ATTN: Bill Kohlleppel - Re:You're A Moron.
Cmdrwilkens
gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him here
where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since it
is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
we can make it.
--
Lcpl Burnett, G.R
USMCR
"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the
enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion."
-Unknown
Kynes
>Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject mentioned
>gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
>can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
>Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
>tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him here
>where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since it
>is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
>we can make it.
Though I don't personally know Bill, I have it on good authority that he likes
to have sex with children and then kill them. Frankly, I'm repulsed by this
behavior, Bill, and I really don't see it taking you anywhere in life.
--
-LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
"I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
of the Star Wars series."
- net.movies, 6/8/1982
The Arctic Moose
vision...
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 09:43:36 GMT, "Cmdrwilkens" <cmdrw...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject mentioned
> >gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
> >can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
> >Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
> >tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him here
> >where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since it
> >is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
> >we can make it.
>
> Though I don't personally know Bill, I have it on good authority that he likes
> to have sex with children and then kill them. Frankly, I'm repulsed by this
> behavior, Bill, and I really don't see it taking you anywhere in life.
For the love of crap, will you just leave the poor bloke alone! You're a
bunch of pathetic wankers
--
The Arctic Moose
"Any lawyer who says there's no
such thing as rape should be
hauled out to a public place by
three large perverts and buggered
at high noon, with all his clients watching"
- Hunter S Thompson
rob.wn5
"The Arctic Moose" <thenospama...@aglami.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1697ab118...@news.ntlworld.com...
> Whilst i was grazing on the tundra of the arctic, Kynes said to me in a
> vision...
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 09:43:36 GMT, "Cmdrwilkens" <cmdrw...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> >
> > >Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject
mentioned
> > >gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as
I
> > >can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
> > >Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
> > >tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him
here
> > >where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying
since it
> > >is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a
manner as
> > >we can make it.
> >
> > Though I don't personally know Bill, I have it on good authority that
he likes
> > to have sex with children and then kill them. Frankly, I'm repulsed by
this
> > behavior, Bill, and I really don't see it taking you anywhere in life.
>
> For the love of crap, will you just leave the poor bloke alone! You're a
> bunch of pathetic wankers
And Kynes is Full of Beefy Flavour too. What more could you ask from us?
:-)
Rob Wilson
denies he is a pathetic Wanker... he's been practicing his Wanking for
years now is a brilliant wanker.
:-)
Tool Packin' Mama
Tool Packin' Mama
Insane Ranter
Tool Packin' Mama wrote in message <3C2DF247...@lauragoodwin.org>...
>Please remove alt.startrek from all followups. Thank you.
Why didn't you then?
Insane Ranter
Kynes wrote in message ...
>On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 09:43:36 GMT, "Cmdrwilkens" <cmdrw...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>>Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject mentioned
>>gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
>>can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
>>Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
>>tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him
here
>>where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since
it
>>is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
>>we can make it.
>
>Though I don't personally know Bill, I have it on good authority that he
likes
>to have sex with children and then kill them. Frankly, I'm repulsed by this
>behavior, Bill, and I really don't see it taking you anywhere in life.
Isn't this slander?
The Executor
"Cmdrwilkens" <cmdrw...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cfgX7.33561$fo.93...@news1.rdc1.md.home.com...
> Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject mentioned
> gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
> can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
> Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
> tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him
here
> where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since
it
> is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
> we can make it.
>
>
>
Bill sent me a picture of a Bothan, so I owe him everything. Demanded by da
gods it is.
C'Pi
"Insane Ranter" <n...@spam.luckie> wrote in message
news:pOmX7.97723$BX4.5...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
Libel.
Actually I don't really know or care. I just want to read a big long drawn
out thread on what is libel and what is slander. The Internet is great.
C'Pi
rob.wn5
"Insane Ranter" <n...@spam.luckie> wrote in message
news:pOmX7.97723$BX4.5...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
>
Hearsay, perfectly ok. :-)
Rob Wilson
armchair lawyer to the stars
>
>
>
rob.wn5
"C'Pi" <jas...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:a0kut3$lr3ul$1...@ID-111793.news.dfncis.de...
or a label, depending on whether it's true or not.
:-)
>
> Actually I don't really know or care. I just want to read a big long
drawn
> out thread on what is libel and what is slander. The Internet is great.
I know. Where else can you learn about the dictionary definition of
fetishes, followed up by gigs of movies about your own particular one. God
bless the Internet and all that perv on her.
:-)
Rob Wilson
fetish free since 1972
>
> C'Pi
>
>
Tool Packin' Mama
Also, please keep subsequent related flamewars in
alt.startrek.vs.starwars
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Tool Packin' Mama
rob.wn5
"The Executor" <trym...@online.no> wrote in message
news:32nX7.12684$KQ3.1...@news1.oke.nextra.no...
Pictures of Bothans? Ah, the forbidden love of a man and his 6 foot ferret.
:-)
Rob Wilson
>
>
Dalton
>
> http://www.impulse.net/~seanette/bitbucket.html
http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy
--
Rob "Roby" Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"I need a drink."
"You don't drink."
"Yeah, but I've been meaning to start."
---UHF
Tool Packin' Mama
>
> Tool Packin' Mama wrote:
> >
> > http://www.impulse.net/~seanette/bitbucket.html
>
> http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy
LOL yeah, I always love that one. The whole amish rake fight site is
kind of cute.
Dalton
rob.wn5
"Dalton" <r...@daltonator.net> wrote in message
news:3C2E0648...@daltonator.net...
> Tool Packin' Mama wrote:
> >
> > Dalton wrote:
> > >
> > > Tool Packin' Mama wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.impulse.net/~seanette/bitbucket.html
> > >
> > > http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy
> >
> > LOL yeah, I always love that one. The whole amish rake fight site is
> > kind of cute.
>
> Should I crosspost back and tell her about goatse.cx?
E-mail her, Versus discussions are not allowed on Alt.Startrek.
Did the whole Chewie thread get started by the imaginary Borg. If so can we
just ignore the figments of our imagination in future?
:-)
Rob Wilson
Gerry LaHay
Kynes <ky...@choam.org> wrote in message
news:IZYtPIXoi5PBSp...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 09:43:36 GMT, "Cmdrwilkens" <cmdrw...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> >Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject
mentioned
> >gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
> >can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
> >Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
> >tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him
here
> >where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since
it
> >is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner
as
> >we can make it.
>
> Though I don't personally know Bill, I have it on good authority that he
likes
> to have sex with children and then kill them. Frankly, I'm repulsed by
this
> behavior, Bill, and I really don't see it taking you anywhere in life.
> --
Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill. I
don't know
if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you don't
even touch, especially
children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists, but
when you sink as low as
you have, it is really sad.
Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
authority....please state said evidence,
or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
Gerry
Durandal
> Since the Chewiee v Worf thread seems to have forced the subject mentioned
> gentleman to call out his attackers I'll say this in as blunt a way as I
> can, owing only slightly to C.S.'s suggestion. Anyway, if you feel Mr
> Kohlleppel has been moronic please feel free to insult, berate, flame,
> tenderize, chew-out, rip to shreds, sigh violently at, or demonize him here
> where he will undoubtably be able to understand what we are saying since it
> is now directed at him in as personal a manner, and as upfront a manner as
> we can make it.
Bill, you're a dumbass. Now that I've said it to your face, as per your
request, why don't we meet in the park after school?
--
Damien Sorresso
[AIM: durandal64] | [ICQ: 12183859]
Nobody knows everything.
I am nobody.
Therefore, I know everything.
Dalton
Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
rob.wn5
>
> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
Rob, can you remove the Alt.Startrek when replying to these oversensitive
prudes in AFS, cheers.
Rob Wilson
whoring for the otherside since 1972
:-)
Durandal
> Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill. I
> don't know
> if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you don't
> even touch, especially
> children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists, but
> when you sink as low as
> you have, it is really sad.
>
> Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
> authority....please state said evidence,
> or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
Great. Now, why don't you go watch Titanic and have yourself a good cry?
rob.wn5
"Durandal" <duran...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:3C2E29E9...@mac.com...
> Gerry LaHay wrote:
>
>
> > Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about
Bill. I
> > don't know
> > if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you
don't
> > even touch, especially
> > children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists,
but
> > when you sink as low as
> > you have, it is really sad.
> >
> > Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
> > authority....please state said evidence,
> > or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
>
>
> Great. Now, why don't you go watch Titanic and have yourself a good cry?
Afetr all, after his humour bypass and laugh gland extraction there's
nothing else for him to do. Maybe he can ask Billy to give him a hug.
:-)
Rob Wilson
Gerry LaHay
them"?
I doubt it.
Gerry
Gerry LaHay
>
>
> > Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill.
I
> > don't know
> > if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you
don't
> > even touch, especially
> > children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists,
but
> > when you sink as low as
> > you have, it is really sad.
> >
> > Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
> > authority....please state said evidence,
> > or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
>
>
> Great. Now, why don't you go watch Titanic and have yourself a good cry?
>
children" have to do with each other?
I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of wuss?
I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the comments
that were posted crossed that line
and were offensive.
Gerry
Gerry LaHay
rob.wn5 <rob...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:g7qX7.10971$Zg2.4...@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
>
> "Durandal" <duran...@mac.com> wrote in message
> news:3C2E29E9...@mac.com...
> > Gerry LaHay wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about
> Bill. I
> > > don't know
> > > if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you
> don't
> > > even touch, especially
> > > children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even
exists,
> but
> > > when you sink as low as
> > > you have, it is really sad.
> > >
> > > Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
> > > authority....please state said evidence,
> > > or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
> >
> >
> > Great. Now, why don't you go watch Titanic and have yourself a good cry?
>
> Afetr all, after his humour bypass and laugh gland extraction there's
> nothing else for him to do. Maybe he can ask Billy to give him a hug.
>
them"?
Gerry
Durandal
> What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> children" have to do with each other?
Nothing.
> I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of wuss?
Yes.
> I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the comments
> that were posted crossed that line
> and were offensive.
No one cares.
Gerry LaHay
> Gerry LaHay wrote:
>
>
> > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> > children" have to do with each other?
>
>
> Nothing.
>
>
> > I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of
wuss?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
> > I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the
comments
> > that were posted crossed that line
> > and were offensive.
>
>
> No one cares.
>
rob.wn5
"Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote
> My brain stem stopped growing when I was a foetus, what's happening. I
don't understand, I'm > scared, I need my mummy.
