np: Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
> Tholen ?
What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
> np: Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
Non sequitur.
what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
--
Steve Leyland
mhm32x16 Smeeter#24 WSD#41 Most Hated Usenetizen Of All Time#1
Top Asshole on the Net#4 Usenet Ruiner#11 Lits Slut#1
Alcatroll Labs Inc (bongwater maintenance dept)
=^MEOW MEOW ARMY^=
Don't go away mad, just go away!
======================================================================
"Warning to all:
Steve Leyland is a trolling twat of the highest order. Killfile the
muppet now and move on. Even the briefest of searches on his past
UseNet posts will reveal the truth. You have been warned. *plonk*"
bear, uk.rec.motorcycles
======================================================================
"I didn't delete any part of your meaningless, pointless, worthless
post in order to clearly demonstrate that you are the nemesis of
Usenet: the crossposting, non-editing, diagram-creating worthless,
dickless, brainless, gutless, mindless, ball-less, spineless, flaccid,
obese, fish-belly pale, ugly, VD-ridden, moronic, bald, hunch-backed,
flat-footed, odoriferous, obnoxious, fecal-smelling, buck-toothed,
physically handicapped, fungus-infected, HIV positive, mud-packing,
masturbating, whining, simpering, self-important, arrogant, egomaniacal
POS that takes up more bandwidth than a despicable binary-poster, and
for no apparent reason beyond seeing his own defecatory vomitus
slithering down the screen in vile green rivulets."
Admiral Halsey, alt.sailing.asa
======================================================================
"I went to the Garden of Love,
And saw what I never had seen;
A Chapel was built in the midst,
Where I used to play on the green.
And the gates of this Chapel were shut
And "Thou shalt not," writ over the door;
So I turned to the Garden of Love
That so many sweet flowers bore.
And I saw it was filled with graves,
And tombstones where flowers should be;
And priests in black gowns were walking their rounds,
And binding with briars my joys and desires."
William Blake.
======================================================================
"When the Earth has been ravaged and the animals are dying, a tribe of
people from all races, creeds and colours shall put their faith in
deeds, not words, and make the land green again. They shall be known as
Warriors of the Rainbow, protectors of the environment."
Native American prophecy
|\ _.-'~~""'~`'~)
/, ~-,__,,,.'~ ,-;;--''
|,4) ./ ' ; ;/'
'-~~;'@ ( ; ;
_.--'' _.-_..' .;.'
(,_..----''' (,..--''
Meow
>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>> Tholen ?
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>> Non sequitur.
> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
Darth Deco, Sith Lord of alt.astronomy
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
Official alt.astronomy FAQ:
<http://www.screedbomb.info/alt.astronomy/>
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali, quoted endlessly by David Tholen as evidence of "something"
> Who wrote?
>
>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>
>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>
>>>>> Tholen ?
>>
>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>
>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>
>>>> Non sequitur.
>>
>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
> Art Deco wrote:
>> Who wrote?
>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
Why?
What's classical music, Ragnar?
Wot?
>> James Moening wrote:
>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
> What's classical music, Ragnar?
Who is "Ragnar", DVH? Suffering from attribution problems, DVH?
Who is best band ever, Moening?
>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
>>> What's classical music, Ragnar?
>> Who is "Ragnar", DVH? Suffering from attribution problems, DVH?
> Who is best band ever, Moening?
Having attribution problems, DVH? You're not responding to
Moening.
Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Nicely evaded, Techno.
Still having attribution problems, DVH? You're not responding to
Techno.
Still evading the question, Ed?
>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
Still having attribution problems, DVH? You're not responding to Ed.
Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
> Who's Ed?
You should know, DVH, considering how you addressed your previous question
to Ed.
Who?
Wot?
What?
Wot?
--
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
Trainer and leash holder of:
Honest "Clockbrain" John
nightbat "fro0tbat" of alt.astronomy
<http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=deco>
Huh?
--
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads for alt.astronomy
Trainer and leash holder of:
Honest "Clockbrain" John
nightbat "fro0tbat" of alt.astronomy
<http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=deco>
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
Muh?
> Art Deco wrote in message
>> ah wrote:
>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>> Who?
>>> What?
>> Huh?
> Muh?
What does your question have to do with classical music, DVH?
Duh?
Take a dollar bill and fold it in half. Listen closely.
I'm not playing cricket until the U.N. has inspected your gear.
Wot?
>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
> Take a dollar bill and fold it in half. Listen closely.
Non sequitur.
