Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term.........ecent polls show an ever-tightening race
44 views
Skip to first unread message
MattB
Oct 20, 2012, 6:59:27 PM10/20/12
to
Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20013856
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has derided US President
Barack Obama, saying his rival has "no agenda" worthy of a second term
in office.
At a campaign rally in Florida, he said the Obama campaign had been
"reduced to petty attacks and silly word games".
Hours earlier, Mr Obama decried Mr Romney for shifting his positions
as election day draws nearer, saying the Republican suffers from
"Romnesia".
The two meet for their final debate, on foreign policy, in Florida on
Monday.
Mr Romney and the Republicans are continuing to focus on the Obama
administration's handling of a deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, in
which four Americans including the US ambassador were killed.
The incident provoked a flashpoint during Tuesday's second debate, and
is likely to be hotly debated again in Boca Raton.
..................
Tightening race
Recent polls show an ever-tightening race, including in key election
states.
A CNN poll on Friday suggested Mr Romney has a slender 1% lead in
Florida, within the poll's margin of error. A separate poll gave a
similar edge to Mr Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Both candidates are also trying to gain as many votes as possible
through early voting, already under way in many states across the US.
Election day itself is Tuesday 6 November.
With the election now less than three weeks away, newspapers are
beginning to hand out their endorsements. On Friday, Mr Obama won the
endorsement of the Salt Lake Tribune - despite the city being home to
Mr Romney's Mormon faith.
Elsewhere, The Tennessean, which often endorses Democratic candidates
for president, chose Mr Romney.
It was also reported on Friday that seven of the key "swing states" in
the US election had seen their unemployment figures fall over the past
12 months.
**************
Maybe he needs this as a Ad
http://youtu.be/xr201FqTP4w
That is the only reason many vote for him.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-20013856
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has derided US President
Barack Obama, saying his rival has "no agenda" worthy of a second term
in office.
At a campaign rally in Florida, he said the Obama campaign had been
"reduced to petty attacks and silly word games".
Hours earlier, Mr Obama decried Mr Romney for shifting his positions
as election day draws nearer, saying the Republican suffers from
"Romnesia".
The two meet for their final debate, on foreign policy, in Florida on
Monday.
Mr Romney and the Republicans are continuing to focus on the Obama
administration's handling of a deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, in
which four Americans including the US ambassador were killed.
The incident provoked a flashpoint during Tuesday's second debate, and
is likely to be hotly debated again in Boca Raton.
..................
Tightening race
Recent polls show an ever-tightening race, including in key election
states.
A CNN poll on Friday suggested Mr Romney has a slender 1% lead in
Florida, within the poll's margin of error. A separate poll gave a
similar edge to Mr Romney in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Both candidates are also trying to gain as many votes as possible
through early voting, already under way in many states across the US.
Election day itself is Tuesday 6 November.
With the election now less than three weeks away, newspapers are
beginning to hand out their endorsements. On Friday, Mr Obama won the
endorsement of the Salt Lake Tribune - despite the city being home to
Mr Romney's Mormon faith.
Elsewhere, The Tennessean, which often endorses Democratic candidates
for president, chose Mr Romney.
It was also reported on Friday that seven of the key "swing states" in
the US election had seen their unemployment figures fall over the past
12 months.
**************
Maybe he needs this as a Ad
http://youtu.be/xr201FqTP4w
That is the only reason many vote for him.
3196 Dead
Oct 20, 2012, 7:03:13 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
the time?
Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
What's his position on coal plants this week?
MattB
Oct 20, 2012, 7:15:28 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>the time?
That Obama all right the great divider.
>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
That isn't what was said.
>What's his position on coal plants this week?
Well we need them for now unless you are willing to do without.
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>the time?
>
>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>What's his position on coal plants this week?
FirstPost
Oct 20, 2012, 7:29:18 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
This one has a catchier tune to it :-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax-2i71bqGw&feature=related
wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax-2i71bqGw&feature=related
Vandar
Oct 20, 2012, 9:09:26 PM10/20/12
to
3196 Dead wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>
>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>
> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> the time?
>
> Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
For.
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>
>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>
> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> the time?
>
> Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
> Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
> What's his position on coal plants this week?
wy
Oct 20, 2012, 10:37:47 PM10/20/12
to
On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 3196 Dead wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> > This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> > the time?
>
> > Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> For.
Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> 3196 Dead wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> > This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> > the time?
>
> > Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> For.
before he was against it.
>
> > Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>
> Half of them ARE useless.
>
> > What's his position on coal plants this week?
>
> Keep it clean. Same as last week.
would believe a coal plant can be clean.
Vandar
Oct 20, 2012, 11:12:11 PM10/20/12
to
wy wrote:
> On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>For.
>
>
> Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> before he was against it.
He was always for it.
> On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>For.
>
>
> Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> before he was against it.
What he was always against is Obamacare.
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
>
> Which would include you.
I contribute more in a day than you do in a year. You're a taker, I'm a
provider.
>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>Keep it clean. Same as last week.
>
>
> Clean coal pants is an oxymoron.
> But, of course, only an oxymoron
> would believe a coal plant can be clean.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Phlip
Oct 20, 2012, 11:40:32 PM10/20/12
to
On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
Romney's plan is ... a secret. Really. But we have a hint; he hired
Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones responsible for
the two biggest fuckups in American history...
wy
Oct 20, 2012, 11:41:44 PM10/20/12
to
On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> wy wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>3196 Dead wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>>the time?
>
> >>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> >>For.
>
> > Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> > before he was against it.
>
> He was always for it.
> What he was always against is Obamacare.
Which, of course, is Romneycare.
> wy wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>3196 Dead wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>>the time?
>
> >>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> >>For.
>
> > Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> > before he was against it.
>
> He was always for it.
> What he was always against is Obamacare.
>
> >>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>
> >>Half of them ARE useless.
>
> > Which would include you.
>
> *yawn*
> I contribute more in a day than you do in a year. You're a taker, I'm a
> provider.
>
> >>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>
> >>Keep it clean. Same as last week.
>
> > Clean coal pants is an oxymoron.
>
> Clean coal pants sounds uncomfortable.
black-and-white and yes-or-no when you very well know what the nuance
of it really was.
>
> > But, of course, only an oxymoron
> > would believe a coal plant can be clean.
>
> Clean is in reference to how they deal with the emissions.
MattB
Oct 20, 2012, 11:49:36 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:35:37 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:15:28 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>
>The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
>(the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
>supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
>initated to it's worst level in American History
>
>Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
>2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
>because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
>
>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>don't need the other.
Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
who will do the work?
Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
Do you know a alternative?.,
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:15:28 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>Utter nonsense
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>
>The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
>(the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
>supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
>initated to it's worst level in American History
>
>Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
>2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>It was HIS HC program, haven't you paid attention? Obama couldn't get
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
>because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
>
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>That isn't what was said.
>
>He did.
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>That isn't what was said.
>
>
>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>don't need the other.
Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
who will do the work?
>
>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>Well we need them for now unless you are willing to do without.
>
>Evasion of the issue of Rumney not having ANY consistent policy stand.
>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>Well we need them for now unless you are willing to do without.
>
Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
Do you know a alternative?.,
MattB
Oct 20, 2012, 11:51:58 PM10/20/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:30:24 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>actually has no ability to see the nonsense he posts.
My Stalker Yoorghis AKA Gary Roselles Pedo-loon of Rapid City, SD is
to be pitied he has failed in life.
Vandar
Oct 20, 2012, 11:59:43 PM10/20/12
to
wy wrote:
> On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>the time?
>>
>>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>>>For.
>>
>>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
>>>before he was against it.
>>
>>He was always for it.
>>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>
>
> Which, of course, is Romneycare.
No, of course. It's not.
> On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>the time?
>>
>>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>>>For.
>>
>>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
>>>before he was against it.
>>
>>He was always for it.
>>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>
>
> Which, of course, is Romneycare.
>>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>>
>>>Which would include you.
>>
>>*yawn*
>>I contribute more in a day than you do in a year. You're a taker, I'm a
>>provider.