Don't worry, Billy will be here in a moment to give you your Blankie and
teddy bear. Don't let the comments of these nasty people with intellect
upset you.
Rob Wilson
rob.wn5
"Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:UoqX7.12187$x78....@news2.bloor.is...
Where to begin? I'll talk slowly so you can /perhaps/ understand, it all
about the absurdity and juxtaposition of content and context, welcome to
understanding humour module 1.01 intro for those without the intellect to
breathe independant of orders.
If he *really* thought he was having sex with children and then killing
him, kynes would just make a nonchalent post on the net???? Are you aware
of sarcasm, hell are you aware of the room your in? I'm sure Billy would
use his 'normal' psychic powers to read your mind for the answers,
unfortunately those powers don't work on solid neutronuim such as found
between your ears.
Lets reduce it to it's most fundamental level, man walks on stage with a
plank on his shoulder. Second man walks on after him and calls his name.
First man turns round and plank knocks down second man, third man
approaches from other side and calls first man who turns and knocks down
third man. Audience laughs at pain inflicted on second and third man, belly
roars ensue when after appearing innocent the first man gives stage wink to
audience. He meant it all along. You may not understand it, but trust me
it's happening right fucking now and the audience is pissing itelf with
laughter.
Rob Wilson
exit stage left, plank on shoulder.
C.S.Strowbridge
>
> Tool Packin' Mama wrote:
> >
> > > > http://www.impulse.net/~seanette/bitbucket.html
> > >
> > > http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy
> >
> > LOL yeah, I always love that one. The whole amish rake fight site is
> > kind of cute.
>
> Should I crosspost back and tell her about goatse.cx?
Do it, you know you want to. ANd that Dolphin sex one as well.
C.S.Strowbridge
Insane Ranter
Gerry LaHay
So, based on you above comments, you find humour in "sex with children"....
>
> If he *really* thought he was having sex with children and then killing
> him, kynes would just make a nonchalent post on the net???? Are you aware
> of sarcasm, hell are you aware of the room your in? I'm sure Billy would
> use his 'normal' psychic powers to read your mind for the answers,
> unfortunately those powers don't work on solid neutronuim such as found
> between your ears.
I am very aware of sarcasm, still trying to understand where the humour in
the topic we are discussing.
>
> Lets reduce it to it's most fundamental level, man walks on stage with a
> plank on his shoulder. Second man walks on after him and calls his name.
> First man turns round and plank knocks down second man, third man
> approaches from other side and calls first man who turns and knocks down
> third man. Audience laughs at pain inflicted on second and third man,
belly
> roars ensue when after appearing innocent the first man gives stage wink
to
> audience. He meant it all along. You may not understand it, but trust me
> it's happening right fucking now and the audience is pissing itelf with
> laughter.
And this is a good comparison as to the type of humour that is associated
with
"sex with children"? And there is an audience that finds this topic amusing?
There was a 5 year old in the city I live in who was kidnapped, sexually
assaulted and murdered
this past summer. Where is the humour in that? I'm sure the young parents of
this little girl would
find it hillarious.
Its one thing to insult an individual in the NG, and I really don't care,
but when a topic
crosses a line, something must be said.
Gerry LaHay
I only see a couple of ignorant people who find humour
in the flaming, and insulting people, or calling their mother's a whore
or find it amusing to joke about sex with children.
I am associated with many intellectual people who have yet to
resort to insults when discussing different topics.
Gerry
His Divine Shadow {PHX}
As someone here said, chalk it up to character building.
Now go find some site about horrible and stupid things to watch at.
He said that too, though he provided an URL.
His Divine Shadow {PHX}
"rob.wn5" <rob...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:aEqX7.11256$Zg2.4...@news11-gui.server.ntli.net...
>
Welcome to the true meaning of ASVS, hatred and misc. bad feelings.
Ahhh....
Dalton
>
> Durandal <duran...@mac.com> wrote in message
> news:3C2E29E9...@mac.com...
> > Gerry LaHay wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill.
> I
> > > don't know
> > > if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you
> don't
> > > even touch, especially
> > > children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists,
> but
> > > when you sink as low as
> > > you have, it is really sad.
> > >
> > > Now, you state you don't even know Bill, yet you have it on good
> > > authority....please state said evidence,
> > > or refrain form posting this type of repulsive nonsense.
> >
> >
> > Great. Now, why don't you go watch Titanic and have yourself a good cry?
> >
> > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> children" have to do with each other?
> I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of wuss?
> I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the comments
> that were posted crossed that line
> and were offensive.
Not here. Not even close :)
--
Rob "Roby" Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"If there's anything on Usenet that makes us seem normal I want it
captured and shot immediately." ---C.S.Strowbridge
Dalton
Sadly I don't remember that one.
--
Rob "Roby" Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"If there's anything on Usenet that makes us seem normal I want it
Dalton
>
> Dayton wrote:
>
> > Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>
> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
> way to Fresno!
Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
--
Rob "Roby" Dalton
http://daltonator.net
"If there's anything on Usenet that makes us seem normal I want it
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>
>> Dayton wrote:
>>
>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>>
>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget it
>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
>> way to Fresno!
>
> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
wes
rob.wn5
"Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
news:B85386B0.15925%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
little
> tyke.
You know, it's entirely possible that you have thatth wrong way round.
:-)
In this NG we breed them tough, and we start when their young.
>
> > "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
> >>
> >> Dayton wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
> >>
> >> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget
it
> >> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
> >> way to Fresno!
> >
> > Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
>
>
> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
>
>
> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
Hehehehehehehehe
ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
Pop. 1065
please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old lady.
Rob Wilson
Post the flame, post the flame, to ASVS we will take you.
:-)
>
> wes
>
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B85386B0.15925%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> little
>> tyke.
>
> You know, it's entirely possible that you have thatth wrong way round.
> :-)
>
> In this NG we breed them tough, and we start when their young.
When does that kick in? I haven't seen it yet.
>
>>
>>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dayton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>>>>
>>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget
> it
>>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
>>>> way to Fresno!
>>>
>>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
>>
>>
>> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
>>
>>
>> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
>
> Hehehehehehehehe
>
> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
> Pop. 1065
> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old lady.
A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a fine
automobile.
>
>
> Rob Wilson
> Post the flame, post the flame, to ASVS we will take you.
> :-)
I've taken on entire NG's before, as many as three at a time.
You don't stand a chance.
The biggest problem in killing dinosaurs is it takes them a week to figure
out they're dead.
wes
>
>>
>> wes
>>
>
>
Dalton
Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>
> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
Been there, done that, it's dull.
If you think this is big league, well....
wes
Dalton
And hence, you're not yelled at for going off-topic :)
Dalton
*snort* *chuckle*
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a little
>> tyke.
>>
>>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dayton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>>>>
>>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget it
>>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
>>>> way to Fresno!
>>>
>>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
>>
>> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
>>
>> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
>
> And hence, you're not yelled at for going off-topic :)
Missed the quote reference I take it?
wes
Durandal
> Been there, done that, it's dull.
> If you think this is big league, well....
The entire USENET fears and hates us because of our fanaticism. Post a
flame war, and you'll be roasted over a spit, with the denizens taking
turns basting your slowly-charring carcass with red wine and taking
turns having orgies with the young, attractive women of your family.
Against the forces of ASVS, there can be no victory.
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>
>
>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>> If you think this is big league, well....
>
>
> The entire USENET fears and hates us because of our fanaticism.
I don't. I passed over your group in March of 99. Too many anal retentives
in one place is no place for the exchange of ideas.
> Post a
> flame war, and you'll be roasted over a spit, with the denizens taking
> turns basting your slowly-charring carcass with red wine and taking
> turns having orgies with the young, attractive women of your family.
Come and get me Skippy.
>
> Against the forces of ASVS, there can be no victory.
See prior dinosaur analogy.
wes
>
>
Cmdrwilkens
Compared to what our home group considers a day at the board those comments
were almost mildly comforting.
--
Lcpl Burnett, G.R
USMCR
"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and the
enemy. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion."
-Unknown
Dalton
>
> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a little
> tyke.
>
> > Wes Hutchings wrote:
> >>
> >> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a little
> >> tyke.
> >>
> >>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Dayton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
> >>>>
> >>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget it
> >>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
> >>>> way to Fresno!
> >>>
> >>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
> >>
> >> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
> >>
> >> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
> >
> > And hence, you're not yelled at for going off-topic :)
>
> Missed the quote reference I take it?
No, got the quote reference. Hence my reply. As in, Star Wars is not off
topic.
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was hung like a Bantha.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B85386B0.15925%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> > little
> >> tyke.
> >
> > You know, it's entirely possible that you have thatth wrong way round.
> > :-)
> >
> > In this NG we breed them tough, and we start when their young.
>
> When does that kick in? I haven't seen it yet.
Well you can lead a dolt to quality but you can't make it appreciate it.
> >>
> >>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Dayton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
> >>>>
> >>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to
forget
> > it
> >>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all
the
> >>>> way to Fresno!
> >>>
> >>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
> >>
> >>
> >> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
> >>
> >>
> >> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
> >
> > Hehehehehehehehe
> >
> > ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
> > Pop. 1065
> > please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old
lady.
>
> A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a
fine
> automobile.
Automobiles, please, we use AT_AT's here. Automobiles are the things we use
as spare 'Shoes'.
> >
> > Rob Wilson
> > Post the flame, post the flame, to ASVS we will take you.
> > :-)
>
> I've taken on entire NG's before, as many as three at a time.
Good for you, never mind the quality feel the width eh?
> You don't stand a chance.
Of course not, only an idiot would trust to chance, I deal only in
certainties. Your losing for instance.
:-)
> The biggest problem in killing dinosaurs is it takes them a week to
figure
> out they're dead.
True, look how long it's taking Billy boy to notice he lost in his first
reply.
Rob Wilson
people never get my quotes, the youth of today and thier lax education
*shakes head*
>
> wes
>
> >
> >>
> >> wes
> >>
> >
> >
>
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a little
>> tyke.
>>
>>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
>>>> little
>>>> tyke.
>>>>
>>>>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dayton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to forget it
>>>>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all the
>>>>>> way to Fresno!
>>>>>
>>>>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
>>>>
>>>> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
>>>>
>>>> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
>>>
>>> And hence, you're not yelled at for going off-topic :)
>>
>> Missed the quote reference I take it?
>
> No, got the quote reference. Hence my reply. As in, Star Wars is not off
> topic.
ok.
wes
rob.wn5
> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
little
> tyke.
