous for a variety of topics. He
had worked on the idea of the equivalence of mass and
energy for many years and had published a paper on the
topic in 1904 in the very same journal which Einstein would
publish his plagiarized version in 1905. For his brilliant
work in this area, Hasenörhl had received in 1904 a prize
from the prestigious Vienna Academy of Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and
energy was a simple deduction from the already well-known
equations of Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists
long understood that the mathematical relationship
expressed by the equation E=mc² was the logical result
of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe it.
Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally,
and most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work.
It is ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this
postulate, particularly in light of the fact that Einstein
did not have the laboratory necessary to conduct the
appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he
suggested to the scientific community, "Perhaps it will
prove possible to test this theory using bodies whose
energy content is variable to a high degree (e.g., salts of
radium)." This remark demonstrates how little Einstein
understood about science, for this was truly an outlandish
remark.
By saying this, Einstein showed that he really did not
understand basic scientific principles and that he was
writing about a topic that he did not understand. In fact,
in response to this article, J. Precht remarked that such
an experiment "lies beyond the realm of possible
experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was
the foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein
wrote about the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric
effect is the release of electrons from certain metals
or semiconductors by the action of light. This area of
research is particularly important to the Einstein myth
because it was for this topic that he unjustly received
his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max
Planck who deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's
paper, and the point for which he is given credit, is that
light is emitted and absorbed in finite packets called
quanta. This was the explanation for the photoelectric
effect.
The photoelectric effect had been explained by Heinrich
Hertz in 1888. Hertz and others, including Philipp Lenard,
worked on understanding this phenomenon. Lenard was the
first to show that the energy of the electrons released in
the photoelectric effect was not governed by the intensity
of the light but by the frequency of the light. This was an
important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers
of modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based
upon his and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy
was absorbed and emitted in finite units called quanta. The
only difference in his work of 1900 and Einstein's work of
1905 was that Einstein limited himself to talking about one
particular type of energy - light energy.
But the principles and equations governing the process
in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein
himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's
work was that light also existed in discrete packets of
energy. Thus, nothing in this paper of Einstein's was
original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the
scientific community took little notice and Einstein
continued his job at the patent office until 1909 when it
was arranged for him to take a position at a school by
World Jewry. Still, it was not until a 1919 newspaper
headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed
in a position where he could begin to use other people's
work as his own more openly. He engaged many of his
students to look for ways to prove the theories he had
supposedly developed, or ways to apply those theories, and
then he could present the research as his own or at least
take partial credit.
In this vein, in 1912, he began to try and express his
gravitational research in terms of a new, recently
developed calculus, which was conducive to understanding
relativity. This was the beginning of his General Theory
of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the
mathematical work was not done by Einstein - he was
incapable of it.
Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel
Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles
developed by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop
a sound non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all
mathematics used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of
relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational
pull of planets and their orbits, and the general principle
that light rays bend as they pass by a massive object.
Einstein published an initial paper in 1913 based upon the
work which Grossmann did, adapting the math of Riemann to
Relativity. But this paper was filled with errors and the
conclusions were incorrect.
It appears that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it
out for Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere
to plagiarize his General Theory. Einstein published his
correct General Theory of Relativity in 1915, and said
prior to its publication that he, "...completely succeeded
in convincing Hilbert and Klein." He is referring to David
Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant mathematician of the
20th century, and Felix Klein, another mathematician who
had been instrumental in the development of the area of
calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General
Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the
reader to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and
Klein's opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he
had influenced them in their thinking. However, the exact
opposite is true. Einstein stole the majority of his
General Relativity work from these two men, the rest being
taken from Grossmann.
Hilbert submitted for publication, a week before Einstein
completed his work, a paper which contained the correct
field equations of General Relativity. What this means is
that Hilbert wrote basically the exact same paper, with the
same conclusions, before Einstein did. Einstein would have
had an opportunity to know of Hilbert's work all along,
because there were Jewish friends of his working for
Hilbert.