>
>
> All I see you providing is bullshit.
>>>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>>>Keep it clean. Same as last week.
>>
>>>Clean coal pants is an oxymoron.
>>
>>Clean coal pants sounds uncomfortable.
>
>
> Yeah, they do. But there you go again, taking everything so literally
> black-and-white and yes-or-no when you very well know what the nuance
> of it really was.
>>>But, of course, only an oxymoron
>>>would believe a coal plant can be clean.
>>
>>Clean is in reference to how they deal with the emissions.
>
>
> But the emissions still come out dirty.
Vandar
Oct 21, 2012, 12:00:05 AM10/21/12
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
>
>
> You should consider leaving---like FILEDUD.
Why?
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
>
>
Why?
Vandar
Oct 21, 2012, 12:02:25 AM10/21/12
to
> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>
>
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>
> Utter nonsense
>
> The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
> (the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
> supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
> initated to it's worst level in American History
>
> Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
> 2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>
>
>
> The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
> (the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
> supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
> initated to it's worst level in American History
>
> Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
> 2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>
>
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>
> It was HIS HC program, haven't you paid attention? Obama couldn't get
> as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
> because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
Romney never switched positions. He has always maintained that what
> as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
> because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
works in one state does not mean it will work in all states.
Romneycare was never meant to be a model for a national system. It was
designed for MA.
Vandar
Oct 21, 2012, 12:09:12 AM10/21/12
to
Phlip wrote:
> On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>
> He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
>
> Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
> vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
It's already been shot down as a whole, with some aspects of it working
> On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>
> He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
>
> Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
> vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
their way through congress.
> Romney's plan is ... a secret. Really. But we have a hint; he hired
> Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones responsible for
> the two biggest fuckups in American history...
wy
Oct 21, 2012, 12:13:56 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 20, 11:59 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> wy wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>wy wrote:
>
> >>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>>>>the time?
>
> >>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> >>>>For.
>
> >>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> >>>before he was against it.
>
> >>He was always for it.
> >>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>
> > Which, of course, is Romneycare.
>
> No, of course. It's not.
Yes, of course. It is. Lots of it.
> wy wrote:
> > On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>wy wrote:
>
> >>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>>>>the time?
>
> >>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>
> >>>>For.
>
> >>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
> >>>before he was against it.
>
> >>He was always for it.
> >>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>
> > Which, of course, is Romneycare.
>
> No, of course. It's not.
Oh, then again. Maybe it's not. Like when Obamacare outdoes
Romneycare by 10 to 1. Well, at least according to those who should
know - like Boston.
http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/health_stew/2012/08/romneycare_vs_obamacare_which.html
>
> >>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>
> >>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
> >>>Which would include you.
>
> >>*yawn*
> >>I contribute more in a day than you do in a year. You're a taker, I'm a
> >>provider.
>
> > All I see you providing is bullshit.
>
> That's all you deserve.
the place in the newsgroup. If you want to really contribute
something positive, clean up your mess.
>
> >>>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>
> >>>>Keep it clean. Same as last week.
>
> >>>Clean coal pants is an oxymoron.
>
> >>Clean coal pants sounds uncomfortable.
>
> > Yeah, they do. But there you go again, taking everything so literally
> > black-and-white and yes-or-no when you very well know what the nuance
> > of it really was.
>
> Humor. Don't leave home without it.
>
> >>>But, of course, only an oxymoron
> >>>would believe a coal plant can be clean.
>
> >>Clean is in reference to how they deal with the emissions.
>
> > But the emissions still come out dirty.
>
> Irrelevant.
his own nonsense, which in itself is an admission of having been
caught in his own nonsense that he can't defend.
Message has been deleted
Vandar
Oct 21, 2012, 12:49:03 AM10/21/12
to
wy wrote:
> On Oct 20, 11:59 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>>>the time?
>>
>>>>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>>>>>For.
>>
>>>>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
>>>>>before he was against it.
>>
>>>>He was always for it.
>>>>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>>
>>>Which, of course, is Romneycare.
>>
>>No, of course. It's not.
>
>
> Yes, of course. It is. Lots of it.
>
> Oh, then again. Maybe it's not. Like when Obamacare outdoes
> Romneycare by 10 to 1. Well, at least according to those who should
> know - like Boston.
>
> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/health_stew/2012/08/romneycare_vs_obamacare_which.html
You post that right after saying Obamacare is Romneycare?
> On Oct 20, 11:59 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>On Oct 20, 11:12 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>wy wrote:
>>
>>>>>On Oct 20, 9:09 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>3196 Dead wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>>>>>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>>>the time?
>>
>>>>>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>>>>>For.
>>
>>>>>Before he was against. And before he was for it. And of course
>>>>>before he was against it.
>>
>>>>He was always for it.
>>>>What he was always against is Obamacare.
>>
>>>Which, of course, is Romneycare.
>>
>>No, of course. It's not.
>
>
> Yes, of course. It is. Lots of it.
>
> Oh, then again. Maybe it's not. Like when Obamacare outdoes
> Romneycare by 10 to 1. Well, at least according to those who should
> know - like Boston.
>
> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/health_stew/2012/08/romneycare_vs_obamacare_which.html
Are you Joe Biden?
>>>>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>>>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>>
>>>>>Which would include you.
>>
>>>>*yawn*
>>>>I contribute more in a day than you do in a year. You're a taker, I'm a
>>>>provider.
>>
>>>All I see you providing is bullshit.
>>
>>That's all you deserve.
>
>
> And that's all you contribute, like I said. By the way, it's all over
> the place in the newsgroup. If you want to really contribute
> something positive, clean up your mess.
>
>
>
>>>>>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>>>>>Keep it clean. Same as last week.
>>
>>>>>Clean coal pants is an oxymoron.
>>
>>>>Clean coal pants sounds uncomfortable.
>>
>>>Yeah, they do. But there you go again, taking everything so literally
>>>black-and-white and yes-or-no when you very well know what the nuance
>>>of it really was.
>>
>>Humor. Don't leave home without it.
>
>
> Repugnants aren't well known for their humor.
>>>>>But, of course, only an oxymoron
>>>>>would believe a coal plant can be clean.
>>
>>>>Clean is in reference to how they deal with the emissions.
>>
>>>But the emissions still come out dirty.
>>
>>Irrelevant.
>
>
> Ah, yes, the old Repugnant 180 degree spin to avoid being caught in
> his own nonsense, which in itself is an admission of having been
> caught in his own nonsense that he can't defend.
emissions.
3196 Dead
Oct 21, 2012, 12:56:17 AM10/21/12
to
had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a secret plan to
cut taxes and eliminate the deficit. Bush Junior had a secret plan
create a new American hegemony.
They all ended badly.
Steve
Oct 21, 2012, 6:36:29 AM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:56:17 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
Everything has ended badly for you, Porks. Must be hard for you.. to
be so needy and know that nobody anywhere gives a shit whether you
live or die.
wrote:
be so needy and know that nobody anywhere gives a shit whether you
live or die.
Man of Mind
Oct 21, 2012, 8:15:35 AM10/21/12
to
On 10/21/2012 5:36 AM, "steve" wheezed his usual puffery:
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:56:17 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied to:
Tell us "steve", did you come to a battle of wits unarmed again,
or were you just projecting your sociopathy for all to see?
Example follows:
> Must be hard for you.. to be so needy and know that nobody
> anywhere gives a shit whether you live or die.
And that somehow justifies how you lie about someone who
disagrees with your narrow-minded perspective so completely
that it makes you look like a blustering fool, right?
--Got any of those "magnetic capacitors" yet, sparky?
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:56:17 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied to:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700, Phlip wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>> He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
>>>
>>> Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
>>> vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
>>>
>>> Romney's plan is ... a secret. Really. But we have a hint; he hired
>>> Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones responsible for the
>>> two biggest fuckups in American history...
>>
>> Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country. Nixon
>> had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a secret plan to
>> cut taxes and eliminate the deficit. Bush Junior had a secret plan
>> create a new American hegemony.
>>
>> They all ended badly.
>
> Everything has ended badly for you
Always with the personal attacks when you have precisely nothing.
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700, Phlip wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>> He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
>>>
>>> Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
>>> vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
>>>
>>> Romney's plan is ... a secret. Really. But we have a hint; he hired
>>> Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones responsible for the
>>> two biggest fuckups in American history...
>>
>> Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country. Nixon
>> had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a secret plan to
>> cut taxes and eliminate the deficit. Bush Junior had a secret plan
>> create a new American hegemony.
>>
>> They all ended badly.
>
> Everything has ended badly for you
Tell us "steve", did you come to a battle of wits unarmed again,
or were you just projecting your sociopathy for all to see?
Example follows:
> Must be hard for you.. to be so needy and know that nobody
> anywhere gives a shit whether you live or die.
disagrees with your narrow-minded perspective so completely
that it makes you look like a blustering fool, right?
--Got any of those "magnetic capacitors" yet, sparky?
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 21, 2012, 8:24:21 AM10/21/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:35:37 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:15:28 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 16:15:28 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>
>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>the time?
>>
>>That Obama all right the great divider.
>
>Utter nonsense
>
>The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
>(the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
>supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
>initated to it's worst level in American History
>
>Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
>2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>
>
>The Nixon Administration deliberately pandered to Southern racists
>(the southern strategy), then Raygun incoporated the scumbag white
>supremacits, the wealthy and the religious reich---an divisiveness was
>initated to it's worst level in American History
>
>Karl Rove deliberatly used wedge issues in his (actually) defeat
>2000---saved only by the Rightwing idiot USSC judges.
>
>>>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>>
>>Worded like that he might be for. Obamacare not so much.
>
>It was HIS HC program, haven't you paid attention? Obama couldn't get
>as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
>because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
>
>as much as Romney did passed---and Romney then had to SWITCH positions
>because the GOP base is dependent on the HC industry.
>
>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>
>>That isn't what was said.
>
>>
>>That isn't what was said.
>
>He did.
>
>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>include the wealthy
Wealthy = people who work
>
>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>include the wealthy
>, the higher paid
= woprk hard to get where they are paid more
>the religious reich
What part of "freedom of religion" do you hate? The "freedom" or the
"religion"?
>, and he
>don't need the other.
>
>>>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>>
>>Well we need them for now unless you are willing to do without.
>
>>
>>Well we need them for now unless you are willing to do without.
>
Reaper G
Oct 21, 2012, 9:05:06 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 20, 8:44 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:30:24 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <d...@gone.com>
talkloon likeloon thisloon.
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:30:24 -0600, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <d...@gone.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>the time?
>
> >>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
> >>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
> >>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>
> >Ya gotta feel sorry for MattPoltroon....I'm beginning to think he
> >actually has no ability to see the nonsense he posts.
>
> My Stalker Yoorghis AKA Gary Roselles Pedo-loon of Rapid City, SD is
> to be pitied he has failed in life.
You should try harder to reach out to him. Maybeloon ifloon youloon
>
> >>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> >>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> >>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> >>the time?
>
> >>Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
> >>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
> >>What's his position on coal plants this week?
>
> >Ya gotta feel sorry for MattPoltroon....I'm beginning to think he
> >actually has no ability to see the nonsense he posts.
>
> My Stalker Yoorghis AKA Gary Roselles Pedo-loon of Rapid City, SD is
> to be pitied he has failed in life.
talkloon likeloon thisloon.
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 21, 2012, 9:47:29 AM10/21/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:30:24 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>Ya gotta feel sorry for MattPoltroon....I'm beginning to think he
>actually has no ability to see the nonsense he posts.
What about your postings where you spanked?
>actually has no ability to see the nonsense he posts.
Phlip
Oct 21, 2012, 10:05:50 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 20, 9:56 pm, 3196 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country. Nixon
> had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a secret plan to
> cut taxes and eliminate the deficit.
Reagan had a secret plan to get our embassy hostages back from Iran.
> Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country. Nixon
> had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a secret plan to
> cut taxes and eliminate the deficit.
It lead to a decade of petty hostage-taking and more demands for more
weapons.
I think that's why, this year, the Iranians decided to get ahead of
the curve with their _own_ October Surprise.
Ahmadinejad quietly endorsing Obama; the guy who actually made the
sanctions work. Who saw THAT coming?
I guess he'd rather negotiate with Obama than with NeoCons looking for
any excuse for another war, to distract us from our domestic problems.
Phlip
Oct 21, 2012, 10:07:25 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 20, 8:42 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
> Do you know a alternative?.,
There's this big bright glowing thing in the sky every day..?
> Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
> Do you know a alternative?.,
Message has been deleted
3196 Dead
Oct 21, 2012, 10:19:31 AM10/21/12
to
Message has been deleted
Phlip
Oct 21, 2012, 10:28:20 AM10/21/12
to
> > Wealthy = people who work
Hey, outsourcing jobs to communist countries all day ain't easy, you
know!
Message has been deleted
Phlip
Oct 21, 2012, 10:35:17 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 21, 7:31 am, An tSin Gorm <chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > I guess he'd rather negotiate with Obama than with NeoCons looking for
> > any excuse for another war, to distract us from our domestic problems.
>
> Ahmadinejad doesn't have power to negotiate squat. Also he's about to leave
> > I guess he'd rather negotiate with Obama than with NeoCons looking for
> > any excuse for another war, to distract us from our domestic problems.
>
> office. The decisions are being made the real powers in Iran.
Point. The Mullahs figured it's time to stop punishing the USA for
installing the Shah of Iran.
(You know; the country that always stands up for democracy around the
world helping a hereditary dictator reclaim power in a violent coup,
just because Iran tried to nationalize BP's holdings in their oil
fields...)
Message has been deleted
Phlip
Oct 21, 2012, 10:52:11 AM10/21/12
to
> All they were originally trying to do is get financial documents so they could
> see if BP was cheating on the contract Iran was forced to enter.
You mean the 17th Rule of Acquisition, "A contract is a contract",
really DOES have a secret clause - "...between Ferengi"?!
> see if BP was cheating on the contract Iran was forced to enter.
You mean the 17th Rule of Acquisition, "A contract is a contract",
really DOES have a secret clause - "...between Ferengi"?!
3196 Dead
Oct 21, 2012, 12:14:05 PM10/21/12
to
care workers. Bakers. Cops. Firemen.
The worthless 47%.
Steve
Oct 21, 2012, 12:23:34 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
Nope, it's the lazy parasites like Jamieson.
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 2:01:17 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Phlip <phli...@gmail.com>
wrote:
So that is correct and yet do you have solar panels on your roof?
wrote:
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 2:01:43 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:19:31 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
Do you have a wind mill?
wrote:
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 2:04:48 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:27:42 -0700, An tSin Gorm
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <n2s68853rub1q7gm0...@4ax.com>,
>Arabs to keep the oil flowing, we would have alternatives by now. Or we can
>continue the current course until we turn every river and park into a slag heap.
>Do you know what happens to the clinker and ash after the coal is burnt?
We did not have the solar or wind tech in 1981. Then we have the
problem of no one wanting things in there area.
Again with the past. If they shut those plants down today what would
happen?
Then again we could start buy building replacement facilities ASAP.
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <n2s68853rub1q7gm0...@4ax.com>,
> MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
>> Do you know a alternative?.,
>
>Had we been working on alternatives since 1981 instead killing Americans and
>
>> Well coal power is dirty and yet at this time we have little choice.
>> Do you know a alternative?.,
>
>Arabs to keep the oil flowing, we would have alternatives by now. Or we can
>continue the current course until we turn every river and park into a slag heap.
>Do you know what happens to the clinker and ash after the coal is burnt?
We did not have the solar or wind tech in 1981. Then we have the
problem of no one wanting things in there area.
Again with the past. If they shut those plants down today what would
happen?
Then again we could start buy building replacement facilities ASAP.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Vandar
Oct 21, 2012, 2:15:57 PM10/21/12
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:00:05 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>>>
>>
>>Why?