>
> > Wes Hutchings wrote:
> >
> > Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>
>
> Been there, done that, it's dull.
Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your already
visiting us from AFS.
> If you think this is big league, well....
A diversion to while away the minutes between reading Fanfics and playing
games. Bloody entertaining diversion mind you, hope your up to making my
giggle.
:-)
Rob Wilson
>
> wes
>
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> little
>> tyke.
>>
>>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>>
>>
>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>
> Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your already
> visiting us from AFS.
Which has new scum in residence.
They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
>
>> If you think this is big league, well....
>
> A diversion to while away the minutes between reading Fanfics and playing
> games. Bloody entertaining diversion mind you, hope your up to making my
> giggle.
> :-)
Probably not.
wes
>
> Rob Wilson
>
>>
>> wes
>>
>
>
Cmdrwilkens
news:pOmX7.97723$BX4.5...@e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com...
>
> Kynes wrote in message ...<snip>
>
> Isn't this slander?
>
It would be if not posted with sarcastic intent.
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B8538B65.1592D%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>> I heard that rob.wn5 was hung like a Bantha.
>>
>>>
>>> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:B85386B0.15925%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
>>> little
>>>> tyke.
>>>
>>> You know, it's entirely possible that you have thatth wrong way round.
>>> :-)
>>>
>>> In this NG we breed them tough, and we start when their young.
>>
>> When does that kick in? I haven't seen it yet.
>
> Well you can lead a dolt to quality but you can't make it appreciate it.
Just as you can proclaim something as quality, doesn't make it so.
>
>>>>
>>>>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dayton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to
> forget
>>> it
>>>>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all
> the
>>>>>> way to Fresno!
>>>>>
>>>>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
>>>
>>> Hehehehehehehehe
>>>
>>> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
>>> Pop. 1065
>>> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old
> lady.
>>
>> A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a
> fine
>> automobile.
>
> Automobiles, please, we use AT_AT's here. Automobiles are the things we use
> as spare 'Shoes'.
A missed film reference.
I like AT-AT's, I especially like how slow and easy to destroy they are.
>
>>>
>>> Rob Wilson
>>> Post the flame, post the flame, to ASVS we will take you.
>>> :-)
>>
>> I've taken on entire NG's before, as many as three at a time.
>
> Good for you, never mind the quality feel the width eh?
Nope, an observation, in contrast to the stated bravado.
>
>> You don't stand a chance.
>
> Of course not, only an idiot would trust to chance, I deal only in
> certainties. Your losing for instance.
> :-)
>
I suggest you check Google.
>> The biggest problem in killing dinosaurs is it takes them a week to
> figure
>> out they're dead.
>
> True, look how long it's taking Billy boy to notice he lost in his first
> reply.
It seems to be catching.
wes
Kynes
>Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill. I
>don't know
>if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you don't
>even touch, especially
>children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists, but
>when you sink as low as
>you have, it is really sad.
CARLIN: "Now, I know what you're thinking. He's not going to attack the
children, is he? Yes he is. He's going to attack the children."
--
-LK!
[ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
"I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
of the Star Wars series."
- net.movies, 6/8/1982
Kynes
>> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
>> Pop. 1065
>> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old lady.
>
>A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a fine
>automobile.
He doesn't even drive it! He just rubs it with a diaper.
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was strong as a herd of Bantha.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> > little
> >> tyke.
> >>
> >>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
> >>
> >>
> >> Been there, done that, it's dull.
> >
> > Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your
already
> > visiting us from AFS.
>
> Which has new scum in residence.
Yay for them, always nice for them to get new infusion of intellect, so I
take it you count as old scum?
> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
Only after we scrub the rim hard enough, you'd be suprised how resilient
some scum can be just won't budge.
>
> >
> >> If you think this is big league, well....
> >
> > A diversion to while away the minutes between reading Fanfics and
playing
> > games. Bloody entertaining diversion mind you, hope your up to making
my
> > giggle.
> > :-)
>
> Probably not.
Your no fun, I demand a new dancing monkey, this one won't perform.
Rob Wilson
>
Kynes
>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>
>
>Been there, done that, it's dull.
>If you think this is big league, well....
Wes, please get real. I remember you, even if you don't remember me. You're
weak. USENET fears and hates us. Don't believe me? Go ask
alt.tv.star-trek.voyager, if you can find them in the rubble. Or SB.com. Or any
one of the individuals who have been broken; stronger and tougher than you.
By the way, I'm great.
Kynes
>> Afetr all, after his humour bypass and laugh gland extraction there's
>> nothing else for him to do. Maybe he can ask Billy to give him a hug.
>>
>I'm at a loss. Where is the humour in "sex with children an then killling
>them"?
Nothing. That's why I'm so disappointed in Bill.
Durandal
> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>
>
>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>> If you think this is big league, well....
>
>
>
> The entire USENET fears and hates us because of our fanaticism. Post a
> flame war, and you'll be roasted over a spit, with the denizens taking
> turns basting your slowly-charring carcass with red wine and taking
> turns having orgies with the young, attractive women of your family.
>
> Against the forces of ASVS, there can be no victory.
>
>
>
I should modify the above, because I believe that I repeated a phrase
that makes it sound bad.
The entire USENET fears and hates us because of our fanaticism. Post a
flame war, and you'll be roasted over a spit, with the denizens taking
turns basting your slowly-charring carcass with red wine and having
their way with the young, attractive women of your family.
Durandal
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 19:54:52 GMT, "Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Frankly, this is the most ignorant thing I have seen written about Bill. I
>>don't know
>>if you were going for a laugh here, but there are some subjects you don't
>>even touch, especially
>>children. It's pathetic enough that a thread like this one even exists, but
>>when you sink as low as
>>you have, it is really sad.
>>
>
> CARLIN: "Now, I know what you're thinking. He's not going to attack the
> children, is he? Yes he is. He's going to attack the children."
"And this is Mister Conductor talking. I know what I'm talking about."
Dalton
>
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:01:57 -0800, Wes Hutchings <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote:
>
> >> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
> >> Pop. 1065
> >> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old lady.
> >
> >A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a fine
> >automobile.
>
> He doesn't even drive it! He just rubs it with a diaper.
Hey Kynes, can you sing?
Kynes
>What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
>children" have to do with each other?
>I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of wuss?
>I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the comments
>that were posted crossed that line
> and were offensive.
Dude, I'm so far across the line that it's a dot to me. Only with the aid of
powerful binoculars can I even see the line. My people crossed the line a
thousand generations ago. I was born across the line.
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:08:36 -0800, Wes Hutchings <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote:
>
>>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>>
>>
>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>> If you think this is big league, well....
>
> Wes, please get real.
Nothing but.
> I remember you, even if you don't remember me.
I remember you.
> You're
> weak.
Then come here and knock me down.
> USENET fears and hates us.
most of USENET hasn't even heard of you.
> Don't believe me?
Nope.
> Go ask
> alt.tv.star-trek.voyager, if you can find them in the rubble. Or SB.com. Or
> any
> one of the individuals who have been broken; stronger and tougher than you.
I haven't met anyone on Usenet like that.
If you imagine you're the first then perhaps you can explain why you left
the last time.
>
> By the way, I'm great.
You certainly think a lot of yourself.
> --
> -LK!
> [ ky...@choam.org ] [ ICQ: 795238 ] [ AIM: Kynes23 ]
>
> "I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
> I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
> of the Star Wars series."
>
> - net.movies, 6/8/1982
I prefer the Bloom County strip quote.
wes
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 15:01:57 -0800, Wes Hutchings <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote:
>
>>> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
>>> Pop. 1065
>>> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old lady.
>>
>> A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a fine
>> automobile.
>
> He doesn't even drive it! He just rubs it with a diaper.
Do you speak English?
What country do you think this is?
wes
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853946B.15958%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>> I heard that rob.wn5 was strong as a herd of Bantha.
>>
>>>
>>> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
>>> little
>>>> tyke.
>>>>
>>>>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>>>
>>> Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your
> already
>>> visiting us from AFS.
>>
>> Which has new scum in residence.
>
> Yay for them, always nice for them to get new infusion of intellect, so I
> take it you count as old scum?
1. Trolls rarely, if ever count as an infusion of intellect.
2. I'm probably older than you, but as to my scum content, Rebel is as close
as I get.
>
>> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
>
> Only after we scrub the rim hard enough, you'd be suprised how resilient
> some scum can be just won't budge.
I'm rarely surprised.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> If you think this is big league, well....
>>>
>>> A diversion to while away the minutes between reading Fanfics and
> playing
>>> games. Bloody entertaining diversion mind you, hope your up to making
> my
>>> giggle.
>>> :-)
>>
>> Probably not.
>
> Your no fun, I demand a new dancing monkey, this one won't perform.
Only one person gets to call me a monkey.
Quite frankly, you don't have her tits.
wes
>
> Rob Wilson
>
>>
>
>
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was a god among men.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B8538B65.1592D%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >> I heard that rob.wn5 was hung like a Bantha.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:B85386B0.15925%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was
a
> >>> little
> >>>> tyke.
> >>>
> >>> You know, it's entirely possible that you have thatth wrong way
round.
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>> In this NG we breed them tough, and we start when their young.
> >>
> >> When does that kick in? I haven't seen it yet.
> >
> > Well you can lead a dolt to quality but you can't make it appreciate
it.
>
> Just as you can proclaim something as quality, doesn't make it so.
I proclaim nothing, simply state what is.
> >>>>> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dayton wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Please. We've seen much, much worse here.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That goat sex one springs to mind. No matter how hard I try to
> > forget
> >>> it
> >>>>>> it still haunts me. Damn you Dalton for posting that! Damn you all
> > the
> >>>>>> way to Fresno!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Fresno? Oh, that hurts. You bastard.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You're not missing much. I was born there you know.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You're going to die there you know? Convenient.
> >>>
> >>> Hehehehehehehehe
> >>>
> >>> ASVS never will you see a more wretched hive of scum and villany
> >>> Pop. 1065
> >>> please drive carefully, 10 points for a troll, 20 for a little old
> > lady.
> >>
> >> A man with his priorities so far out of whack, doesn't deserve such a
> > fine
> >> automobile.
> >
> > Automobiles, please, we use AT_AT's here. Automobiles are the things we
use
> > as spare 'Shoes'.
>
> A missed film reference.
True, if only I knew every film in existance and the lines from them.
> I like AT-AT's, I especially like how slow and easy to destroy they are.
Yep, them pesky APC's are the toughest vehicles ever.
> >>> Rob Wilson
> >>> Post the flame, post the flame, to ASVS we will take you.
> >>> :-)
> >>
> >> I've taken on entire NG's before, as many as three at a time.
> >
> > Good for you, never mind the quality feel the width eh?
>
> Nope, an observation, in contrast to the stated bravado.
So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
>
> >
> >> You don't stand a chance.
> >
> > Of course not, only an idiot would trust to chance, I deal only in
> > certainties. Your losing for instance.
> > :-)
> >
>
> I suggest you check Google.
For? Your flood of triviality or are there gems buried deep in there
somewhere?
>
> >> The biggest problem in killing dinosaurs is it takes them a week to
> > figure
> >> out they're dead.
> >
> > True, look how long it's taking Billy boy to notice he lost in his
first
> > reply.
>
> It seems to be catching.
I'm sorry, if you know you've already lost, why are you still here? Have
you resigned yourself to being my toy of the moment then? Cool, I'd better
start winding theat organ. Lets see your dance repetoire.
;-)
Rob Wilson
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B85396C9.1595F%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> Well you can lead a dolt to quality but you can't make it appreciate
> it.
>>
>> Just as you can proclaim something as quality, doesn't make it so.
>
> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is.
Without supporting evidence and using terms such as dolt, it is quite clear
you are making a proclamation.
>>> Automobiles, please, we use AT_AT's here. Automobiles are the things we
> use
>>> as spare 'Shoes'.
>>
>> A missed film reference.
>
> True, if only I knew every film in existance and the lines from them.
Or even the ones discussed in groups you involve yourself in discussions in.
>
>> I like AT-AT's, I especially like how slow and easy to destroy they are.
>
> Yep, them pesky APC's are the toughest vehicles ever.
(crunch...crash...boom)
What was that noise?
>>> Good for you, never mind the quality feel the width eh?
>>
>> Nope, an observation, in contrast to the stated bravado.
>
> So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
> Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
Go to Google and look them up yourself.
>>> Of course not, only an idiot would trust to chance, I deal only in
>>> certainties. Your losing for instance.
>>> :-)
>>>
>>
>> I suggest you check Google.
>
> For? Your flood of triviality or are there gems buried deep in there
> somewhere?
Content.
>>> True, look how long it's taking Billy boy to notice he lost in his
> first
>>> reply.
>>
>> It seems to be catching.
>
> I'm sorry, if you know you've already lost, why are you still here?
Perspective is a funny thing. let me know when yours clears up.
> Have
> you resigned yourself to being my toy of the moment then?
No, have you chosen to not even put up anything intelligent in reply?
Declarations are not worth anything on their own. Support your boasts or go
into advertising or politics.
> Cool, I'd better
> start winding theat organ. Lets see your dance repetoire.
> ;-)
Get within sight of me and find out.
wes
>
> Rob Wilson
>
>
>
>
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was able to benchpress a herd of Bantha's.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B853946B.15958%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >> I heard that rob.wn5 was strong as a herd of Bantha.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was
a
> >>> little
> >>>> tyke.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
> >>>
> >>> Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your
> > already
> >>> visiting us from AFS.
> >>
> >> Which has new scum in residence.
> >
> > Yay for them, always nice for them to get new infusion of intellect,
so I
> > take it you count as old scum?
>
> 1. Trolls rarely, if ever count as an infusion of intellect.
Nice allusion you attribute there. At least we know how you think your
seen.
> 2. I'm probably older than you, but as to my scum content, Rebel is as
close
> as I get.
Must not make Rebel without a clue joke, too easy.
:-)
>
> >
> >> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
> >
> > Only after we scrub the rim hard enough, you'd be suprised how
resilient
> > some scum can be just won't budge.
>
> I'm rarely surprised.
Your life must be unending drudgery. That's sad.
:-(
> >>>> If you think this is big league, well....
> >>>
> >>> A diversion to while away the minutes between reading Fanfics and
> > playing
> >>> games. Bloody entertaining diversion mind you, hope your up to making
> > my
> >>> giggle.
> >>> :-)
> >>
> >> Probably not.
> >
> > Your no fun, I demand a new dancing monkey, this one won't perform.
>
> Only one person gets to call me a monkey.
I just did.
> Quite frankly, you don't have her tits.
How dare you sir, I'll have you know I have the finest tit's in all the
lands. I demand satisfaction, just ask my G/f.
:-P
Rob Wilson
waiting for the dancing to start.
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B8539D92.1598C%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> Yay for them, always nice for them to get new infusion of intellect,
> so I
>>> take it you count as old scum?
>>
>> 1. Trolls rarely, if ever count as an infusion of intellect.
>
> Nice allusion you attribute there. At least we know how you think your
> seen.
There's that perception problem noted earlier.
>
>> 2. I'm probably older than you, but as to my scum content, Rebel is as
> close
>> as I get.
>
> Must not make Rebel without a clue joke, too easy.
> :-)
Sounds like your path of choice.
>>> Only after we scrub the rim hard enough, you'd be suprised how
> resilient
>>> some scum can be just won't budge.
>>
>> I'm rarely surprised.
>
> Your life must be unending drudgery. That's sad.
> :-(
Nope, it's still got enough variety for me.
>>> Your no fun, I demand a new dancing monkey, this one won't perform.
>>
>> Only one person gets to call me a monkey.
>
> I just did.
From Grimsby, how's the weather there? Nevermind, I'm sure where ever you
are it all seems the same to you.
Let me know when you get out this way, then you can try calling me anything
you'd dare to to my face.
>
>> Quite frankly, you don't have her tits.
>
> How dare you sir, I'll have you know I have the finest tit's in all the
> lands. I demand satisfaction, just ask my G/f.
> :-P
Nope, hers are much better, as is what they are accompanied by.
your G/f isn't talking to me, which is all the better for you that I no
longer do that.
>
> Rob Wilson
> waiting for the dancing to start.
Waiting for a good beat. Boy George songs never did it for me, apparently
they work for you.
wes
>
>
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was playing around with the daft automated reply
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B85396C9.1595F%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>
> >>> Well you can lead a dolt to quality but you can't make it appreciate
> > it.
> >>
> >> Just as you can proclaim something as quality, doesn't make it so.
> >
> > I proclaim nothing, simply state what is.
>
> Without supporting evidence and using terms such as dolt, it is quite
clear
> you are making a proclamation.
Do astound us by showing my reply was not a statement.
>
>
> >>> Automobiles, please, we use AT_AT's here. Automobiles are the things
we
> > use
> >>> as spare 'Shoes'.
> >>
> >> A missed film reference.
> >
> > True, if only I knew every film in existance and the lines from them.
>
> Or even the ones discussed in groups you involve yourself in discussions
in.
Yes it's true, I hold my hand up and declare i don't know Everyline in
every Star Wars or Star trek film. The shame is immense, I don't know how I
can live with myself. Go on stun me, reveal what you were paraphrasing.
Have a small bauble to crow over when you tell you tales round the fire.
:-)
>
> >
> >> I like AT-AT's, I especially like how slow and easy to destroy they
are.
> >
> > Yep, them pesky APC's are the toughest vehicles ever.
>
> (crunch...crash...boom)
> What was that noise?
The sound of my reply breaking the sound barrier over your head.
>
> >>> Good for you, never mind the quality feel the width eh?
> >>
> >> Nope, an observation, in contrast to the stated bravado.
> >
> > So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
> > Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
>
> Go to Google and look them up yourself.
There are over 80,000 posts that contain your name, you may have time to
waste pouring through all that muck for one shiny pebble or two. Produce a
gem here for us to marvel at. Show us your style, and perform.
>
> >>> Of course not, only an idiot would trust to chance, I deal only in
> >>> certainties. Your losing for instance.
> >>> :-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> I suggest you check Google.
> >
> > For? Your flood of triviality or are there gems buried deep in there
> > somewhere?
>
> Content.
I looked there appeared to be none.
(if your going to make it this easy, this will get boring fast. Try to at
least do something here).
>
> >>> True, look how long it's taking Billy boy to notice he lost in his
> > first
> >>> reply.
> >>
> >> It seems to be catching.
> >
> > I'm sorry, if you know you've already lost, why are you still here?
>
> Perspective is a funny thing. let me know when yours clears up.
I have no problem with perspective, i'm just amazed that yours was clear
enough to not only realise you had lost, but ot also admit to it in such an
admirably self-deprecating manner. That deed does you credit, your sudden
cold feet and attempt to retract it however reflect poorly on you.
>
> > Have
> > you resigned yourself to being my toy of the moment then?
>
> No, have you chosen to not even put up anything intelligent in reply?
Why waste pearls before swine. Your providing no entertainment value as
yet, and I'll be damned if I'll do all the work. Winding the organ is my
job in the partnership, so don your fez and waistcoat before the audience
gets bored.
> Declarations are not worth anything on their own.
Any other trueisms to spout or are you actually going to start making posts
with substance?
> Support your boasts or go
> into advertising or politics.
I've made a boast? Do tell.
:-)
>
> > Cool, I'd better
> > start winding theat organ. Lets see your dance repetoire.
> > ;-)
>
> Get within sight of me and find out.
So far you appear to have a very slow shuffle. I paid bottom dollar for a
performing Monkey and I'm not getting my moneys worth!
Rob Wilson
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was getting bored fast with the lack of talent being
presented by the above.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B8539D92.1598C%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>
> >>> Yay for them, always nice for them to get new infusion of intellect,
> > so I
> >>> take it you count as old scum?
> >>
> >> 1. Trolls rarely, if ever count as an infusion of intellect.
> >
> > Nice allusion you attribute there. At least we know how you think your
> > seen.
>
> There's that perception problem noted earlier.
Ok, in the first post I linked ASVS to a hive of Scum and villainy, now if
you don't understand Irony, that's fine (and it would certainly explain
your abysmal performance to date), Then in a mention of Scum in relation to
you, you come back with the Troll bit. Something I certainly didn't allude
to so who does that leave making the assumption... come on you can do it,
push that neuron.
>
> >
> >> 2. I'm probably older than you, but as to my scum content, Rebel is as
> > close
> >> as I get.
> >
> > Must not make Rebel without a clue joke, too easy.
> > :-)
>
> Sounds like your path of choice.
Yes I am indeed choosing to follow where your meandering, if we deviate
you'll just get confused.
>
> >>> Only after we scrub the rim hard enough, you'd be suprised how
> > resilient
> >>> some scum can be just won't budge.
