"Lord Of The Rings: The Rings Of Power" Skeptics Aren't Racist Trolls, And "House Of The Dragon" Can Prove It

[Ubiquitous]

There’s no denying it: most viewers cannot stand “The Lord of the
Rings: The Rings of Power.”

The new Amazon series has a 39% rating on Rotten Tomatoes despite the
contradictory 85% critic rating. Showrunners and mainstream media
insist that people hate the J.R.R. Tolkien adaptation because they
can’t stand seeing black actors added to the cast.

But as usual, the true reason is something very different from the
narrative being pushed.

Amazon spent a whopping $250 million buying the rights to “LOTR” and
then another $715 million producing it, making the series the most
expensive project ever made. Jeff Bezos had allegedly told his team he
wanted the company to make the next “Game of Thrones,” and he was
willing to spend whatever it took to make it happen. The cost, and the
stakes, are what’s making the bad reviews so catastrophic. The media
can’t fathom that anything other than racism can be the reason for so
many one-star reviews.

Most recently, a few stars from the Tolkien movie adaptation, Peter
Jackson’s “Lord of the Rings” (2001) made their position on the bad
reviews clear. Elijah Wood, Sean Astin, Dominic Monaghan, and Billy
Boyd donned shirts that said “You Are All Welcome Here” in Elvish as a
show of solidarity against the perceived racist reviews.

Whoopi Goldberg and “The View” panelists weighed in, mocking fans for
accepting the existence of mythical creatures but taking issue with
black actors joining the cast.

“Are you telling me black people can’t be fake people, too?” Goldberg
said. “I don’t know if there’s, like, a hobbit club, I don’t know if
there are gonna be protests. But people: What is wrong with y’all?”

“What I think is fascinating is like, dragons are OK, fire-breathing
dragons, and people with white hair that are born like that when
they’re little, and violet eyes, but the black people in it is just a
bridge too far for these folks,” panelist Sunny Hostin chimed in.

“It’s just racist. Call it what it is,” Joy Behar insisted.

So what’s going on? Are fans just super racist, or is something else at
play?

A quick perusal of the one-star reviews on Rotten Tomatoes reveals that
most detractors take issue with the script and character development in
the series. They don’t like how showrunners have twisted Tolkien’s
original story, but for most people, it’s not the race of the
characters that they have issues with.

“The film has some breathtaking visuals but has no substance… it’s
almost like looking at an amazing cake that you know was expensive and
take a bite and it’s not good. No flavor…nothing to bring you back,”
one person shared.

“The problem with this show is that it is boring and looks cheap most
of the time,” another reviewer wrote. “The story is barely existent,
the protagonist isn’t interesting or sympathetic, the script is poorly
written. I’m listening to some of what they are saying and it’s just
nonsensical verbal cotton candy.”

A third person wrote, “The show so far is visually gorgeous, but sadly
the characters are bland & the story boring. I very much hope that it
improves. The first two episodes start a story that is Tolkien adjacent
at best.”

Meanwhile, media outlets accuse “racist trolls” of “review bombing” the
series just because of black character additions. They never explicitly
quote these racist reviews, likely because they’re few and far between
— if they exist at all. One tweet from activist Angus Johnston went
viral as he railed against reviewers decrying the show’s “wokenes,”
which he says is a thinly veiled metaphor for diverse casting.

The only review that these highly offended critics can cite as being
racist comes courtesy of RedState. Brandon Morse does mention the
diverse casting if only to point out that it became the focus of the
series at the expense of other more important elements, such as the
script itself. Mainstream critics screaming racism keep quoting this
one review but leaving out the most important part.

“It began when actors within the show began putting emphasis on the
skin color of their characters and the word ‘diversity’ began being
thrown around as if it was a focus of the show,” Brandon Morse wrote.

“Diversity isn’t a bad thing by itself, but when it becomes a major
focus it usually means the story is being shoved further back in terms
of importance.”

Even if Morse had come out and said that he hated the fact that black
actors got cast in lead roles (which he absolutely didn’t), he’d be
alone in that assessment. The vast majority of negative reviews have
nothing to do with race.

In the end there’s proof that hordes of racist, fantasy-loving trolls
don’t roam the earth. It all comes from the best direct comparison to
“The Rings of Power,” which is of course, “House of the Dragon.”

“House of the Dragon” is a spinoff prequel which returns “Game of
Thrones” fans to Westeros. The HBO Max series premiered just a few days
before “Rings of Power” and as another epic fantasy based on a book
with a rabid fan base, making it the perfect comparison.

One element that’s not being discussed enough is that like “LOTR,” the
casting directors for “House of the Dragon” intentionally added a bevy
of black actors as main characters in the series.

“It was very important for Miguel [Sapochnik] and I to create a show
that was not another bunch of white people on the screen,” co-
showrunner Ryan Condal told Entertainment Weekly ahead of the premiere.
“We wanted to find a way to put diversity in the show, but we didn’t
want to do it in a way that felt like it was an afterthought or, worse,
tokenism.”

To achieve this, the creators added the Velaryons as wealthy black
conquerors who arrived in Westeros from the west. Author George R.R.
Martin was very supportive of the concept even though he didn’t
specifically write those characters as black in his books.

But the real test is with the fans. What do reviews look like for
“House of the Dragon?” Has the series experienced the same review-
bombing that “The Rings of Power” was subjected to because of these
overt diversity measures?

In short, no. “House of the Dragon” currently has an 85% critic rating
and 84% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Though the series had a lot
to live up to following the massive success of “Game of Thrones,” so
far fans are on board with the prequel set 200 years before the events
of the original. No one seems to mind that many of the main characters
are black.

“Finally a great fantasy show with excellent acting, competent writing,
and great costumes and cinematography. I love how this show is written,
for adults,” one reviewer gushes. “They let the viewers figure things
out rather than spelling things out for them. In addition to this, they
respect the lore of the world, thank you writers and producers!
Hollywood take note, this is the content we like and are willing to pay
for.”

“Fantastic storytelling. Great acting,” another says. “A character
literally stole the episode without saying a word. It makes me excited
for Sunday night again! Great prequel!”

As expected, some fans of one series overlapped the other.

“Enjoying the story so far, its VASTLY more interesting than Rings of
Power,” a reviewer shared. “I actually have some reason to care about
the characters, they aren’t either totally incompetent or god-like in
their power level, they feel like PEOPLE with flaws and relatable
issues. Its not perfect, but its the best thing on right now, without a
doubt.”

These two shows are likely to keep being pitted against each other as
new episodes are released. Maybe the mainstream media will eventually
figure out that great shows will get great ratings, and not everything
negative is rooted in racism.

On the other hand, the wimpy male characters and turning Galadriel into
a warrior princess tougher and braver than the male elf warriors is the
chief criticism of Tolkien fans. That’s not racial. That’s objecting to
a woke feminist rewrite of Middle Earth.

--
Let's go Brandon!