Yet, even this was not necessary, for Einstein had seen
Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his own. Both of
these papers were, before being printed, delivered in the
form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin
and Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in
Göttingen. On November 18, Hilbert received a letter from
Einstein thanking him for sending him a draft of the
treatise Hilbert was to deliver on the 20th.
So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at least
two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two
men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send
Hilbert an advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as
incontrovertible proof that Einstein quickly plagiarized
the work and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to
the punch. Also, at the same time, Einstein publicly began
to belittle Hilbert, even though in the previous summer he
had praised him in an effort to get Hilbert to share his
work with him. Hilbert made the mistake of sending Einstein
this draft copy, but still he delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of
much higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that
there are many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's
General Theory paper. We know today that Hilbert was much
closer to the truth. Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of
the unified field theory of gravitation and
electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin Schrödinger,
whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual
originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by
the scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of
German physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before
Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl,
Poincaré, etc., had created the foundations of the theory
of relativity..."
However, the Jewish media did not promote the work of these
men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of David
Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew
Albert Einstein.
As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as postulated
by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein
second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass
by a massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the
Sun, light from distant stars passing close to the Sun was
observed to bend according to the theory. This evidence
supported the General Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-
controlled media immediately seized upon the opportunity to
prop up Einstein as a hero, at the expense of the true
genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the
headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New theory of
the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This was the beginning of
the force-feeding of the Einstein myth
to the masses.
In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905 papers were
propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the originator
of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push by the
Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize
for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the
photoelectric effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and
1922 was an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As
soon as Einstein had been established as an idol to the
popular masses of England and America, his image was
promoted as the rare genius that he is erroneously believed
to be today. As such, he immediately began his work as a
tool for World Zionism.
The masses bought into the idea that if someone was so
brilliant as to change our fundamental understanding of the
universe, then certainly we ought to listen to his opinions
regarding political and social issues. This is exactly what
World Jewry wanted to establish in its ongoing effort of
social engineering. They certainly did not want someone
like David Hilbert to be recognized as rare genius. After
all, this physicist had come from a strong German, Gentile
background.
In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken
regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the
Reich, Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf
Hitler, along with other leading German scientists, that
was published in the German newspapers. So the Jews
certainly did not want David Hilbert receiving the credit
he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he
deserved either. This German's grandfather and great-
grandfather had been important German theologians, and
during World War II Planck would stay in Germany throughout
the war, supporting his fatherland the best he could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin
Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This
Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler
University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter
expressing his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's
work on the unified field theory was a forerunner of modern
physics, even though it had been criticized by Einstein,
who apparently could not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as
a rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify
quantum theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as
develop his famous uncertainty principle, in addition to
describing the modern atom and nucleus and the binding
energies that are essential to modern chemistry. No, the
Jews did not want Heisenberg promoted as a genius because
he would go on to head the German atomic bomb project and
serve prison time after the war for his involvement with
the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number
of white Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen,
Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the
body of knowledge and evidence from which Einstein
plagiarized and stole his work. Instead, they needed to
erect Einstein as their golden calf, even though he
repeatedly and often embarrassed himself with his
nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he
had supposedly done.
For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ran a
front page article in which Einstein gave an "emphatic
denial" regarding the idea of practical applications for
the "energy of the atom." The article says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If
you believe that man will someday be able to harness this
boundless energy--to drive a great steamship across the
ocean on a pint of water, for instance-then, according to
Einstein, you are wrong..."
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of
physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the
world at the time theoretical research was underway that
would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after
Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real
attempts to plagiarize any other work.
Rather, he began his real purpose--evangelizing for the
cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish
other articles after this time, all of them were co-
authored by at least one other person, and in each
instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the
research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited
by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work.
Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his
assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States
on a fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem and to promote Zionism. In April of 1922,
Einstein used his status to gain membership in a Commission
of the League of Nations. In February of 1923, Einstein
visited Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June of 1923, he became
a founding member of the Association of Friends of the New
Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from his Communist
and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself
scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrödinger and
Heisenberg.
Following a brief illness, he resumed his Zionistic agenda,
wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a World
Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigned against all forms of
war, although he would reverse this position during World
War II when he advocated war against Germany and the
creation of the atomic bomb, which he supposedly thought
was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940, Einstein, at the
request of other Jews, wrote two letters to Roosevelt
urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to be
used on Germany--not Japan. Einstein would have no part in
the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or
practical, because he lacked the skills for either.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the
White Race and of the Germans in particular in the
following statements. He was asked what he thought about
Germany and about re-educating the Germans after the war
and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally
since 1870 . . . Behind the Nazi party stands the German
people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in
his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the
possibility of misunderstanding. . . . The Germans can be
killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-
educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting . . ."
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindled his efforts for a
World Government, with Israel apparently being the only
autonomous nation. This push continues through the rest of
the 1940s. In 1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in
the creation of the State of Israel, both politically and
economically, was offered the presidency of Israel. He
declined.
In 1953, he spent his time attacking the McCarthy
Committee, and he supported communists such as J. Robert
Oppenheimer. Einstein encouraged civil disobedience in
response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18,
1955, this filthy Jewish demagogue died.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making
stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his
usage and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-
controlled media continued to promote the myth of this
Super-Jew long after his death, and as more and more of the
men who knew better died off, the Jews were more and more
able to aggrandize his myth and lie more boldly.
This brazen lying has culminated in the Jew controlled Time
magazine naming Einstein "The Person of the Century" at
the close of 1999. It may be demonstrated that the Jewish
lies have become more bold with the passage of time because
Einstein was never named "Man of the Year" while he was
alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he is
named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut
choice for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler.
Hitler was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was
still living by Time magazine, and according to a December
27, 1999, article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen
over Adolf Hitler because of the perceived "nasty public
relations fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet
in internet polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was
the
top serious candidate.
Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to Einstein,
which has articles by men with names like Isaacson, Golden,
Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to read.
For one, they found it necessary to include an article
rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice,
Adolf Hitler. But more interesting is the article by
Stephen Hawking which purports to be a history of the
theory of relativity. In it, Hawking admits many of the
things in this article, such as the fact that Hilbert
published the General Theory of Relativity before Einstein
and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the concept of
relativity long before Einstein.
Hawking also writes,
"Einstein . . . was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner
Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin
Schrödinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of
reality called quantum mechanics. . . . Einstein was
horrified by this . . . Most scientists, however, accepted
the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed
excellent agreement with observations . . . They are the
basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular
biology and electronics and the foundation of the
technology that has transformed the world in the past half-
century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits
Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking
names, even though Einstein was so stupid as to be
vehemently against the most important idea of modern
science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified
field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same
magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field
of explaining the contradictions between relativity and
quantum mechanics.
Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified
field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of
the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused
to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field
theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one of
the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has
been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time
magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to
an inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice
would have been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg.
If they wanted to give it to the scientist who most
fundamentally changed the landscape of 20th century
science, then the obvious choice would be William Shockley.
This Nobel prize winning scientist invented the transistor,
which is the basis of all modern electronic devices and
computers, everything from modern cars and telephones, VCRs
and watches, to the amazing computers which have allowed
incomprehensible advances in all fields of science. Without
the transistor, all forms of science today would be
basically in the same place that they were in the late
1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to
William Shockley because he spent the majority of his
scientific career demonstrating the genetic and mental
inferiority of non-whites and arguing for their
sterilization. His scientific, genetic views led the Jews
to financially destroy Shockley who founded the first
company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop
computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and
used them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company
that today is known as Intel.
No, the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses
of our time be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford,
not the great German scientists who helped the National
Socialists in Germany, not Charles Lindbergh, who was
sympathetic to National Socialist causes, and certainly not
William Shockley, one of the most brilliant physicists and
geneticists of our time. Instead, the Jews propped up the
Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated everything
white.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/