Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
2 views
Skip to first unread message
MattB
Sep 8, 2012, 6:57:06 PM9/8/12
to
Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/09/07/160770861/words-wealthy-democratic-donors-should-get-used-to-its-me-rahm
Now that Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is in charge of raising really big
dollars for a superPAC that supports President Obama, wealthy
Democrats all over the country may be eyeing their phones nervously.
Emanuel, the former Obama White House chief of staff, is known for not
taking no for an answer and for aggressively going after what he
wants.
Indeed, he's a ferocious fundraiser who gets to the point, often
throwing in an epithet or two for emphasis, just the sort of rainmaker
needed by Priorities USA Action, the pro-Obama superPAC that
desperately needs cash.
The biggest Democratic donors have shunned the superPAC, which can
raise unlimited contributions. They've preferred to stay within the
regulated, pre-Citizens United campaign finance system.
*******************
The Liberal 1% "may be eyeing their phones nervously."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/09/07/160770861/words-wealthy-democratic-donors-should-get-used-to-its-me-rahm
Now that Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is in charge of raising really big
dollars for a superPAC that supports President Obama, wealthy
Democrats all over the country may be eyeing their phones nervously.
Emanuel, the former Obama White House chief of staff, is known for not
taking no for an answer and for aggressively going after what he
wants.
Indeed, he's a ferocious fundraiser who gets to the point, often
throwing in an epithet or two for emphasis, just the sort of rainmaker
needed by Priorities USA Action, the pro-Obama superPAC that
desperately needs cash.
The biggest Democratic donors have shunned the superPAC, which can
raise unlimited contributions. They've preferred to stay within the
regulated, pre-Citizens United campaign finance system.
*******************
The Liberal 1% "may be eyeing their phones nervously."
Message has been deleted
AlleyCat
Sep 8, 2012, 9:30:10 PM9/8/12
to
In article <k4jn48tlsaeajkgdt...@4ax.com>,
trdell1...@gmail.com says...
color, and they don't want higher taxes for the rich, either. Blahahaha
trdell1...@gmail.com says...
>
> Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
>
> http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/09/07/160770861/words-wealthy-democratic-donors-should-get-used-to-its-me-rahm
>
> Now that Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is in charge of raising really big
> dollars for a superPAC that supports President Obama, wealthy
> Democrats all over the country may be eyeing their phones nervously.
We all know that any wealthy people in the Democrat Party are men of
> Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
>
> http://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2012/09/07/160770861/words-wealthy-democratic-donors-should-get-used-to-its-me-rahm
>
> Now that Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel is in charge of raising really big
> dollars for a superPAC that supports President Obama, wealthy
> Democrats all over the country may be eyeing their phones nervously.
color, and they don't want higher taxes for the rich, either. Blahahaha
Christopher Helms
Sep 8, 2012, 9:42:58 PM9/8/12
to
Democrats don't actually hate wealth and success. That's one of those
obsessively repeated right wing urban myths that right wingers have
forgotten has no basis in reality. Many Dems have done quite well for
themselves, thank you very much. They aren't willing to accept tax
increases because they hate their own wealth; they are willing to
accept them because they understand that we're all in this together
and they don't mind doing their fair share. They aren't communists.
They are adults. Republicans are the ones who behave like spoiled 10
year olds, pointing and yelling "Marxism!" at any suggestion that they
should give a fuck about anything beyond their own immediate
gratification.
obsessively repeated right wing urban myths that right wingers have
forgotten has no basis in reality. Many Dems have done quite well for
themselves, thank you very much. They aren't willing to accept tax
increases because they hate their own wealth; they are willing to
accept them because they understand that we're all in this together
and they don't mind doing their fair share. They aren't communists.
They are adults. Republicans are the ones who behave like spoiled 10
year olds, pointing and yelling "Marxism!" at any suggestion that they
should give a fuck about anything beyond their own immediate
gratification.
MattB
Sep 8, 2012, 9:50:45 PM9/8/12
to
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 18:46:33 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:57:06 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>Warren G. Harding and the "Ohio Gang"
>
Snipped Rhetoric.
Talk about Gangs
Chief Keef: Should Gang Violence Lead To Rap Fame?
http://hiphopwired.com/2012/09/08/chief-keef-should-gang-violence-lead-to-rap-fame/
Chicago talk about Gangs.
>On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:57:06 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
>
>Why not?
>>Words Wealthy Democratic Donors Should Get Used To: 'It's Me, Rahm'
>
>
>Warren G. Harding and the "Ohio Gang"
>
Snipped Rhetoric.
Talk about Gangs
Chief Keef: Should Gang Violence Lead To Rap Fame?
http://hiphopwired.com/2012/09/08/chief-keef-should-gang-violence-lead-to-rap-fame/
Chicago talk about Gangs.
Message has been deleted
3159 Dead
Sep 9, 2012, 12:17:43 AM9/9/12
to
Message has been deleted
AlleyCat
Sep 9, 2012, 12:33:35 AM9/9/12
to
In article <k2h597$6pi$2...@dont-email.me>, de...@gone.com says...
Sorry... Ayatollah Hussein Obama defined "rich" as $250,000 and above.
Try and tax those Democrats that make that kind of money. I'll betcha
$250,000 that they think Obama Khomeini should go fuck himself.
Buttfucker.
Try and tax those Democrats that make that kind of money. I'll betcha
$250,000 that they think Obama Khomeini should go fuck himself.
Buttfucker.
AlleyCat
Sep 9, 2012, 1:08:16 AM9/9/12
to
In article <f86o481e5cl5elufj...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net says...
> no problem with a fair burden of taxation.
>
> IDIOT.
We're not talking the most wealthy people in the world. Ayatollah
Khomeini Obama wants to tax the upper middle class, taking jobs and
people's livelihood away.
Yoor...@Jurgis.net says...
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:30:10 -0500, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
>
> >We all know that any wealthy people in the Democrat Party are men of
> >color, and they don't want higher taxes for the rich, either. Blahahaha
>
> We all know that some of the richest progressive men in the world have
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 20:30:10 -0500, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
>
> >We all know that any wealthy people in the Democrat Party are men of
> >color, and they don't want higher taxes for the rich, either. Blahahaha
>
> no problem with a fair burden of taxation.
>
> IDIOT.
We're not talking the most wealthy people in the world. Ayatollah
Khomeini Obama wants to tax the upper middle class, taking jobs and
people's livelihood away.
3159 Dead
Sep 9, 2012, 11:31:04 AM9/9/12
to
horror!
3159 Dead
Sep 9, 2012, 11:35:20 AM9/9/12
to
A recipe for social revolution, no doubt.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages