Loretta Lynch on Hillary

[David Hartung]

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hillarys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n2127055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu

Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.

[Mitchell Holman]

David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
news:P6-dnfM7lfPmcUvL...@giganews.com:

> http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hill
> arys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n212
> 7055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&

> utm_campaign=buffer
>
> Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu
>
> Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.
>

Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?



Ray LaHood, Sec. of Transportation
Jon Huntsman Jr, Ambassador to China
Robert M. Gates, Sec Defense
Judd Gregg, Sec of Commerce
Dana Perino, Broadcating Board of Governors
Chuck Hagel, Sec. of Defense

[Vandar]

On 3/2/2016 9:17 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
> news:P6-dnfM7lfPmcUvL...@giganews.com:
>
>> http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hill
>> arys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n212
>> 7055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&
>> utm_campaign=buffer
>>
>> Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu
>>
>> Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.
>>
>
>
> Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?

Yes. Incompetent as well, just like nearly everyone else Obama surrounds
himself with.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

Yes otherwise the Republican would have known NOT to get involved with
Obama in any way shape or form..... because you're being used and will
be chewed up and spit out and it won't end well.


I can't believe a General like Petraeus actually accepted a job working
for a Marxist like Obama... Naturally he paid for that with his career
in politics being ended before it began.

--
That's Karma





*Rumination*
#1.0.6 - Liberalism is an unsustainable ideology, it is destroying our
society and the whole of western culture.

[wy]

You're a Lutheran. Which makes you not to be believed.

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

Fools, one and all. Too stupid to trust if they are stupid enough to
work for Obama. Obama views them as his enemy. They will just be used
and discarded when it's convenient for Obama.


--
That's Karma



╔════╗──────────────╔═══╗╔═══╗╔╗╔═══╗─╔╗╔╗╔╗
╚═╗╔═╝──────────────╚══╗║║╔═╗║║║║╔══╝─║║║║║║
──║║╔══╦╗╔╦════╦══╗─╔══╝║║║─║║║║║╚══╗─║║║║║║
──║║║╔═╣║║║╔╗╔╗║╔╗║─║╔══╝║║─║║║║║╔═╗║─╚╝╚╝╚╝
──║║║║─║╚╝║║║║║║╚╝║─║╚══╗║╚═╝║║║║╚═╝║─╔╗╔╗╔╗
──╚╝╚╝─╚══╩╝╚╝╚╣╔═╝─╚═══╝╚═══╝╚╝╚═══╝─╚╝╚╝╚╝
───────────────║║
───────────────╚╝

[Beam Me Up Scotty]

All Lynch was saying was that they are using a political viewpoint and
looking for a way to let Hillary off of the charges of espionage and
violating the secrecy act.

--
That's Karma





*Rumination*

#49 - I'll die protecting my freedom.... will you die protecting your
Socialism?

[First Post]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:20:11 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Their-leaders-prove-the-only-i...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
wrote:

>On 03/02/2016 09:32 AM, Vandar wrote:
>> On 3/2/2016 9:17 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>> David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
>>> news:P6-dnfM7lfPmcUvL...@giganews.com:
>>>
>>>> http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hill
>>>> arys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n212
>>>> 7055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&
>>>> utm_campaign=buffer
>>>>
>>>> Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu
>>>>
>>>> Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?
>>
>> Yes. Incompetent as well, just like nearly everyone else Obama surrounds
>> himself with.
>
>Yes otherwise the Republican would have known NOT to get involved with
>Obama in any way shape or form..... because you're being used and will
>be chewed up and spit out and it won't end well.
>
>
>I can't believe a General like Petraeus actually accepted a job working
>for a Marxist like Obama... Naturally he paid for that with his career
>in politics being ended before it began.

I can see a military man feeling an obligation to his troops and
possibly wanting to have such a position in order to try to do the
right things in spite of the administration they are under.

Regarding Lynch, anyone who thinks that a president creating secret
executive orders on gun control is acceptable is not a true
Republican.

[First Post]

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 10:24:34 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
<Their-leaders-prove-the-only-i...@blackhole.nebulax.com>
wrote:

>On 03/02/2016 09:17 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>> David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
>> news:P6-dnfM7lfPmcUvL...@giganews.com:
>>
>>> http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hill
>>> arys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n212
>>> 7055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&
>>> utm_campaign=buffer
>>>
>>> Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu
>>>
>>> Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ray LaHood, Sec. of Transportation
>> Jon Huntsman Jr, Ambassador to China
>> Robert M. Gates, Sec Defense
>> Judd Gregg, Sec of Commerce
>> Dana Perino, Broadcating Board of Governors
>> Chuck Hagel, Sec. of Defense
>
>Fools, one and all. Too stupid to trust if they are stupid enough to
>work for Obama. Obama views them as his enemy. They will just be used
>and discarded when it's convenient for Obama.