> >>
> >> I'm rarely surprised.
> >
> > Your life must be unending drudgery. That's sad.
> > :-(
>
> Nope, it's still got enough variety for me.
a life of varied drudgery, you don't really ask for much out of life. No
wonder your wits have dulled.
>
> >>> Your no fun, I demand a new dancing monkey, this one won't perform.
> >>
> >> Only one person gets to call me a monkey.
> >
> > I just did.
>
> From Grimsby, how's the weather there? Nevermind, I'm sure where ever you
> are it all seems the same to you.
Cold, but refreshing, and not Grimsby.
> Let me know when you get out this way, then you can try calling me
anything
> you'd dare to to my face.
Someone got out of bed on the wrong side didn't they. I think you need to
*really* reread our little discussion to date.
>
> >
> >> Quite frankly, you don't have her tits.
> >
> > How dare you sir, I'll have you know I have the finest tit's in all the
> > lands. I demand satisfaction, just ask my G/f.
> > :-P
>
> Nope, hers are much better, as is what they are accompanied by.
> your G/f isn't talking to me, which is all the better for you that I no
> longer do that.
And he goes low first. I might have known it. Run out of your meager
reserve of talent already.
Christ you have a short fuse, I've known trolls that stayed civil longer or
actually tried to turn my comments around first, and I've only been posting
a year.
>
> Waiting for a good beat. Boy George songs never did it for me, apparently
> they work for you.
Nah, too 80's Give me Madness any day.
Rob Wilson
Thinks someone needs to think about their reply before the flames really
start, though I'm game if you are.
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853A1D4.15992%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is.
>>
>> Without supporting evidence and using terms such as dolt, it is quite
> clear
>> you are making a proclamation.
>
> Do astound us by showing my reply was not a statement.
>
">>> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is."
Read much?
>>> True, if only I knew every film in existance and the lines from them.
>>
>> Or even the ones discussed in groups you involve yourself in discussions
> in.
>
> Yes it's true, I hold my hand up and declare i don't know Everyline in
> every Star Wars or Star trek film. The shame is immense, I don't know how I
> can live with myself. Go on stun me, reveal what you were paraphrasing.
> Have a small bauble to crow over when you tell you tales round the fire.
> :-)
ROTJ, on the skiff over the Sarlaac Pit, Luke to Han and vice versa. It's a
pretty common quote.
>>> Yep, them pesky APC's are the toughest vehicles ever.
>>
>> (crunch...crash...boom)
>> What was that noise?
>
> The sound of my reply breaking the sound barrier over your head.
Nope, another claim of victory sans support.
>>> So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
>>> Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
>>
>> Go to Google and look them up yourself.
>
> There are over 80,000 posts that contain your name, you may have time to
> waste pouring through all that muck for one shiny pebble or two. Produce a
> gem here for us to marvel at. Show us your style, and perform.
It's all right here, right there, everywhere. You're having a problem
catching on. You're hardly the first.
>>> For? Your flood of triviality or are there gems buried deep in there
>>> somewhere?
>>
>> Content.
>
> I looked there appeared to be none.
There's that perception problem. I suggest having your optometrist check for
myopia first, then go from there to see if the problem goes deeper.
> (if your going to make it this easy, this will get boring fast. Try to at
> least do something here).
I have, you don't grasp it, deal with that.
>>> I'm sorry, if you know you've already lost, why are you still here?
>>
>> Perspective is a funny thing. let me know when yours clears up.
>
> I have no problem with perspective,
Claim of superiority, unsupported in any way.
> i'm just amazed that yours was clear
> enough to not only realise you had lost, but ot also admit to it in such an
> admirably self-deprecating manner.
Again, see a doctor, this sounds serious.
> That deed does you credit, your sudden
> cold feet and attempt to retract it however reflect poorly on you.
Seriously, see a doctor, unless of course you already realize you're just
not terribly bright and choose to bulldoze ahead in your ignorance.
>
>>
>>> Have
>>> you resigned yourself to being my toy of the moment then?
>>
>> No, have you chosen to not even put up anything intelligent in reply?
>
> Why waste pearls before swine.
I'm sorry, were you attempting to ask me a question? Are you claiming you do
in fact possess pearls? I've yet to see any. You've illustrated the typical
tactic of the clueless Usenet poster who believes himself sheltered in
obscurity and thus can vent his spleen in manners he would never dare in
public. it's a sad commentary on the internet, but there it is.
> Your providing no entertainment value as
> yet, and I'll be damned if I'll do all the work.
You've done no work as of yet. I am not here for your entertainment.
> Winding the organ is my
> job in the partnership, so don your fez and waistcoat before the audience
> gets bored.
I'm not dancing for you. You claimed some sense of superiority and how you
as well as others in your group would toast my ass. Fine, come and get me.
I'm waiting.
>
>> Declarations are not worth anything on their own.
>
> Any other trueisms to spout or are you actually going to start making posts
> with substance?
I made no claims of being a member of some imagined bad ass usenet
fraternity.
It's your position to support yourself.
I've stated I can take anything you can dish out.
Now you've gone all limp.
>
>> Support your boasts or go
>> into advertising or politics.
>
> I've made a boast? Do tell.
> :-)
Your one of those who claimed some imagined superiority.
Show it or crawl away.
I don't really care as you've done nothing to impress me as of yet.
>
>>
>>> Cool, I'd better
>>> start winding theat organ. Lets see your dance repetoire.
>>> ;-)
>>
>> Get within sight of me and find out.
>
> So far you appear to have a very slow shuffle. I paid bottom dollar for a
> performing Monkey and I'm not getting my moneys worth!
A dance is only as good as the music or your partner.
At present you suck on both counts.
I don't like you enough to over look your faults.
wes
>
> Rob Wilson
>
>
>
Enigma
> Did the whole Chewie thread get started by the imaginary Borg. If so can we
> just ignore the figments of our imagination in future?
> :-)
>
> Rob Wilson
We should call that figment of our imagination "the one who doesn't exist" or
"TOWDE"
Enigma
> I heard that rob.wn5 was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> little tyke.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
> >> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> > little
> >> tyke.
> >>
> >>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
> >>
> >>
> >> Been there, done that, it's dull.
> >
> > Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your already
> > visiting us from AFS.
>
> Which has new scum in residence.
> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
>
Kynes
I like it.
Enigma
news:wmqX7.12182$x78....@news2.bloor.is...
<snip>
> > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> children" have to do with each other?
Because Bill goes down faster than the Titanic when he's with children. Don't
like that comment? Then unplug the computer and go talk to your plants and
listen to Yanni and Kenny G music.
> I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of wuss?
In this case I'd say yes.
> I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the comments
> that were posted crossed that line
> and were offensive.
>
True but to each person that line is drawn differently. If you don't like what
is said then ignore it and do something else.
rob.wn5
> I heard that rob.wn5 was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
> little tyke.
>
> >
> > "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:B853A1D4.15992%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>
> >>> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is.
> >>
> >> Without supporting evidence and using terms such as dolt, it is quite
> > clear
> >> you are making a proclamation.
> >
> > Do astound us by showing my reply was not a statement.
> >
>
> ">>> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is."
> Read much?
Thank you, it's been sat there Begging to be abused all this time so please
for the love of God *do* something with it. I really can't make it any
easier.
>
> >>> True, if only I knew every film in existance and the lines from them.
> >>
> >> Or even the ones discussed in groups you involve yourself in
discussions
> > in.
> >
> > Yes it's true, I hold my hand up and declare i don't know Everyline in
> > every Star Wars or Star trek film. The shame is immense, I don't know
how I
> > can live with myself. Go on stun me, reveal what you were paraphrasing.
> > Have a small bauble to crow over when you tell you tales round the
fire.
> > :-)
>
> ROTJ, on the skiff over the Sarlaac Pit, Luke to Han and vice versa. It's
a
> pretty common quote.
Really, I'll admit this is the first tim I've seen it quoted.
>
> >>> Yep, them pesky APC's are the toughest vehicles ever.
> >>
> >> (crunch...crash...boom)
> >> What was that noise?
> >
> > The sound of my reply breaking the sound barrier over your head.
>
> Nope, another claim of victory sans support.
What is the role of an AT-AT, and what is the status of an APC on the
battlefield.
For gods sake I'm putting easy stuff out here and so far nothing. At least
put some effort in here.
>
> >>> So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
> >>> Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
> >>
> >> Go to Google and look them up yourself.
> >
> > There are over 80,000 posts that contain your name, you may have time
to
> > waste pouring through all that muck for one shiny pebble or two.
Produce a
> > gem here for us to marvel at. Show us your style, and perform.
>
> It's all right here, right there, everywhere. You're having a problem
> catching on. You're hardly the first.
Oh dear god, not the perception thing again. What is it with you and
flogging dead horses. Try something else, *anything* else. It'sthe
equivalent of "You are, but what am I" Again and again. Your boring people
to tears here.
>
> >>> For? Your flood of triviality or are there gems buried deep in there
> >>> somewhere?
> >>
> >> Content.
> >
> > I looked there appeared to be none.
>
> There's that perception problem. I suggest having your optometrist check
for
> myopia first, then go from there to see if the problem goes deeper.
I know your not a one trick pony, there is an excellent opportunity to
entertain *2* NG's here and really have a ball and you keep stonewalling
it.
>
> > (if your going to make it this easy, this will get boring fast. Try to
at
> > least do something here).
>
> I have, you don't grasp it, deal with that.
No, your bringing it back to the same damn thing each and everytime. You
know how to do this properly, so can we please have it opened out. I've
only got this computer for another 6 hours tops. Lets do something.
>
> >>> I'm sorry, if you know you've already lost, why are you still here?
> >>
> >> Perspective is a funny thing. let me know when yours clears up.
> >
> > I have no problem with perspective,
>
> Claim of superiority, unsupported in any way.
Claiming to have perspective is a claim of superiority now? And no I know
what your alluding to but this is getting drier than the gobi. This is a
wasted opportunity. When you frst posted and I checked on Google I thought
this would be fucking brilliant. I was hoping to learn some new tricks
here. All that's happening is that your killing it dead. But only this
part. Billies done the smart thing and not replied to the jibes, great good
for him, Now either we close this as well. Or we make it worthwhile.
>
> > i'm just amazed that yours was clear
> > enough to not only realise you had lost, but ot also admit to it in
such an
> > admirably self-deprecating manner.
>
> Again, see a doctor, this sounds serious.
You missed out the inference to Dementia, the readers think your still
banging on about Perspective (please tell me your not).
>
> > That deed does you credit, your sudden
> > cold feet and attempt to retract it however reflect poorly on you.
>
> Seriously, see a doctor, unless of course you already realize you're just
> not terribly bright and choose to bulldoze ahead in your ignorance.
(Thank fuck for that)
Hah if I were only half as ignorant as you appear I'd have seen a doctor
long ago.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> Have
> >>> you resigned yourself to being my toy of the moment then?
> >>
> >> No, have you chosen to not even put up anything intelligent in reply?
> >
> > Why waste pearls before swine.
>
> I'm sorry, were you attempting to ask me a question? Are you claiming you
do
> in fact possess pearls? I've yet to see any. You've illustrated the
typical
> tactic of the clueless Usenet poster who believes himself sheltered in
> obscurity and thus can vent his spleen in manners he would never dare in
> public. it's a sad commentary on the internet, but there it is.
What obscurity, the people here probably know more about me than half my
family. You could have done this in a 2 word reply and left me to scrabble
around to turn it.
>
> > Your providing no entertainment value as
> > yet, and I'll be damned if I'll do all the work.
>
> You've done no work as of yet. I am not here for your entertainment.
NO we're here for theirs! Is there a relevant debate here? No. So this
either becomes flames or we have fun and give the others something to read.
Goddammit, you KNOW this, why the hell do I have to explicitly tell you?
>
> > Winding the organ is my
> > job in the partnership, so don your fez and waistcoat before the
audience
> > gets bored.
>
> I'm not dancing for you. You claimed some sense of superiority and how
you
> as well as others in your group would toast my ass. Fine, come and get
me.
> I'm waiting.
So, are you wanting this to become a flame fest, they can pretty
entertaining, but your usual MO is wit and intellect. Though your killing
this dead with the latter, the formers been left out except a sparkle at
the beginning.
>
> >
> >> Declarations are not worth anything on their own.
> >
> > Any other trueisms to spout or are you actually going to start making
posts
> > with substance?
>
> I made no claims of being a member of some imagined bad ass usenet
> fraternity.
> It's your position to support yourself.
> I've stated I can take anything you can dish out.
> Now you've gone all limp.
(this has promise)
Pah, it's so massive there's nothing that will support it, my intellect I
mean.
>
> >
> >> Support your boasts or go
> >> into advertising or politics.
> >
> > I've made a boast? Do tell.
> > :-)
>
> Your one of those who claimed some imagined superiority.
> Show it or crawl away.
> I don't really care as you've done nothing to impress me as of yet.
Trust me it's not a one way street in that regard.
>
> >
> >>
> >>> Cool, I'd better
> >>> start winding theat organ. Lets see your dance repetoire.
> >>> ;-)
> >>
> >> Get within sight of me and find out.
> >
> > So far you appear to have a very slow shuffle. I paid bottom dollar for
a
> > performing Monkey and I'm not getting my moneys worth!
>
> A dance is only as good as the music or your partner.
> At present you suck on both counts.
> I don't like you enough to over look your faults.
You'd have to find them first.
Rob Wilson
do you want to do that one again, or shall we open it up from what we have
to date?
It's in your hands.
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853A5D4.159A0%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> Nice allusion you attribute there. At least we know how you think your
>>> seen.
>>
>> There's that perception problem noted earlier.
>
> Ok, in the first post I linked ASVS to a hive of Scum and villainy, now if
> you don't understand Irony, that's fine (and it would certainly explain
> your abysmal performance to date), Then in a mention of Scum in relation to
> you, you come back with the Troll bit. Something I certainly didn't allude
> to so who does that leave making the assumption... come on you can do it,
> push that neuron.
I understand irony. I don't feel it applies.
You've made several assumptions.
I've made observations which your behavior has supported at each turn.
>>> Must not make Rebel without a clue joke, too easy.
>>> :-)
>>
>> Sounds like your path of choice.
>
> Yes I am indeed choosing to follow where your meandering, if we deviate
> you'll just get confused.
I'm not having a problem, at all.
>>> Your life must be unending drudgery. That's sad.
>>> :-(
>>
>> Nope, it's still got enough variety for me.
>
> a life of varied drudgery, you don't really ask for much out of life. No
> wonder your wits have dulled.
Life gives me what I need in most cases.
My wits are doing just fine, which is why I understand you and your clan
began this so called fight and have yet to actually bring it.
It seems the bluster has faded.
>>> I just did.
>>
>> From Grimsby, how's the weather there? Nevermind, I'm sure where ever you
>> are it all seems the same to you.
>
> Cold, but refreshing, and not Grimsby.
That's where your news server is.
>
>> Let me know when you get out this way, then you can try calling me
> anything
>> you'd dare to to my face.
>
> Someone got out of bed on the wrong side didn't they.
Nope, not at all.
> I think you need to
> *really* reread our little discussion to date.
I have, you and a few others claimed some ability to kick ass and take
names, I stated I was unimpressed.
I still am and you're still trying to claim some sembelance of victory in a
fight you've yet to enter.
>>> How dare you sir, I'll have you know I have the finest tit's in all the
>>> lands. I demand satisfaction, just ask my G/f.
>>> :-P
>>
>> Nope, hers are much better, as is what they are accompanied by.
>> your G/f isn't talking to me, which is all the better for you that I no
>> longer do that.
>
> And he goes low first.
No, a simple statement of fact.
> I might have known it. Run out of your meager
> reserve of talent already.
Nope, I deal in reality, let me know when you're able to grasp that.
> Christ you have a short fuse,
You assume, yet again. I'm not even simmering.
> I've known trolls that stayed civil longer or
> actually tried to turn my comments around first, and I've only been posting
> a year.
Then you're not terribly quick. Not surprising really.
Feel free to quote the passages that are giving you trouble and I'll explain
them to you as often as it takes for you to grasp them.
>
>>
>> Waiting for a good beat. Boy George songs never did it for me, apparently
>> they work for you.
>
> Nah, too 80's Give me Madness any day.
Which is also 80's, there's that Irony again, I'm betting this time you
didn't realize it....either.
>
> Rob Wilson
> Thinks someone needs to think about their reply before the flames really
> start, though I'm game if you are.
You and others made the claim, I'm waiting for you to support it.
You're weak at best to date.
wes
>
>
>
>
>
rob.wn5
"Enigma" <xtre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:gbuX7.9601$bPo....@news1.bloor.is...
Looking good.
Rob Wilson
>
>
Gerry LaHay
> "Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:wmqX7.12182$x78....@news2.bloor.is...
> <snip>
> > > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> > children" have to do with each other?
>
> Because Bill goes down faster than the Titanic when he's with children.
Don't
> like that comment? Then unplug the computer and go talk to your plants and
> listen to Yanni and Kenny G music.
Is this the best you've got?
>
> > I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of
wuss?
>
> In this case I'd say yes.
>
People who know me would say otherwise.
> > I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the
comments
> > that were posted crossed that line
> > and were offensive.
> >
> True but to each person that line is drawn differently. If you don't like
what
> is said then ignore it and do something else.
That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said. Choosing to
ignore
something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on someone
and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
By the way, I do not own any plants, do I own any Kenny G or Yanni.
Gerry
Enigma
>
> Enigma <xtre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:0FuX7.59$5oy...@news2.bloor.is...
> > "Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > news:wmqX7.12182$x78....@news2.bloor.is...
> > <snip>
> > > > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> > > children" have to do with each other?
> >
> > Because Bill goes down faster than the Titanic when he's with children.
> Don't
> > like that comment? Then unplug the computer and go talk to your plants and
> > listen to Yanni and Kenny G music.
>
> Is this the best you've got?
No.
> >
> > > I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort of
> wuss?
> >
> > In this case I'd say yes.
> >
> People who know me would say otherwise.
>
Your multiple personalities do not count.
>
> > > I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the
> comments
> > > that were posted crossed that line
> > > and were offensive.
> > >
> > True but to each person that line is drawn differently. If you don't like
> what
> > is said then ignore it and do something else.
>
> That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
> that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said. Choosing to
> ignore
> something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on someone
> and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
Why bother? Nothing you say will make a difference here. Especially here. It's
humour! HUMOUR!
> By the way, I do not own any plants, do I own any Kenny G or Yanni.
>
Good for you.
--
"DANGER!
A dangerous toy. This toy is being made for the extreme priority the good looks.
The little part which suffocates when the sharp part which gets hurt is
swallowed is contained generously. Only the person who can take responsibility
by itself is to play."
-www.engrish.com
Durandal
> That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
> that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said. Choosing to
> ignore
> something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on someone
> and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
> By the way, I do not own any plants, do I own any Kenny G or Yanni.
"Something had to be said"? Aw, look at the cute little moral paragon.
This isn't a web board. There are no mods. People are free to say what
they wish. Don't like it? Sorry. Instead of whining like a little bitch
with a skinned knee, flame back or be ignored and mocked.
rob.wn5
The advantage of nursing homes I expect.
:-)
> My wits are doing just fine, which is why I understand you and your clan
> began this so called fight and have yet to actually bring it.
Clan? I do this for me and the audience. You should know that your record
shows you to be quicker on the uptake than this.
> It seems the bluster has faded.
You want bluster I gave you bluster and you killed it dead rather than
opening the whole thing up and making me the fool I was offering to be. I
left so many easy hooks throughout you had me wondering whether you were
really you or just someone borrowing the name.
>
> >>> I just did.
> >>
> >> From Grimsby, how's the weather there? Nevermind, I'm sure where ever
you
> >> are it all seems the same to you.
> >
> > Cold, but refreshing, and not Grimsby.
>
> That's where your news server is.
It serves a decent footprint, I'm quite a distance from Grimsby.
>
> >
> >> Let me know when you get out this way, then you can try calling me
> > anything
> >> you'd dare to to my face.
> >
> > Someone got out of bed on the wrong side didn't they.
>
> Nope, not at all.
You misunderstand this easily on a good day? Boy you are fucked.
>
> > I think you need to
> > *really* reread our little discussion to date.
>
> I have, you and a few others claimed some ability to kick ass and take
> names, I stated I was unimpressed.
> I still am and you're still trying to claim some sembelance of victory
in a
> fight you've yet to enter.
>
> >>> How dare you sir, I'll have you know I have the finest tit's in all
the
> >>> lands. I demand satisfaction, just ask my G/f.
> >>> :-P
> >>
> >> Nope, hers are much better, as is what they are accompanied by.
> >> your G/f isn't talking to me, which is all the better for you that I
no
> >> longer do that.
> >
> > And he goes low first.
>
> No, a simple statement of fact.
Really whats her name then? I'll make it easy for you, just her first name?
Wow you've just made yourself a liar in one easy step.
Now do we do this properly or do we actually fight/flame. I've got 4 hours
56 minutes left.
>
> > I might have known it. Run out of your meager
> > reserve of talent already.
>
> Nope, I deal in reality, let me know when you're able to grasp that.
>
> > Christ you have a short fuse,
>
> You assume, yet again. I'm not even simmering.
>
> > I've known trolls that stayed civil longer or
> > actually tried to turn my comments around first, and I've only been
posting
> > a year.
>
> Then you're not terribly quick. Not surprising really.
> Feel free to quote the passages that are giving you trouble and I'll
explain
> them to you as often as it takes for you to grasp them.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Waiting for a good beat. Boy George songs never did it for me,
apparently
> >> they work for you.
> >
> > Nah, too 80's Give me Madness any day.
>
> Which is also 80's, there's that Irony again,
BY god I think he's finally got it. OK so they formed in in '77 and were
doing their signature tunes in '79, but they had a slew of chart hit's in
the Early 80's so they were primarily an 80's band.
> I'm betting this time you didn't realize it....either.
It was chosen on purpose will you Plaese get with the programme
>
> >
> > Rob Wilson
> > Thinks someone needs to think about their reply before the flames
really
> > start, though I'm game if you are.
>
> You and others made the claim, I'm waiting for you to support it.
> You're weak at best to date.
Look I can't make this any plainer either we do something with this Or I go
back to playing the foll on my own NG. You want to fight? We'll fight. You
want to flame? We'll flame. You want to entertain the crowd? We'll do that.
Just please give me an answer.
Rob Wilson
>
> wes
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853AEE6.159B2%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> Do astound us by showing my reply was not a statement.
>>>
>>
>> ">>> I proclaim nothing, simply state what is."
>> Read much?
>
> Thank you, it's been sat there Begging to be abused all this time so please
> for the love of God *do* something with it. I really can't make it any
> easier.
You've got a problem. You seem to think this is a role reversals course of
some kind.
Play the role you think you're best at or admit you don't know how to play
or have enough to play against me.
>>>
>>> Yes it's true, I hold my hand up and declare i don't know Everyline in
>>> every Star Wars or Star trek film. The shame is immense, I don't know
> how I
>>> can live with myself. Go on stun me, reveal what you were paraphrasing.
>>> Have a small bauble to crow over when you tell you tales round the
> fire.
>>> :-)
>>
>> ROTJ, on the skiff over the Sarlaac Pit, Luke to Han and vice versa. It's
> a
>> pretty common quote.
>
> Really, I'll admit this is the first tim I've seen it quoted.
I'll imagine there are a lot of firsts for someone in your particular
position.
>>> The sound of my reply breaking the sound barrier over your head.
>>
>> Nope, another claim of victory sans support.
>
> What is the role of an AT-AT, and what is the status of an APC on the
> battlefield.
Troop transport.
>
> For gods sake I'm putting easy stuff out here and so far nothing. At least
> put some effort in here.
I have, as much as I feel is needed.
I'm not the self proclaimed bad ass aggressor here. That role has been
claimed by you.
Pretend youu kknow what you're drooling.
>
>>
>>>>> So were we supposed to be impressed, how many threads per NG?
>>>>> Come alleviate my boredom, tell us of your feats of derring do.
>>>>
>>>> Go to Google and look them up yourself.
>>>
>>> There are over 80,000 posts that contain your name, you may have time
> to
>>> waste pouring through all that muck for one shiny pebble or two.
> Produce a
>>> gem here for us to marvel at. Show us your style, and perform.
>>
>> It's all right here, right there, everywhere. You're having a problem
>> catching on. You're hardly the first.
>
> Oh dear god, not the perception thing again. What is it with you and
> flogging dead horses. Try something else, *anything* else. It'sthe
> equivalent of "You are, but what am I" Again and again. Your boring people
> to tears here.
I deal in reality.
If you're looking for entertainment try picking on someone your own size.
I'm sure you will have no problem finding someone as small as yourself.
The perception issue is a fact you are either incapable of grasping or too
intentionally stupid to correct. Take your pick.
>>> I looked there appeared to be none.
>>
>> There's that perception problem. I suggest having your optometrist check
> for
>> myopia first, then go from there to see if the problem goes deeper.
>
> I know your not a one trick pony, there is an excellent opportunity to
> entertain *2* NG's here and really have a ball and you keep stonewalling
> it.
I'm not here to amuse you. You seem to not get why I'm here.
let me know which parts are giving you trouble.
>
>>
>>> (if your going to make it this easy, this will get boring fast. Try to
> at
>>> least do something here).
>>
>> I have, you don't grasp it, deal with that.
>
> No, your bringing it back to the same damn thing each and everytime. You
> know how to do this properly, so can we please have it opened out. I've
> only got this computer for another 6 hours tops. Lets do something.
You still don't get it, if you did, then I wouldn't need to repeat it.
I know how to do what I do properly. You don't yet realize what it is I do.
That's a shame, are they repossessing it?
You're one of those claiming some vaunted ability. I'm stating I'm not
impressed.
The ball is yours to drop.
You've done masterly at that task so far.
>>> I have no problem with perspective,
>>
>> Claim of superiority, unsupported in any way.
>
> Claiming to have perspective is a claim of superiority now?
Claiming you possess perspective in this matter is a claim of superiority,
stating you get it, while I somehow don't. You've shown nothing that
indicates, that you in fact do get it.
> And no I know
> what your alluding to but this is getting drier than the gobi.
And yet you've done nothing with it.
> This is a
> wasted opportunity.
For you perhaps. For me it's working out fine. I've shown you for the straw
man you are.
> When you frst posted and I checked on Google I thought
> this would be fucking brilliant. I was hoping to learn some new tricks
> here. All that's happening is that your killing it dead. But only this
> part. Billies done the smart thing and not replied to the jibes, great good
> for him, Now either we close this as well. Or we make it worthwhile.
Brilliance is often overlooked by the uninitiated. That would be you.
I can't teach you, you don't even know what the course of study is.
what precisely do you feel I'm killing? You and others made a claim of being
bad asses, sending people running in fear. I've seen none of that.
The only thing making this worthwhile for me is showing you as weak.
>
>>
>>> i'm just amazed that yours was clear
>>> enough to not only realise you had lost, but ot also admit to it in
> such an
>>> admirably self-deprecating manner.
>>
>> Again, see a doctor, this sounds serious.
>
> You missed out the inference to Dementia, the readers think your still
> banging on about Perspective (please tell me your not).
I ignored the observations of a person who chose to point a finger when an
observation about himself was pointed out and repeatedly supported.
>
>>
>>> That deed does you credit, your sudden
>>> cold feet and attempt to retract it however reflect poorly on you.
>>
>> Seriously, see a doctor, unless of course you already realize you're just
>> not terribly bright and choose to bulldoze ahead in your ignorance.
>
> (Thank fuck for that)
You're easily amused.
>
>
> Hah if I were only half as ignorant as you appear I'd have seen a doctor
> long ago.
Again, unsubstantiated finger pointing from the person with an observed
perception problem.
I'll give it all the credit it deserves.
All done, better luck next time.
Let me know when you've figured out the 'game'.
>>> Why waste pearls before swine.
>>
>> I'm sorry, were you attempting to ask me a question? Are you claiming you
> do
>> in fact possess pearls? I've yet to see any. You've illustrated the
> typical
>> tactic of the clueless Usenet poster who believes himself sheltered in
>> obscurity and thus can vent his spleen in manners he would never dare in
>> public. it's a sad commentary on the internet, but there it is.
>
> What obscurity, the people here probably know more about me than half my
> family. You could have done this in a 2 word reply and left me to scrabble
> around to turn it.
So you're family doesn't know where you are?
Have you been abducted or did you run away to join a cult?
You're still scrabbling to make a reply.
>
>>
>>> Your providing no entertainment value as
>>> yet, and I'll be damned if I'll do all the work.
>>
>> You've done no work as of yet. I am not here for your entertainment.
>
> NO we're here for theirs! Is there a relevant debate here? No. So this
> either becomes flames or we have fun and give the others something to read.
> Goddammit, you KNOW this, why the hell do I have to explicitly tell you?
No, you're hear for entertainment purposes, not I.
I'm here because you claimed to be a den of bad asses.
I'm not impressed.
>
>>
>>> Winding the organ is my
>>> job in the partnership, so don your fez and waistcoat before the
> audience
>>> gets bored.
>>
>> I'm not dancing for you. You claimed some sense of superiority and how
> you
>> as well as others in your group would toast my ass. Fine, come and get
> me.
>> I'm waiting.
>
> So, are you wanting this to become a flame fest, they can pretty
> entertaining, but your usual MO is wit and intellect. Though your killing
> this dead with the latter, the formers been left out except a sparkle at
> the beginning.
You still haven't grasped the game being played.
>>> Any other trueisms to spout or are you actually going to start making
> posts
>>> with substance?
>>
>> I made no claims of being a member of some imagined bad ass usenet
>> fraternity.
>> It's your position to support yourself.
>> I've stated I can take anything you can dish out.
>> Now you've gone all limp.
>
> (this has promise)
>
> Pah, it's so massive there's nothing that will support it, my intellect I
> mean.
Yes you people clearly are dense enough to create a black hole, too bad you
lack the initiative.
>>> I've made a boast? Do tell.
>>> :-)
>>
>> Your one of those who claimed some imagined superiority.
>> Show it or crawl away.
>> I don't really care as you've done nothing to impress me as of yet.
>
> Trust me it's not a one way street in that regard.
I'm not interested in impressing you.
I'll simply let you blunt your self professed edge trying to cut or burn me.
>>>
>>> So far you appear to have a very slow shuffle. I paid bottom dollar for
> a
>>> performing Monkey and I'm not getting my moneys worth!
>>
>> A dance is only as good as the music or your partner.
>> At present you suck on both counts.
>> I don't like you enough to over look your faults.
>
> You'd have to find them first.
All of them noted to date have been outlined in the thread.
>
> Rob Wilson
> do you want to do that one again, or shall we open it up from what we have
> to date?
> It's in your hands.
I'm happy with my replies.
