Can’t compete with free stuff…

[cicero venatio]

Mitt Romney said he could not compete with the trillion dollars Obama
borrowed from the Chinese to give gifts to voters. When you consider
the magnitude of Chinese money given to minorities and the underclass,
Mitt Romney didn’t have a snowball's chance in hell. One survey
revealed that 75% of Obama’s voters were on food stamps. Obama’s
regime has started an avalanche of “taking”, as he borrows billions
more every month from the Chinese. In a way you could call this a
welfare bubble that will burst when everyone gets in on the
selfishness and greed. Unfortunately when this welfare bubble bursts,
much like it has in Greece, there will be no safety net as that is
what is going to burst. What you have left then is simply revolution,
violence, poverty, hunger, and mass death. I don’t blame Obama, I
blame the voters who voted for him as they are the ones responsible
for the nations destruction.

[jane]

The reason we have a republic rather than a democracy is that our
elected officials are supposed to temper the selfish desires of the
masses and to temper the tyranny of the majority.

Our elected officials ARE to blame, not the dumb masses.

[Eddie Haskell]

"jane" <jane....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:485e35e5-8699-43d1...@j18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

Lord, woman. Who put those corrupt officials in office?

-Eddie Haskell

[Igor]

On Nov 15, 2:52 pm, cicero venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Willard forgot to mention the biggest gift of all: his 14% tax rate.
So if there is a problem here, he's definitely a big part of it.

[Eddie Haskell]

"Igor" <thoo...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:e8450726-4064-46a5...@m4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...

Oh, so you're one of the retards that wants to lower revenues so Hussein can
play his destructive Marxist class warfare.

Get out of my country. You don't deserve to be an American.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"AlleyCat" <al...@aohell.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2b0f16ce6...@news.eternal-september.org...
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:52:50 -0800 (PST), In article <a6e70492-79ae-
> 4de9-a514-4...@uc4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
> jazz...@hotmail.com says...
>
>> One survey
>> revealed that 75% of Obama?s voters were on food stamps.
>
> The other 25% were the stupid, guilt-stricken, gimme my birth control
> for free and abortion on demand no matter how late the term, white,
> young, college-aged, early twenties, dumbass women.

You got everything right except the white women who went overwhelmingly for
Hussein.

-Eddie Haskell

[FirstPost]

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:00:09 -0800 (PST), jane <jane....@gmail.com>
wrote:

Who elected those officials for promising free goodies to the masses?
The people elected the ones they deserve.
If their motivation was to obtain free healthcare, more foodstamps and
a paycheck to sit at home(whether they will actually receive it or
not) then they share just as much of the blame as the idiots that are
destroying the nation from within the government.

"Don't blame me just because I voted for them" is far from being a
legitimate excuse for voting the nation into bankruptcy.

[wy]

Republics never work, which explains why you don't see a successful
one anywhere in the world, including the US. Democracy demands that
the "dumb" masses be treated fairly and equally and respectfully
against the handful of fat cats out to ruin their lives. Republics
are only for fat cats, they do nothing for everybody else.

[jane]

Once again, you expressed your ignorance.

Picture the old-time western movie:
An accused man is being held inside a jail cell;
Outside is a mob with a rope asking for the prisoner;
Standing on the porch, in front of the jail house door, is a lone
sheriff with a shotgun.

The Sheriff represents a republic, the rule of law.
The mob with the rope represents democracy, the rule of the masses,
tyranny of the majority, mob rule.

[wy]

The sheriff is George Bush who refuses to hang the accused banker for
crashing the economic livelihood of the town that has ruined
everyone's lives because Sheriff Bush allowed it to happen. The mob
is right in seeing that the accused - who everyone knows is guilty
because he ran the only bank in town and stole everyone's money - and
even Sheriff Bush gets hanged, and gets hanged high.

But yeah, thanks for stumbling back into the irrelevant 1800s to make
a piss-poor analogy to 21st century times. Only Repugnants seem to be
able to keep clawing back to the past, the way forgotten past, to make
a pointless point.

[1799 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:54:16 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:00:09 -0800 (PST), jane <jane....@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>

>You got the "dumb masses" JaneLoon
>
>Fortunately, I belong to the liberal/progressive side which gave us
>this nation, kept it together, provided for the demise of Old Age
>Poverty, Child labor, exploitation of workers, championed women's
>franchise, Civil RIghts, Civil Liberties, workers rights......
>
>What did your conservatives ever do for us?

