Blacks and Browns Are Responsible For Most Of The Violent Crime In America. WHY?
Tracey12
known but little discussed fact.; Yet the make up only 25 percent of
the US population when combined.
Why are these two races so criminally oriented?
Peter Principle
Posted the follwoing to a local group the Travidiot used to infest with
huge, steaming piles of daily kook.farts. Here, for your enjoyment and
edification...
After getting his/her ass thoroughly kicked here for years, the Travidiot
took s/h/it's show on the road. Sure, s/h/it still posts here from time to
time, but these days Travid saves up his very best kookiness for the
national political groups.
Anyone who has come across the cognitive train wreck that is
Trace/Tracey/David Abrams/Carol/Darrell/etc., etc., etc. knows that for
pure, unadulterated, rock hard, super dense stupidity paired with huge,
steaming piles of USDA Grade AAA Prime Bullshit, the Travidiot has no peer.
But if you don't follow the political groups you're missing out on some
truly profound - and very entertaining - Travidiocy.
For example, just the other day Travid, who has, variously, engaged in
online searches for large breasted, Jewish women, claimed to be a male
private eye, claimed to be a female attorney, claimed to be a stay at home
mom and claimed who knows how many other instances of highly entertaining
bullshit, uncorked one of the goofiest claims yet.
Seems ol' Travid is upset by all the unfair liberal media attacks on poor
little vote fraud felon and incendiary conservadolt asswipe Ann Coulter, and
just because the nasty bitch trashed the 9/11 widows as "The Witches of New
Brunswick," among other, less flattering ad hominems.
Rising to her defense, Travid is now claiming he is a friend of dear ol' Ann
the man. I shit you not. Witness, from a post in alt.politics.bush entitled
"My Friend Ann Coulter":
"The story is out, so I might as well comment on it: Ann Coulter is a
friend of mine. I've known her for years. We met in college. Thats (sic)
the facts as they are, however.........."
Gosh, I somehow missed the big story that Ann and Travid were college
buddies. And the liberal media has deviously erased any and all traces of
such a story.
However, as we all know Travid well, there are a few things that pop right
out at you. First off, let's be frank, and not Travid. The odds of Travidiot
knowing ANYONE who doesn't push a broom, drive a truck or dig a ditch fall
somewhere between nil and zip. But it gets better...
Travid claims he knows Ann from their college days. Fair enough. All we're
asked to believe is that Travid matriculated to Cornell, the Ivy League
school in NJ where Ann did her undergrad work.
Yes, it seems our own Global Village Idiot is actually an IVY LEAGUE village
idiot. Pretty keen, huh? And Travid is so modest that in a decade of Usenet
kook.farts, s/h/it has never once mentioned Cornell, the Ivy League or
anything else that might call attention to s/h/it's impressive academic
career.
Of course, it may be that Travid meant to say he and Ann went to graduate
school together. For this to be true, all we have to believe is not only
that Travid graduated from an Ivy League school with honors and killed on
the GREs, but that s/h/it attended the University of Michigan law school,
one of the most difficult post-grad programs to crack in the country.
Now, who WOULDN'T believe of own Global Village Idiot was a grad of one of
the very top law schools in the country?
So, who here buys Travid's latest wild-ass claims? Anyone? Anyone at all?
Speak right up...
The Coulter's buddy claim was but one line in a post that is classic Global
Village Idiot. You can find the original post in all of its entertaining
idiocy by tracking down: Message-ID:
<1150005969.2...@m38g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
Enjoy...
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit. Slow thinkers keep right.
------
Why are so many not smart enough to know they're not smart enough?
http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html
Š 1999 by the American Psychological Association
December 1999 Vol. 77, No. 6, 1121-1134
Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own
Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments
Justin Kruger and David Dunning
Department of Psychology
Cornell University
ABSTRACT:
...the authors found that participants scoring in the bottom quartile on
tests of humor, grammar, and logic grossly overestimated their test
performance and ability. Although their test scores put them in the 12th
percentile, they estimated themselves to be in the 62nd.
------
Peter Principle
Sorry, folks, the line should read, "...large breasted, HAIRY Jewish
women..."
I apologize to Travid for the error of omission...
> © 1999 by the American Psychological Association
Slo
Tracey12 wrote:
> Blacks and browns do most of the violent crime in America, this is a
> known but little discussed fact.; Yet the make up only 25 percent of
> the US population when combined.
Because white people like Bush and Cheney commit their
violent crimes abroad.
Frank B.
<fasti...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:1150154952.3...@h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Peter Principle, uses a lot of words to admit he lost a debate.
> Peter Principle obviously needs help.
>
> Peter Principle, since you were not able to get an education, I will
> help fill in your gaps.
>
> Your first and best option would be to go to the crime statistics and
> establish that the base argument is false. You prove that those people
> do not do most crime.
>
> But of course, you can't, even if you did have the brains to think of
> it, since the statistics on crime, and people in prison, are available.
>
>
> So, you agree that they are doing the most crimes.
>
> Then you were asked, why.
>
> At which point, you string out this massive ad hominem fallacy, Non
> Sequitur, and red herring.
>
> Obviously, you will respond to me in the identical way, (assuming you
> have the courage to do even that much).
>
> No one with half a brain ever does what you have done, because they
> don't want to actually take the time to prove themselves ignorant.
>
> So,
>
> 1) What do the numbers say? Are they doing that much crime? Yes or No.
> (This is where you blather and make fallacy) YES or NO will do.
>
> If you answer No, you are either a liar, or just too stupid to look
> them up. There are hundreds of websites with crime stats. If you answer
> yes, then explain why that is.
>
> As to myself, I have no questions on what you think. You function at
> such a low level; I know everything you think far better than you do.
>
> You are one of those ENTIRELY FAKE anti-racists. No doubt you have a
> passionate hatred of various races, especially Arabs, Persians, and
> Whites (you will insert fallacy here. Whites means - people not ashamed
> to be white as an identity EQUAL to the others)
>
> Your entirely fake protection of 'brown people' is nothing more than
> what you have shown.
>
> You have ZERO interest in elevating those people in society. ZERO
> interest in them: having jobs, voice in the media, positions in
> government, getting out of prison, and ect. You have ZERO interest in
> curing their social ills in this nation or any other.
>
> Your 'contribution' to them - is making pedantic fallacy at people who
> dare bring up one of your MANY 'taboo topics'.
>
> I'll be happy to casually destroy you in any debate you want to name.
> You will be no challenge even given the entire sphere of human
> knowledge to choose from.
>
> People like you are so annoying. Pitiful little pseudo intellectuals
> who flunk out of school, or do nothing but make fallacy.
>
> And your ignorant little plan? That your pathetic name-calling could
> silence debate.
>
>
>Actually Clinton Justice Department figures seem to bear out what the
>original poster alluded to. I would imagine the trends have not changed
>much since then. Your post is simply foolish.
salad
I don't see any stats you provided. Do blacks and Mexicans commit most
violent crimes in Beverly Hills or Idaho?
If your statement is true, most likely poverty and drugs has something
to do with crime stats which I assume is in the inner cities. Rich
people are more prone to be charged with white collar crime and pedophilia.
Bush's Torture Chambers
They have a lot of catching up to do.
Whites killed 50,000,000 in WWII. They killed 100,000 Iraqis in a year.
They wiped out 100,000,000 Native Americas since Columbus. They gave
out smallpox blankets to the Florida Indians on the Death March to
Oklahoma, first known use of germ warfare.
Whites invented megadeaths -- they created poison gas as weapon of war.
Whites killed by the 100,000 Armenians a century ago.
Blacks and Browns are way behind in scalps collected.
trike...@yahoo.com
ROLMAO!!!! Another embecelle with access to a computer. Shucks if we
still had the command prompt from early days of DOS and UNIX, these
idiots would have stayed off the internet.
zzbu...@netscape.net
Bush's Torture Chambers wrote:
> > Blacks and browns do most of the violent crime in America, this is a
> > known but little discussed fact.; Yet the make up only 25 percent of
> > the US population when combined.
> >
> > Why are these two races so criminally oriented?
>
> They have a lot of catching up to do.
>
> Whites killed 50,000,000 in WWII. They killed 100,000 Iraqis in a year.
> They wiped out 100,000,000 Native Americas since Columbus. They gave
> out smallpox blankets to the Florida Indians on the Death March to
> Oklahoma, first known use of germ warfare.
Whites were the only population intelligent enough to
invent atomic bombs to save moron blacks
from their moron brown commie Cuban associate morons.
So, it's all works out the same in moron places like Los Angelos.
Bush's Torture Chambers
I_seek_t...@yahoo.com wrote:
> 100,000,000 Indians?
> ROLMAO!!!! Another embecelle with access to a computer. Shucks if we
> still had the command prompt from early days of DOS and UNIX, these
> idiots would have stayed off the internet.
If I gave you a DOS prompt
C: >
Do you think you could find your way over to Google.com and look up the
search terms
North American Genocide "100 million" ???
If I gave you a clickable link do you think you are smart enough to
click on it?
http://snipurl.com/rpel
Google Results about 134,000 for North American Genocide "100 million".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenous_peoples
"... Some scholars believe that it does. Historian David Stannard has
argued that "The destruction of the Indians of the Americas was, far
and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the
world." Like Ward Churchill, Stannard believes that the natives of the
Americas were deliberately and systematically exterminated over the
course of several centuries, and that the process continues to the
present day. Stannard estimates that almost 100 million American
indigenous people have been killed what he calls the American
Holocaust.[16] ..."
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0195085574?v=glance
American Holocaust : The Conquest of the New World (Paperback)
by David E. Stannard
Book Description
For four hundred years--from the first Spanish assaults against the
Arawak people of Hispaniola in the 1490s to the U.S. Army's massacre of
Sioux Indians at Wounded Knee in the 1890s--the indigenous inhabitants
of North and South America endured an unending firestorm of violence.
During that time the native population of the Western Hemisphere
declined by as many as 100 million people. Indeed, as historian David
E. Stannard argues in this stunning new book, the European and white
American destruction of the native peoples of the Americas was the most
massive act of genocide in the history of the world.
Stannard begins with a portrait of the enormous richness and diversity
of life in the Americas prior to Columbus's fateful voyage in 1492. He
then follows the path of genocide from the Indies to Mexico and Central
and South America, then north to Florida, Virginia, and New England,
and finally out across the Great Plains and Southwest to California and
the North Pacific Coast. Stannard reveals that wherever Europeans or
white Americans went, the native people were caught between imported
plagues and barbarous atrocities, typically resulting in the
annihilation of 95 percent of their populations. What kind of people,
he asks, do such horrendous things to others? His highly provocative
answer: Christians. Digging deeply into ancient European and Christian
attitudes toward sex, race, and war, he finds the cultural ground well
prepared by the end of the Middle Ages for the centuries-long genocide
campaign that Europeans and their descendants launched--and in places
continue to wage--against the New World's original inhabitants.
Advancing a thesis that is sure to create much controversy, Stannard
contends that the perpetrators of the American Holocaust drew on the
same ideological wellspring as did the later architects of the Nazi
Holocaust. It is an ideology that remains dangerously alive today, he
adds, and one that in recent years has surfaced in American
justifications for large-scale military intervention in Southeast Asia
and the Middle East.
At once sweeping in scope and meticulously detailed, American Holocaust
is a work of impassioned scholarship that is certain to ignite intense
historical and moral debate.
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
<Melch...@USA.com> wrote:
America is the greatest terror nation in history. In the last 70 years
they have killed tens of millions of civilians in germany and japan
and vietnam and iraq by their urban bombing.
laura bush - VEHICULAR HOMICIDE
wrote:
Depends on what you mean by violent crime. If drunk driving was
classed as a VC (as it should be), the numbers would be a lot
different. But DUI is a crime of rich whities so it's excused.
Bush's Torture Chambers
fasti...@charter.net wrote:
> It is far more useful to me if people actually have ANY opinion on the
> topic. Do you even have an opinion?...
> What IQ does a person need to have to turn of their crying fountains,
> turn off their badly acted emotions, turn off their 'feelings', and be
> an impartial judge on these matters?
>> Why are these two races so criminally oriented?
They have a lot of catching up to do.
Whites killed 50,000,000 in WWII. They killed 100,000 Iraqis in a year.
They wiped out 100,000,000 Native Americas since Columbus. They gave
out smallpox blankets to the Florida Indians on the Death March to
Oklahoma, first known use of germ warfare.
Whites invented megadeaths -- they created poison gas as weapon of war.
Whites killed by the 100,000 Armenians a century ago.
Blacks and Browns are way behind in scalps collected.
If I gave you a clickable link do you think you are smart enough to
click on it?
http://snipurl.com/rpel
Google Results about 134,000 for North American Genocide "100 million".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenou...
historical and moral debate. If I gave you a clickable link do you
think you are smart enough to click on it?
http://snipurl.com/rpel
Google Results about 134,000 for North American Genocide "100 million".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_American_indigenou...
Bush's Torture Chambers
fasti...@charter.net wrote:
> Bush's Torture Chambers wrote: YES, the social crimes of history give
> people today PERMISSION to do violent crime. Yes. Any people who were
> attacked in history have
> permission today to murder - to balance out the numbers.
>
>
> Wow, thanks. At least you answered.
> It is totally evil and insane. But at least you answered.
You give yourself permission to enjoy the fruits of violent crime and
the spoils of genocide, slavery and wars of resources aggression. I
just answered your exact question as you posed it... "be an impartial
judge on these matters?"
I didn't give the pink race a free ride in their violent criminal
history. I was impartial, like you asked.