scar, briefcase mystery sovled?
DaMoNK
i just started reading this group and i dont know if this theory has
been posted before.. but i heard an interesting theory. i heard that
the reason why ving had a scar on his neck.. and that he wanted the
beautiful gold thing in the briefcase was because his soul was in the
briefcase. thats y the bandaid was on his neck.. thats where whoever
took out his soul. lemme know if this is a new theory to yall.. and
if its any good.. or if you heard it before and its crap..<G>
damonk
nan mulder
The reason theres a plaster on Ving Rhames has a plaster on his neck is
to cover a nasty scar he's got in real life and when asked in an
interview what was in the breifcase Tarantino replyed "2 lightbulbs and a
car battery,"........sorry to spoil the theory (that yes! I had already
heard 500 times) but I thought the unimaginative truth should be told
NIN
David Fresko
nan mulder <nanm...@sol.co.uk> wrote:
>DaMoNK wrote:
>>
>> i just started reading this group and i dont know if this theory has
>> been posted before.. but i heard an interesting theory. i heard that
>> the reason why ving had a scar on his neck.. and that he wanted the
>> beautiful gold thing in the briefcase was because his soul was in the
>> briefcase. thats y the bandaid was on his neck.. thats where whoever
>> took out his soul. lemme know if this is a new theory to yall.. and
>> if its any good.. or if you heard it before and its crap..<G>
>>
>> damonk
>
>The reason theres a plaster on Ving Rhames has a plaster on his neck is
>to cover a nasty scar he's got in real life and when asked in an
>interview what was in the breifcase Tarantino replyed "2 lightbulbs and a
>car battery,"
Actually, it was Samuel L. Jackson who said that about the two lightbulbs and a battery.
Dave
!
On Mon, 18 Nov 1996 23:54:58 -0800, nan mulder <nanm...@sol.co.uk>
wrote:
>DaMoNK wrote:
>>
>> i just started reading this group and i dont know if this theory has
>> been posted before.. but i heard an interesting theory. i heard that
>> the reason why ving had a scar on his neck.. and that he wanted the
>> beautiful gold thing in the briefcase was because his soul was in the
>> briefcase. thats y the bandaid was on his neck.. thats where whoever
>> took out his soul. lemme know if this is a new theory to yall.. and
>> if its any good.. or if you heard it before and its crap..<G>
>>
>> damonk
>
>The reason theres a plaster on Ving Rhames has a plaster on his neck is
>to cover a nasty scar he's got in real life
Another thing about the scar(that has received so much attention in
here). I noticed that in Mission Impossible, the only scene that we
see the back of Ving Rhames head, he is wearing a big-ass turtleneck.
(It's the scene near the end where Tom Cruise and he are sitting at
the outdoor cafe)
The character in Pulp didn't strike me as a turtleneck kind 'a guy. I
guess that's why the band-aid instead.
!
chelsea corazon
Yeah, but what's so wrong about a tough gang boss having a scar on his neck?
Maybe someone grazed a bullet by there, so it is a badge of his toughess and
survivability, just like a tattoo, only better. I don't believe the "soul"
theory either, though, 'cause it just doesn't make sense to me, and besides
the FAQ doesn't support it. ;-]
~Chelsea~
!
On Fri, 22 Nov 96 23:45:03 GMT, kare...@sirius.com (chelsea corazon)
wrote:
Yes, but as I've said before, a big nasty scar on on a 20 foot tall
movie screen would not only be distracting, but gross...
I guess QT didn't want everyone to spend the whole movie going "What
the HELL is that thing on the back of that guy's NECK?"
Joseph W Snyder
Give me a break, do you think that if Ving wanted the scare on his neck
to be hidden that a make up crew could not do it. If the make-up crew
could make Willis and Rhames look like bloody pulps they can cover up a
scare. The scare has a big thing to do with the movie, If it didn't then
the camera would not have focused on it for so long in the pride speech
to Butch. Anyway on the America Online talk with QT he said it had to do
with the devil.
David Fresko
He was a never on America On-Line. He probably hasn't even used a computer in his life. Show me a
transcript. AOL puts all of them up on their server.
Dave
chelsea corazon
believing that Quentin has been on AOL. A five year old can be on AOL.
