RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
Doug Bashford
RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" onair
about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
(Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices etc).
...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
Rush Limbaugh:
"Voters who voted yesterday believe that
Republicans are; "the big government party now."
How can you blame them?"
-- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
Is it any wonder why Repubs must "change" reality
to get support?
Liberal Radio ! - 27 stations online NOW!
Why do Republicans fear us?
Cuz Limbaugh & Co "taught" them all they need
to "know" about Dems? Yer kidding, right!?
Hiding from actual and REAL Dem ideas? Like duh.
They have no idea what reality is. Poor guys.
They don't even have the freedom to think critically.
That's Republicanism! Yep yep.
Liberal Radio
http://radiotime.com/genre/c_247/Liberal.aspx#Options[%3Cstrong%3EOn%20Right%20Now%3C/strong%3E]
Options
* On Right Now (27)
* HD Radio (3)
* Local (1)
* On Demand (11)
* Recordable (72)
PURE Republicanism?? It's now clear.
Six years of PURE Republicanism - BOTH houses
AND the Prez. Pure as it gets.
So?
Are you better off now than seven years ago?
Are you proud with what they have done to
America and her reputation? ...Your reputation?
...all that sleaze, lies and bribery?
How about all the killing...the torture? Proud?
If actions speak louder than rhetoric, then
name ONE good thing about Republicanism.
Just one.
Just one *real* thing.
Can't do it?
So? Your Republicanism more like a bad habit then?
Might be time to consider Change.
Doug Bashford
>
> RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
>
> She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" onair
> about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
> (Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
>
> ...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
> article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
> they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices etc).
> ...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
> wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
Now she's explaining the evidence that Operation Kaos is really
a coverup of a massive Repub defection to the party of morality
and the working man, etc. Repubs are just tired of all the sleaze.
>
> Rush Limbaugh:
> "Voters who voted yesterday believe that
> Republicans are; "the big government party now."
> How can you blame them?"
> -- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
>
> Is it any wonder why Repubs must "change" reality
> to get support?
>
> Liberal Radio ! - 27 stations online NOW!
>
> Why do Republicans fear us?
>
> Cuz Limbaugh & Co "taught" them all they need
> to "know" about Dems? Yer kidding, right!?
>
> Hiding from actual and REAL Dem ideas? Like duh.
> They have no idea what reality is. Poor guys.
>
> They don't even have the freedom to think critically.
> That's Republicanism! Yep yep.
>
> Liberal Radio
>
>
> http://radiotime.com/genre/c_247/Liberal.aspx#Options[%3Cstrong%3EOn%20Right%20Now%3C/strong%3E]
>
> Options
>
> * On Right Now (27)
PURE Republicanism?? It's now clear.
OneTwoThree
"Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
>
> RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
all five of her listeners agree!
Doug Bashford
Rush Limbaugh:
"Voters who voted yesterday believe that
Republicans are; "the big government party now."
How can you blame them?"
-- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said about:
Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
> news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
> >
> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
> all five of her listeners agree!
another deluded Repub!
In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
When they were both working from the same shop,
Limbaugh demanded he not go against her.
...that's how she got the afternoon drive time market.
> > She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" onair
> > about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
> > (Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
> >
> > ...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
> > article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
> > they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices etc).
> > ...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
> > wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
> > Is it any wonder why Repubs must "change" reality
> > to get support?
> >
> > Liberal Radio ! - 27 stations online NOW!
> >
> > Why do Republicans fear us?
> >
> > Cuz Limbaugh & Co "taught" them all they need
> > to "know" about Dems? Yer kidding, right!?
> >
> > Hiding from actual and REAL Dem ideas? Like duh.
> > They have no idea what reality is. Poor guys.
> >
> > They don't even have the freedom to think critically.
> > That's Republicanism! Yep yep.
> >
> > Liberal Radio
> >
> >
> > http://radiotime.com/genre/c_247/Liberal.aspx#Options[%3Cstrong%3EOn%20Right%20Now%3C/strong%3E]
> >
PURE Republicanism?? It's now clear.
Hannah Stickers
> "Doug Bashford" <play...@always.edu> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hannah Stickers
What do you expect from a guy who mocks his listeners as "ditto-
heads"? Evidently, they are too stupid to comprehend the insult.
OneTwoThree
"Hannah Stickers" <Buff...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:97d27ded-8516-40ff...@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
you obviously have no klew as the real meaning of the greeting "dittos"
but then what can one expect from people who merely repeat what their
leftist masters tell them to think.....
.
OneTwoThree
>
> Rush Limbaugh:
> "Voters who voted yesterday believe that
> Republicans are; "the big government party now."
> How can you blame them?"
> -- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
>
> in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
> On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said about:
> Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
>
>>
>> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
>> news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
>> >
>> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>>
>> all five of her listeners agree!
>
> another deluded Repub!
>
> In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
> she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
what markets are those? and why are there only a "few" such? how many
precicely is her "few"
say, isnt Randi Rhoades the one who fell and broke her leg while in a
drunken stupor?