>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
>>>> What's classical music, Ragnar?
>>> Who is "Ragnar", DVH? Suffering from attribution problems, DVH?
>> Who is best band ever, Moening?
> I'm not playing cricket until the U.N. has inspected your gear.
Non sequitur.
Sometimes I may seem to be asking questions but in fact I may be meditating.
Some of my posts are not questions, but reflections on the cosmos. I seek
wisdom, unity with the eternal rhythms of life, and a good helping of Fuh?
Wot?
Wot?
>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>> Muh?
>>> Duh?
Illogical, given that one does not post to Usenet while meditating, DVH.
> Some of my posts are not questions, but reflections on the cosmos.
Illogical.
> I seek
> wisdom, unity with the eternal rhythms of life, and a good helping of Fuh?
What does your question have to do with classical music, DVH?
Wot?
What does your assertion have to do with classical music, Tholen?
>
>> Some of my posts are not questions, but reflections on the cosmos.
>
> Illogical.
Only for stupid people.
>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>>> Muh?
>>>>> Duh?
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, DVH?
>>> Some of my posts are not questions, but reflections on the cosmos.
>> Illogical.
> Only for stupid people.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> I seek
>>> wisdom, unity with the eternal rhythms of life, and a good helping of
>>> Fuh?
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, DVH?
Note: no response.
Half a dollar, Bill, is fitty cent!
Innit?
--
Now with even more of the same as before!
> James Moening wrote:
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>>> np: Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
>> Take a dollar bill and fold it in half. Listen closely.
> Half a dollar, Bill, is fitty cent!
>
> Innit?
What does your question have to do with classical music, Goldstein?
Wot?
Wot?
Value line cutouts of Satie CDs
>> Tonto Goldstein wrote:
>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
>>>>>>>>>>> np: Anti-Nowhere League - Rampton
>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
>>>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
>>>> Take a dollar bill and fold it in half. Listen closely.
>>> Half a dollar, Bill, is fitty cent!
>>> Innit?
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Goldstein?
> Value line cutouts of Satie CDs
Non sequitur.
> hoKEy wOLf wrote:
> > In article <4686b23f$0$31268$4c36...@roadrunner.com>,
> > tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> >
> >> No Marsupial Equivalent <ma...@mattduanegriffin.com> writes:
> >>
> >>>> James Moening wrote:
> >>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Who wrote
> >>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
> >>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Techno?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League Rampton
> >>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
> >>>>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have to do with techno music, question?
> >>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> >>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a distaste for techno music, who.
> >>>>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with, what with not.
> >>>>>> What does that have to do with classical music, Moening?
> >>>>> Take a dollar bill and fold it in half. Listen closely.
> >>>> Non sequitur.
> >>> Then tear the vinyl fortress from my beard, releasing the sparrows.
> >> Also non sequitur.
> >
> > Also Sprach Zarathustra
>
> IWPTA Spinach Zarathustra, and wondered if you had a recipe? Thanks
> and God bless.
you can't just waltz in here and just start postin like you own the
place.
> Shelly wrote:
>> hoKEy wOLf wrote:
>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> np: Anti-Nowhere League Rampton
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> Also non sequitur.
>>> Also Sprach Zarathustra
What does that have to do with classical music, wOLf?
allow me to adjust my antlers
>>> Shelly wrote:
>>>> hoKEy wOLf wrote:
>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> np: Anti-Nowhere League Rampton
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>> Also non sequitur.
>>>>> Also Sprach Zarathustra
Non sequitur.
Wot?
>�����������������������ï
���������� wrote:
>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>> of<468abd1e$0$4830$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>:
>>
>>>�����������������������¿
��
>> ���������� wrote:
>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>>>> of<4688acf3$0$4844$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>:
>>>>
>>>>>����������������������
�
>> ��
>>>> ���������� wrote:
>>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>>>>>> of<4686a9d9$0$431$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>���������������������ï
�½
>> �
>>>> ��
>>>>>> ���������� wrote:
>>>>>>>> ah <splif...@gmail.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>>>>>>>> of<4685eee2$0$4819$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com>:
>>>>>>>>>Auh.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ouh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Iuh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suh?
>>>>>
>>>>>Luh?
>>>>>
>>>> Guh?
>>>
>>>Guh?
>>>
>> Luh?
>
>Nuh.
>
Auh.
I got freedoms up the ass and shit.
>>>> Tonto Goldstein wrote:
>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>> Innit?
>> Non sequitur.
Also non sequitur.
I got non sequiturs up the ass and shit.
