PING: Cyber-Terrorist Steve Leyland (Re: LEGAL ACTION TAKEN - NOTICE)
Sharky
<mercy snip of yet another disjointed Doogie Rant(tm)>
see:<XcWdnVPpHf6s1ObX...@giganews.com>
>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>in a false light real Veterans. (Does anyone know the real name of
>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL that denies his
>real name is Steve Leyland? Let me know if you really know who this
>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
Steve Leyland; You've been *served* in another Doogie Grant "Usenet
Lawyer"(tm) Ko0kS0oT.
How the hell did that happen?
I just hope you're happy with yourself now, you cyber-stalking web
name! [1]
--
Cheers,
Sharky
[1] Doogie Rant(tm)'s Ko0kSiT3
http://groups.google.com/group/namesofcyberstalkers?hl=en
Doogie was banned from his own group by Google but it remains as a
testiment to Doogies awsome legal mind ...mheh.
Nigel Brooks
"Sharky" <sh...@he11sgates.org> wrote in message
news:4a7cc286....@news.free.fr...
I Nigel Brooks do hereby affirm that I do indeed know the true legal name of
the poster Mr. Reiman is referring to.
It seems to me that we went through all of this last year when Reiman
claimed that law enforcement officers were looking for him
http://tinyurl.com/5u04s9.
At that time I offered my complete cooperation and told Reiman to provide my
contact details to the "law enforcement" officers.
Well that was May 25, 2008 - and as of right now, no-one has contacted me.
It's just another Doogie lie - in other words :
http://bsmeter.bravehost.com/statement_evaluation_tool.htm
Nigel Brooks
Sharky
Well, there you go Steve, you're absolutely fjcked!
The leader of the Nigel Brooks smear...blah, cyber, blah...stalker
gang has linked you to the Ko0s0ot with Usernet SITES!
Be prepared to send all your material wealth to Doug Grant (tm)
<legal...@comcast.net> or prepare for the consequence.
You don't want to be rebutted by Doogie...believe me.
SteveL
wrote:
>DGVREIMAN wrote:
>
><mercy snip of yet another disjointed Doogie Rant(tm)>
>see:<XcWdnVPpHf6s1ObX...@giganews.com>
>
>>Not to mention exposing the real names of those that are not even
>>Veterans that post on Veteran's newsgroups so as to defame and paint
>>in a false light real Veterans. (Does anyone know the real name of
>>the hate gang member that goes by the name of SteveL that denies his
>>real name is Steve Leyland? Let me know if you really know who this
>>person is as officers of the court are most defiantly interested).
>
>Steve Leyland; You've been *served* in another Doogie Grant "Usenet
>Lawyer"(tm) Ko0kS0oT.
For some reason I haven't figured out yet Doug Grant seems to really
*really* want me to be named Steve Leyland (whoever he is), and
mentions this guys name whenever he mentions mine - as if he *knows*
something (nudge nudge wink wink).
For those of us who *do* know it just confirms once again that he
knows *nothing* and is an idiot for loudly advertizing that fact again
and again.
Maybe it's a "really smart" (tm) tactic to goad me into "My name's not
Leyland you moron, its <real name>!!!!!"
I'm sure it makes sense to him.
>
>How the hell did that happen?
I proved Doug Grant (who denies he is a child molester) to be a liar
once again.
(see? anyone can do it!)
>
>I just hope you're happy with yourself now, you cyber-stalking web
>name! [1]
Nope. They got me working away in London 5 days a week at the moment.
Pain in the ass.
DGVREIMAN
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7e47i9F...@mid.individual.net...
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Doug's Rebuttal:
===========================
>I should also mention that one of my lawyers has already furnished key
>members of the Nigel Brooks smear/hate and con gang written cease and
>desist notices - which of course they have ignored.
"In the case of the Nigel Brooks hate/smear and con gang, a legal
>action has been initiated by my lawyers""
Sooooo.... ? ? ?
-Mac, the Medic
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
>
> Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
> your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
> you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Oh my but what will the Court think of Mr Reiman attempting to obscturct
justice...
SteveL
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
>knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
>would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
>anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland).
Doug. You claimed I was being *sought* by law enforcement. Actively
*sought*. It was in that context that you were expected to (presumably
*eagerly*) take up the request to provide their contact details in the
interests of justice.
That you may have kookily approached some agency and were rebuffed is
of no interest - except for your ridiculous attempt to parlay that
into the above libellous accusation. But that only means you are a
reprehensible cunt - which we knew all along.
Nigel Brooks
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:ft-dnUjgNMuRWhjX...@giganews.com...
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:20:06 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
>>knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
>>would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
>>anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland).
>
> Doug. But that only means you are a reprehensible cunt - which we knew
> all along.
Nice to see that you have practically fully embraced the language and
culture of my former home
:-)
I approve of this post.
Nigel Brooks
DGVREIMAN
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
"Nigel Brooks" <nbr...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:7em2anF...@mid.individual.net...