>
> When they were both working from the same shop,
> Limbaugh demanded he not go against her.
> ...that's how she got the afternoon drive time market.
what shop? going back to the mid 80's, when Limbaugh was in Sacramento, Ca,
when did the two ever work for the "same shop" ?
Al E. Crocodile
"OneTwoThree" <you...@notverysmart.ru> wrote in message
news:fe2dnYXOZZQYJ73V...@comcast.com...
>
> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
> news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
>>
>> That's Republicanism! Yep yep.
>>
brains to think at all,
that's why they need their daily fillup of limbaugh horseshit,
encourage them to get more
support limbaugh, the democrats second best ally, after bush
Doug Bashford
On Tue, 6 May 2008 13:38:10 -0700, OneTwoThree said about:
>
> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
> news:PsCdnS-DpvVaJr3V...@pghconnect.com...
> >
> > Rush Limbaugh:
> > "Voters who voted yesterday believe that
> > Republicans are; "the big government party now."
> > How can you blame them?"
> > -- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
> >
> > in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
> > On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said about:
> > Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
> >
> >
> >>
> >> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
> >> news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
> >> >
> >> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
> >>
> >> all five of her listeners agree!
> >
> > another deluded Repub!
> >
> > In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
> > she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
>
> what markets are those? and why are there only a "few" such? how many
> precicely is her "few"
>
> say, isnt Randi Rhoades the one who fell and broke her leg while in a
> drunken stupor?
No.
>
>
> >
> > When they were both working from the same shop,
> > Limbaugh demanded he not go against her.
> > ...that's how she got the afternoon drive time market.
>
> what shop? going back to the mid 80's, when Limbaugh was in Sacramento, Ca,
> when did the two ever work for the "same shop" ?
They are still neighbors. Florida. I think Limbaugh's studio
was at his home, but linked to the same local station.
Rush was known as a real oinker at that station.
Sorry to hear yer a loser Republican. How can you
stand all those sleazy scandals? You think that's a
coincedence!?
Doug Bashford
in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said
> "Hannah Stickers" <Buff...@yahoo.com> wrote
> > If actions speak louder than rhetoric, then
> > name ONE good thing about Republicanism.
> > Just one.
> >
> > Just one *real* thing.
> >
> > Can't do it?
> > So? Your Republicanism more like a bad habit then?
> > Might be time to consider Change.
>
> > What do you expect from a guy who mocks his listeners as
> > "ditto-heads"? Evidently, they are too stupid to
> > comprehend the insult.
HA!
Kinda weird, aint it? Limbaugh is just like all the
other rich Republican honchos, their loyal minions are only
there to do their evil bidding, and all the lies needed to
get that done are just fine and dandy.
And the odd thing is, they don't seem to mind.
At least he doesn't call them shitheads.
> you obviously have no klew as the real meaning of the
> greeting "dittos"
Quick definitions (ditto)
# verb: repeat an action or statement (Example: "The next
speaker dittoed her argument")
# name: A surname (rare)
# ditto : Compact Oxford English Dictionary
• noun 1 the same thing again (used in lists and often
indicated by a ditto mark).
2 a symbol consisting of two apostrophes representing a
repetition.
> but then what can one expect from people who merely repeat what their
> leftist masters tell them to think.....
The Irony is RICH! laff.
Of course you think that, because
Rush "I don't tell you what to think" Limbaugh
told you so. If you guys wern't so clownish,
we would pity you. You remind me of Pennywise
The Clown, from Stephen King's "IT" movie,
where a malevolent, shape-shifting, pagan-killing
monster (referred to simply as "It") lurks in the
sewers and storm-drains.
OneTwoThree
>
>
> On Tue, 6 May 2008 13:38:10 -0700, OneTwoThree said about:
> Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
>
>>
>> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
>> news:PsCdnS-DpvVaJr3V...@pghconnect.com...
>> >
>> > Rush Limbaugh:
>> > "Voters who voted yesterday believe that
>> > Republicans are; "the big government party now."
>> > How can you blame them?"
>> > -- Rush Limbaugh November 8, 2006
>> >
>> > in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
>> > On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said about:
>> > Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Doug Bashford" <pla...@always.edu> wrote in message
>> >> news:PsCdnTKDpvVNL73V...@pghconnect.com...
>> >> >
>> >> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>> >>
>> >> all five of her listeners agree!
>> >
>> > another deluded Repub!
>> >
>> > In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
>> > she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
>>
>> what markets are those? and why are there only a "few" such? how many
>> precicely is her "few"
noted: you cannot provide any meaningful analysis.
>>
>> say, isnt Randi Rhoades the one who fell and broke her leg while in a
>> drunken stupor?
>
> No.
oh that's right, she merely slipped and fell, and Airhead America issued the
false report that she was mugged. along with their usual lies.
http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=18&num=16683
>
>>
tar~bal
>
>
>
> in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said
>> "Hannah Stickers" <Buff...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> On May 6, 4:34 pm, (Doug Bashford) wrote:
>
>> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>> >
>> > She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" on air
>> > about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
>> > (Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
>> >
>> > ...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
>> > article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
>> > they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices
>> > etc).
