Two Senators, not one. I cannot claim or deny what each Senator
does with correspondence sent to them. You're asserting NONE of
them "read personal letters and emails from their constituents."
That's your assertion you cannot back up with evidence.
> You can't deny, or claim otherwise, what you haven't
> mentioned, or claimed. Fuckhead.
Sure I can, and just did...and unlike you, proved it.
>>> Only those few letters and emails that stand apart in
>>> some way or other are forwarded to the Senator.
>>
>> ...and his/her staff can see a trend if alot of emails or
>> tweets, facebook or other communication rises over a
>> particular issue. THAT tells the staff to inform the Senator.
> That's what I said, stupid. The derivative stuff gets
> counted and, of course, by extension, the count would be
> brought up to the Senator's attention, otherwise why do
> the count? Damn, you're dense.
Yet you claimed, "Senators don't read personal letters and
emails from their constituents". They direct their staff to
look for "hot button" issues, and MAY review a few themselves.
Claimingmotherwise is an assertion you cannot back up with
any credible evidence.
>>> The pastor man's meaningless communique is derivative of
>>> about a thousand other mindless ones sent to the Senator
>>> and merely counted in for what it is, not read by the Senator.
>>
>> ...and you know for a fact the "pastor man's...communique" was
>> NOT read by the Senator...how? Show your evidence, not your
>> biased anti-Hartung assumptions....
> ...here------> It reads exactly like a thousand other letters
> from dim-witted right wingers, all free of any originality of
> thought to make it stand out and noteworthy for the Senator's
> attention. It's no more than a cut-and-paste letter, which I
> wouldn't be surprised if the phony pastor man did exactly that
> from someone else's letter, being as free of original thought
> as he is.
That's not evidence. Show Mr Hartung's email to both Senator's
and their responses, else it remains your biased opinion.
>> ITM, you show NG readers your interest is merely whining in
>> Usenet threads. That means for POTUS' elections, I won't be
>> wasting my vote by cancelling your vote, as you believe doing
>> such civic duties are "meaningless".
> Whatever. But still, fuck, you're stupid.
Thanks for validating that point....and STILL cursing like an
angry teenager. One that probably cannot vote. LOL