I know lots of people who aren't in the least computer literate/or
interested in computers, who have been in the chatrooms (and in some
cases, other places) on AOL. Quentin has an IQ of 160+. If you think
someone that intelligent wouldn't have tried out computers and the
Internet, then you guys are just ignorant or (more likely) CYA for
yourselves or other celebrity or other semi-celebrity friends who want to
keep their Internet presence anonymous. Well fuck you, you can't have
your cake and eat it. I could say Dave Fresko, Jason Forrest and Mark
Fleury's "real names" right here and now, but I won't 'cause I'm cutting
you guys a little slack. Quentin is most definitely *on* the Internet,
and has been on AOL in the past. Just watch what you say,and don't
bullshit the people on the newsgroup, "Dave Fresko" (nym)
~Chelsea~
(my Internet name, and like Mike Shields says, not many people know
I'm famous.)
Kale Whorton
In article <57r4cs$9...@sun.sirius.com>, chelsea corazon
<kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>Dave, I really don't know why you and Jason seem to have such a hard time
>believing that Quentin has been on AOL. A five year old can be on AOL.
>I know lots of people who aren't in the least computer literate/or
>interested in computers, who have been in the chatrooms (and in some
>cases, other places) on AOL. Quentin has an IQ of 160+. If you think
>someone that intelligent wouldn't have tried out computers and the
>Internet, then you guys are just ignorant or (more likely) CYA for
>yourselves or other celebrity or other semi-celebrity friends who want to
>keep their Internet presence anonymous. Well fuck you, you can't have
>your cake and eat it. I could say Dave Fresko, Jason Forrest and Mark
>Fleury's "real names" right here and now, but I won't 'cause I'm cutting
>you guys a little slack. Quentin is most definitely *on* the Internet,
>and has been on AOL in the past. Just watch what you say,and don't
>bullshit the people on the newsgroup, "Dave Fresko" (nym)
>
> ~Chelsea~
> (my Internet name, and like Mike Shields says, not many people know
> I'm famous.)
What the hell is this, Chelsea?
QT has not been on AOL. Trust me, I'd know. He doesn't know how to type,
shit, he can barely write legibly. He is not *on* the internet, and he has
NOT been on AOL in the past, unless he happened to be with a friend who
logged on to show it to him. It is possible that his secretary may have
logged on for him, but he can't type.
To quote Jami Bernard:
"Sorry to burst your bubble, but QT -- though interested to know what
people are saying about him -- has the technical know-how of a gnat. He
doesn't own a computer. He doesn't even type his scripts -- he writes 'em
by hand."
-Jami Bernard
So be it. Now Chelsea, you should know better than going and slamming other,
more knowledgeable people on the newsgroup. As you said yourself "Just watch
what you say and don't
bullshit the people on the newsgroup".
Kale
--
"From the moment that I moved out of my mom's house and was living on my
own, I was hassled by the cops. I looked like white trash. I never went
anywhere. I never left Los Angeles County all through my 20s. When I went to
[the Sundance Film Festival], it was the first time I'd been in snow."
-Quentin Tarantino
January 1996 US Magazine
Richard
chelsea corazon wrote:
> in a misguided attempt to protect Quentin's "privacy", or because you
> have been "leaned on" I dunno. I know, however, what I know: Tarantino
> has been in the past a presence on AOL, and may be currently and in the
> future (I dunno about that because I got off of that spaceship over a
> year ago). Quentin can do what he wants to do and be where he wants to
> be, but I don't appreciate the implication that I am a liar. Do I have
> any support here? If I don't, I can get off this newsgroup right now.
> ~Chelsea~
> Hey Chelsea,
Don't leave. I agree with you 100%! I know that he comes to this
newsgroup and reads the posts. I don't know what Kale is talking about.
I am sure that Quentin can use a computer, and I am positive that he
can type. Some people are just ignorant.
Richard
Marc Fleury
chelsea corazon <kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>I could say Dave Fresko, Jason Forrest and Mark Fleury's "real names"
>right here and now, but I won't 'cause I'm cutting you guys a little slack.
Wouldn't be too hard for mine. Just change the k to a c and you're
right on.
-- Fleury.