>> > ...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
>> > wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
>> >
You have to be kidding me. Are you suggesting Randi was reading articles on
the air? Say it isn't so. She's the most researched talk host in America.
I was under the impression that everything I heard on her show wasn't her
reading something, but her actual thoughts.
While I personally think Rush is a blowhole myself, Randi would be so lucky
to have a tenth of his listeners. Make no mistake, she would give her left
front tooth to have her own 'Operation Chaos'. She would love to be the one
that news stations were commenting on.
And PS, anyone that brags about watching CSPAN all day long isn't
politically savvy, they are an idiot.
forbi...@msn.com
> "Doug Bashford" <play...@always.edu> wrote in message
>
> news:UPudnT-QVdrUl7_V...@pghconnect.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said
> >> On May 6, 4:34 pm, (Doug Bashford) wrote:
>
> >> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
> >> > She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" on air
> >> > about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
> >> > (Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
>
> >> > ...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
> >> > article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
> >> > they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices
> >> > etc).
> >> > ...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
> >> > wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
>
> You have to be kidding me. Are you suggesting Randi was reading articles on
> the air? Say it isn't so. She's the most researched talk host in America.
> I was under the impression that everything I heard on her show wasn't her
> reading something, but her actual thoughts.
>
> While I personally think Rush is a blowhole myself, Randi would be so lucky
> to have a tenth of his listeners. Make no mistake, she would give her left
> front tooth to have her own 'Operation Chaos'. She would love to be the one
> that news stations were commenting on.
>
> And PS, anyone that brags about watching CSPAN all day long isn't
> politically savvy, they are an idiot.
Randi hasn't been on WJNO long.
http://www.wjno.com/main.html
Let's just wait and see how her ratings turn our compared to
those on either side of her time slot.
http://www.stationratings.com/ratings.asp?market=299
tells an interesting story. Local talk, WZZR, seems
to be wiping the syndicates, WJNO, WFTL, (and also rans)
WIOD, and WINZ. Strange that some personalities appear
on both WJNO and WIOD. Maybe not so strange.
http://www.adnotas.com/cgi-bin/research/viewresearchdata.cgi?tableName=arbitron&areaId=29
In Miami WJNO doesn't even register. WINZ is well
below WIOD in Miami. Conservative talk radio has
taken quite a bit of time building station coverage.
Liberal talk radio just hasn't done that until recently
and Liberal talk hasn't had the personalities until
recently either. Still, if WINZ registers in markets
far from the transmitter the format could benefit by
more local transmitters.
bval...@aol.com
bval...@aol.com
> In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
> she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
Bullshit. If Randi beat Rush Limbaugh, she'd be a national figure.
Doug Bashford
in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
In
<74d025a9-bbd9-47d7...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT), bval...@aol.com said
about:
Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
Silly boy.
In about 3 weeks she already has about 30 affilliates.
"Nova M Radio, LLC is a radio station acquisition firm and
upstart radio syndication service. Its stated purpose was to
purchase, own and operate under-performing radio stations in
small and medium sized markets. These stations would then
broadcast progressive talk radio content, particularly
programming from their own network, as well as from Air America
Radio and other organizations."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_M_Radio
Nova M Radio - The Home of Randi Rhodes & Mike Malloy
... plus exclusive Founders Club videos? Randi and Mike are in
all week. Again, thank you for supporting Nova M Radio - The
Future of Progressive Talk! ...
www.novamradio.com/ - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
Nova M Radio - Bringing Democracy to the Airwaves
Nova M Radio adds Los Angeles and Dallas ... John Manzo Upped to
CEO at Nova M Radio ... Sign up for the Nova M Radio Email
Newsletter ...
www.novamradio.com/index_page.php - 33k - Cached - Similar pages
Doug Bashford
in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
On Thu, 8 May 2008, tar~bal said:
> "Doug Bashford" wrote
> > in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, On Tue, 6 May 2008, OneTwoThree said
> >> "Hannah Stickers" <Buff...@yahoo.com> wrote
> >> On May 6, 4:34 pm, (Doug Bashford) wrote:
> >
> >> > RANDI Rhodes Calls Limbaugh a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
> >> >
> >> > She was quoting an article Rush "quoted" on air
> >> > about Repubs wanting to vote Dem but they couldn't.
> >> > (Of course, he was lying to his trusting fans again. Duh.)
> >> >
> >> > ...she included what the Limbaughtomy left out of that
> >> > article. ...that Repubs were being quoted about how disgusted
> >> > they were with what the new Repub Party has become (sleaze, prices
> >> > etc).
> >> > ...she also quoted an article of crossover "hardcore" Repubs who
> >> > wanted to vote for Obama (opposite of Rush's Operation Kaos plan)
> >> >
>
> You have to be kidding me. Are you suggesting Randi was reading articles on
> the air? Say it isn't so. She's the most researched talk host in America.