Keep ourselves healthy by laughing at moonbat bullshit like you just
posted.

[scum chuggers]

On 11/15/2012 5:53 PM, wy wrote:
> the way forgotten past, to make
> a pointless point.

Pierre Wy
Montreal, QC H1A 1A1
514-903-2639

-------------------------------------------------

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

[1799 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

Now you will list all those successful 'true democracies', eh?

[scum chuggers]

On 11/15/2012 5:07 PM, wy wrote:
> Republics
> are only for fat cats, they do nothing for everybody else.

[JaxKayaker]

This was written nearly 200 years ago but could not be more prophetic than it is today.


A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years."
-- Alexis de Tocqueville

[Vandar]

wy wrote:

> On Nov 15, 3:00 pm, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Nov 15, 2:52 pm, cicero venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Mitt Romney said he could not compete with the trillion dollars Obama
>>>borrowed from the Chinese to give gifts to voters. When you consider
>>>the magnitude of Chinese money given to minorities and the underclass,

>>>Mitt Romney didn�t have a snowball's chance in hell. One survey
>>>revealed that 75% of Obama�s voters were on food stamps. Obama�s
>>>regime has started an avalanche of �taking�, as he borrows billions

>>>more every month from the Chinese. In a way you could call this a
>>>welfare bubble that will burst when everyone gets in on the
>>>selfishness and greed. Unfortunately when this welfare bubble bursts,
>>>much like it has in Greece, there will be no safety net as that is
>>>what is going to burst. What you have left then is simply revolution,

>>>violence, poverty, hunger, and mass death. I don�t blame Obama, I

>>>blame the voters who voted for him as they are the ones responsible
>>>for the nations destruction.
>>
>>The reason we have a republic rather than a democracy is that our
>>elected officials are supposed to temper the selfish desires of the
>>masses and to temper the tyranny of the majority.
>>
>>Our elected officials ARE to blame, not the dumb masses.
>
>
> Republics never work, which explains why you don't see a successful
> one anywhere in the world, including the US. Democracy demands that
> the "dumb" masses be treated fairly and equally and respectfully
> against the handful of fat cats out to ruin their lives. Republics
> are only for fat cats, they do nothing for everybody else.

Would you like a list of republics, or will you admit you're wrong
simply by realizing that San Marino has been a republic since the year 301?

[wy]

On Nov 15, 10:54 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> wy wrote:
> > On Nov 15, 3:00 pm, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>On Nov 15, 2:52 pm, cicero venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>Mitt Romney said he could not compete with the trillion dollars Obama
> >>>borrowed from the Chinese to give gifts to voters.  When you consider
> >>>the magnitude of Chinese money given to minorities and the underclass,

> >>>Mitt Romney didn’t have a snowball's chance in hell.  One survey
> >>>revealed that 75% of Obama’s voters were on food stamps.  Obama’s
> >>>regime has started an avalanche of “taking”, as he borrows billions

> >>>more every month from the Chinese.  In a way you could call this a
> >>>welfare bubble that will burst when everyone gets in on the
> >>>selfishness and greed.  Unfortunately when this welfare bubble bursts,
> >>>much like it has in Greece, there will be no safety net as that is
> >>>what is going to burst.  What you have left then is simply revolution,

> >>>violence, poverty, hunger, and mass death.  I don’t blame Obama, I

> >>>blame the voters who voted for him as they are the ones responsible
> >>>for the nations destruction.
>
> >>The reason we have a republic rather than a democracy is that our
> >>elected officials are supposed to temper the selfish desires of the
> >>masses and to temper the tyranny of the majority.
>
> >>Our elected officials ARE to blame, not the dumb masses.
>
> > Republics never work, which explains why you don't see a successful
> > one anywhere in the world, including the US.  Democracy demands that
> > the "dumb" masses be treated fairly and equally and respectfully
> > against the handful of fat cats out to ruin their lives.  Republics
> > are only for fat cats, they do nothing for everybody else.
>
> Would you like a list of republics, or will you admit you're wrong
> simply by realizing that San Marino has been a republic since the year 301?

And what will these republics tell me?

