Stupid liberals politicize death and destruction AGAIN!!!
topcat
paper bag, they now have to be able to count the dead bodies coming home
from Iraq AND the dead bodies on the gulf coast. Death and destruction are
important to liberals. It's their way of getting to one man. The duly
elected President of the United States.
Part one. The liberals started almost immediately politicizing an act of
nature. It was BUSHS' fault for not signing the Kyoto treaty! (Or course,
Clinton never signed it either). It was BUSHS' fault for not doing more to
combat global warming. Of course, there was no talk of global warming 40
years ago when similar hurricanes hit the gulf coast.
As part two of their all out assault on the duly elected President of the
United States, the liberals thought it would be wise to blame the Presidents
tax cuts as the primary reason New Orleans didn't have better flood
protection. Of course, no mention has been made about the growing economy
that has materialized (even in the face of high gas prices) due to those tax
cuts. No mention has been made about how government revenues have INCREASED
due to that growing economy. Liberal spin always has a way of getting
smacked in the face by something know as "cold hard facts".
Speaking of "cold hard facts", here are a few more. Liberals have certainly
shown their true colors when it comes to helping the poor and the
victimized. Liberals don't really see the poor or the victimized, they see
nothing but what they consider political opportunity.
The good thing for this country is that liberals never learn. Like Wyle E.
Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner, their new improved Acme Bush Legacy
Destroyer is going to do nothing but blow up in their face. Beep! Beep!
TC
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE <xeton2001@yahoo.com>
The sad thing is that there are no doubt lots of good people Black Americans
who just want to survive and wish they didn't have to mingle with the
Niggers.
"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:df76a...@news3.newsguy.com...
•Boink!•
"laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE <xeto...@yahoo.com>"
<ass...@VEHICULARHOMICIDE.KENNEDY> wrote in message
news:7zFRe.17680$k32.11203@trnddc08...
> Goddam Nigger Democrats are proving what a bunch of filthy animals they
> are. The sad thing is that there are no doubt lots of good people Black
> Americans who just want to survive and wish they didn't have to mingle
> with the Niggers.
Translation: I voted for Bush and he's let me down.
Rob Olsen
<xeto...@yahoo.com>" <ass...@VEHICULARHOMICIDE.KENNEDY> wrote:
>Goddam Nigger Democrats are proving what a bunch of filthy animals they are.
>The sad thing is that there are no doubt lots of good people Black Americans
>who just want to survive and wish they didn't have to mingle with the
>Niggers.
>
Fuck off bigot
-
"Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? Oh, I
mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my
beautiful mind on something like that?"
-Barbra Bush
Mark McGilvray
What did you expect from a political party increasingly supportive of our
nation's enemies? Half the moonbats in this NG support terrorism and
terrorists. The Democraps are becoming the party of treason, so it is a
small step for these hyenas to scavenge corpses for political advantage.
Rob Olsen
Nonsense . It's you freedom hating, constitution bashing un_American
neo -cons who are the traitors. As we can see, the American people of
finally wised up and they are beginning to see you for the scum that
you are. Your idiot-son-of-an-asshole president has the lowest rating
any president has ever had at this point of his presidency. The
American people disapprove of everything that bush has done. His
ratings are not on the positive side on any issue. Not even terrorism.
Bush is going down fast and he's going to take the marching morons
like you with him.
Now go back to stroking off your jackbooted buddies...
1880 Dead
<mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
Hi, Silly McGilly. Ignoring the dirtbags who are using this
catastrophe to try to foment a race war in order to take cheap shots
at liberals?
>
•Boink!•
"Mark McGilvray" <mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote in message
news:11hefk6...@corp.supernews.com...
You divisionists never quit with your stinking anti-American views.
topcat
"Rob Olsen" <R...@burningbush.org> wrote in message
news:atfeh15r6n0ukd1af...@4ax.com...
Uhh....how about YOU and YOUR KIND win an election, then you can talk, 'kay?
TC
pl...@quentincrisp.com
justifies Mr. Bush refusing New Orleans money to repair their levees?
If we're all doing so well, why didn't he give them the cash? Could,
maybe, a $200 billion war have something to do with it?
As for politicizing this tragedy, Democrats can't TOUCH the so-called
"Christian" Republicans, who within twelve hours blamed it on GAY MEN:
http://www.365gay.com/newscon0 5/08/083105nola.htm
topcat
<pl...@quentincrisp.com> wrote in message
news:1125599486.8...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Sheesh. What fresh idiocy is this? An allegedly growing economy
> justifies Mr. Bush refusing New Orleans money to repair their levees?
> If we're all doing so well, why didn't he give them the cash? Could,
> maybe, a $200 billion war have something to do with it?
>
Only an idiot (you) would think that one has anything to do with the other.
> As for politicizing this tragedy, Democrats can't TOUCH the so-called
> "Christian" Republicans, who within twelve hours blamed it on GAY MEN:
>
Being a sick GAY MAN has nothing to do with politics.
(Btw, pluto is a good name for you, because you're out there)
TC
cliff...@yahoo.co.uk
"I hope people don't play politics at this time of a natural disaster
the likes of which this country has never seen."
OH, I'M TOUCHED. UTTERLY TOUCHED. AFTER 9/11, THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN
PARTY WENT EN MASSE TO GET TWIN TOWERS ASS TATOOS.
The Republican convention was a wholesale tribute to crass
exploitation, the sets themselves designed to evoke the aftermath of
the attack. Every domestic and international policy this administration
-- no, this entire Republican government -- has produced has been
heaved up before the public while waving the spectre of 9/11 as the
catch-all vindication of every administration whim. Every tax cut,
every civil rights issue, every budget cut, every budget expansion, no
matter how tortured the logic must be, has some Republican senator
standing on the Senate floor and proudly raping the corpses of that day
as justification for their particular agenda item.
Oh, we've seen politicalization of disaster. Every Republican campaign
for the last four years has revolved around the politicalization of
disaster.
But Lord help us, George W. Bush is going to get the vapors if anyone
asks him to explain his administration's active cuts of the very
programs designed to keep New Orleans safe."
http://www.dailykos.com/
http://www.hurricane.lsu.edu/_in_the_news/houston.htm
pl...@quentincrisp.com
> campaign for the last four years has revolved around the
> politicalization of disaster.
Abso-friggin'-lutely. And now that a giant hole has been ripped in
President Bush's America, Republicans are acting like whiny little
babies. They cut funds to cities and complain when it backfires. They
blew $200 billion on a useless war, and now they're begging us for
change.
How this disaster is being handled is *completely* representative of
our esteemed president's leadership strategy: it dragged him back from
vacation long enough to say, "Don't buy gas if you don't need it." If
that's not symptomatic of his leadership I don't know what is.
Rob Olsen
<cliff...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>"He [Bush] also said today:
>
>"I hope people don't play politics at this time of a natural disaster
>the likes of which this country has never seen."