> I was under the impression that everything I heard on her show wasn't her
> reading something, but her actual thoughts.
"Everything" is a very big word.
> And PS, anyone that brags about watching CSPAN all day long isn't
> politically savvy, they are an idiot.
That day she wasn'r bragging about that, but more like
a sorry addiction. No boyfriend etc.....
Doug Bashford
in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:14:41 -0700 (PDT), bval...@aol.com said
about:
Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
> Wasn't she fired for calling Hillary a cunt?
I think that was ann coulter.
bval...@aol.com
> > > In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
> > > she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
.
> > Bullshit. If Randi beat Rush Limbaugh, she'd be a national figure.
.
> Silly boy.
> In about 3 weeks she already has about 30 affilliates.
BTD.
bval...@aol.com
> > Wasn't she fired for calling Hillary a cunt?
> I think that was ann coulter.
Of course, Ann Coulter said no such thing.
jgro...@hotmail.com
>
> Let's just wait and see how her ratings turn our compared to
> those on either side of her time slot.
>
> http://www.stationratings.com/ratings.asp?market=299
> tells an interesting story. Local talk, WZZR, seems
> to be wiping the syndicates, WJNO, WFTL, (and also rans)
> WIOD, and WINZ. Strange that some personalities appear
> In Miami WJNO doesn't even register. WINZ is well
> below WIOD in Miami. Conservative talk radio has
> taken quite a bit of time building station coverage.
> Liberal talk radio just hasn't done that until recently
> and Liberal talk hasn't had the personalities until
> recently either. Still, if WINZ registers in markets
> far from the transmitter the format could benefit by
> more local transmitters.
On a related note Progressive WCPT in Chicago noses past reich wing
WIND.
WCPT talk Newsweb Corp. 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.4 0.8
WIND talk Salem Com Corp. 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7
robw
Class act she is.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ac3eb804-05a0-4a4b...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
robw
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:74d025a9-bbd9-47d7...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
> "In a few markets....." Can you read, moron?
Hey, the child who's never been published is back.
bval...@aol.com
Michael Moore was outraged that bin Laden killed Democrats instead of
Republicans.
He said that the passengers on the bombed flights were cowards because
they where white.
This piece of shit sat next to Jimmy Carter at the DNC convention.
So, yeah, Ann Coulter is a classy lady.
Harold Burton
<bc78713e-b4e2-4376...@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"bval...@aol.com" <bval...@aol.com> wrote:
> Wasn't she fired for calling Hillary a cunt?
I'm shocked, shocked! A left wing organization would fire someone for
telling the truth. I'm shocked, shocked.
Snicker.
Harold Burton
pla...@always.edu (Doug Bashford) wrote:
> in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:14:41 -0700 (PDT), bval...@aol.com said
> about:
> Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
>
> > Wasn't she fired for calling Hillary a cunt?
>
> I think...
Nope, not a bit of evidence to support that claim.
... that was ann coulter.
You specialize in being wrong.
Snicker.
robw
And sorry that I've been assent but we've been living our lives.
A couple bands, 48 hour Film Festival, two Flyer's playoff games,a chick
flix (randal brand was in it.) a 76'er's playoff game, First Night and an
Eddie Izzard show.
We've been living our life.
You've been posting.
Math?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3f9d8be5-b370-4ddb...@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Clave
news:3615bfd9-4637-4452...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
Only someone of your sophistication could say that and mean it.
Jim
robw
The take for Michael's movie vs., Ben Stein's ???
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3615bfd9-4637-4452...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
robw
"Harold Burton" <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-807C...@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
tar~bal
Are you a new listener? She mentions it all the time like it's a badge of
honor. She repeats it over and over like it gives her some kind of
credibility for watching a stupid tv show.
Check out the last sentence here:
http://www.novamradio.com/live/rhodes_about.php
Sorry, but it's really GAY.
OneTwoThree
"robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:HaadnSkngeMPXb7V...@comcast.com...
> Let's play a game.
>
> The take for Michael's movie vs., Ben Stein's ???
some bet. the lefties in this country flocked to Moore's travesty because
they needed more brainwashing
conservatives dont need to have their views continually reinforced.
when was the last time the Phillies were in the playoffs, anyway? must have
something to do with global warming... ;)
robw
The Phils made the playoffs last year.
Are you this stupid?
"OneTwoThree" <you...@notverysmart.ru> wrote in message
news:sKWdnRqSMu44DrnV...@comcast.com...
OneTwoThree
>
> in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,
> In
> <74d025a9-bbd9-47d7...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
>
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT), bval...@aol.com said
> about:
> Re: RANDI Calls RUSH a "blowhole" (Operation Kaos)
>
>
>> .
>> > In the few markets (time slots) where they compete,
>> > she often cooks Limbaugh's goose.
>> .