[wy]

Yeah, nice. The problem with that, though, is that the US isn't a
democracy. It's a republic, and yet its still finding itself voting
for largesse from the public treasury. Oops, the US is doomed
according to Tocqueville.

[Vandar]

That in spite of your statement above, republics work and one in
particular has worked for over 1,700 years.

[wy]

Sure, it's easy to make a republic of just 25 square miles and 30,000
people work for 1,700 years. Everyone's like family - and the same
language and color too. Throw in some blacks, more than you're
comfortable with, and latinos, more than you're comfortable with as
well, and religious basket cases of every religious stripe, multiply
the population 10 thousandfold and the land mass by 95 million times
and then see how well a republic really functions.

[Vandar]

You've previously redefined "always" to mean "some of the time". Are you
now claiming "never" is synonymous?

[wy]

I don't know what you're babbling about.

[Vandar]

Of course you don't.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf9994a?hl=en
"most times, with exceptions".

Now you've said "never" and are admitting that there are exceptions to
that as well.

[wy]

> Of course you don't.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf9...

> "most times, with exceptions".
>
> Now you've said "never" and are admitting that there are exceptions to
> that as well.

Care to frame it within the context I actually used it in and apply
that to whatever you're trying to suggest just to see if you know what
the hell you're talking about? It must be way past your bedtime now
for you to be thinking coherently because you're getting much too
vague and oblique.

[jane]

You got one thing wrong, one thing right, and a third thing partially
right.

The part you got wrong:
", it's easy to make a republic ... work for 1,700 years.
 Everyone's... the same language and color too.

If you had read James Madison in "The Federalist Papers" you would
have found that the reason for a republic is to protect the minority
from tyranny of the majority. It is a democracy that will work well
when " Everyone's like family - and the same language and color too."

The part you got right:

"multiply the population 10 thousandfold "

Once again, if you had read "The Federalist Papers", you would have
found that our FEDERAL government was to be a very minor part of the
governance and was to be insignificant until it was needed in time of
war. The intent of our country was that the governance was to take
place at the state and local level where " Everyone's like family "

The part you got partially right:

" It's a republic, and yet its still finding itself voting for
largesse from the public treasury. Oops, the US is doomed according
to Tocqueville. "

ONLY the Representatives were supposed to be elected by the PEOPLE;
that is why they are called "Representatives". The President and the
Senators were supposed to be elected by the States to protect
"States' Powers"; Once again, if you had read "The Federalist
Papers", there was a concern by the Anti-Federalists that the Federal
Government would usurp power from the States. The Federalist Papers
answered this concern by stating, How can the Federal Government usurp
power from the States? The Federal powers are defined and limited.
The only way the Federal government can gain power is if the States
gave away their power to the Federal Government, and why would they do
that? (paraphrased because I don't want to waste time looking for the
exact passage for an idiot who will ague that it is wrong)

The way that the Federal government has USURPED power is by the States
giving the power of the States' to the people. The worst Amendment
in the Constitution is the 17th Amendment that made the election of
the Senate by the Will of the People, the "will of the masses", the
tyranny of the majority

I don't think the United States is doomed. It will simply become an
also-ran just as England transformed from the world leader to an also-
ran. That will happen when China's GDP exceeds the US and when there
are only 2 workers supporting each retiree (in 2033)

[jane]

> Of course you don't.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf9...

> "most times, with exceptions".
>
> Now you've said "never" and are admitting that there are exceptions to
> that as well.

This is one of Wy's typical responses when he has lost. He claims
that you took it out of context without explaining how the context is
different. In past discussions, I have provided a link to the entire
context of what I was referencing, and he has still stated that I am
writing out of context.

I am waiting for Wy to say that his comment, "Republics never work,

which explains why you don't see a successful one anywhere in the

world", is still an accurate statement simply because you having
given San Marino time enough to fail.

[cicero venatio]

> However, you and Schmitt don't see anything wrong with massive gifts
> to Richard Scaife, and hundreds of the
> wealthy.
>
> Why is that, FILEDUD?
==========================================
Barack asked you to vote for "revenge" and then you did. I would like
to know now in what form that "revenge" against Scaife will be
detailed? And do you think Richard Scaife is quaking in his boots as
he waits for you to take "revenge" on him?

