The country was served will in this debate. It was substantive and
interesting despite the occasional interjections of host Brian
Williams. Scoring it, Perry and Romney essentially tied on substance
and presentation. Both stood apart from the rest of the candidates.
Newt Gingrich was effectively aggressive, especially when he noted
that the GOP really is a team focused on defeating President Obama and
rolling back his destructive agenda. Bachmann’s star faded a bit from
her earlier, more powerful debate performances. Cain, Huntsman and
Santorum all acquitted themselves credibly and all showed that they
belonged on the stage. Ron Paul’s quirky performance continues to be a
taste that I have not acquired.
The big loser tonight is Barack Obama. By comparison to all but one of
the candidates, the president comes off poorly. He delivers a speech
before tomorrow night’s NFL kickoff that will not be as substantive or
as interesting as this debate. Despite the atmosphere of a joint
session of Congress he will seem small because his ideas are small and
he is a proven failure in his office. I doubt that Americans will have
any qualms replacing him next year with a solid, credible Republican,
and there were many of those engaged in this debate tonight.
>On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:26:54 -0700 (PDT), Richard Steel
><rstee...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>Gov. Rick Perry came into tonight’s debate the leader and I think he
>>leaves it in that position
>
>
>BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
>How in fuck do you think that's going to fly in a nation where the
>population is aging and the master of republicanism (reagan) were
>Pro-Social security?
Hey nigger, SS was never intended to be a retirement program, it was
meant to be supplemental to a portfolio but then we know with your
character you'll never have much more that what gubment gibs you.
>
>The gift of conservative winger stupidity is a gift that keeps on
>giving and giving and giving....
There are no gifts in life but from your mother and father on your
birthday, that 'is' if you have both, as in family.
>
>That entire "debate" is an anatomy of how wierd the Republican party
>has become.
You mean how steadfast Conservitives have remained in America's
founding prencipals of Borders, language, culture, Constitution?
Progressive have as their value system, Relativism, where vulgarity is
accepted like Ebonics, "just words, just speeches" --Obama
CB
By their fruits you shall know them--The White House and Christ
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
In Matthew 7:15-16, Jesus warns, "Beware of false prophets, which come
to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. Ye
shall know them by their fruits."
http://prophecyfrombillwilsontoday.blogspot.com/2011/04/by-their-fruits-you-shall-know-them.html
Compare the above with...
Keynesian economics 'is' at work by Oboobuh duh Marxist in sheep's
clothing.
Fabian/Kensyan coat of arms, a wolf in sheeps clothing
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4091/5061156284_476ecafd07_m.jpg
The whole Fabian stain window
http://www.canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/FabianWindow-1.jpg
"Obama didn’t just have a team of Keynesians. He had the Keynesian
all-star team"
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=We+Are+All+Keynesians+Now&view=detail&id=F42464A667E9DE1A569CAB0C1356878EBA5D420F&first=30&FORM=IDFRIR