>> Bullshit. If Randi beat Rush Limbaugh, she'd be a national figure.
>
> Silly boy.
> In about 3 weeks she already has about 30 affilliates.
wow! all of THIRTY affiliates! where's that put her on the nationally
syndicated list? 4 hundred and eighty fifith?
lest see some numbers, pal
I am positive that Randi Rhoades was part of Airhead Amerika a couple of
years ago, before they went bankrupt. what were her real ratings then?
hell, Airhead America failed in San Francisco, which is a leftist
stronghold, as you should know. she doing anything in the SF market now?
OneTwoThree
> Operation Chas didnt;t work.
your proof? got studies you can cite?
hahahahahaha
bval...@aol.com
> Yeah, I have been published.
No, you haven't. If you had, you'd be happily waving the book in my
face. Or, at the very least, mention the name of the book.
bval...@aol.com
> Operation Chas (SPELLING MISTAKE) didnt;t (SPELLING MISTAKE) work.
.
Two spelling mistakes in a four word sentence.
bval...@aol.com
> > Silly boy.
> > In about 3 weeks she already has about 30 affilliates.
.
> wow! all of THIRTY affiliates! where's that put her on the nationally
> syndicated list? 4 hundred and eighty fifith?
I wonder how many of those stations are two thousand watt wonders?
Harold Burton
"OneTwoThree" <you...@notverysmart.ru> wrote:
> "robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:Y7ydnd8Vsv6GXr7V...@comcast.com...
> > Operation Chas didnt;t work.
>
> your proof? got studies you can cite?
gotta wonder why the leftards are so hung up on this (claiming that
Operation Chaos didn't work). If operation didn't work, as they claim,
the smart thing would be to keep that "failure" secret so that
Republicans waste their time on an effort that doesn't work. So what
conclusion can we come to - leftards are incredibly stupid.
Snicker.
bval...@aol.com
> The Stein movie failed.
.
Really? It's by far the biggest money making documentary this year,
and of this writing, the fifth largest of all time. (It's still in
theaters). And that's with a press which is doing everything it can to
shut it down.
robw
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cdc50eb7-2a34-4657...@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
robw
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1012385c-981f-4acd...@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
robw
Seeing as how he's on 650 stations and only pulls three million listeners a
day????????
When Stern was on terrestrial radio he was on 65 affiliates and yet Rush
only beat him by a couple million a week.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:42be6b0b-14a7-4aac...@1g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
robw
wasn't even top ten which means it made less than 2.3 million.
O'Really has 2.7 million viewers, Rush 3 million listeners.....
What are they waiting for....the DVD?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2e493d69-31ac-45a7...@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Harold Burton
"robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Wow, you can count!
Gives him a one up on you.
Snicker.
bval...@aol.com
> Sure, and you'll review the book in a fair manner?
Save your cowardly excuses for someone else. The book doesn't exist.
bval...@aol.com
> I'm sure that Rush is on some low watt wonders.
Rush Limbaugh is actually in the game. Randi is an utter unknown.
Clave
news:bffdbaba-f22e-4f79...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
No one expects *you* to know who she is.
Jim
Harold Burton
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
Heheheh. Other than a fuck-up fired by Err Merica, for incompetence, who
is she.
Snicker.
bval...@aol.com
> Expelled made 3.1 million the first week. I noticed the second week it
> wasn't even top ten which means it made less than 2.3 million.
http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=expelled.htm
EXPELLED:
NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED
Domestic Total as of May. 8, 2008: $6,906,488
Distributor: Rocky Mountain Pictures Release Date: April 18, 2008
Genre: Documentary Running Time: 1 hrs. 30 min.
MPAA Rating: PG Production Budget: N/A
As of this writing, it's the fifth most popular political documentary
ever released.
bval...@aol.com
.
> > Two spelling mistakes in a four word sentence.
> Wow, you can count!.
.
And spell. And I know basic grammar.
You should learn it some time.
Harold Burton
<de948e9b-1684-45a0...@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com>,
"bval...@aol.com" <bval...@aol.com> wrote:
Not a chance. :-)
robw
And you were an editor?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:de948e9b-1684-45a0...@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Clave
news:9419bc8c-cc91-47bc...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
The fact that there's a huge market for comforting lies doesn't mean the
lies are anything more than lies. The GOP counts on this fact, and on the
people like you who provide the market, for its very existence.
Jim
robw
less affiliates.
Your thoughts?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bffdbaba-f22e-4f79...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
robw
wouldn't the take be more like 20 mil?????
Don't you cunts get out?
(snicker)
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9419bc8c-cc91-47bc...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
robw
Harold Burton
"robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote:
> "disagreement" when you meant disagreed with??????
No.
robw
And we didn't do them to get rich.
They're collaborations.
We like to share our art.
You;re a hack writer who has never been published with original
characheters.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f3f22e01-1174-486c...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
> Yes, both books exist.
> And we didn't do them to get rich.
>
> They're collaborations.
>
> We like to share our art.