[wy]

Hey, don't take my word for it, take your own. You're the one, along
with a whole slew of other Repugnants, who keep complaining that
America doesn't work. You bitch about this, you bitch about that,
nothing's ever working right, you even gave the US your own motto for
it - "We're not happy until you're not happy". So obviously, by your
own accounts, the republic of America is a failure.

[Eddie Haskell]

"wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message
news:cf703792-e24d-4a91...@3g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...

Hey, wy, did you see where your unions put Hostess out of business? No more
cream filled ding dongs for you.

But look at the bright side, maybe you'll lose enough weight to finally make
it out of your mom's basement.

-Eddie Haskell

[Eddie Haskell]

"wy" <w...@myself.com> wrote in message

news:f5fd6acd-ad2e-4e37...@c16g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

Hey, wy. Why do you lie so goddamn much? Why don't you have any morals? Why
do you hate humanity? Why do you want another financial crisis?

Hey, wy. Fuck you.

"In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases
of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under
that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and
creative in stimulating minority gains."

"The two companies are now required to devote 42% of their portfolios to
loans for low- and moderate-income borrowers"

"Although Fannie Mae actually has exceeded its target since 1994, it is
resisting any hike. It argues that a higher target would only produce more
loan defaults by pressuring banks to accept unsafe borrowers."

http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807

"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory
overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a
decade ago."

"Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency
would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the
two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."

http://tinyurl.com/6lp5qu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8LA8hPgQtI

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

"McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"

"Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
learned from the letter shown in full text below."

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973

Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
the entire congress, even in his short stint there.

Bill Clinton himself said it best:

"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."

-Bill Clinton

''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''

[jane]

> Of course you don't.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf9...

> "most times, with exceptions".
>
> Now you've said "never" and are admitting that there are exceptions to
> that as well.

I want to your link of Wy's logic; it was hilarious. That explains
why arguing with Wy is so much fun. I have separated the fun parts
and copied them below.

BTW: I went to a General Store, but they wouldn't let me buy anything
specific.



Citations:
Wy's specific understanding of "general language".

Always?

Wy: "Always in a general sense."

"Always" isn't an absolute in your world?
Wy: "In a general sense it is. "

What's with the "general sense" qualifier? It either is or it isn't.
Wy:" I'm not a black-and-white, yes-or-no Repugnant like you are.
There
are no absolutes, except in a general sense. ... I don't mean it as
"every time, without exception". It's "most times,
with exceptions". "


You have a very poor command of language.
Wy:"You have an extremely abysmal understanding of general language."

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf9994a?hl=en

[jane]

YOU used the word "NEVER" and Vandar proved you wrong with a specific
example.

We all make mistakes, but your consistent refusal to admit that you
are wrong makes you an idiot.

[wy]

> https://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/2d01c580dbf...

Here's one missed:

Jane, you ignorant slut, boy, are you stupid - generally speaking.

[cicero venatio]

> I think the term "revenge" in on your mind a lot because of
> Montezuma....what with living in that filthy rat-infested, cockroach
> crawing trailer park in a 3rd world country you do.
---------------------
so you did vote for "revenge", ....thankyou for that.

[wy]

Well, it's a word that's accurate by your own accounts. Otherwise,
you wouldn't have come up with the motto that you did for the republic
of America - "We're not happy until you're not happy." That can only
mean the US republic is ALWAYS miserable and dysfunctional and, as
such, NEVER works. Your words, not mine, I'm just agreeing with you.

>
> We all make mistakes, but your consistent refusal to admit that you
> are wrong makes you an idiot.

Coming from someone who has labeled America is not being happy until
everybody isn't happy.

[jane]

As I have said many, many times, you have a reading comprehension
problem.

I did not attribute that comment to America; I attributed that motto
to the Federal Government.


As I said, you are an idiot and you are proving that point.

[scum chuggers]

On 11/16/2012 9:48 AM, wy wrote:
> Coming from someone who has labeled America is not being happy until
> everybody isn't happy.

Pierre Wy
Montreal, QC H1A 1A1
514-903-2639

-------------------------------------------------

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

[wy]

The Federal Government represents the Republic of America. Who do you
think the rest of the world has to deal with, Bill-Joe Bob down the
street in Hicksville, Mississippi? Boy, are you stupid.

[jane]

You are really sucking wind on this one.

FIRST: if you are going to quote me, get it right.

