Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DOW -350 Day After Election....WHY?

88 views
Skip to first unread message

Tracey12

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 11:41:09 AM11/7/12
to
Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.


WHY?

Lee L. Curtis

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 12:27:59 PM11/7/12
to
Tracey12 wrote:

> Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
>
>
> WHY?



Fact check. The Dow is up 5000 points
since Obama took office, after LOSING 2000
points under our last Republican president.

Why IS it that the stock market always does
better under Democrats, do you think?





REPUBLICANS vs. DEMOCRATS ON THE ECONOMY
Washington Monthly

The results are simple: Democratic presidents have
consistently higher economic growth and consistently
lower unemployment than Republican presidents. If you
add in a time lag, you get the same result. If you
eliminate the best and worst presidents, you get the
same result. If you take a look at other economic
indicators, you get the same result. There's just no
way around it: Democratic administrations are better
for the economy than Republican administrations.

Under Democratic presidents, every income class did
well but the poorest did best. The bottom 20% had
average pretax income growth of 2.63% per year while
the top 5% showed pretax income growth of 2.11% per
year.

Republicans were polar opposites. Not only was their
overall performance worse than Democrats, but it was
wildly tilted toward the well off. The bottom 20% saw
pretax income growth of only .6% per year while the
top 5% enjoyed pretax income growth of 2.09% per year.
(What's more, the trendline is pretty clear: if the
chart were extended to show the really rich — the
top 1% and the top .1% — the Republican growth numbers
for them would be higher than the Democratic numbers.)

In other words, Republican presidents produce poor
economic performance because they're obsessed with
helping the well off. Their focus is on the wealthiest
5%, and the numbers show it. At least 95% of the country
does better under Democrats.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_05/006282.php





MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 12:34:10 PM11/7/12
to

Just as the Market Peak of the 90's was precisely one day
after the DOJ's ruling against Microsoft, so too, History will record
another Market Peak seen by all with eyes that did not refuse to see:


http://realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/07/26/fireworks_cnbcs_bartiromo_vs_
barney_frank_on_banks.html
CNBC: ATLAS SHRUGGED's PREQUEL, BARNEY FRANK VS MARIA BARTIROMO


http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/10/31/how-did-atlas-shrugged-and-ayn-
rand-predict-america-spinning-out-control/
How Did Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged'
Predict an America Spinning Out of Control?


Why SHOULD Good Men continue to sponsor their Adversaries?
Why SHOULD Good Men tolerate the intolerable, defend the indefensible.


It is NOT too late.

Good Men must vote with their pocket book
against Liberalism or forever live as their Slave.

Alan Ferris

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 2:22:25 PM11/7/12
to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
>
>
>WHY?

Obama win actually inspired a short-lived rally for Dow futures
http://blogs.marketwatch.com/thetell/2012/11/07/obama-win-actually-inspired-a-short-lived-rally-for-dow-futures/

The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA -1.96% actually did rally immediately
after President Obama was re-elected for a second term in the Oval Office.


Dow futures ran up more than 100 points after midnight EST, before sinking fast
and hard before the U.S. markets opened for trading Wednesday.

But by mid-day Wednesday, the Dow had tanked 300 points to 12,948 as investors
grew very anxious about what the president and the Republican-controlled House
of Representatives will do about $600 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts set
to kick in Jan. 1.
--
Ferrit

()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")

Zardoz

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 4:37:09 PM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 11:41 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
>
> WHY?

Because you touch yourself at night.

Paul Duca

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 4:43:54 PM11/7/12
to
WHY? Does Tracey cares, since he doesn't own any share of stock?


Paul

Tracey12

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 4:56:14 PM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 3:43 pm, Paul Duca <paul.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WHY? Does Tracey cares, since he doesn't own any share of stock?
>
> Paul

Paulette, you are right. I don't own a single share. I own far more
than that.

Tracey12

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 4:58:56 PM11/7/12
to
Because Democrats are not trustworthy.

Tracey12

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 5:00:06 PM11/7/12
to
On Nov 7, 1:22 pm, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

this does not concern you.



Tracey12

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 5:01:46 PM11/7/12
to
Did I ask for the history of the DOW JONES?
Why can't you answer the question?

gord...@swbell.net

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 5:27:18 PM11/7/12
to
Everyone should care, because if our economy collapses no one will
havea a job and those of us who have saved for our retirement will be
dead broke. Then China or Russia will step in and take over the whole
planet and set up a form of totalitarian government. Gordon

George Kerby

unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 7:25:00 PM11/7/12
to



On 11/7/12 4:27 PM, in article 9unl989c1k57rg8o8...@4ax.com,
Don't get little Pauline upset! She is just waiting to have another
encounter with elementary school honor student.

Alan Ferris

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 2:45:19 AM11/8/12
to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:00:06 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Nov 7, 1:22 pm, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>this does not concern you.
>

I tell them that the next time they invite me to your country.

duke

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 6:35:14 AM11/8/12
to
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:41:09 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.

>WHY?

The people that get the free handouts voted him back in. He's made every wrong
choice in history, but they don't care.

The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************

duke

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 6:36:26 AM11/8/12
to
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:27:59 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis" <cle...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Tracey12 wrote:
>
>> Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
>>
>>
>> WHY?

> Fact check. The Dow is up 5000 points
>since Obama took office, after LOSING 2000
>points under our last Republican president.

Fact check: The Dow was never higher than it was under President Bush 2 at
14,000+.

duke

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 6:37:43 AM11/8/12
to
And they will use the ducas of the world for the butt ramming.

holle...@gmx.com

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 7:25:23 AM11/8/12
to
> chart were extended to show the really rich � the
>
> top 1% and the top .1% � the Republican growth numbers
>
> for them would be higher than the Democratic numbers.)
>
>
>
> In other words, Republican presidents produce poor
>
> economic performance because they're obsessed with
>
> helping the well off. Their focus is on the wealthiest
>
> 5%, and the numbers show it. At least 95% of the country
>
> does better under Democrats.
>
>
>
> http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_05/006282.php

That's a 2% drop. During the Reagan presidency, it dropped 23% in one day. Bush owned ten sessions with drops between 5% - 11%

Lee L. Curtis

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 12:29:36 PM11/8/12
to
duke wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:27:59 -0600, "Lee L. Curtis"
> <cle...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Tracey12 wrote:
> >
> >> Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
> >>
> >>
> >> WHY?
>
> > Fact check. The Dow is up 5000 points
> > since Obama took office, after LOSING 2000
> > points under our last Republican president.
>
> Fact check: The Dow was never higher than it was under President
> Bush 2 at 14,000+.
>


And yet, just as with his fellow Republican
Hoover, the Dow actually LOST value under his
economic leadership.

Harvard should ask for their MBA back....






Salty Stan

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 12:52:23 PM11/8/12
to
On Nov 7, 11:41 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dow is down 350 pts and crashing day after Obama was reelected.
>
> WHY?

And the landslide continues today...

David Hartung

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 1:04:15 PM11/8/12
to
While two days does not constitute any sort of trend, should the market
continue going down, it could well be a harbinger of trouble.
Personally, I will not begin to be concerned until we see several weeks
of significant losses.

George Kerby

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 2:48:04 PM11/8/12
to



On 11/8/12 11:29 AM, in article
Er-dnYUVMZKdcQbN...@giganews.com, "Lee L. Curtis"
You should ask Igor for your brain back...


George Kerby

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 2:48:48 PM11/8/12
to



On 11/8/12 11:52 AM, in article
e8a69b6e-c510-4e48...@h15g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, "Salty
Yep. Off 70 points already...

George Kerby

unread,
Nov 8, 2012, 2:54:41 PM11/8/12
to



On 11/8/12 12:04 PM, in article
G_SdnSwCo4O9aQbN...@giganews.com, "David Hartung"
I will tell you this:

When December comes around and those ass crowns in DC don't do something
about Bush's Tax Cuts expiring at the end of the year, you're ginge to see
such a sell-off to avoid higher taxes on profits, that the drop in 87 will
like a small dip.

Take that to the bank, literally...

duke

unread,
Nov 9, 2012, 7:55:34 AM11/9/12
to
And like massa bama is doing now.
0 new messages