>
>OH, I'M TOUCHED. UTTERLY TOUCHED. AFTER 9/11, THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN
>PARTY WENT EN MASSE TO GET TWIN TOWERS ASS TATOOS.
>
This was from the same out of touch moron who said that no one could
have anticipated the breaches in the levees. How can anyone not be
thoroughly disgusted with this marauding band of idiots we have
running the country?
Mark McGilvray
power. There is nothing they will not stoop to, but the truth. Harry Truman,
or even JFK, would have some of the present traitorcrats prosecuted for
treason and sedition. They would not recognize the steaming pile of shit the
Democrat party has become.
1880 Dead
<mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
I just found out (from Randi Rhodes) that Condoleezza Rice, the
person who is responsible
for overseeing things for the administration in the event of domestic
catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last evening
attending a Broadway play.
"Spamalot" for those Republicans who share her values.
>
1880 Dead
wrote:
>On 1 Sep 2005 12:17:10 -0700, "cliff...@yahoo.co.uk"
><cliff...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>"He [Bush] also said today:
>>
>>"I hope people don't play politics at this time of a natural disaster
>>the likes of which this country has never seen."
>>
>>OH, I'M TOUCHED. UTTERLY TOUCHED. AFTER 9/11, THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN
>>PARTY WENT EN MASSE TO GET TWIN TOWERS ASS TATOOS.
>>
>
>This was from the same out of touch moron who said that no one could
>have anticipated the breaches in the levees. How can anyone not be
>thoroughly disgusted with this marauding band of idiots we have
>running the country?
I just found out (from Randi Rhodes) that Condoleezza Rice, the
person who is responsible
for overseeing things for the administration in the event of domestic
catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last evening
attending a Broadway play.
"Spamalot" for those Republicans who share her values.
Mark McGilvray
> On 1 Sep 2005 12:17:10 -0700, "cliff...@yahoo.co.uk"
> <cliff...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>"He [Bush] also said today:
>>
>>"I hope people don't play politics at this time of a natural disaster
>>the likes of which this country has never seen."
>>
>>OH, I'M TOUCHED. UTTERLY TOUCHED. AFTER 9/11, THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN
>>PARTY WENT EN MASSE TO GET TWIN TOWERS ASS TATOOS.
>>
>
> This was from the same out of touch moron who said that no one could
> have anticipated the breaches in the levees. How can anyone not be
> thoroughly disgusted with this marauding band of idiots we have
> running the country?
> -
>
Retard Robbie shares some of his blinding stupidity with the NG. Here's a
math problem: what happens when a 22 foot tidal surge encounters
predominately 15 foot levees and dikes? New Orleans actually dodged the
bullet in two ways as I understand it. First the center of the storm missed
the city by about 20 miles. Second, a high pressure anomaly to the north
slowed the storm and it came ashore as a category 3 hurricane. Had these
factors not been in play, a direct hit on the city by a category 5 storm
would have produced a 30 foot tidal surge and monumental loss of life.
Now, moonbats, we know Haliburton was secretly tearing down dikes before the
storm to get the contract to rebuild them after killing thousands. This is
about as absurd as some of the partisan shit being posted by moonbats. If it
wasn't so sad and opportunistic, it would be funny anyone could be this
stupid and self-serving.
Mark McGilvray
"1880 Dead" <zepp#221118...@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote in message
news:nmmeh1154dou4nr4n...@4ax.com...
politically and anatomically correct Fidel Castro Love Doll?
Shut The Fuck Up
wrote:
> Death and destruction are
> important to liberals.
Better then thinking it unimportant.
Ace
<zepp#221118...@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 01 Sep 2005 19:26:19 GMT, Rob Olsen <R...@burningbush.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On 1 Sep 2005 12:17:10 -0700, "cliff...@yahoo.co.uk"
>><cliff...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>"He [Bush] also said today:
>>>
>>>"I hope people don't play politics at this time of a natural disaster
>>>the likes of which this country has never seen."
>>>
>>>OH, I'M TOUCHED. UTTERLY TOUCHED. AFTER 9/11, THE ENTIRE REPUBLICAN
>>>PARTY WENT EN MASSE TO GET TWIN TOWERS ASS TATOOS.
>>>
>>
>>This was from the same out of touch moron who said that no one could
>>have anticipated the breaches in the levees. How can anyone not be
>>thoroughly disgusted with this marauding band of idiots we have
>>running the country?
>
>I just found out (from Randi Rhodes) that Condoleezza Rice, the
>person who is responsible
>for overseeing things for the administration in the event of domestic
>catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last evening
>attending a Broadway play.
<ROTFLMAO> This is the third post that Greywolf Jamieson has made
documenting the fact that he doesn't know that Condoleezza Rice is the
Secretary of State and not the National Security Advisor.....
What do you expect from a moron like Jamieson who gets his news from
Air America and the WSWS....
--
"Me, I'm a half-ass empath, and if I ingest the right chemicals,
telepath too -- but I *hate* it. Folks don't *like* it when ye
look inside their heads. Lost me some friends that way, and it
sucks. I do psychometry sometimes -- pick up vibes off objects
or things. And that sucks, too. Ever hold a murder weapon in
yer hand, and flash on it? You don't want to. I was handed a
real Nazi dagger once, by an asshole pseudo-friend who thought
it'd be a real trip. When I got done pukin' I busted his nose
for him."
--Greywolf Zepp Jamieson Sep 13 1997
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/aa602f6537936ca5?hl=en&
Ace
It's not surprising at all that neither Randi Rhodes, nor Greywolf
Jamieson doesn't know that Condoleezza Rice is the Secretary of State
and not the National Security Advisor.
-----
"Well, that's the funny thing about terrorists. If they get what they
want, they stop being terrorists."
--Zepp Jamieson
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=q5sc50lf1id03ms1i9truk78v2dk6052f5%404ax.com
"The South couldn't taken any more of the Missouri Compromise,
sensing (correctly) that it would kill slavery in the end,
and Lincoln planned to uphold it."
--Zepp Jamieson
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=9j2n5vsqfga7l2fsrt0polt2eg6lqs71hv%404ax.com
"The first amendment means that you are protected by law from haters."
--Zepp Jamieson
"http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&selm=an_541474719
Mark McGilvray
"Ace" <stevencanyon@y***hoo.com> wrote in message
news:b3peh1dcjfvmjemqo...@4ax.com...
SNIP
>>I just found out (from Randi Rhodes) that Condoleezza Rice, the
>>person who is responsible
>>for overseeing things for the administration in the event of domestic
>>catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last evening
>>attending a Broadway play.
>
>
> <ROTFLMAO> This is the third post that Greywolf Jamieson has made
> documenting the fact that he doesn't know that Condoleezza Rice is the
> Secretary of State and not the National Security Advisor.....
