Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tom Bombadil

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Tomasz Zapala

unread,
Mar 23, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/23/98
to

Please tell me what do you know about Tom Bombadil ???

BALROG_
Zapala Tomasz
< zapa...@tl.krakow.pl >
<http://www.tl.krakow.pl/~zapalsky/>


Ron Ploeg

unread,
Mar 23, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/23/98
to

Tomasz Zapala wrote:
>
> Please tell me what do you know about Tom Bombadil ???
>
He was a merry fellow. And maybe he still is. :)

Ron Ploeg

http://home.wxs.nl/~hobbiton


Yeah

unread,
Mar 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/25/98
to

He was cool.  He wore a feather in his hat.

Jon

JR

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to

I see that so far, you've gotten two funny but non-helpful answers.
This newsgroup is about more than humor, so... Do a websearch on the
keyword Bombadil. There are several webpages with good information.
One site in particular is devoted purely to the Tom Bombadil character.

Hope this helps you.
J.R.

--
Note: If you wish me to receive your response to this newsgroup post
in private Email, please be sure to remove the anti-spam extra letters
"ny" from the reply-address. Make it say johnreb, not johnny.

Tomasz Zapala <zapa...@tl.krakow.pl> wrote in article
<Pine.GSO.3.96.980323130014.7851C-100000@zosia>...


>
> Please tell me what do you know about Tom Bombadil ???
>

Ron Ploeg

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to

I am afraid you caught the newsgroup at a wrong time to start the
discussion on Bombadil all over again (it had just ended for the xxx
time- it seems there is a careful new thread again though...).
The thing is there is not enough information available to make a
definite conclusion on who or what Bombadil really was. And that is why
one always gets the same suggestions and opinions over and over again.

One could always try to add another view though. How about this one:

I always refer to Tom Bombadil as " Tolkien's Hoax ".

from LETTERS 144

"As a story, I think it is good that there should be a lot of things
unexplained (especially if an explanation actually exists); and I have
perhaps from this point of view erred in trying to explain to much, and
give to much past history. My readers have , for instance, rather stuck
at the Counsel of Elrond. And even in a mythical Age there must be some
enigmas, as there always are. Tom Bombadil is one (intentionally)."

:)

At your service;

Ron Ploeg

http://home.wxs.nl/~hobbiton

0 new messages