Doug's Rebuttal to Nigel Brooks:
Mr. Brooks, inciting your gang member (who is NOT a veteran yet
attacks and defames veterans and denies he is Steve Leyland) to call
me playground names, and then post a support of such childish and
brainless attacks, because you know you have been caught in mid con
yet again, is more than typical of your "smear and attack the
messenger" tactics whenever one of your frauds have been exposed as I
did above.
You and your SteveL gang member (who denies being Steve Leyland)
should return to the 5th grade, and take some more lessons from the
kids.
Here is what SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland) and Nigel Brooks
are trying their best to hide:
Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
Moreover, I do not believe that someone with the delusions you seem
to have about mind reading and soothsaying is intelligent enough to be
contacted by anyone without legal representation.
Moreover, your pathetic and child like bsmeter is simply a fraud, as
you know I have offered you and the \SteveL anonymous cyberstalker
(who denies being Steve Leyland) the opportunity to receive that
information several times - which you hide from, and then use child
like school yard nonsense to try and deflect the fact you have been
hiding from the name of the law enforcement agency I contacted about
SteveL for more than a year now.
Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
Doug Grant (Tm)
Doug Grant (Tm)
>
Pepperoni
news:4bCdndRkjegNFxXX...@giganews.com:
> Walk the walk Brooks - no one believes your childish nonsense. Have
> your lawyer contact me - or SteveL's lawyer or any lawyer representing
> you or the group, if you can find one stupid enough to do so.
>
You can't find one stupid enough to play your game; what makes you think
someone else could find one stupid enough to play your game?
Pepperoni
tankfixer
dgvr...@comcast.net says...
> Doug's Rebuttal: Mr. Brooks, you know, the group knows, the world
> knows that I told you everal times that if your lawyer contacted me I
> would provide the law enforcement agency that I contacted about the
> anonymous yberstalker SteveL (who denies being Steve Leyland). Since
> the issue is not in the hands of the lawyers, and the lawyers were the
> ones doing the contacting, your lawyer needs to be involved.
>
That sure sounds like an admission that Doug is hindering prosecution..
Pepperoni
@news.bytemine.net:
>
> That sure sounds like an admission that Doug is hindering prosecution..
>
Wasn't it Doug who complained that the Casinos didn't always play the
"full deck"?
Ironic, ain't it?
Mac
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
=================================
LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
I have been asked by this same law firm to not reveal nor discuss the
specific actions they have initiated this time on USENET.
(((((((((((((((((((( )))))))))))))))))))))))
-Mac, the Medic
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
news:lp9i85pnjbv0uqtqq...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:39:10 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
>
> =================================
> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
> 1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>
> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
Super!
Mac
==================
>Super!
***********************
The above claim is from the infamous DOUG GRANT.
He claims that he has, once again, contacted alleged attorneys.
He claims that, in this case, on or before 2nd AUGUST, "legal action"
has been initiated....
Today is now 17th AUGUST.
As of this date no one has been the recipient of any "legal action".
Draw your own conclusions about the bluster of Doug Grant, especially
when he is challenged regarding his military embellishments.
-Mac, the Medic
....the_pc_jellllybean!!.!!!!.
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:06:01 -0700, <.... tHe_PC_JelLlLy BeAn!! .!
> !!! .> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
>>news:lp9i85pnjbv0uqtqq...@4ax.com...
>
>> On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:39:10 -0700, "DGVREIMAN"
>> <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote the following:
>>
>> =================================
>> LEGAL ACTION TAKEN -NOTICE August 2, 2009
>> 1. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
>>
>> I have been informed by the law firm that I recently retained they
>> have initiated legal action against some key members of the Nigel
>> Brooks smear/hate and con gang.
> ==================
>>Super!
>
> ***********************
> The above claim is from the infamous DOUG GRANT.
> He claims that he has, once again, contacted alleged attorneys.
> He claims that, in this case, on or before 2nd AUGUST, "legal action"
> has been initiated....
> Today is now 17th AUGUST.
heh, I love usenet loons, especially when they either threaten to "come over
and beat the shit out of you" or claim to have filed suit.
LOL!
DGVREIMAN
"Mac" <NoSpa...@NoSpamToday.net> wrote in message
Mr. Dennis M. McDonnell:
First, I am not infamous. Simply because a gang targeted me for
smears and fraud does not make me infamous. The gang I suspect is
the infamous one. Second, of course I initiated legal action. It is
still pending - soon Mr. Brooks will be reading some of it. Third,
what "challenge" regarding any military embellishments? I asked Nigel
Brooks to name a single document in my records that disproved any
statement of fact I have ever made about my military service, and he
is still pissing running and pissing his panties. Obviously, Nigel
Brooks has been lying about this issue for years.
You are hereby advised to cease and desist your harassment and false
accusations about me immediately, and apologize, or face further legal
action in regards to libel, harassment and defamation.
Douglas Reiman