Hell, half of the Republicans appointed by Republicans have been
untrustworthy.
Which is still better odds than the democrats have.

[Salty Stan]

You're an idiot...that is far, far worse.

[Vandar]

On 3/2/2016 11:40 AM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:32:10 -0500, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?
>>
>> Yes. Incompetent as well, just like nearly everyone else Obama surrounds
>> himself with.
>

> Well---Nixon, Raygun, dumbya "surrounded" themselves with what is now
> termed some of the "Most corrupted, criminal, disreputable, indicted,
> tried, convicted, fired, reprimanded and disgraced" army of HIGH LEVEL
> appointees, advisors, cabinet officers, and other officers we ever had
> in America. Including a VICE PRESIDENT

I'll be sure not to vote for them this year.

Stop living in 1988.

[Salty Stan]

I see the Republicans can't count on the kook votes this year.

[David Hartung]

On 03/02/2016 08:17 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
> David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
> news:P6-dnfM7lfPmcUvL...@giganews.com:
>
>> http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2016/03/01/loretta-lynch-hill
>> arys-case-is-being-reviewed-just-like-every-other-case-we-consider-n212
>> 7055?utm_content=buffere6299&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&
>> utm_campaign=buffer
>>
>> Or: http://tinyurl.com/hvj6rbu
>>
>> Lynch works for Obama, thus she is not trustworthy.
>>
>
>
> Is every Republican Obama appointed "untrustworthy"?

You have made it abundantly clear over the years that you did not trust
those appointed by GW Bush, why would you expect that I would trust
Obama appointees?

[David Hartung]

On 03/02/2016 10:36 AM, koo...@maricaibo.com wrote:

> You cited a rightwing, biased, untrustworthy political hack site
>
> Thus--YOU are as nutty as a I say you are

Are you claiming that Lynch did not make the statements attributed to her?

[Fred Oinka]

On Wednesday, March 2, 2016 at 10:21:29 AM UTC-5, wy wrote:

Just couldn't stay away could you, Pajamaboy?

SLURP

SLURP

SLURP

BURP

[Mitchell Holman]

David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in

news:CdCdnZsckNx_rErL...@giganews.com:

Who told you that? I thought Gates was a great
Sec of Defense, Roberts was qualified to be on the
Court, Michael Mukasey as very able as Atty General.

Unlike you I look at the person, not the pres
who appointed them.

> why would you expect that I would trust
> Obama appointees?

Your naive opposition to everything Obama said
and did speaks volumes.

[Mitchell Holman]

koo...@maricaibo.com wrote in news:7ngfdbdu3kl1abh9vfol28c3rmfmji49ie@
4ax.com:

> On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 16:58:52 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> <noe...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>David Hartung <d_ha...@h0tmail.com> wrote in
>
>>

>>> why would you expect that I would trust
>>> Obama appointees?
>>
>>
>> Your naive opposition to everything Obama said
>>and did speaks volumes.
>
>

> Does hartfung forget the vow made inaugaration night 2009, or the last
> 7 years of UNPARALLELED, blind, opposition to EVERYTHING Obama
> tried---even when it was a republican idea (HC a Heritage Foundation
> policy), and best for the nation?
>
> Hartung seems to be a tad hateful
>
>





GOP Opposes Their Own Ideas — If Obama Backs Them
Tue, 26 Jun 2012

One idea Republicans had been pushing was a proposal
for a bipartisan commission to recommend tough deficit-
reduction measures. But then the Obama administration
decided to embrace the idea.

And, lo and behold, as Mike Allen reported in Politico,
the Republicans promptly turned on their heels and
repudiated it. Six of the bill's Republican co-sponsors
voted against it. The justification was that mumble mumble
tax increases mumble.

Obama:

"This law failed by seven votes when seven Republicans
who had co-sponsored the bill — had co-sponsored the
idea — suddenly walked away from their own proposal after
I endorsed it"

http://tinyurl.com/9dy4ybz

[wy]

What Democrats did Bush appoint?