Do your best, I'm waiting.
wes
>
>
>
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853946B.15958%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>> I heard that rob.wn5 was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
>> little tyke.
>>
>>>
>>> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
>>> news:B8538CF3.15934%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>>> I heard that Dalton was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a
>>> little
>>>> tyke.
>>>>
>>>>> Wes Hutchings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh my, looks like Mr. Hutchings is going big-league.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Been there, done that, it's dull.
>>>
>>> Damned right, getting slumming with the scum I say, oh I see your already
>>> visiting us from AFS.
>>
>> Which has new scum in residence.
>> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
>>
> I don't know. You're still posting.
>
>
Is "I know you are but what am I." the limit of your imagined humor?
I am replying to one in a rather long line of cross posted threads.
Let me know when you're all caught up.
wes
Gerry LaHay
> "Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:gUuX7.67$5oy...@news2.bloor.is...
> >
> > Enigma <xtre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:0FuX7.59$5oy...@news2.bloor.is...
> > > "Gerry LaHay" <gla...@rogers.com> wrote in message
> > > news:wmqX7.12182$x78....@news2.bloor.is...
> > > <snip>
> > > > > What does watching Titanic and the ignorant comment of " sex with
> > > > children" have to do with each other?
> > >
> > > Because Bill goes down faster than the Titanic when he's with
children.
> > Don't
> > > like that comment? Then unplug the computer and go talk to your plants
and
> > > listen to Yanni and Kenny G music.
> >
> > Is this the best you've got?
>
> No.
> > >
> > > > I voiced an objection to something said here and now I'm some sort
of
> > wuss?
> > >
> > > In this case I'd say yes.
> > >
> > People who know me would say otherwise.
> >
> Your multiple personalities do not count.
Sorry, no multiple personalities here.
> >
> > > > I believe there are some lines that shouldn't be crossed, and the
> > comments
> > > > that were posted crossed that line
> > > > and were offensive.
> > > >
> > > True but to each person that line is drawn differently. If you don't
like
> > what
> > > is said then ignore it and do something else.
> >
> > That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
> > that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said.
Choosing to
> > ignore
> > something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on
someone
> > and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
>
> Why bother? Nothing you say will make a difference here. Especially here.
It's
> humour! HUMOUR!
>
Humour? I understand and appreciate humour.
Simpsons, Dennis Miller, David Letterman....good examples of humour.
I fail to see the humour in this thread.
> > By the way, I do not own any plants, do I own any Kenny G or Yanni.
> >
> Good for you.
Why thank you.
Enigma
> >>
> >> Which has new scum in residence.
> >> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
> >>
> > I don't know. You're still posting.
> >
> >
>
> Is "I know you are but what am I." the limit of your imagined humor?
There is no limit. If I made a funnier remark then you wouldn't understand it.
Enigma
> > > That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
> > > that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said.
> Choosing to
> > > ignore
> > > something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on
> someone
> > > and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
> >
> > Why bother? Nothing you say will make a difference here. Especially here.
> It's
> > humour! HUMOUR!
> >
> Humour? I understand and appreciate humour.
> Simpsons, Dennis Miller, David Letterman....good examples of humour.
> I fail to see the humour in this thread.
>
goes. I agree there are limits in making humourous remarks but there is little
that you or anyone can do about it except killfiling the offending poster.
Gerry LaHay
Durandal <duran...@mac.com> wrote in message
news:3C2E7F62...@mac.com...
> Gerry LaHay wrote:
>
>
> > That maybe so, and for the most part, I do ignore most of the nonsense
> > that is posted here, but in this case, something had to be said.
Choosing to
> > ignore
> > something, say, a lame humourous attempt to associate a flame war on
someone
> > and a "joke" regarding child abuse is something I will not do.
> > By the way, I do not own any plants, do I own any Kenny G or Yanni.
>
>
> "Something had to be said"? Aw, look at the cute little moral paragon.
> This isn't a web board. There are no mods. People are free to say what
> they wish. Don't like it? Sorry. Instead of whining like a little bitch
> with a skinned knee, flame back or be ignored and mocked.
>
pointing out what I felt were inappropriate comments. Hell, a good arguement
about Star Wars or Star Trek would be enjoyable, but when you
feel the need to post comments that are purely repulsive, expect a response.
As you pointed out, people are free to say what they wish, as I have done,
and now
I get flamed for it? This is my first real flame war in over a year, so
bring it on!
Gerry
Gerry LaHay
You've got a good point. I generally just choose to ignore most of the trash
written
here, and enjoy the on topic posts. I, for the most part stay out of flame
wars, so I guess
I just got a little pissed at something that was offensive.
gerry
>
Wes Hutchings
little tyke.
>
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853B7F2.159BE%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> a life of varied drudgery, you don't really ask for much out of life.
> No
>>> wonder your wits have dulled.
>>
>> Life gives me what I need in most cases.
>
> The advantage of nursing homes I expect.
> :-)
You're really quite base in your attempts at humor.
I bet you slay them at the Cons though.
>> My wits are doing just fine, which is why I understand you and your clan
>> began this so called fight and have yet to actually bring it.
>
> Clan? I do this for me and the audience. You should know that your record
> shows you to be quicker on the uptake than this.
You still don't get the game here.
let me know which part is giving you trouble.
>
>> It seems the bluster has faded.
>
> You want bluster I gave you bluster and you killed it dead rather than
> opening the whole thing up and making me the fool I was offering to be. I
> left so many easy hooks throughout you had me wondering whether you were
> really you or just someone borrowing the name.
You still don't get it, if I wanted to pick on people, that is what I'd do.
You were the one claiming that you and your ilk were the scourge of Usenet.
You have a limp view of what constitutes a scourge.
Does your mom need to open your milk cartons and jars for you?
>>> Cold, but refreshing, and not Grimsby.
>>
>> That's where your news server is.
>
> It serves a decent footprint, I'm quite a distance from Grimsby.
You miss the point, but by all means, enjoy that warm contented glow of
ignorance.
>>> Someone got out of bed on the wrong side didn't they.
>>
>> Nope, not at all.
>
> You misunderstand this easily on a good day? Boy you are fucked.
I don't misunderstand at all.
I'm waiting for you to open your vaunted can of whoop ass.
>
>>
>>> I think you need to
>>> *really* reread our little discussion to date.
>>
>> I have, you and a few others claimed some ability to kick ass and take
>> names, I stated I was unimpressed.
>> I still am and you're still trying to claim some sembelance of victory
> in a
>> fight you've yet to enter.
A glimmer of light crept into your brain.
>>> And he goes low first.
>>
>> No, a simple statement of fact.
>
> Really whats her name then?
No clue, don't care.
> I'll make it easy for you, just her first name?
>
> Wow you've just made yourself a liar in one easy step.
Really, point to the lie. You've just proven that you're angry over a
statement of fact.
I'll be happy to support it.
>
> Now do we do this properly or do we actually fight/flame. I've got 4 hours
> 56 minutes left.
That's a shame.
>>>
>>> Nah, too 80's Give me Madness any day.
>>
>> Which is also 80's, there's that Irony again,
>
> BY god I think he's finally got it. OK so they formed in in '77 and were
> doing their signature tunes in '79, but they had a slew of chart hit's in
> the Early 80's so they were primarily an 80's band.
I've always had it. You're still trying to play Parcheesi on a Chinese
checkers board, not realizing the game is actually chess.
>
>
>> I'm betting this time you didn't realize it....either.
>
> It was chosen on purpose will you Plaese get with the programme
I'm not playing your program.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Rob Wilson
>>> Thinks someone needs to think about their reply before the flames
> really
>>> start, though I'm game if you are.
>>
>> You and others made the claim, I'm waiting for you to support it.
>> You're weak at best to date.
>
> Look I can't make this any plainer either we do something with this Or I go
> back to playing the foll on my own NG. You want to fight? We'll fight. You
> want to flame? We'll flame. You want to entertain the crowd? We'll do that.
> Just please give me an answer.
I did, several times, you still haven't grasped it.
wes
>
> Rob Wilson
>
>>
>> wes
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> <snip>
>>>>
>>>> Which has new scum in residence.
>>>> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
>>>>
>>> I don't know. You're still posting.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Is "I know you are but what am I." the limit of your imagined humor?
>
> There is no limit.
Prove that applies to you.
> If I made a funnier remark then you wouldn't understand it.
I'd settle for a coherent or applicable remark at this point.
wes
>
>
Enigma
> I heard that Enigma was traumatized by a herd of Bantha when it was a little
> tyke.
>
> > <snip>
> >>>>
> >>>> Which has new scum in residence.
> >>>> They'll leave, does the scum ever leave asvs?
> >>>>
> >>> I don't know. You're still posting.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is "I know you are but what am I." the limit of your imagined humor?
> >
> > There is no limit.
>
> Prove that applies to you.
No the burden is on you to prove that I have a limited humour.
>
> > If I made a funnier remark then you wouldn't understand it.
>
> I'd settle for a coherent or applicable remark at this point.
How about this?
Scum will not leave this newsgroup as long as you are posting. When you leave
then the NG will be a better place. There is no room for you, TOWNMNBS and TOWDE
here. Do us all a favour and play Russian Roulette with a 9.mm pistol.
Wes Hutchings
tyke.
> "Wes Hutchings" <yyr...@cwnet.com> wrote in message
> news:B853C92C.159F9%yyr...@cwnet.com...
>>> There is no limit.
>>
>> Prove that applies to you.
>
> No the burden is on you to prove that I have a limited humour.
I'm not interested in proving an obvious absence.
Show a positive.
>
>>
>>> If I made a funnier remark then you wouldn't understand it.
>>
>> I'd settle for a coherent or applicable remark at this point.
>
> How about this?
>
> Scum will not leave this newsgroup as long as you are posting.
Prove that.
> When you leave
> then the NG will be a better place.
Then stop cross posting.
> There is no room for you, TOWNMNBS and
> TOWDE
> here.
Apply actual words, acronyms made up by a group of secluded geeks have no
meaning except for said geeks.
Is your world really that empty?
> Do us all a favour and play Russian Roulette with a 9.mm pistol.
Like the Mateba perhaps?
Perhaps you meant to say a 9mm automatic and lacked the ability to know the
distinction.
Perhaps you choose to direct suicide at people whom you are incapable of
engaging directly and this is your version of running to someone else for
help.
If you want me dead, then I suggest you do your own dirty work. Let me know
when you're in town and I'll give you directions or arrange a meeting.
wes
>
>