If you did, you'd post your work online. You don't, because they
don't exist.
.
> You;re (SPELLING MISTAKE) a hack writer who has never been published with original
> characheters. (SPELLING MISTAKE)
.
Let's put aside for a moment that I have done many non-licensed pieces
- not to mention non-fiction.
Do you seriously claim that Robert Downey Jr., Terrence Howard, Jeff
Bridges, Gwyneth Paltrow and Jon Favreau were hacks when they created
the film version of "Iron Man"? Ronald D. Moore was simply phoning it
in when he worked on "Battlestar Galactica" and "Star Trek"? Frank
Miller was slumming when he turned in "Batman", "Daredevil", and "The
Spirit"? Alan Moore should be ashamed of his "Superman" and "Swamp
Thing" scripts? How about Speilberg's "Tin-Tin" film? Bryan Singer's
"Superman Returns"?
You have so much ego with so little to show for it.
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9419bc8c-cc91-47bc...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On May 10, 6:35 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> Expelled made 3.1 million the first week. I noticed the second week it
> >> wasn't even top ten which means it made less than 2.3 million.
> > .
> >http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=expelled.htm
>
> > EXPELLED:
> > NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED
>
> > Domestic Total as of May. 8, 2008: $6,906,488
> > Distributor: Rocky Mountain Pictures Release Date: April 18, 2008
> > Genre: Documentary Running Time: 1 hrs. 30 min.
> > MPAA Rating: PG Production Budget: N/A
>
> > As of this writing, it's the fifth most popular political documentary
> > ever released.
>
> The fact that there's a huge market for comforting lies doesn't mean the
> lies are anything more than lies.
Don't tell me, tell Rob W. He's the one who insists that high box
office returns equals truth.
.
>The GOP counts on this fact, and on the
.
So far, the only argument you've offered against the film boils down
to "how dare anyone question what I believe?"
Clave
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ff9cf087-5686-491b...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> On May 10, 8:04 pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
> wrote:
>> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:9419bc8c-cc91-47bc...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> > On May 10, 6:35 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >> Expelled made 3.1 million the first week. I noticed the second week it
>> >> wasn't even top ten which means it made less than 2.3 million.
>> > .
>> >http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=expelled.htm
>>
>> > EXPELLED:
>> > NO INTELLIGENCE ALLOWED
>>
>> > Domestic Total as of May. 8, 2008: $6,906,488
>> > Distributor: Rocky Mountain Pictures Release Date: April 18, 2008
>> > Genre: Documentary Running Time: 1 hrs. 30 min.
>> > MPAA Rating: PG Production Budget: N/A
>>
>> > As of this writing, it's the fifth most popular political documentary
>> > ever released.
>>
>> The fact that there's a huge market for comforting lies doesn't mean the
>> lies are anything more than lies.
> .
> Don't tell me, tell Rob W. He's the one who insists that high box
> office returns equals truth.
I don't think so. When did he insist that?
>>The GOP counts on this fact, and on the
>> people like you who provide the market, for its very existence..
> .
> So far, the only argument you've offered against the film boils down
> to "how dare anyone question what I believe?"
I haven't argued against the film. I've made fun of its audience.
Huge difference.
Jim
OneTwoThree
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:24cfec9e-d032-4657...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
but he DOES have a pretty young wife, which is probably the only reason he's
welcome at the local wife swapping clubs ;)
>
>
>
robw
Meanwhile, you've done "Archie" and a "Star Trek" spin off.
Let me put it to you this way......if a Miller Batman comic was going to
come out this Wednesday I'd take a pass.
But if it was a new "Sin City" I'd be at the comic shop five minutes after I
got off work.
Think about it.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:24cfec9e-d032-4657...@b5g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
robw
Never.
What I've pointed out is that if Rush has 3 million listeners a day and
O'Really has 2.7 million viewers a night that anything less than a 20
million take (and "Expelled is not even close) proves that conservatives
don't get out much.
You said 7million. (which I dispute seeing as how the flix did 3.2 mil the
first week and less than 203 the second.)
But let's give you 7 mil.
That translates into a million people or less seeing the movie.
It doesn't add up?
Where were your conservative masses?
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ff9cf087-5686-491b...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
> All those people you mentioned have also done totally original things.
>
> Meanwhile, you've done "Archie" and a "Star Trek" spin off.
And staff writer for a sit-com. Several original children's books.
Several non-fiction books, too.
.
> Let me put it to you this way......if a Miller Batman comic was going to
> come out this Wednesday I'd take a pass.
.
> But if it was a new "Sin City" I'd be at the comic shop five minutes after I
> got off work.
> Think about it.
.
I have - I think that you're the most bitter loser on Usenet - and
that's sayin' something.
Jim E
"robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:o_qdnQLYM7TzN7rV...@comcast.com...
>I never said high box office returns equals truth.
>
> Never.