>
> What do you expect from a moron like Jamieson who gets his news from
> Air America and the WSWS....
> --
>
Jamieson lives in rural squalor. I recently had the distinct pleasure of
pissing in Zepp's water well.
topcat
LOL! Next time spit in it for me.
TC
1880 Dead
Well, by gosh, silly Mcgilly, you got you a problem, you little liar.
I don't have well water. We got us what you call yer water system
here. Hot and cold and flushing toilets and all that.
>
Mark McGilvray
Water taste funny lately??????????
gjoh...@eudoramail.com
> Now the liberals really have a problem. Unable to find their way out of a
> paper bag, they now have to be able to count the dead bodies coming home
> from Iraq AND the dead bodies on the gulf coast. Death and destruction are
> important to liberals. It's their way of getting to one man. The duly
> elected President of the United States.
Topcat, like most usenet conservatives, have no concept of irony.
When 9/11 happened liberals rallied to the country, but conservatives
wanted to use that death and destruction as a club for their own petty,
political agenda anyway.
People like Topcat have repeated "9/11, 9/11" like some sort of
chant for 5 years now. They've used it to get us involved in a war that
no one but they wanted.
Now Topcat, and other usenet conservatives, complain when someone
points out death and destruction. Why? Not because they actually give a
damn about poor suffering people in Iraq, New Orleans, or even New
York. Because Topcat and usenet conservatives never did give a damn
about any of those people.
Topcat complains because it gets in the way of his political
agenda. And that's all that really matters to him, and his buddies.
Ace
Hey Greywolf, you figure out who the National Security Advisor is yet?
--
"I have been injured on the job in the
past. And I worked in a voc rehab office for a year."
--Zepp the Weasel Mar 15 1998
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.impeach.clinton/msg/055177372a6247f8?hl=en&
"Some years ago I worked at a rehab hospital; nurse's aide during the week,
ward clerk on the weekends."
--Greywolf the Wanderer Aug 14 1996
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/968ae00b03c8698b?hl=en&
Per
>Hey Greywolf, you figure out who the National Security Advisor is yet?
Another rightard without a brain.
Down with the Hitler loving right.
1880 Dead
<mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
My goodness. A stalker, a coward, and a liar, and you prove yourself
all three in just one post.
How long before you run away, thoroughly spanked, again?
>
Ace
Hey Greywolf, you figure out who the National Security Advisor is yet?
--
Here's a strange set of "coincidences" Both Greywolf and Zepp
have two Samoyeds, a spaniel, three an 1/2 cats" and
live near Mt Shasta with their "mate." Greywolf says the
"half-a-cat was injured in an accident.
>"Bryan Zepp Jamieson [ze...@snowcrest.net] lives on the slopes
>of Mt.Shasta with his wife, Paris, three dogs and three and a
>half cats."
>-- swagazine Issue Four, Summer 1997
>http://www.swagazine.com/issue4/swag4.txt
>"Greywolf the Wanderer, likewise, who shares my home with one
>mate, 3 dogs, and 3 and 1/2 cats"
>-- Greywolf the Wanderer's signature Jan 5 1997
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/a74ba5b1349e3029?hl=en&
>"I live in northern california, near Mount Shasta"
>--Greywolf the Wanderer May 18 1996
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/9c842439b3a06c5a?hl=en&
>I currently share my domicile with 2 Samoyeds and a rescue dog who is
>a spaniel cross <Cocker/Brittany)
>-- Greywolf the Wanderer Apr 8 1997
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/38fcea88594560f9?hl=en&
>Since I own three of the critters (two Samoyeds and a Cockeyed
>Spanule)
>Zepp Jamieson 2004
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/eab27b40288a74fe?hl=en&
Could this be Zepp Jamieson telling another lie?
>"Let me make it very clear. I am not Greywolf.
>Greywolf is not me."
>--Greywolf Zepp Jamieson Mar 2, 2005
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.democrats.d/msg/b503459d6b2db5b2?hl=en&
Stevie Nichts
> Now Topcat, and other usenet conservatives, complain when someone
> points out death and destruction. Why?
Because you lot only do so in order to attack the President. You've
recently suggested that Bush is personally responsible for the plight
of New Orleans due to budget cuts. (This, plus your assertion that
liberals make up the bulk of our armed forces, provided no small
source of amusement.)
> Not because they actually give a
> damn about poor suffering people in Iraq, New Orleans, or even New
> York. Because Topcat and usenet conservatives never did give a damn
> about any of those people.
Why is it that neither you anti-war types and your anti-war
websites ever seem to get around to denouncing the suicide
bombers and other terrorists in Iraq who target civilians, or
don't mind killing civilians in their jihad against our troops?
Could it be that you lot don't actually give a damn about poor
suffering people in Iraq?
> Topcat complains because it gets in the way of his political
> agenda. And that's all that really matters to him, and his buddies.
I see that projection is another hobby of yours.
Jeffrey Scott Linder
When did she change jobs?
>"Spamalot" for those Republicans who share her values.
You're so gullible.
JSL
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Zepp talking smack...gotta luv it.
Hey Zepp... any progress on the "barely qualified" rating yet? Any
documentation that proves you aren't a liar AND a coward?
JSL
Martin McPhillips
news:43184903...@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu...
I don't think you get it. If Zepp *said*
that rating existed, then it existed.
Haven't you heard that facts aren't really
real, they're just contingent, on theory.
There's really no such thing as lying,
just things made up and made real by
a wish.
1880 Dead
Actually, it slipped my mind that she HAD changed jobs.
>
>>"Spamalot" for those Republicans who share her values.
>
>You're so gullible.
And Republicans are selfish dirtbags.
I'll take my category, thanks.
Say, isn't FEMA doing a wonderful job, saving thousands of lives?
>
>JSL
"'I’m not meeting with that goddamned bitch,' Bush screamed at aides
who suggested he meet with Cindy Sheehan, the war-protesting mother
whose son died in Iraq. 'She can go to hell as far as I’m concerned!'"
--Putsch, a decompensating drunk
"Grover Norquist couldn't drown the government, so he drowned New Orleans instead."
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_news
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
http://groups.yahoo.com/subscribe/zepps_essays
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Ace
Zepp's magic telepathic abilities....
Ace
That was a particularly long blackout, Greywolf... Maybe you need to
call your alcoholic anon.. sponsor
--
"Glad you don't go along with the "get wrecked every night" philosophy
I did for a while, which led to me never finishing college."
Greywolf Zepp Jamieson Jan 11 1997
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/645945536f518ea8?hl=en&
richard schumacher
Mark McGilvray
"Jeffrey Scott Linder" <linde...@osu.edu> wrote in message
news:43184903...@nntp.service.ohio-state.edu...
Actually Zepp is pissed - so's his drinking water.