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Bored? Restless? Sorry, can't help ya. But go read my web page! |
| |
| Writing for Comics! http://www.gl.umbc.edu/~lmize1/writing.html |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/
David Fresko
tet...@fox.nstn.ca (Marc Fleury) wrote:
>chelsea corazon <kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>
>>I could say Dave Fresko, Jason Forrest and Mark Fleury's "real names"
>>right here and now, but I won't 'cause I'm cutting you guys a little slack.
>
>Wouldn't be too hard for mine. Just change the k to a c and you're
>right on.
>
> -- Fleury.
I'll tell everyone right now: David Fresko. No strings attached. Says so right on my birth
certificate and my passport.
Dave
chelsea corazon
"Kale Whorton" <nik...@mind.net> wrote:
>In article <57r4cs$9...@sun.sirius.com>, chelsea corazon
><kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>>Dave, I really don't know why you and Jason seem to have such a hard time
>>believing that Quentin has been on AOL. A five year old can be on AOL.
>>I know lots of people who aren't in the least computer literate/or
>>interested in computers, who have been in the chatrooms (and in some
>>cases, other places) on AOL. Quentin has an IQ of 160+. If you think
>>someone that intelligent wouldn't have tried out computers and the
>>Internet, then you guys are just ignorant or (more likely) CYA for
>>yourselves or other celebrity or other semi-celebrity friends who want to
>>keep their Internet presence anonymous. Well fuck you, you can't have
Gemma L. Sweeney
Richard wrote:
> Don't leave. I agree with you 100%! I know that he comes to this
> newsgroup and reads the posts. I don't know what Kale is talking about.
> I am sure that Quentin can use a computer, and I am positive that he
> can type. Some people are just ignorant.
>
> Richard
I don't want to insult anyone's intellegance, especially not Quentin's,
but I did read an interview in which he admitted he couldn't type
properly, but he may have picked it up by now. I'm not taking any sides
here, I'm just saying what I think. And if he ever was on AOL, I'm gutted
shitless 'cos I missed it.
* Gemma L. *
--
Live fast, die young, leave a good lookin' corpse.
"The less a man makes declarative statements, the less
he's apt to look foolish in retrospect." - Quentin Tarantino - Four Rooms
Gemma L. Sweeney @ Res...@netcomuk.co.uk (Send standard e-mail to
this address.)
Gemma L. Sweeney @ Resev...@aol.com (Send images/sounds etc, to
this address.)
Check out my homepage @ -
http://member.aol.com/resevrdogs/coolres/gempage.htm
GO -d+ H- S g? p# au++++ a14 w++ v? C++ P?
!L !3 E? N-- K- W+ M-- !V -po+ Y+ t--- 5--
j R G? tv+++ b++ D++ B--- !e u--- h! f+ !r
n---- !x+
satan
if quentin has the technical know-how of a gnat, hed fit right in on AOL
"I am the Great Cornholio!"-Beavis
David Fresko
Richard <kb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Hey Chelsea,
> Don't leave. I agree with you 100%! I know that he comes to this
>newsgroup and reads the posts. I don't know what Kale is talking about.
>I am sure that Quentin can use a computer, and I am positive that he
>can type. Some people are just ignorant.
>
>Richard
You may agree with him, but I doubt very much that any person reads the
letters posted about them on fan groups, including Tarantino. I know what
Kale is talking about. Kale did give back up information while you nor
Chelsea have, and don't be so sure he can use a computer, and don't be
postitive that he can type. Show me some proof. It was Craig Hamann who
typed out all of his scripts, and he wrote them all out by hand in little
notebooks. So, since I say he's not on the internet or a computer user
that makes me ignorant. You're the ignorant if you've never learned to
show respect.
Dave
a. hejl
some people actually do read posts about them. i know that tom clancy
checks on alt.fan.tom.clancy and periodically resolves disputes. i'm
not sure about qt though.
a. hejl
Richard
a. hejl wrote:
>
> David Fresko wrote:
> >
> > Richard <kb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > >> Hey Chelsea,
> > > Don't leave. I agree with you 100%! I know that he comes to this
> > >newsgroup and reads the posts. I don't know what Kale is talking about.
> > >I am sure that Quentin can use a computer, and I am positive that he
> > >can type. Some people are just ignorant.
> > >
> > >Richard
> >
> > You may agree with him, but I doubt very much that any person reads the
> > letters posted about them on fan groups, including Tarantino. I know what
> > Kale is talking about. Kale did give back up information while you nor
> > Chelsea have, and don't be so sure he can use a computer, and don't be
> > postitive that he can type. Show me some proof. It was Craig Hamann who
> > typed out all of his scripts, and he wrote them all out by hand in little
> > notebooks. So, since I say he's not on the internet or a computer user
> > that makes me ignorant. You're the ignorant if you've never learned to
> > show respect.
> >
> > Dave
anyone can type. As for using a computer, it is not that hard to turn it
on and double click on an icon that automatically dials.
Richard
David Fresko
Richard <kb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Anybody can type. Whether it is 60 words per minute or 3 words per minute,
>anyone can type. As for using a computer, it is not that hard to turn it
>on and double click on an icon that automatically dials.
>
>Richard
The problem is knowing which icons to click. Knowing how to navigate your way
around. Knowing how to find information. He says he can't type (your argument is
just plain idiotic), and he says that he can't use a computer. So why don't you
believe him. He's not god, so don't treat him as one.
Dave
Richard
What is your problem? You act like you are god! My arguement is not
idiotic. Anyone can type. All you do is look at the letter you want
to go on the screen and press it with one of your fingers. That is all!
As for the computer thing, how do you know that he didn't learn how to
use it? It doesn't take a genius to figure out how to use the internet,
and he is one, so there shouldn't be a problem now should there!?!?
Richard
Richard
Daniel Fienberg
e2c.gnn.com>:
Distribution:
My only question is...What does it matter? Who is this newsgroup
for? Well, the answer is obviously -- us, the fans. QT hasn't posted here
to the best of my knowledge and I'm a little curious as to why he would
start now, especially the way posting has gone down on this group in the
past year. People aren't really suggesting things to him and he isn't
really responding, so the interaction is nil. If you want to think that
he occasionally checks these newsgroups, then by all means do, but why
bother arguing.
Knowing that the man himself is watching wouldn't really make
much difference in my life.
-Daniel
--
Daniel J. Fienberg
d...@sas.upenn.edu
Daniel's Lion Den -- http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~djf
Music Editor - 34th Street Magazine http://www.dp.upenn.edu/street
"Even the president of the United States sometimes must have to stand naked."
-Bob Dylan
--
Marc Fleury
chelsea corazon <kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>"Kale Whorton" <nik...@mind.net> wrote:
>
>>So be it. Now Chelsea, you should know better than going and slamming other,
>>more knowledgeable people on the newsgroup. As you said yourself "Just watch
>>what you say and don't bullshit the people on the newsgroup".
>Again, Kale, I honestly believe you are not telling the truth...
>I know, however, what I know: Tarantino has been in the past a presence
>on AOL, and may be currently and in the future. Quentin can do what he
>wants to do and be where he wants to be, but I don't appreciate the
>implication that I am a liar. Do I have any support here? If I don't,
>I can get off this newsgroup right now.
I don't think that anyone is asking you to leave the group. (And if
they are, screw 'em. I don't want you to leave.) But you have to
understand that *you* are implying that *we* are liars (and you did
more than just imply it to Kale).
If you have actual evidence that Tarantino was on AOL, give it to us.
If it's just a hunch, say so. (Personally, I neither know nor care if
he ever was.)
David Fresko
Richard <kb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>What is your problem? You act like you are god! My arguement is not
>idiotic. Anyone can type. All you do is look at the letter you want
>to go on the screen and press it with one of your fingers. That is all!
>As for the computer thing, how do you know that he didn't learn how to
>use it? It doesn't take a genius to figure out how to use the internet,
>and he is one, so there shouldn't be a problem now should there!?!?
>
>Richard
Why can't you take anything at face value. Why do you have to dive into
what ifs? and why do you think that Tarantino is some kind of god who is
capable of doing anything???
He says that he can't type. That's that. He says that he's never even sat
in front of a computer. That's that. What's so hard to comprehend?
This newsgroup is definately gone to shit if we're arguing, not even
discussing, whether Tarantino can type.
Dave
Jason A Forrest
chelsea corazon (kare...@sirius.com) wrote:
: Dave, I really don't know why you and Jason seem to have such a hard time
: believing that Quentin has been on AOL. A five year old can be on AOL.
: I know lots of people who aren't in the least computer literate/or
: interested in computers, who have been in the chatrooms (and in some
: cases, other places) on AOL. Quentin has an IQ of 160+. If you think
: someone that intelligent wouldn't have tried out computers and the
: Internet, then you guys are just ignorant or (more likely) CYA for
: yourselves or other celebrity or other semi-celebrity friends who want to
: keep their Internet presence anonymous. Well fuck you, you can't have
: your cake and eat it. I could say Dave Fresko, Jason Forrest and Mark
: Fleury's "real names" right here and now, but I won't 'cause I'm cutting
: you guys a little slack. Quentin is most definitely *on* the Internet,
: and has been on AOL in the past. Just watch what you say,and don't
: bullshit the people on the newsgroup, "Dave Fresko" (nym)
What the hell is this rant about? Christ, I spend a few days away and
this starts again? The closest you've ever provided for proof of this,
Chelsea, was some mumbling about 'intuition' telling you. Do you have
anything new about this? If not, I've spoke to enough people who know him
who tell me he's never been online, I tend to believe them over you.
Seriously, if you're so concerned he knows you exist, write him a letter
or something.
(I see there's a bunch more responses in this thread. Why do I have the
feeling it gets worse from here?)
--
------------------------------------------
Jason Forrest
afn2...@freenet.ufl.edu
aa...@ccn.cs.dal.ca
http://www.ccn.cs.dal.ca/~aa114/Profile.html
Jason A Forrest
chelsea corazon (kare...@sirius.com) wrote:
: Again, Kale, I honestly believe you are not telling the truth....whether
: in a misguided attempt to protect Quentin's "privacy", or because you
: have been "leaned on" I dunno. I know, however, what I know: Tarantino
: has been in the past a presence on AOL, and may be currently and in the
: future (I dunno about that because I got off of that spaceship over a
: year ago).
What do you base this on? What's your proof? Information? Anything?
: Quentin can do what he wants to do and be where he wants to
: be, but I don't appreciate the implication that I am a liar.
Well for Christ's sake girl, tell us what you know.
I just proved 1+1 actually equals 3. Don't ask me to tell you how I did
this, believe me or you're calling me a liar.
: Do I have
: any support here? If I don't, I can get off this newsgroup right now.
Give me a fucking break. All I ask is how do you know he's been online?
If it's a secret, say so. Otherwise don't whine, it's so unbecoming.
Jason A Forrest
Distribution:
Richard (kb...@earthlink.net) wrote:
: Don't leave. I agree with you 100%! I know that he comes to this
: newsgroup and reads the posts. I don't know what Kale is talking about.
: I am sure that Quentin can use a computer, and I am positive that he
: can type. Some people are just ignorant.
How do you know he comes here? How? Answer me Goddamnit. How do you know?
(This is getting silly.)
David Fresko
afn2...@afn.org (Jason A Forrest) wrote:
>
> (I see there's a bunch more responses in this thread. Why do I have the
>feeling it gets worse from here?)
Don't bother reading them. Me and you are on the same side and you should (or
shouldn't) see the barage of stupid shit being written.
Dave
Skander Halim
chelsea corazon <kare...@sirius.com> wrote:
>"Kale Whorton" <nik...@mind.net> wrote:
>
>>So be it. Now Chelsea, you should know better than going and slamming other,
>>more knowledgeable people on the newsgroup. As you said yourself "Just watch
>>what you say and don't bullshit the people on the newsgroup".
>
>Again, Kale, I honestly believe you are not telling the truth...
>I know, however, what I know: Tarantino has been in the past a presence
>on AOL, and may be currently and in the future. Quentin can do what he
>wants to do and be where he wants to be, but I don't appreciate the
>implication that I am a liar. Do I have any support here? If I don't,
>I can get off this newsgroup right now.
Okay, Chelsea, it's no use lying to you anymore. I am Quentin Tarantino.