>
>
> Because you, like he is, are not what America is made of---or for.
I am exactly what the country is made of and for.
You, who seeks to remove those who disagree with you politically, are
not what this country is about.
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:00:05 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vand...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>>>>
>>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>You should consider leaving---like FILEDUD.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Why?
>
>
> Because you, like he is, are not what America is made of---or for.
I am exactly what the country is made of and for.
You, who seeks to remove those who disagree with you politically, are
not what this country is about.
wy
Oct 21, 2012, 2:41:56 PM10/21/12
to
On Oct 21, 2:16 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:00:05 -0400, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> You, who seeks to remove those who disagree with you politically, are
> not what this country is about.
But you Repugnants sure act like it is, i.e.: "take *our* country
back".
> Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:00:05 -0400, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>
> >>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
> >>>You should consider leaving---like FILEDUD.
>
> >>Why?
>
> > Because you, like he is, are not what America is made of---or for.
>
> I am exactly what the country is made of and for.
That's a definition of a pretty sad country.
> >>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 21:09:26 -0400, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
>
> >>>>Half of them ARE useless.
>
> >>>You should consider leaving---like FILEDUD.
>
> >>Why?
>
> > Because you, like he is, are not what America is made of---or for.
>
> I am exactly what the country is made of and for.
> You, who seeks to remove those who disagree with you politically, are
> not what this country is about.
back".
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 3:01:53 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:05:47 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>who will do the work?
>
>That's a nonsense claim
>
>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
little tax. Seems not the same.
>
>Of those you claim are "freeloaders"---they range from elderly,
>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
No I have said the Disabled and elderly aren't included in my
definition of Freeloader. Freeloader abled bodied and just lazy .
You are a example and have been most your life.
>
>ALL societies in ALL history have have all.
LOL No they did not. Read more history.
>
>It's only those who are ethical and moral who do not advocate what you
>and your racists bigots want----from letting them starve or let
>'nature take it's course" and allowing them to die.
What has freeloader to do with race?
No race is owed.
Hating the Haters
http://youtu.be/ffEjJs2kOto
Voted Blindly and has now learned.
..........
Obama Phone
http://youtu.be/xr201FqTP4w
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>don't need the other.
>>
>>Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
>>
>>who will do the work?
>
>That's a nonsense claim
>
>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
little tax. Seems not the same.
>
>Of those you claim are "freeloaders"---they range from elderly,
>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
No I have said the Disabled and elderly aren't included in my
definition of Freeloader. Freeloader abled bodied and just lazy .
You are a example and have been most your life.
>
>ALL societies in ALL history have have all.
LOL No they did not. Read more history.
>
>It's only those who are ethical and moral who do not advocate what you
>and your racists bigots want----from letting them starve or let
>'nature take it's course" and allowing them to die.
What has freeloader to do with race?
No race is owed.
Hating the Haters
http://youtu.be/ffEjJs2kOto
Voted Blindly and has now learned.
..........
Obama Phone
http://youtu.be/xr201FqTP4w
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 6:11:01 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:40:22 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:01:53 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>situation.
Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>
>>>Of those you claim are "freeloaders"---they range from elderly,
>>>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>>>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
>>
>>No I have said the Disabled and elderly aren't included in my
>>definition of Freeloader. Freeloader abled bodied and just lazy .
>>You are a example and have been most your life.
>
>But they ARE in your percentage you moron.
No they are not. Do you have data to prove your point?
>
>The number of all "lazy" (as you put it) are crammed into areas with
>Absolutely NO means of getting out of that society. The views of
>Romney have absolutely no relevance to someone in that situation.
>There are NO jobs, there are NO educational opportunities, there are
>NO social and familial foundations, there are no fundamentals of what
>a comparable white suburban society enjoys.
I know 3 that got out and you call the "UncleToms"
>
>The original intent came about because after the South lost the Civil
>RIghts battle---they literally kicked out people from the rural areas,
>the migration north to where JOBS were---was in cities. The
>staggering social problem of Homelessness, Hunger was so bad by the
>late 60's that the govt (D)----began to build affordable housing,
>created food programs--etc, etc, etc. But In areas where WORK was.
>
>Within a few years----the migration to the suburbs began---leaving
>all those people stranded in projects---no work, no opportunity.
>
>THEY didn't do that, you mindless idiot.
>
>It was the white business and leadership in banks, finances, who
>literally left.
>
>YOUR kind of idiots created the problem in retaliation for being
>forced to desegregate, abide by Civil rights laws, and states whined
>and howled because Civil liberties were expanded (Warren Court)
So we should just allow you to murder. That is your solution and all
other ides are racist.. You are being quite clear with your views.
>
>
>>>
>>>ALL societies in ALL history have
>
Yes because you can't counter it and like to post out of Context.
Known that for a while.
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:01:53 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:05:47 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>>>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>>>>>don't need the other.
>>>>
>>>>Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
>>>>who will do the work?
>>>
>>>That's a nonsense claim
>>>
>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>
>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>
>He/they also do not have the same quality of life, or the same ability
>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:05:47 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>>>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>>>>>don't need the other.
>>>>
>>>>Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
>>>>who will do the work?
>>>
>>>That's a nonsense claim
>>>
>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>
>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>
>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>situation.
Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>
>>>Of those you claim are "freeloaders"---they range from elderly,
>>>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>>>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
>>
>>No I have said the Disabled and elderly aren't included in my
>>definition of Freeloader. Freeloader abled bodied and just lazy .
>>You are a example and have been most your life.
>
No they are not. Do you have data to prove your point?
>
>The number of all "lazy" (as you put it) are crammed into areas with
>Absolutely NO means of getting out of that society. The views of
>Romney have absolutely no relevance to someone in that situation.
>There are NO jobs, there are NO educational opportunities, there are
>NO social and familial foundations, there are no fundamentals of what
>a comparable white suburban society enjoys.
I know 3 that got out and you call the "UncleToms"
>
>The original intent came about because after the South lost the Civil
>RIghts battle---they literally kicked out people from the rural areas,
>the migration north to where JOBS were---was in cities. The
>staggering social problem of Homelessness, Hunger was so bad by the
>late 60's that the govt (D)----began to build affordable housing,
>created food programs--etc, etc, etc. But In areas where WORK was.
>
>Within a few years----the migration to the suburbs began---leaving
>all those people stranded in projects---no work, no opportunity.
>
>THEY didn't do that, you mindless idiot.
>
>It was the white business and leadership in banks, finances, who
>literally left.
>
>YOUR kind of idiots created the problem in retaliation for being
>forced to desegregate, abide by Civil rights laws, and states whined
>and howled because Civil liberties were expanded (Warren Court)
So we should just allow you to murder. That is your solution and all
other ides are racist.. You are being quite clear with your views.
>
>
>>>
>>>ALL societies in ALL history have
>
>>LOL No they did not. Read more history.
>
>And you wonder why I snip out 99% of all your ignorance.....
>
Yes because you can't counter it and like to post out of Context.
Known that for a while.
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 21, 2012, 7:31:47 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:05:47 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>>>don't need the other.
>>
>>Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
>>who will do the work?
>
>That's a nonsense claim
>
>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:49:36 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>>>include the wealthy, the higher paid, the religious reich, and he
>>>don't need the other.
>>
>>Well the freeloaders are about 23%. When everyone becomes freeloaders
>>who will do the work?
>
>That's a nonsense claim
>
>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>
>Of those you claim are "freeloaders"---they range from elderly,
>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
>
>ALL societies in ALL history have have all.
>veterans, retirees, unemployed, orphaned children (being cared for),
>the mentally enfeebled, ....and the "sick, lame and lazy"
>
>
>It's only those who are ethical and moral who do not advocate what you
>and your racists bigots want----from letting them starve or let
>'nature take it's course" and allowing them to die.
Don't forget yogi - some people choose to be poor.
>It's only those who are ethical and moral who do not advocate what you
>and your racists bigots want----from letting them starve or let
>'nature take it's course" and allowing them to die.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
MattB
Oct 21, 2012, 10:42:16 PM10/21/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:27:48 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:11:01 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>anyone---except the top elite classes.