>
> What I've pointed out is that if Rush has 3 million listeners a day and
> O'Really has 2.7 million viewers a night that anything less than a 20
> million take (and "Expelled is not even close) proves that conservatives
> don't get out much.
>
> You said 7million. (which I dispute seeing as how the flix did 3.2 mil the
> first week and less than 203 the second.)
>
> But let's give you 7 mil.
>
> That translates into a million people or less seeing the movie.
>
> It doesn't add up?
>
> Where were your conservative masses?
>
Quietly reloading.
Jim E
Clave
news:68pqvrF...@mid.individual.net...
Their solution for everything.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
> I never said high box office returns equals truth.
>
> Never.
>
> What I've pointed out is that if Rush has 3 million listeners a day and
> O'Really has 2.7 million viewers a night that anything less than a 20
> million take (and "Expelled is not even close) proves that conservatives
> don't get out much.
No, it proves that not all of Rush's listeners are interested in a
documentary about Intelligent Design. That would mean (gasp) that
they have different opinions and interests.
.
> You said 7million. (which I dispute seeing as how the flix did 3.2 mil the
> first week and less than 203 the second.)
203 grand? Where, may I ask, did you come up with THAT number?
Perhaps you've confused it with lefty favorite documentary "Where in
the World Is Osama Bin Laden?" Nope - that film's second weekend
brought in the princely sum of $60,000.
This is not a topic which informed, honest people can disagree.
Seriously - just visit BOM, they have all the numbers right at their
fingertips.
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed - second week:
This weeks ranking: 13
Weekend gross: $1,394,940
Total gross: (as of the second weekend) $5,297,860 -
http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?yr=2008&wknd=17&p=.htm
> But let's give you 7 mil.
.
> That translates into a million people or less seeing the movie.
>
> It doesn't add up?
.
A million people paid to see a documentary, so far.
And this happened without the endless campaign the media handed
Micheal Moore and Al Gore, who base their careers entirely on
literally billions of dollars of free advertising..
I'm impressed.
BTW, how many copies of your "books" (snicker) did you sell? A
dozen? I mean, really sold. Not pity copies, where you sat "signing"
the book, but where they sat on a shelf by themselves, and people
bought them because they liked it?
bval...@aol.com
> "disagreement" when you meant disagreed with??????
>
> And you were an editor?
Considering the crap you've inflicted on Usenet, you have the gall to
try and make something out of a single typo?
robw
If I give you the 7 Mil. number the math doesn't work. When's the last time
you went to the movies???
Freaking matinees are eight bucks.
You really are stupid.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f860cf05-e502-4389...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
robw
And I'm sorry, I'm drawn to people's original work.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:935f1d14-df9b-410b...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
robw
and reference "Step Two: Craft"
So tell us, what condiments do you like on your words when you're eating
them?
(snicker)
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bae8a2b5-2f14-4b28...@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
> What sit-com and at what point in the show's history?
I've already sent you that information. More than once, as it
happens.
robw
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:33b5d25e-19e9-4287...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
.
Agreed.
.
>so. When did he insist that?
He publicly stated that the film was a failure, and the only argument
he presented was its box office.
.
> >>The GOP counts on this fact, and on the
> >> people like you who provide the market, for its very existence..
.
> > So far, the only argument you've offered against the film boils down
> > to "how dare anyone question what I believe?"
> I haven't argued against the film. I've made fun of its audience.
> Huge difference..
.
Of course - after all, what have you to offer other than hatred for
those who believe differently than you?
robw
I merely pointed out that if the "New Media" is so terrific the movie should
have made more money.
I mean if 2.7 million people watch O'Really and million more listen to Rush,
Hannity and Beck........7 million sucks.
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d3a46654-9bab-4224...@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
bval...@aol.com
> I never said high box office returns equals truth.
> Never.
.
Then what was with the obcession with how much money the film made?
Why the snide comments like "Let's play a game.
The take for Michael's movie vs., Ben Stein's ??? "
> What I've pointed out is that if Rush has 3 million listeners a day...>
.
It's actually between 14 and 20 million.
.
> and
> O'Really has 2.7 million viewers a night that anything less than a 20
> million take (and "Expelled is not even close) proves that conservatives
> don't get out much.
.
> You said 7million.>
.
I didn't say it, I proved it.
.
> (which I dispute seeing as how the flix did 3.2 mil the
> first week and less than 203 the second.)
.
Nope. It it's second week, it made 1.6 million.
.
> But let's give you 7 mil.
,
> That translates into a million people or less seeing the movie.
.
> It doesn't add up?
.
> Where were your conservative masses?
.
A million people seeing a scholarly documentary IS a mass.
Just how many people bought your self published book?
bval...@aol.com
> Once again,l never equated the box office take with truth.
So why are you so obscessed with how much money it made?
.
> I merely pointed out that if the "New Media" is so terrific the movie should
> have made more money.
Sez who? You? A guy who has to beg perfect strangers to sell a dozen
copies of his children's book?
.
> I mean if 2.7 million people watch O'Really and million more listen to Rush,
> Hannity and Beck........7 million sucks.
