Flat Chested Actress
Steven Jelen
be popular?
She has very little acting talent and has no body to speak about.
What is the actraction to this Flat Chested nobody?
Bill Brown
"Steven Jelen" <t...@deadman.ink> wrote in message
news:3AF35FE7...@deadman.ink...
Ben
Of course you
did, you we're preoccupied with her breast size.
"Steven Jelen" <t...@deadman.ink> wrote in message
news:3AF35FE7...@deadman.ink...
lichtgestalt
> Can someone tell me how a flat chested actress like Sandra
> Bullock can be popular?
I know, it sounds strange in this from TV and life style magazines
brainwashed world, but tits aren't everything. Besides, personally, I
like small breasts, so I'd consider Ms. Bullock's chestsize an asset.
Furthermore, I have to admit that I'm a "face guy". As long as a
person's body isn't abundantly voluminous, a pretty face is enough to
spark my interest. And that's why Sandra is perfect in my eyes. Oh,
"eyes"... Hasn't she the most beautiful feline eyes?
Aside from her attractive physique she radiates so much charm, wit and
humor you just have to like her (regardless how you rate her skills as
an actress).
There are sure women on this planet who have a nicer body, a more
beautiful face, are brighter or funnier, but Sandra comes in such a
perfect mix while at the same time staying the often quoted "girl next
door".
So, Steven, watch "While you were sleeping" (my all time favorite BTW),
the scene where she talks to unconscious Peter about her loneliness and
tell me you wouldn't want to hug her. ;)
lichtgestalt
--
Tired of crashing and reinstalling Windows?
Get a new OS! It's free. http://free.be.com
LW
wrote:
In case you haven't yet figured it out, there is more to any person
than just the physical attributes.
Cornelis Steinitz
>brainwashed world, but tits aren't everything. Besides, personally, I
>like small breasts, so I'd consider Ms. Bullock's chestsize an asset.
>Furthermore, I have to admit that I'm a "face guy". As long as a
>person's body isn't abundantly voluminous, a pretty face is enough to
>spark my interest. And that's why Sandra is perfect in my eyes. Oh,
>"eyes"... Hasn't she the most beautiful feline eyes?
>
>Aside from her attractive physique she radiates so much charm, wit and
>humor you just have to like her (regardless how you rate her skills as
>an actress).
>There are sure women on this planet who have a nicer body, a more
>beautiful face, are brighter or funnier, but Sandra comes in such a
>perfect mix while at the same time staying the often quoted "girl next
>door".
>
>So, Steven, watch "While you were sleeping" (my all time favorite BTW),
>the scene where she talks to unconscious Peter about her loneliness and
>tell me you wouldn't want to hug her. ;)
AMEN!!!!!!!
TA4N,
Cornelis (Steinitz)
---
To email me, remove "nospam"
John Gibeau
Wish I had a girl next door like that. Sandra is the all time number one in
my book.
b14kN01z?
I dont think this person really gives a damn what we think. Whoever it was
just wanted to spark a debate, and predictably, we are giving him one. Who
cares what he thinks. it is his opinion. If this boy doesnt like Sandy, but
he likes somone with big-breasts, then i suggest
alt.binaries.erotica.bigbreastsforidiots. however, alt.fan.sandra-bullock is
a newsgroup for those who are a fan to Sandra Bullock. she may not be the
greatest, most popular or most attractive actress on this planet (and she
may not be the most talented) but she sure is better looking than whoever HE
likes.
Ben
LW
>Amen to that...
>
cal
Must be something about her since I have more DVDs of her movies than
any other star! 15 in all, I think.
Now as to physical attributes... great legs, lovely hair, nice smile,
great butt, nice arms, sparkling eyes... and breasts? I dated a lady
years ago who was flatter than an ironing board... but that wasn't a
problem for me. People are the sum of all their parts, not just
certain ones.
As for acting... it's all in the wrist... you like or you do not.
Subjective matters these things. Some people don't think Julia Roberts
can act either.
For me, it's a matter of invoking the proper response to the
performance. But, as I say, it's subjective.
cal
Lance Sloan
answer. First of all bust size has nothing to do with popularity, secondly
as far as acting talent Sandra is R E A L and lovable, thirdly as far as not
having a body... each to their own buddy. I personally would prefer a down
to earth attractive girl next door sexiness to the pumped up, plastic barbie
dolls that you seem to think are so "popular". I prefer real and Miss
Bullock to me is just that !!!
"Steven Jelen" <t...@deadman.ink> wrote in message
news:3AF35FE7...@deadman.ink...
lichtgestalt
> I've never replied to this group before but this question needs a real
> answer. First of all bust size has nothing to do with popularity,
> secondly as far as acting talent Sandra is R E A L and lovable,
> thirdly as far as not having a body... each to their own buddy. I
> personally would prefer a down to earth attractive girl next door
> sexiness to the pumped up, plastic barbie dolls that you seem to think
> are so "popular". I prefer real and Miss Bullock to me is just that!!!
Nicely put!
AOL!
lichtgestalt
--
[Prime Minister Joseph] Chamberlain loves the working man -- he loves
to see him work.
-- Winston Churchill
Lance Sloan
"lichtgestalt" <lichtg...@bemail.org> wrote in message
news:PM00038D3...@Gaia.unknown.dom...
Fox
<snow...@uniserve.com> wrote:
Down to earth - Girl next door type - Exactly as I would want it
too. Well said!!
Stephen Ray
women can carry it off and make it look good, but ... If they're real, they
tend to go saggy and flabby. Sandra is proportioned beautifully. If she gets
a butt implant, then maybe she'll need larger breasts to make it work, but
forget about it until then. Even if I were a plastic surgeon, I can't see
how Sandra could possibly be made to look more beautiful.
Be a troll, be a troll,
All the world loves a troll.
"Fox" <lw...@netins.net> wrote in message
news:3b96c941...@news.netins.net...