>>>>>> Tonto Goldstein wrote:
>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>> Non sequitur.
>> Also non sequitur.
What does that have to do with classical music, matt?
What does classical music have to do with my ass?
>>>>>>>> Tonto Goldstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> Also non sequitur.
Isn't that what I just asked you, Matt?
You were asking about classical music, I was asking about my ass.
>>>>>>>>>> Tonto Goldstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>> Also non sequitur.
On the contrary, you asked about the connection between the two, as
I had already done, Matt.
<SLAP>
A pussy says what?
>snuh...@netscape.net writes:
>
>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>> Who wrote?
>
>>>>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote in message
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to
do with classical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> music,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Techno?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> np> Anti-Nowhere League -
Rampton
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what does your non sequitur have
to do with techno
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> music,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> question?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic non sequitur coupled with a
distaste for techno
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> music,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> who.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not who, what. What on, what with,
what with not.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does that have to do with
classical music, Moening?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical
music, DVH?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ouh?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iuh?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suh?
>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>
>>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>
>>>>>>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music,
snuhwolf?
>
>>>>>>>>> Whuh duh yuh quh-stuh-yuh-nuh huh tuh duh wuh cluh-suh-kuh
muh-suh,
>>>>>>>>> buhwolf?
>
>>>>>>>> Who is "buhwolf", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using
>>>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>>>> Moo jizz nuhwolf, wuhwolf? Bear fizz hobody win spit fusenuke
rusing
>>>>>>> shat walrus.
>
>>>>>> Who is "wuhwolf", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using
>>>>>> that alias.
>
>>>>> What does your question have to do with snuh, Tholen?
>
>>>> Now see...*that* was on topic. Now if I could just get somwon to
hepl
>>>> me with my LOCAL DEMONS.
>
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
>> Stop x-poosting into my snuh group or I'll be forced to send a
harshly
>> worded missive to yuor ISP, Thnolen!
>
Your newsfeeder seems b0rK3d, Tnholem.
:(
>>> Wot kinder help you need?
>
>> I have a deamon...and he lives in my butt...I call him "stinky"...
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
>
Get off my leg humpy...dont you have some crak to smoke today?
:(
>snuh...@netscape.net writes:
>
>>>> [ snip k00k screed ]
>
>>> I'm well aware that the cascades of Art Deco and ah represent
>>> "k00k screed", snuhwolf. No need to tell me about it.
>
>> Well you seem pretty fucking klewless, Tholem.
>
>Who is "Tholem", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
>that alias. Rather ironic, coming from someone as clueless as you
>are about whom you are responding to.
>
>>>> STFU PUSSY!!! If I want any shit outta you I'll squeeze your head.
>
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
>> Keep your poo-stings outta my snuh group and we'll call it even...
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>
Why do you keep adding the classical music newsfroup back to the froups
line, PUSSY?
>
><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
>news:468e86d8$0$4901$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
>> snuh...@netscape.net writes:
>>
>>> ah wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>
>> What does your question have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>>
>
>It wasn't a question.
>
Pinhead dosent know the difference...
:)
> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
> classical music?"
That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>> classical music?"
>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
Not so much, really.
>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
> Not so much, really.
Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
No, I meant it's not really all that ironic. I don't care about
crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist. I'm posting
from alt.non.sequitur, and your posts have been a laugh riot. But I'm
pretty bored at this point, and just wish you would take
"alt.not.sequitur off the list of places you are sending this garbage
to. You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
you're doing more than anyone else...
><snuh...@netscape.net> writes:
>
>> DVH wrote:
>Who is "Pinhead", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that
>alias. Rather ironic, coming from someone who doesn't know the
difference
>between aliases.
>
>> :)
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
>
Stay out of my SNUH group you fucking duchebag.
I propose a New Award just for Tholen: Ironicly Twisted Kook.
"Twisted Ko0k II" was better.
>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>> Not so much, really.
>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic.
Classic inconsistency.
> I don't care about
> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I'm posting from alt.non.sequitur,
What does that have to do with classical music, Matt?
> and your posts have been a laugh riot.
Illogical, given that I'm not the one inserting all the non sequitur
responses, Matt.
> But I'm pretty bored at this point,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given your continued
responses, Matt.
> and just wish you would take
> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places
Classic erroneous presupposition of the existence of such a newsgroup.
> you are sending this garbage to.
Classic erroneous presupposition of any garbage being written by me.
> You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
> you're doing more than anyone else...
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I haven't added a single
newsgroup to the distribution of any article, Matt.
> No Marsupial Equivalent <ma...@mattduanegriffin.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>>> Not so much, really.
>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
>> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic. I don't care about
>> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist. I'm posting
>> from alt.non.sequitur, and your posts have been a laugh riot. But I'm
>> pretty bored at this point, and just wish you would take
>> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places you are sending this garbage
>> to. You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
>> you're doing more than anyone else...
> I propose a New Award just for Tholen: Ironicly Twisted Kook.
What does your ridiculous proposal have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ouh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iuh?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Suh?
>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>> Nuh.
>>>>>> Auh.
Note: no response.
>>> :)
>> What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
> Stay out of my SNUH group you fucking duchebag.
Classic erroneous presupposition. Practice what you preach, snuhwolf.
> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>> No Marsupial Equivalent <ma...@mattduanegriffin.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
>>> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic. I don't care about
>>> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist. I'm posting
>>> from alt.non.sequitur, and your posts have been a laugh riot. But I'm
>>> pretty bored at this point, and just wish you would take
>>> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places you are sending this garbage
>>> to. You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
>>> you're doing more than anyone else...
>> I propose a New Award just for Tholen: Ironicly Twisted Kook.
> "Twisted Ko0k II" was better.
What does that have to do with classical music, honestjohn?
thereby proving you're an idiot.
>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
>>> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic.
>> Classic inconsistency.
Note: no response.
>>> I don't care about
>>> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Note: no response.
>>> I'm posting from alt.non.sequitur,
>> What does that have to do with classical music, Matt?
Note: no response.
>>> and your posts have been a laugh riot.
>> Illogical, given that I'm not the one inserting all the non sequitur
>> responses, Matt.
Note: no response.
>>> But I'm pretty bored at this point,
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, given your continued
>> responses, Matt.
Note: no response.
>>> and just wish you would take
>>> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of the existence of such a newsgroup.
Note: no response.
>>> you are sending this garbage to.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of any garbage being written by me.
Note: no response.
>>> You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
>>> you're doing more than anyone else...
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. I haven't added a single
>> newsgroup to the distribution of any article, Matt.
> thereby proving you're an idiot.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, laced with invective, as
expected from someone who lacks a logical argument.
and be HONEST about it for a change
>> hones...@centurytel.net wrote:
>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
What does that have to do with classical music, wOLf?
Then why did you bother asking a question that was already
answered in the preceding text, Tholen?
What does that have to do with classical music, Tholen?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you're now responding to yourself, Tholen. Interesting.
Who is "Tholen", Tholen? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
What does your question have to do with classical music, Tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic rationalization.
Note the absence of substantiation.
Non sequitur.
>>>> :)
>
>>> What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
>> Stay out of my SNUH group you fucking duchebag.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Practice what you preach, snuhwolf.
>
Why would I stay out of my own newsgroup you gormless fuckwit?
>
>"я黨wぃf" <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote in message
>news:4690f520$0$97225$892e...@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
>> DVH <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> pinched out a steaming pile
>> of<2pSji.29578$_14.2...@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net>:
>>
>>>
>>><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
>>>news:468ff27b$0$8917$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
>>>>>>>> On what basis do you make that claim, DVH?
>>>>
>>>>>>> What has your question to do with classical music, Tholen?
>>>>
>>>>>> Reread the third- and second-last words of my earlier question,
>> DVH.
>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> If you refuse to examine the evidence, DVH, then don't repeat the
>>>> question requesting the evidence.
>>>>
>>>>>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, DVH?
>>>>
>>>>> What does your question have to do with classical music, Tholen?
>>>>
>>>> Reread the third- and second-last words of my earlier question,
DVH.
>>>
>>>No.
>>>
>>>> Then read my advice above.
>>>
>>>No.
>>>
>> That obsessive dullard hi-jacked a perfectly good snuh cascade and
>> broke it beyond all recognition. It will take me *countless* man
hours
>> to get it back together and working properly.
>
>Their tendency to engage in destructive behaviour makes me wonder "why
do
>they hate us?"
>
Usenet terrorists always hate our freedoms...
>>
>> I propose a double-dog UDP against Tholen.
>>
>> He is teh 5u><or.
>
>I bet he listens to Sty><or to relax.
>
I put him squarely in the SkReWdRiVeR fan base.
>snuh...@netscape.net writes:
>What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>
Check the groupsline you twit.
>> I propose a double-dog UDP against Tholen.