I did NOT say that "AMERICA is not being happy" and I did NOT say
"EVERYBODY isn't happy"

I attributed the motto to the FEDERAL government, and if you ever had
to deal with federal agencies, you would understand.

SECOND: I never said or implied that "America is not being happy".
America is a wonderful place to live. It is far better compared to
most of the places I have been to.

THIRD: The motto is a "play on words"
NOW, see if you can get it right this time:
The federal motto is, "We're not happy until you're not happy"


Every time you respond, you prove my point that you are an idiot.

[scum chuggers]

On 11/16/2012 10:32 AM, wy wrote:
> The Federal Government represents the Republic of America.

[stereocicle]

On 11/16/2012 8:56 AM, wy wrote:

> Here's one missed:
>
> Jane, you ignorant slut, boy, are you stupid - generally speaking.
>

[scum chuggers]

On 11/16/2012 8:16 AM, wy wrote:
> Hey, don't take my word for it, take your own.

[jane]

Do you really think we care? Do you really think anyone wants you
littering the News Group with your repetitious garbage that adds
nothing to the threads.

[wy]

The Federal government represents the type of government you have - a
republic. If the federal government isn't working, it's because the
republic doesn't work. "We're (the federal government representing
the republic) not happy until you're (the people under the republic as
represented by the federal government) not happy".

>
> SECOND: I never said or implied that "America is not being happy".
> America is a wonderful place to live. It is far better compared to
> most of the places I have been to.

I didn't say it either. Such a control freak.

>
> THIRD: The motto is a "play on words"
> NOW, see if you can get it right this time:
> The federal motto is, "We're not happy until you're not happy"

I got it. And I repeated it verbatim. But you didn't get it -
verbatim. And they're your own words, too. Koo-koo, koo-koo.

>
> Every time you respond, you prove my point that you are an idiot.

I know you are but what am I?

[jane]

I did a cut and paste from YOUR post. You are an idiot,

It is amusing arguing with you, a person who can twist and squirm
rather than admit that you are wrong, but it has gotten tiresome.

[1799 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:53:41 -0800 (PST), wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:

>On Nov 15, 7:28 pm, jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Once again, you expressed your ignorance.
>>
>> Picture the old-time western movie:
>> An accused man is being held inside a jail cell;
>> Outside is a mob with a rope asking for the prisoner;
>> Standing on the porch, in front of the jail house door, is a lone
>> sheriff with a shotgun.
>>
>> The Sheriff represents a republic, the rule of law.
>> The  mob with the rope represents democracy, the rule of the masses,
>> tyranny of the majority, mob rule.
>
>The sheriff is George Bush who refuses to hang the accused banker for
>crashing the economic livelihood of the town that has ruined

>everyone's lives because Sheriff Bush allowed it to happen. The mob
>is right in seeing that the accused - who everyone knows is guilty
>because he ran the only bank in town and stole everyone's money - and
>even Sheriff Bush gets hanged, and gets hanged high.
>
>But yeah, thanks for stumbling back into the irrelevant 1800s to make
>a piss-poor analogy to 21st century times. Only Repugnants seem to be
>able to keep clawing back to the past, the way forgotten past, to make
>a pointless point.

With loons like you prattling on about your mob rule dreams, I thank
the Founders for the second amendment.

If you decide to go out mobbing, be sure to look for the little red
dot on your chest.

[wy]

On Nov 15, 9:15 pm, 1799 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities'

It's funny how the mob ruled and Obama got re-elected, though. You'd
think your way Romney would've gotten elected with a minority of the
vote.

[scum chuggers]

On 11/16/2012 1:11 PM, wy wrote:
> Romney would've gotten elected with a minority of the
> vote.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 08:55:34 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:06:55 -0800, 1799 murdered in Obama's
>'organized communities' since 1-20-09 <flush...@whitehouse.gov>
>wrote:

>
>>>>Our elected officials ARE to blame, not the dumb masses.
>>>

>>>You got the "dumb masses" JaneLoon
>>>
>>>Fortunately, I belong to the liberal/progressive side which gave us
>>>this nation, kept it together, provided for the demise of Old Age
>>>Poverty, Child labor, exploitation of workers, championed women's
>>>franchise, Civil RIghts, Civil Liberties, workers rights......
>>>
>>>What did your conservatives ever do for us?
>>
>>Keep ourselves healthy by laughing at moonbat bullshit like you just
>>posted.
>
>Gee, you're not even capable of anything you think up yourself, are
>you
>
>You copied my line I've used for years----defining you.

You've been laughing at your own moonbat bullshit for years? Posting
it, for sure.

>Noted is your lack of an answer.

Did your head just implode?

>What did your conservatives ever do for us?

We let you live. Many fought and died for your right to be an asshole
and/or run away to Canada because you were afwaid.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:01:03 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:57:46 -0600, FirstPost
><AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote:
>
>>>The reason we have a republic rather than a democracy is that our
>>>elected officials are supposed to temper the selfish desires of the
>>>masses and to temper the tyranny of the majority.
>>>

>>>Our elected officials ARE to blame, not the dumb masses.
>>

>>Who elected those officials for promising free goodies to the masses?
>
>Who deflected your asskicking by saying that was the reason for the
>loss?
>
>>The people elected the ones they deserve.
>
>So---If Schitt Rumney was elected---the Wealth class would have
>"deserved" the billions more in untaxable income---or the billions in
>govt subsidies?

Not yo' money, envious bitch. Never will be.

>>If their motivation was to obtain free healthcare, more foodstamps and
>>a paycheck to sit at home(whether they will actually receive it or
>>not) then they share just as much of the blame as the idiots that are
>>destroying the nation from within the government.
>
>What if their motivation came from the FACT that those who supported
>Rumney created the CONDITIONS where they were Forced to use food
>stamps and "other" govt help?

Funny how most of it happened under your leg-humpee, Obama. Maybe you
should just as Barky to change his name to Bush so you could be
accurate for once in your life when you squawk out your daily croak.

>Is not Billions in Oil Subsidies considered "Help" from Govt? How
>about the millions made available to entice business into cities and
>counties or states? Isn't that "help"?

Usually done to screw over some other city that also wanted to tax the
shit out of the products and employees.

>>"Don't blame me just because I voted for them" is far from being a
>>legitimate excuse for voting the nation into bankruptcy.
>
>WE're in "Bankruptcy" because REPUBLICANS ran up most of the fucking
>National debt and nearly ALL of the National deficit ---you dingy
>fuckwit---by their: Wars, unfunded mandates, tax policy, massive
>financial sector deregulation, lack of oversight of banking and wall
>street and literally no enforcement of laws.

...and you sink noisily back into your raging delusions...

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

(and lied and smeared and teat-sucked and defrauded and...)

>and Obama got re-elected, though.
>You'd think your way Romney would've gotten elected with a minority of the
>vote.

Tell us about all those 'Rat districts where well over 100% of the
eligible voters voted. May each one who fraudulently did so bleed out
in a gutter somewhere. Body count could be even higher than Obama's
organized communities in Shitcago.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:02:57 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:28:40 -0800 (PST), jane <jane....@gmail.com>
>wrote:

>
>>Once again, you expressed your ignorance.
>>
>>Picture the old-time western movie:
>

>Picture the "old time western" as a MADE UP bunch of nonsense.
>
>I always thought you were a dingbat---but to try and support some
>cockamanie crap with unrealstic hollywood nonsense is simply
>hilarious.
>
>NO wonder you're too chickenshit to take me on directly

Ew! Gary is waving his tiny li'l dick around in public again.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:44:54 -0800 (PST), cicero venatio
<jazz...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>> However, you and Schmitt don't see anything wrong with massive gifts
>> to Richard Scaife, and hundreds of the
>> wealthy.
>>
>> Why is that, FILEDUD?
>==========================================
>Barack asked you to vote for "revenge" and then you did. I would like
>to know now in what form that "revenge" against Scaife will be
>detailed? And do you think Richard Scaife is quaking in his boots as
>he waits for you to take "revenge" on him?

He's already planning to bomb Scaife's head off Mt Rushmore, no doubt.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:05:49 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:44:54 -0800 (PST), cicero venatio
><jazz...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> However, you and Schmitt don't see anything wrong with massive gifts
>>> to Richard Scaife, and hundreds of the
>>> wealthy.
>>>
>>> Why is that, FILEDUD?
>>==========================================
>>Barack asked you to vote for "revenge" and then you did. I would like
>>to know now in what form that "revenge" against Scaife will be
>>detailed? And do you think Richard Scaife is quaking in his boots as
>>he waits for you to take "revenge" on him?
>

>Wow---the real disaster of making Scaife Pay a few percent More on the
>massive wealth (he was handed at age 18) he gets from not having to
>work.

But you want to take all of his money so you can continue not having
to work. Basic difference is you're just an envious little shit.

[jane]

On Nov 16, 11:03 am, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:28:40 -0800 (PST), jane <jane.pla...@gmail.com>

> wrote:
>
> >Once again, you expressed your ignorance.
>
> >Picture the old-time western movie:
>
> Picture the "old time western" as a MADE UP bunch of nonsense.
>
> I always thought you were a dingbat---but to try and support some
> cockamanie crap with unrealstic hollywood nonsense is simply
> hilarious.
>
> NO wonder you're too chickenshit to take me on directly

I don't take you on for several reasons; here are three:
1. you snipped everything that was pertinent and then stamped you feet
about the things you snipped didn't make sense to your feeble mind;
2. you are are a worthless little troll;
3. you are a proven liar.

[wy]

It's an edited cut and paste. You're such a control freak.

>
> It is amusing arguing with you, a person who can twist and squirm
> rather than admit that you are wrong,  but it has gotten tiresome.

And yet you never seem to tire of it. Go figure.

[Freedom Dude]

"1799 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09" wrote in
message news:738ba89kfg2r20crr...@4ax.com...

=======================================================
Isn't that funny how you morons of the right try to bring the 2nd Amendment
to the discussion when you see your point debunked? Don't you think the 2nd
works for the other side too? He doesn't have to go mobbing anywhere, we
kick out the rightards in Congress that only represent the billionaires and
put
people that care for everybody, like we did Nov. 6 and will be doing again
two
years from now.

[Freedom Dude]

wrote in message news:4fega8dgoq2vfmvbm...@4ax.com...

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:21:02 -0800, "Freedom Dude"
<don'tbo...@spamfree.com> wrote:

>With loons like you prattling on about your mob rule dreams, I thank
>the Founders for the second amendment.
>
>If you decide to go out mobbing, be sure to look for the little red
>dot on your chest.
>=======================================================
>Isn't that funny how you morons of the right try to bring the 2nd Amendment
>to the discussion when you see your point debunked? Don't you think the 2nd
>works for the other side too?

Like in 1865, and in 1965 when the national guard was armed and ready
in Little Rock?

Or ...at Waco, or Utah, and dozens of other places where the gunloons
start shooting.
=========================================================
Yoorghis, haven't you noticed that they always end up with 2nd Amendment
on their posts when they have no answers to get our of the corner you put
them in? It's very common with them, even with the people they vote for,
like
that woman from Nevada.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:21:02 -0800, "Freedom Dude"
<don'tbo...@spamfree.com> wrote:

>
>

Most of the left's gun users use them on their schoolmates and homeys.

>He doesn't have to go mobbing anywhere, we
>kick out the rightards in Congress that only represent the billionaires and
>put
>people that care for everybody, like we did Nov. 6 and will be doing again
>two
>years from now.

You kicked all the R's out of congress on Nov 6, did you?

They say an active imagination will get you far in kindergarten.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:30:33 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:21:02 -0800, "Freedom Dude"
><don'tbo...@spamfree.com> wrote:
>

>>With loons like you prattling on about your mob rule dreams, I thank
>>the Founders for the second amendment.
>>
>>If you decide to go out mobbing, be sure to look for the little red
>>dot on your chest.
>>=======================================================
>>Isn't that funny how you morons of the right try to bring the 2nd Amendment
>>to the discussion when you see your point debunked? Don't you think the 2nd
>>works for the other side too?
>

>Like in 1865, and in 1965 when the national guard was armed and ready
>in Little Rock?
>
>Or ...at Waco, or Utah, and dozens of other places where the gunloons
>start shooting.

Gary's t-shirt has "Shoot Crack Not Guns!" on it. His tracks live in
a little shack by the tracks.

[1802 murdered in Obama's 'organized communities' since 1-20-09]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:59:46 -0800, "Freedom Dude"

At least the second amendment is in the Constitution.

You moonbats can only scream "Racist!" or "Godwin!" when you regularly
get cornered by the truth.