Zepp is also one of the premier liars of our time
Witness the mendacity of the Kanuckistani Kockbreath at
http://www.no-treason.com/wild/the_zepp_bet/index.htm
Martin McPhillips
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 07:05:35 -0700, 1880 Dead
> <zepp1880#2211finestplanet.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 12:42:00 GMT, linde...@osu.edu
>>(Jeffrey Scott
>>Linder) wrote:
>>
>>>1880 Dead <zepp#221118...@nospamzeppscommentaries.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Rice, the
>>>>person who is responsible
>>>>for overseeing things for the administration in the
>>>>event of domestic
>>>>catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last
>>>>evening
>>>>attending a Broadway play.
>>>
>>>When did she change jobs?
>>
>>Actually, it slipped my mind that she HAD changed jobs.
>
> That was a particularly long blackout, Greywolf... Maybe
> you need to
> call your alcoholic anon.. sponsor
I don't know about the AA sponsor, but there's
clearly an adult diaper in Zepp's near future.
His home health care worker will need a
civil engineering background to manage
that situation.
It "slipped [Zepp's] mind" that Condy Rice
had become the first black woman to be
Secretary of State? Is that like when
it slipped his mind that both he and
Greywolf drove a Duster and owned "half
a cat"?
Ace
If he's not into them already...
at 300+ lbs (and he claims to be pretty short) it's doubtful that he
can reach far enough wipe his own butt.
>His home health care worker will need a
>civil engineering background to manage
>that situation.
>
>It "slipped [Zepp's] mind" that Condy Rice
>had become the first black woman to be
>Secretary of State? Is that like when
>it slipped his mind that both he and
>Greywolf drove a Duster and owned "half
>a cat"?
>
>
...and worked in a rehab hospital..
...and named their dogs Monk and moon...
...and went to school at UCSB
...and ran a BBS in Santa Barbara
(etc)
--
Steve
Mark McGilvray
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2005 12:31:54 -0700, "Mark McGilvray"
> <mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
>>news:df7ga...@news3.newsguy.com...
>>>
>>> "Rob Olsen" <R...@burningbush.org> wrote in message
>>> news:atfeh15r6n0ukd1af...@4ax.com...
> person who is responsible
> for overseeing things for the administration in the event of domestic
> catastrophe, the National Security advisor, spend last evening
> attending a Broadway play.
>
Rhodes. ROFLMAO!
Jeffrey Scott Linder
I am well aware of the Zepp bet. Its #2 behind Milt's list.
JSL
>
>
Ace
<mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
Two steaming piles of shit and neither one smart enough to know who
the National Security Advisor is....
--
Steve
Mark McGilvray
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Surely you jest?
It spawned it's own website:
Do google search for power tools and Milt Shook
JSL
Ace
Milt has disappeared from usenet after telling us he was getting
married. I suspect that "the little woman" has him busy doing the
housework these days.
--
Steve
1886 Dead
The one that Billy made and lost, you mean?
]
Ace
See how Greywolf Jamieson lies? he never won that bet but he thinks
he can just say he did and people will believe him....
Jamieson's dishonesty is *very* well documented, like back when he
pretended when he could vote.....
--
"I have the right to vote against him in the next
election."
--Zepp Jamieson, 1996
http://www.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=4l6trj%24iq4%40news.snowcrest.net
"I will throw my vote away on a 3rd party candidate."
--Zepp Jamieson,2000/02/15
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=38a8c8d3.16637502%40news.snowcrest.net
"I can just as easily vote once now--in my local Congressional race"
--Zepp Jamieson, 1996
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.usa.misc/msg/a6fa6287419ce925?hl=en&
"You just doubled the value of my vote."
--Zepp Jamieson, 2000/04/25
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=3905050c.66719349%40news.snowcrest.net
"I -can- vote"
--Zepp Jamieson, 2000/04/25
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=4lmnit%24eiv%40news.snowcrest.net
[...] if we decide elections by square miles, my vote is worth
200 Los Angeles votes.
--Zepp Jamieson, 2000-12-18
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=tbit3tc60l1a6c1mj89b4o285anpe11kqa%404ax.com&oe=UTF-8
"Legal resident alien Zepp Jamieson, a Canadian who has lived
in the United States for more than 30 years, said his status
changed dramatically with the Patriot Act."
http://www.mtshastanews.com/archives/index.inn?loc=detail&doc=/2003/June/04-1695-news11.txt
Legal resident aliens aren't allowed to vote, Jamieson.
Why were you lying and pretending to be a citizen?
topcat
I miss Milt (about as much as I can miss a traitorous liberal). He had
almost as many silly analogies as Mitch Holman.
TC
Dana
news:9b6mh19lrllqrhp6v...@4ax.com...
> >I am well aware of the Zepp bet. Its #2 behind Milt's list.
>
> The one that Billy made and lost, you mean?
As zipper lies again.
Ace
I have to admit that it was delightful fun slamming him around when he
tried to claim that "Your right to free speech is protected from more
than the government." He hung on to that ridiculous notion until he
slipped off the edge and disappeared. I sometimes wonder if he's
snuck back with a different name but I think I'd recognize him.
--
Steve
Mark McGilvray
I just looked at the site. It's funny, but nothing to lose sleep over.
Thanks for the reply, but the site is way behind the Zepp Bet for yucks
IMHO.
Mark McGilvray
"1886 Dead" <zepp1886#2211finestplanet.com@> wrote in message
news:9b6mh19lrllqrhp6v...@4ax.com...
Zeppp's head off ad shat down his throat for all the world to see. And, this
is documented at http://www.no-treason.com/wild/the_zepp_bet/index.htm .
See what a dickhead Zepp really is. BTW, that was an hellacious piss in the
Jamieson water supply.
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Maybe but having witnessed both from the onset Milt Shook takes the
cake.
You don't see Milt posting anymore and his "list" of childproof power
tools is the major reason.
JSL
Martin McPhillips
> "Mark McGilvray" <mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>I just looked at the site. It's funny, but nothing to lose
>>sleep over.
>>Thanks for the reply, but the site is way behind the Zepp
>>Bet for yucks
>>IMHO.
>
> Maybe but having witnessed both from the onset Milt Shook
> takes the
> cake.
>
> You don't see Milt posting anymore and his "list" of
> childproof power
> tools is the major reason.
Now, wait a second, there's got to be some
room here for when Erb provided a link at
his University of Maine webpage to Glenn
Yeadon's website.
nevermore
Yes, and also his ridiculous claim that he could sue a private citizen
under the First Amendment for infringement of his speech... and also
his stupid statements saying that individuals didn't always end up
paying a corporation's taxes...
>JSL
--
Steve
nevermore
Really???? That's got to rank *VERY* high on the list of usenet
stupidity.
.... but how about Jamieson's inability to keep his Greywolf posts
from pointing directly back at him while at the same time claiming
that he can make computers "jump through hoops?"
--
Steve
Jeffrey Scott Linder
I wasn't addressing websites per se.
I was talking about some of the most well known blunders.
Everyone who was around remembers Milt's list as well as Zepp's bet.
Erb's link to the White Rose should give his tenure committee pause.
JSL
>
>
Jeffrey Scott Linder
And he could outrun bullets
And women couldn't own property in the 1970's
and on and on
JSL
Eagle Eye
<zepp1886#2211finestplanet.com@> wrote:
>On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 21:55:31 GMT, linde...@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott
>Linder) wrote:
>>"Mark McGilvray" <mcgi...@surewest.net> wrote:
>>>Actually Zepp is pissed - so's his drinking water.
>>>Zepp is also one of the premier liars of our time
>>>Witness the mendacity of the Kanuckistani Kockbreath at
>>>http://www.no-treason.com/wild/the_zepp_bet/index.htm
>>I am well aware of the Zepp bet. Its #2 behind Milt's list.
>The one that Billy made and lost, you mean?
No, that would be your hallucination.
In the real world, you never did demonstrate that Bill Clinton
was telling the truth when he claimed to remember black churches
in Arkansas being burned by racist arsonists during the time
of his youth.
Clinton's people even admitted that he was mistaken and argued that
he just got confused.
But despite that, you STILL insist that he was telling the
truth when he said that (but not when he retracted it, of course).
=====
EE
milt....@gmail.com
I have a life. And a list.
You're too stupid to have the former, or find the latter.
milt....@gmail.com
The original scenario had me protesting on a public street corner, and
a nearby store owner forcibly removing me from the corner. The
"lawsuit" was to extablish that I had the right to be on the corner,
and to get the court to prevent him from stopping me again.
You're the one claiming that the judge would laugh me out of court. You
never explained why, though, conveniently.
Get a life, moron.
Milt
milt....@gmail.com
what I said in order to do so.
I never said I could outrun bullets. I said I had scars on my ankles
from the buckshot, which would indicate to most people with brain cells
that I most certainly did NOT outrun it.
As for the second claim, the original claim I made was that, as late as
the 1970s a MARRIED WOMAN could not borrow money or own a credit card
without her husband as a co-signor.
You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
pathetic, ya fat little turd.
Milt
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Now that's funny.
Go away Milt...you'll be much happier.
Or do you miss the abuse?
JSL
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>I love how you idiots call ME stupid, and yet, you have to rephrase
>what I said in order to do so.
>
>I never said I could outrun bullets. I said I had scars on my ankles
>from the buckshot, which would indicate to most people with brain cells
>that I most certainly did NOT outrun it.
Well...lets just recall what you did say:
"I was hit by buckshot by accident once when I was a kid. I have a
scar to show for it. But no matter where it would have hit me, it
wouldn't have killed me, because I was running away from it. It's
called basic physics, boyz..." --Milt Shook
Sounds to me like you claimed you could outrun the lethal effects of
bullets.
>As for the second claim, the original claim I made was that, as late as
>the 1970s a MARRIED WOMAN could not borrow money or own a credit card
>without her husband as a co-signor.
No its not Milt. Here is your original claim:
"Up until the 70s, women could not own land on their own, or sign
contracts in many cases." --Milt Shook
>You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
>argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
>pathetic, ya fat little turd.
Ahh...Milt's didn't forget the style that endears him to everyone.
And BTW Milt, are you going to post your list?
JSL
1904 Dead
Linder) wrote:
>milt....@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>I love how you idiots call ME stupid, and yet, you have to rephrase
>>what I said in order to do so.
>>
>>I never said I could outrun bullets. I said I had scars on my ankles
>>from the buckshot, which would indicate to most people with brain cells
>>that I most certainly did NOT outrun it.
>
>Well...lets just recall what you did say:
>
>"I was hit by buckshot by accident once when I was a kid. I have a
>scar to show for it. But no matter where it would have hit me, it
>wouldn't have killed me, because I was running away from it. It's
>called basic physics, boyz..." --Milt Shook
>
>Sounds to me like you claimed you could outrun the lethal effects of
>bullets.
If you have enough of a head start, you can.
>
>>As for the second claim, the original claim I made was that, as late as
>>the 1970s a MARRIED WOMAN could not borrow money or own a credit card
>>without her husband as a co-signor.
>
>No its not Milt. Here is your original claim:
>
> "Up until the 70s, women could not own land on their own, or sign
>contracts in many cases." --Milt Shook
Frankly, given your track record, Jeffy, I would like to see the
ENTIRE quote, and not just one you cherrypicked. You're notorious for
doing that.
>
>
>>You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
>>argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
>>pathetic, ya fat little turd.
His favorite with me is a shrill "PROVE Nixon was ever president!"
type of demands for cites on things that are common knowledge. Now
days I just tell him to go to Google and learn something. He hates
that.
>
>Ahh...Milt's didn't forget the style that endears him to everyone.
>
>And BTW Milt, are you going to post your list?
>
>
>JSL
"'I’m not meeting with that goddamned bitch,' Bush screamed at aides
kyl...@yahoo.com
Mark McGilvray wrote:
> "topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
> news:df7ga...@news3.newsguy.com...
> >
> > "Rob Olsen" <R...@burningbush.org> wrote in message
> > news:atfeh15r6n0ukd1af...@4ax.com...
How so? Specifically, dork. <crickets...>
> in a bid to regain political
> power. There is nothing they will not stoop to, but the truth. Harry Truman,
> or even JFK, would have some of the present traitorcrats prosecuted for
> treason and sedition. They would not recognize the steaming pile of shit the
> Democrat party has become.
Not true but it isn't difficult to imagine Lincoln rolling over in his
grave in response to what you dirtbags have done to his Republican
party.
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Now that's funny coming from a guy like you Zepp but you can read the
orginal by merely looking it up. If you have a quibble then please
present it.
>>>You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
>>>argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
>>>pathetic, ya fat little turd.
>
>His favorite with me is a shrill "PROVE Nixon was ever president!"
>type of demands for cites on things that are common knowledge. Now
>days I just tell him to go to Google and learn something. He hates
>that.
Common knowledge? Please give me an example Zepp.
We ALL know your track record when it comes to your "certain
knowledge" don't we?
1904 Dead
Linder) wrote:
No, no, I'll just assume you're lying.
>
>>>>You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
>>>>argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
>>>>pathetic, ya fat little turd.
>>
>>His favorite with me is a shrill "PROVE Nixon was ever president!"
>>type of demands for cites on things that are common knowledge. Now
>>days I just tell him to go to Google and learn something. He hates
>>that.
>
>Common knowledge? Please give me an example Zepp.
>We ALL know your track record when it comes to your "certain
>knowledge" don't we?
It's much better than yours.
>
>>>Ahh...Milt's didn't forget the style that endears him to everyone.
>>>
>>>And BTW Milt, are you going to post your list?
>
>
>JSL
Martin McPhillips
message news:u6p2j19nc5kcgj82a...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:26:25 GMT, linde...@osu.edu
> (Jeffrey Scott
> Linder) wrote:
>>
>>Now that's funny coming from a guy like you Zepp but you
>>can read the
>>orginal by merely looking it up. If you have a quibble
>>then please
>>present it.
>
> No, no, I'll just assume you're lying.
You see, now, T'baloo, here you create
a dilemma. Since you are almost always
lying, most of us around here take that
as your admission that Jeffrey is telling
the truth.
It's like when you deny that you are
Wolfbane, or whatever you call yourself
when you're feeling particularly psychotic.
That's seen as a very clear admission by
you that you are Wolfie.
For instance, if anyone wants to confirm
that it's a sunny day in Mt. Shasta, there's
no need to go to Weather Underground if
you've said that it's raining.
Jeffrey Scott Linder
Feel free Zepp. I know you're just blustering to mask your cowardice.
>>
>>>>>You're a liar, Jeffrey. Stupid and a liar. And the only way you can
>>>>>argue is to lie about what I say and then call ME a liar. You're
>>>>>pathetic, ya fat little turd.
>>>
>>>His favorite with me is a shrill "PROVE Nixon was ever president!"
>>>type of demands for cites on things that are common knowledge. Now
>>>days I just tell him to go to Google and learn something. He hates
>>>that.
>>
>>Common knowledge? Please give me an example Zepp.
>>We ALL know your track record when it comes to your "certain
>>knowledge" don't we?
>
>It's much better than yours.
Of course it is Zepp, you're infallible aren't you? Its much better
living in ignorance that the have to face the facts isn't is Zepp?
JSL
nevermore
<zepp1904#2211finestplanet.com@> wrote:
That fantasy is about par for someone who claims to have some goddess
back in the woods....
--
"I'd been drawn toward Wicca for many years, then one night She
pretty much came up and tapped me on the shoulder and said hello. Not
literally, but that's how it felt. I believe in the Goddess and the God
because I have felt Their touch... "
Greywolf Zepp Jamieson Aug 12 1996,
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.wicca/msg/c7ca14e74a59cfb6?hl=en&
1904 Dead
>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:08:31 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
><nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>For instance, if anyone wants to confirm
>>that it's a sunny day in Mt. Shasta, there's
>>no need to go to Weather Underground if
>>you've said that it's raining.
>
>If anyone wants to confirm what a total zero you are, they only need
>to refer back to the years you've been a total zero
>
>McFly
>
>Appropriate name.
Why is this person raving about the weather in my area?
>
>
>
>>=======================================================================
>
>On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:37:05 +0000, Black Dragon <Caliga...@yahoo.com>
>wrote about RCLOON:
>
>>("Archie...@Getit.Com" <rcma...@excite.com>)
>
>"What a sad piece of work this guy - or rather, this automated process
>possessing a human body - is. Nobody's going to be convinced of
>anything by this but this person's idiocy."
Martin McPhillips
wrote in message
news:3q23j1pf5n0fs8n9n...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:36:53 -0600, Knick...@Hang-up.com
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:08:31 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
>><nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>For instance, if anyone wants to confirm
>>>that it's a sunny day in Mt. Shasta, there's
>>>no need to go to Weather Underground if
>>>you've said that it's raining.
>>
>>If anyone wants to confirm what a total zero you are, they
>>only need
>>to refer back to the years you've been a total zero
>>
>>McFly
>>
>>Appropriate name.
>
> Why is this person raving about the weather in my area?
Gary's not raving about the weather in
your area, T'baloo. He's come rushing
to your defense. Careful you don't get
a splash of the contents of his adult
diaper on you.
nevermore
<zepp#221119...@nospamzeppscommentaries.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:36:53 -0600, Knick...@Hang-up.com wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:08:31 GMT, "Martin McPhillips"
>><nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>For instance, if anyone wants to confirm
>>>that it's a sunny day in Mt. Shasta, there's
>>>no need to go to Weather Underground if
>>>you've said that it's raining.
>>
>>If anyone wants to confirm what a total zero you are, they only need
>>to refer back to the years you've been a total zero
>>
>>McFly
>>
>>Appropriate name.
>
>Why is this person raving about the weather in my area?
>>
We need to know if there's a full moon cause that's probably when
you're out in the woods howling at it, Greywolf....
--
"I would dearly love to be able to PS, but as yet
I have had no luck, outside of the dream realm.
But I know that I AM Wolf, and I hope that
one day I'll be able to look it, as well."
--Greywolf Zepp Jamieson May 11 1997,
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.horror.werewolves/msg/3140105a24938261?hl=en&
milt....@gmail.com
dishionest editing style makes you look like an even bigger moron.
Note, folks, the difference between the two quotes above. Note that he
misreads the first quote, but he includes the entire quote, because
he's too stupid to read it as it's written. I was HIT by the BUCKSHOT,
you fool. Obviously, I never said I outran it.
As for the second quote, here's the entire quote, in context. (I know
you don't believe context matters, jeffrey, but most of us do.)
"God, you don't even have to go to the Muslim world. In 1973, my mother
applied for a Master Charge-- she WORKED for them, for Chrissakes, at
Maryland National Bank-- and they refused to give her (or any married
woman) a card unless my father co-signed. Up until the 70s, women could
not own land on their own, or sign contracts in many cases. Women have
been oppressed, and are just now starting to catch up. Considerin they
are about 350 years behind economically, that's going to take some
doing..."
Read the entire paragraph, and one can see that I was discussing
married women, Jeffrey. I left out the word "married" in the section
you choose to dishonestly misquote, perhaps, but in context, it makes
sense.
You're just a fat, retarded jackass, Jeffrey. You don't have any
intelligence on politics, and I have wondered for years why you bother
embarrassing yourself in here. But then, I realized that no one reads
this shit, anyway, so it doesn't matter...
Milt
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>You have a serious reading problem, Jeffrey. That, combined with a
>dishionest editing style makes you look like an even bigger moron.
>
>Note, folks, the difference between the two quotes above. Note that he
>misreads the first quote, but he includes the entire quote, because
>he's too stupid to read it as it's written. I was HIT by the BUCKSHOT,
>you fool. Obviously, I never said I outran it.
Maybe you can explain what prinicple in physics you were refering to
when you added the caveat that it would have hurt you because you were
running away from it Milt? What is your speed vs the speed of the
buckshot Milt?
>As for the second quote, here's the entire quote, in context. (I know
>you don't believe context matters, jeffrey, but most of us do.)
>
>"God, you don't even have to go to the Muslim world. In 1973, my mother
>applied for a Master Charge-- she WORKED for them, for Chrissakes, at
>Maryland National Bank-- and they refused to give her (or any married
>woman) a card unless my father co-signed. Up until the 70s, women could
>not own land on their own, or sign contracts in many cases. Women have
>been oppressed, and are just now starting to catch up. Considerin they
>are about 350 years behind economically, that's going to take some
>doing..."
>
>Read the entire paragraph, and one can see that I was discussing
>married women, Jeffrey. I left out the word "married" in the section
>you choose to dishonestly misquote, perhaps, but in context, it makes
>sense.
Not really Milt. The main discussion was women. You brought up a
single married woman and then refered to women parenthetically.
And also since you were refering to married women why weren't single
women behind 350 years economically?
And tell us Milt....why couldn't "married" women own property until
the 70's? Or sign contracts or own land on their own?
>You're just a fat, retarded jackass, Jeffrey. You don't have any
>intelligence on politics, and I have wondered for years why you bother
>embarrassing yourself in here. But then, I realized that no one reads
>this shit, anyway, so it doesn't matter...
Yet you feel compelled to offer rather weak rebutalls to your explicit
claims.
Tell us Milt...where is that list?
JSL
milt....@gmail.com
actually get anywhere. Married women couldn't own land or sign a
contract or get a credit card until the mid-70s because the law was
different then, you fucking idiot! That was my point. My mother had a
job, made plenty of money, and no one would give her a credit card
without my father's signature, because they COULD.
And FYI, you fucking moron, I don't offer "rebuttals"; I present
arguments. Ypure the one who thinks that gain-saying is sufficient
argument to make a point.
And another FYI; I posted the list years ago. That you and the other
lamebrains can't find it points to your stupidity, not mine. It's right
under your noses, and you're too lazy to look for it.
Anyway, I've wasted five minutes on you today. That's enough for a few
more months. Usenet is such a waste of time...
Milt
Unknown
WOW - It took you 5 minutes to type all that?
stay in drugs,don't do school.
***************************
http://www.dubyareport.net/
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>Jeffrey, you're pathetic. You spin and spin and spin, but you never
>actually get anywhere. Married women couldn't own land or sign a
>contract or get a credit card until the mid-70s because the law was
>different then, you fucking idiot!
Please post such a law Milt.
>That was my point. My mother had a
>job, made plenty of money, and no one would give her a credit card
>without my father's signature, because they COULD.
>
>And FYI, you fucking moron, I don't offer "rebuttals"; I present
>arguments. Ypure the one who thinks that gain-saying is sufficient
>argument to make a point.
Poor Milt...up to your usual tricks again.
>And another FYI; I posted the list years ago. That you and the other
>lamebrains can't find it points to your stupidity, not mine. It's right
>under your noses, and you're too lazy to look for it.
You didn't post it years ago Milt. You're lying.
>Anyway, I've wasted five minutes on you today. That's enough for a few
>more months. Usenet is such a waste of time...
Milt runs away again.
Why did you feel it necessary to delete most everything Milt?
JSL
nevermore
Milt is a coward and a moron who regularly got his ass kicked on
Usenet so many times that he has to run away from it....
Shook lives in his own little world....he's has been claiming that his
"book" is being published, or about to be published for about a decade
now and yet, nobody's ever seen it.....
--
"As for me, I'm tired of this BS. I'm going to
finish writing my book."
--Milt Shook 1996/07/28
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.discrimination/msg/753a9d0c7acb5d57?dmode=source
"Keep an eye on your bookstore next Christmas, and my name
will pop out at you."
--Milt Shook 1997/12/06
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=348A1B90.51A97B99%40hearthlink.net
"You mean the one that I'm rewriting for publication right now? Or the
one that two publishing houses are interested in?"
--Milt Shook 1998/06/14
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=35831dc6.12233272%40news.earthlink.net
"Sory I have to leave, but I have a novel to finish. Look in your bookstore
this Christmas; hopefully, no later than march, if Xmas doesn't work out."
--Milt Shook 1998/08/25
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=35e34aca.5878878%40news.earthlink.net
"The working Title is "Talent on Loan, and it's about a fat janitor who
makes a deal with the devil and becomes a blithering talk show host.
The legal complications keep coming from you-know-who. I'm working
around them, however."
--Milt Shook 1999/08/03
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=7o7erc%24v37%241%40nnrp1.deja.com
But make no mistake, Parker; two books with my name on them
will be out shortly.
--Milt Shook 2000-09-09
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=%25UDu5.266%24zC.11426%40newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net
"I am very close to publishing my first novel,"
--Milt Shook 2002-11-30
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=Fq6cnX4oFuzowXSgXTWcqA%40comcast.com
"I'm rewriting that one for a major publisher as we speak."
--Milt Shook 2004-10-22
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=WpidnQe3YPTmA-TcRVn-vg%40comcast.com&oe=ISO-8859-1
milt....@gmail.com
was passed in 1974, and up until then, issuers of credit were free to
discriminate pretty much as they saw fit.
I don't run away. You bore me.
And I don't delete anything. Google has changed the form for responding
to your bullshit. Deal with it.
Milt
milt....@gmail.com
And FYI, you have NEVER kicked my ass. No one on Usenet has ever kicked
my ass. The vast majority of lamers who occupy (waste) their time in
political Usenet groups don't have the IQ to do that. Certainly you
don't...
Milt
Jeffrey Scott Linder
milt....@gmail.com
JSL
Only in Linderland, Jeffrey...
nevermore
>And I now have two of them ready to go. Your point?
<LOL> Ready to go??? Now all you need to do is find a publisher
dumb enough to want to publish them and since you've been looking for
just about a decade now....
>And FYI, you have NEVER kicked my ass. No one on Usenet has ever >kicked
>my ass. The vast majority of lamers who occupy (waste) their time in
>political Usenet groups don't have the IQ to do that. Certainly you
>don't...
Milt spent months trying to find a way to bluster his way out of his
claim that the First Amendment protected his speech from private
individuals and in the end, he crawled back into his little hole and
pulled the dirt back on top of himself....
He was all atwitter about getting married back then and I figured that
the "little woman" forbade him from playing on Usenet....
--
Steve
Jeffrey Scott Linder
I thought google wouldn't let you quote text Milt?
Hmmm...curiouser and curiouser.
JSL
nevermore
Shook is a technology moron who once created a sock puppet named
"Matt" so he could claim that he had at least one supporter...
...but, of course, Milt was so stupid that he posted as "Matt" using
the same IP as he himself used...
....and when I questioned him about that, he stupidly claimed:
"I have checked e-mails from at eight other people who live around
here and use Comcast, and two of them sport the same IP as me"
--Milt Shook
http://www.google.com/groups?selm=49983a09.0407141830.56a3a1e%40posting.google.com
milt....@gmail.com
about what actually happened, but I'll do so in a book...
2. The scenario I presented was this one:
I'm on a public street, exercising my free speech rights as guaranteed
me under the First Amendment. A nearby store owner has two goons drag
me away. I take him to court to reassert my First Amendment rights.
YOU are the dumbass who claimed that the judge would laugh me out of
court. Dumbass.
3. I have never crawled into a hole of any kind. Usenet is a waste of
time. You're too stupid to get that.
4. No one tells me what to do, least of all my wife. Perhaps you're
just jealous because you're all alone. It's no wonder, really, if your
posts here are any indication. You're mud-dumb and mean.
Milt
milt....@gmail.com
If married women could get credit back in the 60s and early 70s without
their hubby's signature, what would have been the purpose of including
them in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in 1974?
And to answer your question, Google opens a little box, and the only
way to quote text is to cut and paste it.
You're not worth the time.
Milt
steven...@yahoo.com
Date: 27 Sep 2005 12:20:17 -0700
Local: Tues, Sep 27 2005 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: Stupid liberals politicize death and destruction AGAIN!!!
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
>1. I've had several publishers, dumbass. Someday, I'll tell the story
>about what actually happened, but I'll do so in a book...
<LOL> Sure you have, Milt.... Several publishers??? But none that
actually wanted to publush your book, eh?
>2. The scenario I presented was this one:
>I'm on a public street, exercising my free speech rights as guaranteed
>me under the First Amendment. A nearby store owner has two goons drag
>me away. I take him to court to reassert my First Amendment rights.
>
>
>YOU are the dumbass who claimed that the judge would laugh me out of
>court. Dumbass.
That'd be absolutely correct, Milt, because anybody that has any even
a tiny bit of knowledge about Constitutional law knows that the First
Amendment only protects your right to speech from abridgement by
government and not private individuals, as documented right here:
"The First Amendment by its terms applies only to laws enacted by
Congress, and not to the actions of private persons"
-http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/06.html#1
>
>
>3. I have never crawled into a hole of any kind. Usenet is a waste of
>time. You're too stupid to get that.
>
>
>
>4. No one tells me what to do, least of all my wife. Perhaps you're
>just jealous because you're all alone. It's no wonder, really, if your
>posts here are any indication. You're mud-dumb and mean.
>
Actually, Milt, since I've been checking your Yahoo profile every now
and then: http://profiles.yahoo.com/Milt0506 and I saw when you were
talking about all the time you spent in the chat rooms, <LOL> and then
your book was going to be published this last summer. <LMAO> ....
and of course, I also know that just recently you were alternatively
claiming to be single and single_and_looking so I know that the
marriage
you were bragging about slipped away....
So. of course, I know that it's you that's alone and me that's not....
>Milt
Steve
Eagle Eye
steven...@yahoo.com <steven...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>From: milt....@gmail.com
>Date: 27 Sep 2005 12:20:17 -0700
>Local: Tues, Sep 27 2005 3:20 pm
>Subject: Re: Stupid liberals politicize death and destruction AGAIN!!!
>Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
>original | Report Abuse
>
>>1. I've had several publishers, dumbass. Someday, I'll tell the story
>>about what actually happened, but I'll do so in a book...
>
><LOL> Sure you have, Milt.... Several publishers??? But none that
>
>actually wanted to publush your book, eh?
=====
EE
steven...@yahoo.com
Date: 27 Sep 2005 21:43:16 -0000
Local: Tues, Sep 27 2005 5:43 pm
Subject: Re: Stupid liberals politicize death and destruction AGAIN!!!
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
<ROTFLMAO> yes, yes, Milt Shook should indeed write a book about his
"publishing" experiences.....
Steve
milt....@gmail.com
about 99% sure it was you, and now it's confirmed.
So, how did it feel when nearly everyone there -- the people who
actually know something about me -- chased your sorry ass out of there?
You're so pathetic.
And btw, I'd love to hear your explanation -- for the first time -- as
to why you think a judge -- who works for the government -- would toss
such a case out, and not reinforce your right to speak freely on a
public sidewalk. You've never actually explained why a government
employee is not required to protect your right to free speech...
Dumbass...
Milt
Jeffrey Scott Linder
>So, Jeffrey, just curious:
>
>If married women could get credit back in the 60s and early 70s without
>their hubby's signature, what would have been the purpose of including
>them in the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in 1974?
To stop discrimination I would suspect Milt. But then that has
nothing to do with property does it?
>And to answer your question, Google opens a little box, and the only
>way to quote text is to cut and paste it.
>
>You're not worth the time.
lol
You have yet to answer a question Milt.
What principle of physics kept you from being hurt by the buckshot
because you were running away from it?
JSL
JB
topcat wrote:
> Now the liberals really have a problem. Unable to find their way out of a
> paper bag, they now have to be able to count the dead bodies coming home
> from Iraq AND the dead bodies on the gulf coast. Death and destruction are
> important to liberals. It's their way of getting to one man. The duly
> elected President of the United States.
>
> Part one. The liberals started almost immediately politicizing an act of
> nature. It was BUSHS' fault for not signing the Kyoto treaty! (Or course,
> Clinton never signed it either). It was BUSHS' fault for not doing more to
> combat global warming. Of course, there was no talk of global warming 40
> years ago when similar hurricanes hit the gulf coast.
>
> As part two of their all out assault on the duly elected President of the
> United States, the liberals thought it would be wise to blame the Presidents
> tax cuts as the primary reason New Orleans didn't have better flood
> protection. Of course, no mention has been made about the growing economy
> that has materialized (even in the face of high gas prices) due to those tax
> cuts. No mention has been made about how government revenues have INCREASED
> due to that growing economy. Liberal spin always has a way of getting
> smacked in the face by something know as "cold hard facts".
>
> Speaking of "cold hard facts", here are a few more. Liberals have certainly
> shown their true colors when it comes to helping the poor and the
> victimized. Liberals don't really see the poor or the victimized, they see
> nothing but what they consider political opportunity.
>
> The good thing for this country is that liberals never learn. Like Wyle E.
> Coyote trying to catch the Roadrunner, their new improved Acme Bush Legacy
> Destroyer is going to do nothing but blow up in their face. Beep! Beep!
>
> TC
See, here's part of the problem with people like you:
You said:
>Speaking of "cold hard facts", here are a few more. Liberals have certainly
>shown their true colors when it comes to helping the poor and the
>victimized. Liberals don't really see the poor or the victimized, they see
>nothing but what they consider political opportunity.
You think "Liberals have certainly shown their true colors when it
comes to helping the poor and the victimized. Liberals don't really see
the poor or the victimized, they see nothing but what they consider
political opportunity." is not just a fact, but a "cold hard fact".
Those aren't facts. Those are opinions.
Here, let's try a couple more. For each, answer 'fact' or 'opinion'
a-republicans are selfish
b-liberals hate america
c-republicans symbol is an elephant
d-elephants smell bad
e-republicans hate america
f-'liberals' starts with the letter 'l'
scroll down for answers
a-opinion
b-opinion
c-fact
d-opinion
e-opinion
f-fact