Yeah, like "Skander Halim" is a real name! Oh by the way, Kale Whorton, Jason
Forrest, David Fresko, and Marc Fleury are actually my friends Alex
Rockwell, Allison Anders, Robert Rodriguez, and Lawrence Bender. You're
right, I can type, and I can use a computer. In fact, I design software,
in between writing the Great American Novel and playing with my son, Jesus.
XOXO,
- Q
Marc Fleury
ba...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Skander Halim) wrote:
>Okay, Chelsea, it's no use lying to you anymore. I am Quentin Tarantino.
>Yeah, like "Skander Halim" is a real name! Oh by the way, Kale Whorton, Jason
>Forrest, David Fresko, and Marc Fleury are actually my friends Alex
>Rockwell, Allison Anders, Robert Rodriguez, and Lawrence Bender.
Awww! *I* wanted to be Rodriguez!
-- Rodriguez.
David Fresko
ba...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Skander Halim) wrote:
>Okay, Chelsea, it's no use lying to you anymore. I am Quentin Tarantino.
>Yeah, like "Skander Halim" is a real name! Oh by the way, Kale Whorton, Jason
>Forrest, David Fresko, and Marc Fleury are actually my friends Alex
>right, I can type, and I can use a computer. In fact, I design software,
>in between writing the Great American Novel and playing with my son, Jesus.
>
>XOXO,
>
>- Q
Guilty as charged.
Dave
za...@hub.ofthe.net
In article <58204b$f...@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
David Fresko <D.Fr...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>You may agree with him, but I doubt very much that any person reads the
>letters posted about them on fan groups, including Tarantino. I know what
Well, I don't know about QT being on the internet or not but I know of at
least two associates of his (one real close) that have been right here on this
newsgroup. What's to say he wasn't looking over their shoulders? While I can
believe he might not own a computer or know how to work one, It's hard to
believe he would be able to resist the curiosity of finding some way to see
what was being said about him in a newsgroup devoted soley to him.
But doesn't look like anyone could really knows for sure, and we can all dream
right?
Hi Quentin
Make a movie soon.
Zach D.
In article <5811qr$g...@news-e2c.gnn.com>, VE...@gnn.com (satan) wrote:
>
>
> if quentin has the technical know-how of a gnat, hed fit right in on AOL
>
All Hail Satan
Richard
I agree, lets just drop it. Neither one of us is going to back down
because neither one of us ever does. Lets get back to discussing real
Tarantino stuff.
Richard
David Fresko
Who are these two associates you speak of? One of them posts on alt.cult-movies
and Roger Avary posted here twice and used to be an avid poster on a.c-m.
Dave
Jason Forrest
Organization: Chebucto Community Net
Distribution:
Marc Fleury (tet...@fox.nstn.ca) wrote:
: Awww! *I* wanted to be Rodriguez!
And I *didn't* want to be Anders ;').
--------------------------------------------
Jason A. Forrest
aa...@chebucto.ns.ca
afn2...@freenet.ufl.edu
http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa114/Profile.html
Tara Seeley
On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Marc Fleury wrote:
> ba...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Skander Halim) wrote:
>
> >Okay, Chelsea, it's no use lying to you anymore. I am Quentin Tarantino.
> >Yeah, like "Skander Halim" is a real name! Oh by the way, Kale Whorton, Jason
> >Forrest, David Fresko, and Marc Fleury are actually my friends Alex
> >Rockwell, Allison Anders, Robert Rodriguez, and Lawrence Bender.
>
> Awww! *I* wanted to be Rodriguez!
What's even more disturbing is that Jason Forrest is a woman!
Hey Jason! I really loved "Gas Food Lodging". :)
Jason Forrest
Tara Seeley (t...@ecst.csuchico.edu) wrote:
: What's even more disturbing is that Jason Forrest is a woman!
: Hey Jason! I really loved "Gas Food Lodging". :)
Hey, thanks, I appreciate that! Umm, I think.
Jason A Forrest
Richard (kb...@earthlink.net) wrote:
: I agree, lets just drop it. Neither one of us is going to back down
: because neither one of us ever does. Lets get back to discussing real
: Tarantino stuff.
That's pretty wimpy after you stated for a fact this and that, etc. Next
time don't bring it up in the 1st place.