>
>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>that thought for political gain.
>
>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
racist.
See you have Matt T as a backer for gang violence now.
Murder is wrong no matter what race does it.
>
>
>
>>===========================================================
>
>
>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:50:03 -0700, MattB <trdel...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>
>I consider you use of the word Loon to be racist so is it Ok if I call
>you Coonboy?
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:11:01 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>>>
>>>He/they also do not have the same quality of life, or the same ability
>>>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>>>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>>>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>>>situation.
>>
>>Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
>>this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>
>There are no programs coming from the right that ever helped
>>>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>>>
>>>He/they also do not have the same quality of life, or the same ability
>>>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>>>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>>>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>>>situation.
>>
>>Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
>>this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>
>anyone---except the top elite classes.
>
>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>that thought for political gain.
>
>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
racist.
See you have Matt T as a backer for gang violence now.
Murder is wrong no matter what race does it.
>
>
>
>>===========================================================
>
>
>>On Thu, 06 Sep 2012 11:50:03 -0700, MattB <trdel...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>
>I consider you use of the word Loon to be racist so is it Ok if I call
>you Coonboy?
NoBody
Oct 22, 2012, 6:50:59 AM10/22/12
to
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>the time?
>
Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is so
noted.
wrote:
>On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
>This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>the time?
>
noted.
Man of Mind
Oct 22, 2012, 7:15:42 AM10/22/12
to
On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
--Like the good little right-wing quisling you are..
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>> the time?
>
> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>
>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>
>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>> the time?
>
> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
--Like the good little right-wing quisling you are..
Message has been deleted
3206 Dead
Oct 22, 2012, 11:48:00 AM10/22/12
to
without blowing up the deficit.
MattB
Oct 22, 2012, 1:12:29 PM10/22/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:35:52 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:42:16 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
So because a Right of center White person posted. OK Think that is
called racist.
> We know your pro-racist/bigoted
>beliefs and stands on issues. When you post anything related to
>blacks, gangs, violence, crime, chicago, .....you are inferring that
>obama is bad, or the cause of it.
I infer it? Please do go on. Did you know you have done to same to
articles about other countries gang problems. Guess you didn't bother
to read them. One was about a white gang you did the same.
So you must like Gang violence.
>
>>See you have Matt T as a backer for gang violence now.
>
>I doubt it.
>
>What he believes is his opinion and sometimes parallels mine.
Well still waiting for a quote of me blaming it on Obama from him.
Might be waiting a while.
>
>I never see HIM post a set of crimes to infer Rumney is the reason.
No he is saying Ryan is responsible for all crime in Wi.
>
>Mostly, he just rips you apart for your silly crap.
LOL Ok I normally agree with him more than disagree. Think at
times he has bad days and reverts to you and Eddie type. Then again
we all have bad days.
>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 19:42:16 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:27:48 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:11:01 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>>>>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>He/they also do not have the same quality of life, or the same ability
>>>>>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>>>>>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>>>>>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>>>>>situation.
>>>>
>>>>Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
>>>>this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>>>
>>>There are no programs coming from the right that ever helped
>>>anyone---except the top elite classes.
>>>
>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>
>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>
>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>racist.
>
>Because it's YOU that's posting them.
>
>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:27:48 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:11:01 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Everyone who buys something pays taxes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe but when my tax money goes to a freeloader and he then pay a
>>>>>>little tax. Seems not the same.
>>>>>
>>>>>He/they also do not have the same quality of life, or the same ability
>>>>>to survive in a world created by people like you. Moreover, the
>>>>>entire agenda of those who you agree with----has no interest (as
>>>>>Rumney clearly stated) in doing anything that alleviates the
>>>>>situation.
>>>>
>>>>Yet when I post articles about programs that are made to help with
>>>>this very problem you call them racist. WHY?
>>>
>>>There are no programs coming from the right that ever helped
>>>anyone---except the top elite classes.
>>>
>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>
>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>
>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>racist.
>
So because a Right of center White person posted. OK Think that is
called racist.
> We know your pro-racist/bigoted
>beliefs and stands on issues. When you post anything related to
>blacks, gangs, violence, crime, chicago, .....you are inferring that
>obama is bad, or the cause of it.
I infer it? Please do go on. Did you know you have done to same to
articles about other countries gang problems. Guess you didn't bother
to read them. One was about a white gang you did the same.
So you must like Gang violence.
>
>>See you have Matt T as a backer for gang violence now.
>
>
>What he believes is his opinion and sometimes parallels mine.
Well still waiting for a quote of me blaming it on Obama from him.
Might be waiting a while.
>
>I never see HIM post a set of crimes to infer Rumney is the reason.
No he is saying Ryan is responsible for all crime in Wi.
>
>Mostly, he just rips you apart for your silly crap.
LOL Ok I normally agree with him more than disagree. Think at
times he has bad days and reverts to you and Eddie type. Then again
we all have bad days.
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 22, 2012, 8:40:35 PM10/22/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:15:55 -0700, An tSin Gorm
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <a8q788l22d1fjdk5n...@4ax.com>, ozark...@yahoo.com
Possibly - you have to ask them. But they can go as far as their
ability and initiative can take them
>That greeter at Walmart?
Possibly - you have to ask them. But they can go as far as their
ability and initiative can take them
> A gas station attendant? A miner? A farmer? A car salesman?
As above.
And many rich people have done some of those jobs.
Done several of them myself - and - by some peoples standards, I am
wealthy. By my standards, I am just about the richest man in the
world.
>
>> >the religious reich
>>
>> What part of "freedom of religion" do you hate? The "freedom" or the
>> "religion"?
>
>What part of blasphemy and heretic do you love?
The freedom to do just that - if one chooses.
>The pagan right has nothing to
>do with christianity.
I never claimed it did - but it does have the freedom.....
As I asked - what part of freedom do you hate?
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <a8q788l22d1fjdk5n...@4ax.com>, ozark...@yahoo.com
>wrote:
>
>> >47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>
>> >47% won't vote, won't take responsiblity, ----and that means HIS 47%
>> >include the wealthy
>>
>> Wealthy = people who work
>
>Does that mean janitors and waitresses are wealthy?
>>
>> Wealthy = people who work
>
Possibly - you have to ask them. But they can go as far as their
ability and initiative can take them
>That greeter at Walmart?
Possibly - you have to ask them. But they can go as far as their
ability and initiative can take them
> A gas station attendant? A miner? A farmer? A car salesman?
As above.
And many rich people have done some of those jobs.
Done several of them myself - and - by some peoples standards, I am
wealthy. By my standards, I am just about the richest man in the
world.
>
>> >the religious reich
>>
>> What part of "freedom of religion" do you hate? The "freedom" or the
>> "religion"?
>
The freedom to do just that - if one chooses.
>The pagan right has nothing to
>do with christianity.
I never claimed it did - but it does have the freedom.....
As I asked - what part of freedom do you hate?
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 22, 2012, 8:41:55 PM10/22/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead <de...@gone.com>
They may be. And some may be on their way to their wealth.
They have a shot at it, just like everyone else.
And, keep in mind, some people choose to be poor.
They have a shot at it, just like everyone else.
And, keep in mind, some people choose to be poor.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
MattB
Oct 22, 2012, 11:48:11 PM10/22/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:41:21 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:12:29 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
But I don't support many of the right positions and can't support all
the lefts. What ideology do I have?
My State passed this by public vote
"Washington State is prohibited from discriminating or granting
preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or
national origin in public employment, education, and contracting?"
This I support 100%
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:12:29 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>>>
>>>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>>>
>>>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>>>racist.
>>>
>>>Because it's YOU that's posting them.
>>
>>So because a Right of center White person posted.
>
>No, because of the ideology you support is racist.
>>>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>>>
>>>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>>>
>>>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>>>racist.
>>>
>>>Because it's YOU that's posting them.
>>
>>So because a Right of center White person posted.
>
But I don't support many of the right positions and can't support all
the lefts. What ideology do I have?