It's the fifth most popular political documentary every made.
That's a success.
robw
Oh, and it's 14-20 million a week, not a day.
You really are stupid.
But fun!
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:402c4261-9747-41d9...@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Jeff Strickland
robw
You've now spelled that word wrong twice.
I would suggest you reference Rule Two of "Bravado Billy's Three Rules of
Being a Writer."
You're making this easy.
And I notice you're being very selective about the posts to which you
respond.
I would suggest Rule One for that.
We cook and eat Indian food quite frequently. We could suggest some cool
spices that word make those words go down easier.
(snicker)
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bf8d101a-f970-4327...@d19g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
Clave
news:d3a46654-9bab-4224...@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 10, 9:21 pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
> wrote:
>> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
<...>
>> >> The fact that there's a huge market for comforting lies doesn't mean
>> >> the
>> >> lies are anything more than lies.
>> > .
>> > Don't tell me, tell Rob W. He's the one who insists that high box
>> > office returns equals truth.
>>
>> I don't think so. When did he insist that?
>
> He publicly stated that the film was a failure, and the only argument
> he presented was its box office.
Quote him insisting that high box office equals truth, liar.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
> Does ANYBODY care what Randi Rhodes says about anything?
I suppose someone must - but would you want to talk to that person?
Jeff Strickland
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3e75a0c3-7336-4d60...@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Not for very long.
Clave
news:CN6Wj.18186$OT1.869@trnddc03...
As if any of you has a chance.
Jim
robw
He keeps insisting that a million people have seen the movie but 7 million
divided by a movie ticket doesn't add up.
He's drastically out of touch.
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:B9qdnd48jY4QaLXV...@cablespeedwa.com...
Reaper G
Jeff Strickland wrote:
> Does ANYBODY care what Randi Rhodes says about anything?
Air America sure did.
bval...@aol.com
> >>> Does ANYBODY care what Randi Rhodes says about anything?
.
> >> I suppose someone must - but would you want to talk to that person?
> > Not for very long.
.
> As if any of you has a chance.
You mean I don't get to listen to an asshole drone on and on by
quoting the wit and wisdom of Ms. Rhodes? Get the nitro - I'll decide
later whether to use it to restart my heart or blow myself up.
Clave
news:7a1a2145-7911-4c66...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
I see -- intelligent women scare you. Not a surprise.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
I'm not afraid of Ann Coulter. Or are you talking about Hillary the
whore?
Clave
news:fe9e31ba-652a-44aa...@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
See? You've completely repressed the subject of the discussion.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fe9e31ba-652a-44aa...@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 8:32 pm, "Clave" <ClaviusNoSpamDam...@cablespeed.com>
> > wrote:
> >> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:7a1a2145-7911-4c66...@y18g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > .
> >> >> >>> Does ANYBODY care what Randi Rhodes says about anything?
> >> > .
> >> >> >> I suppose someone must - but would you want to talk to that person?
.
> >> >> > Not for very long.
.
> >> >> As if any of you has a chance.
.
> >> > You mean I don't get to listen to an asshole drone on and on by
> >> > quoting the wit and wisdom of Ms. Rhodes? Get the nitro - I'll decide
> >> > later whether to use it to restart my heart or blow myself up.
.
> >> I see -- intelligent women scare you. Not a surprise.
.
> > I'm not afraid of Ann Coulter. Or are you talking about Hillary the
> > whore?
> See? You've completely repressed the subject of the discussion.
And by "repress(ing) the subject of the discussion", of course you
mean revealed your hypocrisy.
Clave
news:45539939-8737-4fd3...@f24g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
HJARF!
You don't even know what the word means.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
> HJARF!
.
> You don't even know what the word means.
re·press Audio Help (rĭ-prěs') Pronunciation Key
v. re·pressed, re·press·ing, re·press·es
v. tr.
1. To hold back by an act of volition: couldn't repress a smirk.
2. To put down by force, usually before total control has been
lost; quell: repress a rebellion.
3. Psychology To exclude (painful or disturbing memories, for
example) automatically or unconsciously from the conscious mind.
4. Biology To block (transcription of a gene) by combination of a
protein to an operator gene.
I stand by my observation.
Clave
news:ffee94e1-5899-4789...@w34g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
v. re搆ressed, re搆ress搏ng, re搆ress搪s
v. tr.
1. To hold back by an act of volition: couldn't repress a smirk...
===========================
You don't even know which word I'm talking about, dumbass.
Jim
bval...@aol.com
> v. re·pressed, re·press·ing, re·press·es
>
>
> 1. To hold back by an act of volition: couldn't repress a smirk...
> You don't even know which word I'm talking about, dumbass.
(indifferent shrug) The inability of the left to present an argument
duly noted.
Clave
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3c58ee1d-d25f-4a9d...@u12g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
Argue what? You stopped making anything like sense a whole bunch of posts
ago.
I'm just hanging around to point and laugh.
Jim