>
>What does your ridiculous proposal have to do with classical music,
>snuhwolf?
>
Do you have any SNUH to discuss, Net Abuser?
>> He is teh 5u><or.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
>
Then why did you bother asking a question that was already
answered in the preceding text, Tholen?
What does that have to do with classical music, Tholen?
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you're now responding to yourself, Tholen. Interesting.
Who is "Tholen", Tholen? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
What does your question have to do with classical music, Tholen?
>
>"§ńühw¤Łf" <snuh...@netscape.net> wrote in message
Was that the one with John Rhys Davies as the professor?
:)
What does your red-dickless proposal have to do with Steve Leyland,
k00k?
No Marilyn Manson.
Well, I just thought that, when talking about classical music, we should
be honest.
> hones...@centurytel.net wrote:
>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>> No Marsupial Equivalent <ma...@mattduanegriffin.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
>>>> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic. I don't care about
>>>> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist. I'm posting
>>>> from alt.non.sequitur, and your posts have been a laugh riot. But I'm
>>>> pretty bored at this point, and just wish you would take
>>>> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places you are sending this garbage
>>>> to. You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
>>>> you're doing more than anyone else...
>>> I propose a New Award just for Tholen: Ironicly Twisted Kook.
>> "Twisted Ko0k II" was better.
> Was that the one with John Rhys Davies as the professor?
What does your question have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
> :)
What does that have to do with classical music, snuhwolf?
>>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
Who is "k00k", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>> hones...@centurytel.net wrote:
>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>> No Marsupial Equivalent <ma...@mattduanegriffin.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A better question might be, "What does this NEWSGROUP have to do with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> classical music?"
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's not a better question, given the ambiguity caused by having five
>>>>>>>>>>>> newsgroups in the distribution but asking about one of them.
>>>>>>>>>>> Aha...crossposting. Well, that partially answers the question!
>>>>>>>>>> What is allegedly left unanswered, Oster?
>>>>>>>>> Why you continue to crosspost, since it seems to bug you so much
>>>>>>>> How ironic, coming from someone who crossposted.
>>>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
>>>>> No, I meant it's not really all that ironic. I don't care about
>>>>> crossposting, you're the one with his panties in a twist. I'm posting
>>>>> from alt.non.sequitur, and your posts have been a laugh riot. But I'm
>>>>> pretty bored at this point, and just wish you would take
>>>>> "alt.not.sequitur off the list of places you are sending this garbage
>>>>> to. You have no right to complain about anybody else crossposting,
>>>>> you're doing more than anyone else...
>>>> I propose a New Award just for Tholen: Ironicly Twisted Kook.
>>> "Twisted Ko0k II" was better.
>> Was that the one with John Rhys Davies as the professor?
> No Marilyn Manson.
What does that have to do with classical music, honestjohn?
>>>> hones...@centurytel.net wrote:
>>>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> John Oster wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Not so much, really.
>>>>>>>> Degree is irrelevant, Matt.
Then why did you use the alias "hoKEy wOLf", wOLf?
> DVH wrote:
>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ouh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iuh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nuh.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>>>>>> No.
>>>> No.
>>>> No.
Non sequitur.
>>> I propose a double-dog UDP against Tholen.
>>> He is teh 5u><or.
>> I bet he listens to Sty><or to relax.
> I put him squarely in the SkReWdRiVeR fan base.
What does that have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf?
>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> snuh...@netscape.net wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DVH wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> James Moening wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who wrote?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Steve Leyland writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MC Techno R wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tholen ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nicely evaded, Techno.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who's Ed?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Muh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Duh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ouh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iuh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Luh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nuh.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Auh.
>>>>>> No.
>>>> No.
>>>> No.
Who is "you twit", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>>> I propose a double-dog UDP against Tholen.
>> What does your ridiculous proposal have to do with classical music,
>> snuhwolf?
> Do you have any SNUH to discuss, Net Abuser?
Who is "Net Abuser", snuhwolf? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.
>>> He is teh 5u><or.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Then why did you bother asking a question that was already
> answered in the preceding text, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf?
> What does that have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf?
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, snuhwolf.
> I see that you're now responding to yourself, Tholen. Interesting.
Classic hallucination on your part, snuhwolf.
> Who is "Tholen", Tholen? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
> alias.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> What does your question have to do with classical music, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf?
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Classic rationalization.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Note the absence of substantiation.
I'm well aware that you didn't provide any substantiation for your claims,
snuhwolf. No need to tell me about it.
> Non sequitur.