My State passed this by public vote
"Washington State is prohibited from discriminating or granting
preferential treatment based on race, sex, color, ethnicity or
national origin in public employment, education, and contracting?"
This I support 100%
NoBody
Oct 23, 2012, 5:48:43 AM10/23/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>> the time?
>>
>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>
>I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans for a second
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>
>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>> the time?
>>
>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>
>I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
term are.
>
>--Like the good little right-wing quisling you are..
NoBody
Oct 23, 2012, 5:49:29 AM10/23/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 15:48:00 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
The first question was what are Obama's plans for a second term. Why
are you afraid to respond?
wrote:
are you afraid to respond?
Man of Mind
Oct 23, 2012, 7:05:12 AM10/23/12
to
On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
nation's infrastructure and public education..
>> --Like the good little right-wing quisling you are..
>
> Like the good little left-wing loon you are.
*>LOL!<* Pulling a "Romney" hunh?
--Now, repeat after me..
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>
>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>
>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>> the time?
>>>
>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>
>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>
> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
> for a second term are.
That was outlined last night at the debate..
>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>
>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>> the time?
>>>
>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>
>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>
> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
> for a second term are.
Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
nation's infrastructure and public education..
>> --Like the good little right-wing quisling you are..
>
> Like the good little left-wing loon you are.
--Now, repeat after me..
Message has been deleted
MattB
Oct 23, 2012, 1:35:57 PM10/23/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:01:09 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:48:11 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>up to, and including most of War years, you fool
We know what you are saying about the left as we also see Eddie saying
it about the right. We have to chose one of the extremes.
Very Glad that isn't true.
>
>The DISPARITY of "goals" of the side you favor (rightwing
>conservatism) has such a horrible historical record, an ONGOING
>horrible record of lies, deceit, greed, racism and hypocrisy---that no
>sane person should have a problem deciding.
>
>The worst you can say about the "left"---is that they tend to try and
>do too much to alleviate the misery and unfairness---and tend to
>create policy and law that is faulty.
>
>The main (MAIN) thing the Republican party was known for---was to
>mitigate and make changes smaller by being more fiscally
>responsible---but recognizing the merit of progressive/liberal
>policies. The GI Bill, Interstate Highway, aid to education,
>expansion of Civil liberties----all with support and input from both
>sides.
>
>Until the Warren court started making (needed) rulings on police
>power, and expanding civil liberties, and the introduction of the
>Civil RIghts Act by a group of younger democrats defying their
>leadership (southern dixiecrats)---the democrats were impeding
>progress. That's when moderate (real, not feigned like you) aided
>those liberal/progressives and we got the CRA legislation.
>
>From that day on---the Republican party was inundated by the
>disgruntled white southerners, and the white religious fundamentalists
>started rising in power (and wealth), and backed by the mega-millions
>of the wealthy---and now the GOP is on a track to destroy itself.
>
>Even a moron like you ought to be able to look at the scumbag
>politicians---from Rumney down to Akin and figure something's wrong.
>
>But you will vote for that suzzy crap because you "don't like Obama"
>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:48:11 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:41:21 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:12:29 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>>>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>>>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>>>>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>>>>>racist.
>>>>>
>>>>>Because it's YOU that's posting them.
>>>>
>>>>So because a Right of center White person posted.
>>>
>>>No, because of the ideology you support is racist.
>>
>>
>>But I don't support many of the right positions and can't support all
>>the lefts. What ideology do I have?
>
>That what I've been trying to explain to you what "good germans" said
>
>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:41:21 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:12:29 -0700, MattB <trdell1...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>Every post you've done is associated with an attempt to associate
>>>>>>>"Crime, Gangs, Shootings," with Obama, or and propaganda that extends
>>>>>>>that thought for political gain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>IOW, you're nothing but a doofus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well I did not check to see if these programs were from the right or
>>>>>>left. Most I have seen are apolitical and yet you attack them also as
>>>>>>racist.
>>>>>
>>>>>Because it's YOU that's posting them.
>>>>
>>>>So because a Right of center White person posted.
>>>
>>>No, because of the ideology you support is racist.
>>
>>
>>But I don't support many of the right positions and can't support all
>>the lefts. What ideology do I have?
>
>up to, and including most of War years, you fool
We know what you are saying about the left as we also see Eddie saying
it about the right. We have to chose one of the extremes.
Very Glad that isn't true.
>
>The DISPARITY of "goals" of the side you favor (rightwing
>conservatism) has such a horrible historical record, an ONGOING
>horrible record of lies, deceit, greed, racism and hypocrisy---that no
>sane person should have a problem deciding.
>
>The worst you can say about the "left"---is that they tend to try and
>do too much to alleviate the misery and unfairness---and tend to
>create policy and law that is faulty.
>
>The main (MAIN) thing the Republican party was known for---was to
>mitigate and make changes smaller by being more fiscally
>responsible---but recognizing the merit of progressive/liberal
>policies. The GI Bill, Interstate Highway, aid to education,
>expansion of Civil liberties----all with support and input from both
>sides.
>
>Until the Warren court started making (needed) rulings on police
>power, and expanding civil liberties, and the introduction of the
>Civil RIghts Act by a group of younger democrats defying their
>leadership (southern dixiecrats)---the democrats were impeding
>progress. That's when moderate (real, not feigned like you) aided
>those liberal/progressives and we got the CRA legislation.
>
>From that day on---the Republican party was inundated by the
>disgruntled white southerners, and the white religious fundamentalists
>started rising in power (and wealth), and backed by the mega-millions
>of the wealthy---and now the GOP is on a track to destroy itself.
>
>Even a moron like you ought to be able to look at the scumbag
>politicians---from Rumney down to Akin and figure something's wrong.
>
>But you will vote for that suzzy crap because you "don't like Obama"
dot-5
Oct 23, 2012, 1:52:07 PM10/23/12
to
On 10/23/2012 5:05 AM, Man of Mind wrote:
> *>LOL!<* Pulling a "Romney" hunh?
>
> --Now, repeat after me..
================================
> *>LOL!<* Pulling a "Romney" hunh?
>
> --Now, repeat after me..
Poor, dumb Kurtie Licknutz Harrington had been following me all over
Usenet and desperately tracing my posts to try to find out were I
lived..
..that was... until I tricked him into admitting that he's been
hauled into court over child support payments and that he's supposed
to attend AA meetings...
See below:
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:55 -0600
Canyon: "did the court let you settle for pennies on the dollar?"
Harrington: "Not that I'm aware of.. Did you have any other petty
remarks? "
Canyon: "did they see that your kids were better off if you weren't in
the picture? "
Harrington: "Why don't you go and find out for yourself, cartoon
hero..
Oh, that's right, you can't find anything past that, no
child custody filings, no further hearings on the settled
account and discontinuence.. Poor little cartoon hero..
You really are looking for something, anything to attack me
personally, with malice aforethought.. That'll be just
another in a long series of mistakes you've made today..
Canyon: "...say, are you attending those AA meetings regularly?"
Harrington: "Sure am, anything else you'd like to desperately try to
attack me personally with, or would you prefer to stop
now before you get into much more trouble?
--Or, do you just have nothing left to lose?"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/7171c5a4bd29de81?hl=en.
Message has been deleted
ozark...@yahoo.com
Oct 23, 2012, 8:32:40 PM10/23/12
to
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:50:27 -0700, An tSin Gorm
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <hspb88tod08oc2j8b...@4ax.com>, ozark...@yahoo.com
>wrote:
Actually, both.
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <hspb88tod08oc2j8b...@4ax.com>, ozark...@yahoo.com
>wrote:
>
>> >> Wealthy = people who work
>> >
>> >You know. Custodians. Mill workers. Day care providers. Home health
>> >care workers. Bakers. Cops. Firemen.
>>
>> They may be. And some may be on their way to their wealth.
>
>Ah. So that was a statement of faith rather than a statement of fact.
>> >> Wealthy = people who work
>> >
>> >You know. Custodians. Mill workers. Day care providers. Home health
>> >care workers. Bakers. Cops. Firemen.
