Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: stone-giants in the hobbit just trolls?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Jul 5, 2006, 6:19:13 PM7/5/06
to
"yawnmoth" <terr...@yahoo.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:1151980603.8...@j8g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Supposedly, lots of people look at weather balloons and think they're
> instead seeing UFO's. People see heat waves (mirages, or whatever) and
> think they're seeing water. Is it possible Bilbo and company were
> actually seeing trolls and just thought that they were seeing
> stone-giants, instead?
>
> Based on the description of them in The Hobbit, it doesn't sound like
> the dwarves were the first people to see them, so perhapes everyone
> else who saw them was similarily confussed in what they were seeing?

LOL - clearly, everybody was taken in by this troll, even despite the
signature appended to it. This was funny!
I only saw this thread today. Honestly, people, can't you tell when
someone is taking the piss?

Öjevind


Pseudonymus al-Faqha'ter III

unread,
Jul 5, 2006, 7:37:25 PM7/5/06
to

You lie. And "stone troll" is clearly a typo for "stoned troll."

Derek Broughton

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 2:35:11 PM7/6/06
to
Öjevind Lång wrote:

> LOL - clearly, everybody was taken in by this troll, even despite the
> signature appended to it. This was funny!

If trolls ask an interesting question, I'm always willing to bite - but I
don't see any signature at all.

> I only saw this thread today. Honestly, people, can't you tell when
> someone is taking the piss?

In this case, not.
--
derek

yawnmoth

unread,
Jul 6, 2006, 4:54:35 PM7/6/06
to

Derek Broughton wrote:
> Öjevind Lång wrote:
>
> > LOL - clearly, everybody was taken in by this troll, even despite the
> > signature appended to it. This was funny!
>
> If trolls ask an interesting question, I'm always willing to bite - but I
> don't see any signature at all.
I'm a little confussed, myself - is the OP suggesting that I'm a troll?
The fact that I'm kinda talking about trolls in my post has me a
little confussed...

Regardless, I don't think I was being trollish with my post. As you
observed, I didn't attach a signature.

In fact, if there are any trolls in this thread, Öjevind Lång might
well qualify as being that troll (although I suppose this post, now,
too, qualifies as being a trollish post)...

JimboCat

unread,
Jul 7, 2006, 12:23:53 PM7/7/06
to
yawnmoth wrote:

>Derek Broughton wrote:
>> Öjevind Lång wrote:
>>
>> > LOL - clearly, everybody was taken in by this troll, even despite the
>> > signature appended to it. This was funny!
>>
>> If trolls ask an interesting question, I'm always willing to bite - but I
>> don't see any signature at all.
>I'm a little confussed, myself - is the OP suggesting that I'm a troll?
> The fact that I'm kinda talking about trolls in my post has me a
>little confussed...

Irony is sweet, but confusion is like vinegar: I declare this the
"sweet and sour" thread of the week.

Jim Deutch (JimboCat)
--
"I really don't think you need to get abusive to everybody who happens
to disagree with you. If that's your thing, I think you should start
editing articles in the Wikipedia instead." -- Öjevind Lång

Michael O'Neill

unread,
Jul 7, 2006, 12:49:55 PM7/7/06
to

Mjany thjanks for brjinging thjis ujtter TRJOLL to my attjention.

I ijnvoke Martinez' Pjolicy of Djealing with TRJOLLS.

It cjomes as njo sjurprise tjo sjee thjis wjanton TRJOLL bjeing
pjerpetuated by a Balrog Wings prjomoter ajnd fjellow trjaveller ojf
ojther ujtter TRJOLLs.

Whjat hjave thjese grjoups cjome tjo???!!!!!111!!1!1!

M.

Öjevind Lång

unread,
Jul 7, 2006, 8:50:54 PM7/7/06
to
"Michael O'Neill" <o...@bwahahaha.indigo.ie> skrev i meddelandet
news:44AE90B3...@bwahahaha.indigo.ie...

[snip]

> Mjany thjanks for brjinging thjis ujtter TRJOLL to my attjention.
>
> I ijnvoke Martinez' Pjolicy of Djealing with TRJOLLS.
>
> It cjomes as njo sjurprise tjo sjee thjis wjanton TRJOLL bjeing
> pjerpetuated by a Balrog Wings prjomoter ajnd fjellow trjaveller ojf
> ojther ujtter TRJOLLs.
>
> Whjat hjave thjese grjoups cjome tjo???!!!!!111!!1!1!

Michael, you *must* lay off the whiskey.

Öjevind


Öjevind Lång

unread,
Jul 9, 2006, 7:40:56 PM7/9/06
to
"Bill O'Meally" <OMea...@wise.rr.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:DfUrg.28963$Zo4....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

[snip]

> Although this is Treebeard's take on the Ent's origins, it does not appear
> to be accurate. As described in 'Of Aule and Yavanna', the Ents were
> created, akin to the Eagles, when spirits summoned "from afar" dwelt among
> the kelvar and olvar. In _Letters_, Tolkien elaborates saying that they
> "...were either souls sent to inhabit trees, or else that slowly took the
> likeness of trees owing to their inborn love of trees." (#247 p335). But
> who's to say? Maybe the Elves did indeed teach > them language.

I think the one doesn't exclude the other. They could be spirits inhabiting
trees *and* have been taught to speak by Elves.

Öjevind


Bill O'Meally

unread,
Jul 9, 2006, 10:26:09 PM7/9/06
to
Öjevind Lång wrote:
> "Bill O'Meally" <OMea...@wise.rr.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:DfUrg.28963$Zo4....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...

But who's to say? Maybe the


>> Elves did indeed teach > them language.
>
> I think the one doesn't exclude the other. They could be spirits
> inhabiting trees *and* have been taught to speak by Elves.

Yup.

--
Bill

"Wise fool"
Gandalf, THE TWO TOWERS
-- The Wise will remove 'se' to reply; the Foolish will not--


0 new messages