Drake Bell denies involvment in nude Vanessa Hudgens pictures sex scandal
Taylor
Vanessa Hudgens nude exposure
Posted on Sep 9 07
Paul Millar
Nickelodeon star Drake Bell has denied any involvement in fellow kids
TV star Vanessa Hudgens' nude exposure, via email
The 'Drake and Josh' star had apparently received an email from
Hudgens showing the sexy pic of the disgraced star, Post Chronicle
reports.
The pair starred together in an episode of popular kids show 'Drake
and Josh' in 2006, with Hudgens as Drake's girlfriend, sparking rumors
that there was a quiet relationship going on afterwards.
However, According to People Magazine, Hudgens "emailed photos to the
'Drake and Josh' actor a couple of years ago."
However, Bell's flak Jill Fritzo told People that "Drake says he never
received those photos."
18 year old Hudgens has since apologized for the photo, she said: "I
want to apologize to my fans, whose support and trust means the world
to me. I am embarrassed over this situation and regret having ever
taken these photos. I am thankful for the support of my family and
friends."
BTR1701
Taylor <fetchwithr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Nickelodeon star Drake Bell has denied any involvement
> in fellow kids TV star Vanessa Hudgens' nude exposure,
> via email
>
> The 'Drake and Josh' star had apparently received an
> email from Hudgens showing the sexy pic of the disgraced
> star, Post Chronicle reports.
How exactly as she been disgraced? Because people found out that she
does indeed have girl parts?
Taylor
> In article <1189445855.448572.264...@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Taylor <fetchwithruffruff...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Nickelodeon star Drake Bell has denied any involvement
> > in fellow kids TV star Vanessa Hudgens' nude exposure,
> > via email
>
> > The 'Drake and Josh' star had apparently received an
> > email from Hudgens showing the sexy pic of the disgraced
> > star, Post Chronicle reports.
>
> How exactly as she been disgraced? Because people found out that she
> does indeed have girl parts?
Not disgraced. I'd say embarrassed... but by her own doing. It's a
little more scandalous because she's a person working for a family
entertainment/kids' channel.
All these idiots on the IMDb are running around like chickens with
their heads cut off not intelligent enough to distinguish nude
pictures of a minor (if she was under the age of 18 when they were
taken) and the type that's against the law.
William George Ferguson
wrote:
>On Sep 10, 6:28 pm, BTR1701 <btr1...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> In article <1189445855.448572.264...@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> Taylor <fetchwithruffruff...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > Nickelodeon star Drake Bell has denied any involvement
>> > in fellow kids TV star Vanessa Hudgens' nude exposure,
>> > via email
>>
>> > The 'Drake and Josh' star had apparently received an
>> > email from Hudgens showing the sexy pic of the disgraced
>> > star, Post Chronicle reports.
>>
>> How exactly as she been disgraced? Because people found out that she
>> does indeed have girl parts?
>
>Not disgraced. I'd say embarrassed... but by her own doing.
It's not all that much by her own doing unless she actually released the
photo herself (not unheard of). Exactly how that photo got out is maybe
the most interesting thing about this. The easiest, and most common in
past similar events, way would seem to lead to young Zac rapidly becoming
'ex-boyfriend'.
--
"Oh Buffy, you really do need to have
every square inch of your ass kicked."
- Willow Rosenberg
Anim8rFSK
And did all the photos come from the same source? Or were the others
already floating around, and the nude one just got added to the mix?
--
Why watch the Sci Fi Channel?
For every Flash Gordon, there is an Earthstorm!!