>>
>> They may be. And some may be on their way to their wealth.
>
Actually, both.
RichTravsky
Oct 23, 2012, 11:56:19 PM10/23/12
to
3196 Dead wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> > Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> the time?
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>
> > Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>
> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
> the time?
>
> Is Mittens for or against healthcare reform?
Yes.
> Does he love 100% of Americans or regard half of them as useless?
> What's his position on coal plants this week?
RichTravsky
Oct 23, 2012, 11:56:43 PM10/23/12
to
AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700 (PDT), In article <f0e3c8cd-3846-
> 4a4a-ac42-b...@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>, phli...@gmail.com
> says...
> > Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
> > vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> >
> >
>
> At what cost? Give tax breaks to the private sector and they will
> provide MORE jobs than that. Taxing everyone to give a few jobs?
> Socialism. Communism? Both.
Taxes are at their lowest since Ike.
>
> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700 (PDT), In article <f0e3c8cd-3846-
> 4a4a-ac42-b...@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>, phli...@gmail.com
> says...
> > Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
> > vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> >
> >
>
> At what cost? Give tax breaks to the private sector and they will
> provide MORE jobs than that. Taxing everyone to give a few jobs?
> Socialism. Communism? Both.
Taxes are at their lowest since Ike.
NoBody
Oct 24, 2012, 5:59:57 AM10/24/12
to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>
>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>> the time?
>>>>
>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>
>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>
>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>> for a second term are.
>
>That was outlined last night at the debate..
>
>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>nation's infrastructure and public education..
Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>
>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>
>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>> the time?
>>>>
>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>
>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>
>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>> for a second term are.
>
>That was outlined last night at the debate..
>
>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>nation's infrastructure and public education..
we don't have....
NoBody
Oct 24, 2012, 6:00:32 AM10/24/12
to
NoBody
Oct 24, 2012, 6:00:54 AM10/24/12
to
Mitchell Holman
Oct 24, 2012, 9:33:50 AM10/24/12
to
NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:fvef8816h0omuqlma...@4ax.com:
You mean like Bush 41 did?
year.......................defense budget
1989........................343 billion
1990........................342 billion
1991........................320 billion
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/year_spending_1991USbn_13bs1n#usgs302
news:fvef8816h0omuqlma...@4ax.com:
year.......................defense budget
1989........................343 billion
1990........................342 billion
1991........................320 billion
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/year_spending_1991USbn_13bs1n#usgs302
Man of Mind
Oct 24, 2012, 9:58:29 AM10/24/12
to
On 10/24/2012 4:59 AM, "nobody" whined the usual right-wing tripe:
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
> cut the military and spend yet more money
> we don't have....
You appear to have a case of "Romnesia"..
--Investment in our national infrastructure has always paid back..
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>
>> On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>> the time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>
>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>
>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>> for a second term are.
>>
>> That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>
>> Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>> nation's infrastructure and public education..
>
> Well there's something new:
Too bad you didn't catch those facts, first hand, hunh?
>> On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds good at
>>>>>> the time?
>>>>>
>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>
>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>
>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>> for a second term are.
>>
>> That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>
>> Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>> nation's infrastructure and public education..
>
> Well there's something new:
> cut the military and spend yet more money
> we don't have....
--Investment in our national infrastructure has always paid back..
3206 Dead
Oct 24, 2012, 11:40:43 AM10/24/12
to
and get absolutely nothing back for it, because even the military doesn't
want increased spending.
3206 Dead
Oct 24, 2012, 11:41:32 AM10/24/12
to
Christ, do you morons browse with Apple//es or something?
Message has been deleted
Mitchell Holman
Oct 24, 2012, 10:14:23 PM10/24/12
to
Mitchell Holman <nomailcomcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA0F656E40C895...@216.196.121.131:
<crickets> from "Nobody".
news:XnsA0F656E40C895...@216.196.121.131:
NoBody
Oct 25, 2012, 5:43:46 AM10/25/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:33:50 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
>NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
>news:fvef8816h0omuqlma...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind
>> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
>>>>>>> good at the time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>>
>>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>>> for a second term are.
>>>
>>>That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>>
>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>
>> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>> we don't have....
>
>
> You mean like Bush 41 did?
Bush hasn't been President for four years now. Do try to keep up.
<nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
>NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
>news:fvef8816h0omuqlma...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind
>> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
>>>>>>> good at the time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>>
>>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>>> for a second term are.
>>>
>>>That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>>
>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>
>> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>> we don't have....
>
>
> You mean like Bush 41 did?
NoBody
Oct 25, 2012, 5:53:20 AM10/25/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:53:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:59:57 -0400, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>
>>Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>>we don't have....
>
>We "don't have money" because those with ALL the money pay less than
>the poorest, you moron.
A flat out lie. You guys are just tiresome.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/cbo-rich-pay-outsized-share-taxes/
>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:59:57 -0400, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>
>>Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>>we don't have....
>
>the poorest, you moron.
A flat out lie. You guys are just tiresome.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/cbo-rich-pay-outsized-share-taxes/
NoBody
Oct 25, 2012, 5:54:51 AM10/25/12
to
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:41:32 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
Your failure to provide a cite is so noted. Why are you so unwilling
to back up your own claims?
wrote:
to back up your own claims?
Man of Mind
Oct 25, 2012, 7:29:17 AM10/25/12
to
On 10/25/2012 4:43 AM, "nobody" was whining like a baby:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>> You mean like Bush 41 did?
>
> Bush hasn't been President for four years
So, the money that could be saved from a bloated military
budget, and then invested in public schools and roads is
money that we don't have?
--Your infantile lack of critical reasoning is showing, again..
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:33:50 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>
>> "nobody" sniveled pointless when refuted by:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:33:50 -0500, Mitchell Holman
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
>>>>>>>> good at the time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>>>> for a second term are.
>>>>
>>>> That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>>>
>>>> Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>> nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>>
>>> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet
>>> more money we don't have....
So, simple arithmetic is beyond your grasp?
>>>> On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
>>>>>>>> good at the time?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
>>>>> for a second term are.
>>>>
>>>> That was outlined last night at the debate..
>>>>
>>>> Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
>>>> nation's infrastructure and public education..
>>>
>>> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet
>>> more money we don't have....
>> You mean like Bush 41 did?
>
> Bush hasn't been President for four years
budget, and then invested in public schools and roads is
money that we don't have?
--Your infantile lack of critical reasoning is showing, again..
3206 Dead
Oct 25, 2012, 10:45:37 AM10/25/12
to
ignorant of revenue levels for the federal government, you have no role
in this discussion. Just simple self-respect would make you look it up,
one would think.
3206 Dead
Oct 25, 2012, 11:02:47 AM10/25/12
to
Overall tax burden for a billionaire in terms of percentage of income is
significantly less than that of a family of four making $30,000, and
that's a disgrace. Even most billionaires think it's a disgrace.
Mitchell Holman
Oct 25, 2012, 8:02:21 PM10/25/12
to
Mitchell Holman <nomailcomcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA0F6D7D6BB951...@216.196.121.131:
Just what he accuses everyone else of doing.
What a hypocrite.
NoBody
Oct 26, 2012, 6:06:24 AM10/26/12
to
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:02:47 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:53:20 -0400, NoBody wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:53:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:59:57 -0400, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own nation's
>>>>>infrastructure and public education..
>>>>
>>>>Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>>>>we don't have....
>>>
>>>We "don't have money" because those with ALL the money pay less than the
>>>poorest, you moron.
>>
>> A flat out lie. You guys are just tiresome.
>>
>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/cbo-rich-pay-outsized-
>share-taxes/
>
>My gawd, the Moonie Times. No wonder you're such an ignorant putz.
So the CBO is lying as well.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/43373
"In 2009, the shares of federal taxes paid by households in certain
income quintiles were:
Lowest quintile: 0.3 percent
Middle quintile: 9.4 percent
Highest quintile: 67.9 percent
"
The reflex lying Zippo flexes again...
>
>Overall tax burden for a billionaire in terms of percentage of income is
>significantly less than that of a family of four making $30,000, and
>that's a disgrace. Even most billionaires think it's a disgrace.
"
So you discount my valid cites and pull numbers from your butt.
Typical lib...
wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:53:20 -0400, NoBody wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:53:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 05:59:57 -0400, NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own nation's
>>>>>infrastructure and public education..
>>>>
>>>>Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
>>>>we don't have....
>>>
>>>We "don't have money" because those with ALL the money pay less than the
>>>poorest, you moron.
>>
>> A flat out lie. You guys are just tiresome.
>>
>> http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/10/cbo-rich-pay-outsized-
>share-taxes/
>
>My gawd, the Moonie Times. No wonder you're such an ignorant putz.
https://www.cbo.gov/publication/43373
"In 2009, the shares of federal taxes paid by households in certain
income quintiles were:
Lowest quintile: 0.3 percent
Middle quintile: 9.4 percent
Highest quintile: 67.9 percent
"
The reflex lying Zippo flexes again...
>
>Overall tax burden for a billionaire in terms of percentage of income is
>significantly less than that of a family of four making $30,000, and
>that's a disgrace. Even most billionaires think it's a disgrace.
"
Typical lib...
NoBody
Oct 26, 2012, 6:08:15 AM10/26/12
to
having issues. *You* on the other hand vanish without a trace on
regular basis.
NoBody
Oct 26, 2012, 6:09:09 AM10/26/12
to
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:45:37 +0000 (UTC), 3206 Dead <de...@gone.com>
You took a lot of words to say:" I don't back up my own claims".
Typical lib.
Typical lib.
Mitchell Holman
Oct 26, 2012, 9:15:18 AM10/26/12
to
NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
news:h6ok889g82gjqp41n...@4ax.com:
Just show us your complaints about cutting
the military and "spending money we don't have"
when Republicans were doing it.
news:h6ok889g82gjqp41n...@4ax.com:
the military and "spending money we don't have"
when Republicans were doing it.
3206 Dead
Oct 26, 2012, 11:22:10 AM10/26/12
to
something, bubbles.
Lee Curtis
Oct 26, 2012, 9:32:15 PM10/26/12
to
Man of Mind wrote:
> On 10/21/2012 5:36 AM, "steve" wheezed his usual puffery:
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:56:17 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied to:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700, Phlip wrote:
> > > > hired Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones
> > > > responsible for the two biggest fuckups in American history...
> > >
> > > Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country.
> > > Nixon had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a
> > > secret plan to cut taxes and eliminate the deficit. Bush Junior
> > > had a secret plan create a new American hegemony.
> > >
> > > They all ended badly.
> >
> > Everything has ended badly for you
>
> Always with the personal attacks when you have precisely nothing.
>
> Tell us "steve", did you come to a battle of wits unarmed again,
> or were you just projecting your sociopathy for all to see?
>
> Example follows:
>
> > Must be hard for you.. to be so needy and know that nobody
> > anywhere gives a shit whether you live or die.
>
> And that somehow justifies how you lie about someone who
> disagrees with your narrow-minded perspective so completely
> that it makes you look like a blustering fool, right?
>
> --Got any of those "magnetic capacitors" yet, sparky?
Damn Kuntie - you are so stupid. What are you 14 years old?
> On 10/21/2012 5:36 AM, "steve" wheezed his usual puffery:
> >
> > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 04:56:17 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied to:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700, Phlip wrote:
> > > >
> >>>On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
> > > >
> > > > He's down to nothing but rote projectivity.
> >>>On Oct 20, 3:52 pm, MattB <trdell1234N...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real
> > > > economists have vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> > > >
> > > > Romney's plan is ... a secret. Really. But we have a hint; he
> > > > Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real
> > > > economists have vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> > > >
> > > > hired Bush's economic & foreign policy advisers. The ones
> > > > responsible for the two biggest fuckups in American history...
> > >
> > > Republicans with secret plans tend to really fuck up the country.
> > > Nixon had a secret plan to end the Vietnam war. Reagan had a
> > > secret plan to cut taxes and eliminate the deficit. Bush Junior
> > > had a secret plan create a new American hegemony.
> > >
> > > They all ended badly.
> >
> > Everything has ended badly for you
>
> Always with the personal attacks when you have precisely nothing.
>
> Tell us "steve", did you come to a battle of wits unarmed again,
> or were you just projecting your sociopathy for all to see?
>
> Example follows:
>
> > Must be hard for you.. to be so needy and know that nobody
> > anywhere gives a shit whether you live or die.
>
> And that somehow justifies how you lie about someone who
> disagrees with your narrow-minded perspective so completely
> that it makes you look like a blustering fool, right?
>
> --Got any of those "magnetic capacitors" yet, sparky?
Damn Kuntie - you are so stupid. What are you 14 years old?
RichTravsky
Oct 27, 2012, 12:36:32 AM10/27/12
to
NoBody wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:56:43 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >AlleyCat wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700 (PDT), In article <f0e3c8cd-3846-
> >> 4a4a-ac42-b...@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>, phli...@gmail.com
>
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:56:43 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >AlleyCat wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 20:40:32 -0700 (PDT), In article <f0e3c8cd-3846-
> >> 4a4a-ac42-b...@n7g2000pbj.googlegroups.com>, phli...@gmail.com
> >> > Obama's agenda is the American Jobs Act. The one real economists have
> >> > vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> At what cost? Give tax breaks to the private sector and they will
> >> provide MORE jobs than that. Taxing everyone to give a few jobs?
> >> Socialism. Communism? Both.
> >
> >Taxes are at their lowest since Ike.
>
> Cite?
http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/taxes/2010-05-10-taxes_N.htm
> >> > vetted and found will make 1.9M jobs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> At what cost? Give tax breaks to the private sector and they will
> >> provide MORE jobs than that. Taxing everyone to give a few jobs?
> >> Socialism. Communism? Both.
> >
> >Taxes are at their lowest since Ike.
>
> Cite?
...
Federal, state and local income taxes consumed 9.2% of all personal income in
2009, the lowest rate since 1950, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reports.
...
On average, though, the tax rate paid by all Americans rich and poor,
combined has fallen 26% since the recession began in 2007.
Sid9
Oct 27, 2012, 12:40:59 AM10/27/12
to
"RichTravsky" <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:508B64D0...@hotmail.com...
RichTravsky
Oct 27, 2012, 12:45:25 AM10/27/12
to
NoBody wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:33:50 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> <nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
> >NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 08:33:50 -0500, Mitchell Holman
> <nomailcomcast.net> wrote:
> >NoBody <NoB...@nowhere.com> wrote in
> >> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:05:12 -0500, Man of Mind
> >> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
> >>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
> >>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
> >>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
> >>>>>>> good at the time?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
> >>>> for a second term are.
> >>>
> >>>That was outlined last night at the debate..
> >>>
> >>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
> >>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
> >>
> >> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
> >> we don't have....
> >
> > You mean like Bush 41 did?
>
> Bush hasn't been President for four years now. Do try to keep up.
Hey Mitch, he doesn't know who Bush 41 is...
> >> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>On 10/23/2012 4:48 AM, "nobody" whined stridently:
> >>>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 06:15:42 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
> >>>>> On 10/22/2012 5:50 AM, "nobody" whined and opined:
> >>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:03:13 +0000 (UTC), 3196 Dead replied:
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 15:59:27 -0700, MattB wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Mitt Romney: Obama has 'no agenda' for second term
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This from a bozo whose only agenda seems to be whatever sounds
> >>>>>>> good at the time?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Your inability to describe what Obama's plans for a second term is
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I see that you've failed to address Romney's evasions..
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that you've failed to address what Obama's plans
> >>>> for a second term are.
> >>>
> >>>That was outlined last night at the debate..
> >>>
> >>>Pull back the military budget, invest it in our own
> >>>nation's infrastructure and public education..
> >>
> >> Well there's something new: cut the military and spend yet more money
> >> we don't have....
> >
> > You mean like Bush 41 did?
>
> Bush hasn't been President for four years now. Do try to keep up.
RT
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages