Is Google Ultra Left Wing?

[Tracey12]

I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
What have you heard?

Reportedly, Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
information on the search habits of certain individuals.

Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.

What do you think about Google's politics?

[bolivar]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:30:23 -0800, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:

> Any group that has much higher than average intelligence, tends to be
> Liberal.
>
> -Ramon
>
> Pretty much ALL folks in high tech are Liberals:
>
> - Bill Gates
> - Steve Ballmer
> - Steve Jobs (now, his widow)
> - Steve Wozniak
> - Jeff Bezos
> - The Google Boys
> - Mark Zuckerberg
> - etc.

Recent stories in the Press indicate high intelligence (IQ) is
meaningless. This is in the _major_ press. Further, there is NO
indication the individuals you mention have ANY higher IQ's than
anybody else. Their IQ's AFAIK are not released publicly
(OK, I think Bill Gates anyway did well there, in SAT scores)
are not public info... (SAT scores supposedly correlate well, according
to some, with IQ scores, which in any case are MEANINGLESS.)

Bill Gates has said, there isn't enough capitalism... This is NOT
a liberal position. Hugh Chavez has the liberal position, which
does NOT favor Capitalism, free-markets, laissez-faire. or any other
form of capitalism, unless HEAVILY HEAVILY HEAVILY HEAVILY regulated,
and TAXED TAXED TAXED TAXED TAXED - indeed - if allowed to exist at
all. IT's simply, from a LIBERAL standpoint - EVIL. And, from a
progressive standpoint as well. From a Democratic Party (the core
anyway) standpoint. EVIL EVIL EVIL EVIL.

Cuba, OTOH, seems to be embracing capitalism. I would not be at all
surprised if North Korea is not far from it.. Fine. WE WILL BURY THEM.
As I hit my shoe on the rostrum. Take THAT, capitalist FOOLS. We in
ObamAmerica, will BURY YOU neocapitalists..

WHY do we not target the LUXURY GOODS with a HIGH tax, upon the RICH????
JEWELS, boats, CARS, beyond a CERTAIN value??? It is irresponsible NOT
to. TAX such revenues. $$$$$$$. (better than just printing it..)

[Red Blade]

I wouldn't say "ultra" left wing, but Google blatently refuses to
recognize patriotic holidays on their front page, no matter how many
times vets and patriotic conservatives complain.

And yes, Google is basically the civilian Thought Police branch of the
NSA. They have links to many high-ranking Bush II-era cabinet members
(not sure about Obama).

--

Red Blade

President of alt.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, & talk.politics.misc
Fanfiction Committee Chairman of alt.tv.beavis-n-butthead

http://www.libertycolumns.com/

[good progressive]

It should not just include Jewels, etc as you suggest. The rich buy many
things. They have businesses and try to get richer and richer. We
should put a tax upon capital goods, to insure they cannot make more and
more and more and more evil profits.

If they make more money, they don't care if they pay a tax on luxury
goods. Your luxury tax solution is not sufficient. We must suppress
business itself.

OTOH, if they try to leave the country, they indeed should be
restrained. Or, if they try and retire, same thing. The peoples need
them working. This must be required.

I also feel, from what I read, that it will not be sufficient to just
target the super-filthy rich. We must go down-scale a bit, even perhaps
down to professionals making $100K or so, and consider them evil filthy
rich, and deal with them appropriately to insure that government
revenues, and services to the people are maintained properly.

The government should work with google to improve the Android system such
that it could be implanted. In time, the government/leadership could
move underground - and be called Morlocks. The people they serve could
be called Eloi, and enjoy themselves in the sunlight and air above. The
Morlocks could control the Eloi and serve them remotely... Provide a
good life for them. Toiling below-ground for the Eloi.

Just one thought. Progress may occur in other ways, I don't know, but
this is one possibility. Other ways the future may happen. All I know,
it's going to be good.







--
Progress!

[bobo fizmarkian]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 05:24:56 -0600, bolivar wrote:

What you don't understand...

DemonRats say they hate capitalism (or more, imply it strongly, in
public, many) but in private - they love it. They just want to control
it, and aren't particularly in favor of high growth and human development.

They want to control things... want a bigger government sector. Want a
chunk of national $ for themselves and cronies.

If that doesn't work, and things fall apart, fine. Lawyers can adapt to
anything. They're modern hunter-gathers, in a sense.. Meanwhile, come
up with a lot of stuff to justify this and that, made up largely.
Distorted. Those involved realize the political forces, and go along..

It's kind of glorious, in a way.




--
Bobo - (What's the Jive? Bird's alive!)

[good progressive]

I don't understand. There are many good Democrats like John
Edwards, who deeply love the peoples. Work their asses off for
the peoples, toil toil. Sacrifice.

He particularly, is and was for the poorest among us.




--
Progress!

[Mike Smith]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:30:23 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera"
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:

>On Dec 28, 4:05 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Any group that has much higher than average intelligence, tends to be
>Liberal.
>
>-Ramon
>
>Pretty much ALL folks in high tech are Liberals:
>
> - Bill Gates
> - Steve Ballmer
> - Steve Jobs (now, his widow)
> - Steve Wozniak
> - Jeff Bezos
> - The Google Boys
> - Mark Zuckerberg
> - etc.

BWAHAHAHAAHAHHAhahAhahah

You libtards know so much that just is not true.

Your old liberal myth has been refuted repeatedly... Even more times
that your ridiculous "ramon challenge".

Mike Smith

[Mitchell Holman]

Red Blade <pena...@yomomma.hot.invalid> wrote in news:kbk0an$6l4$1@dont-
email.me:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:05:48 -0800, Tracey12 wrote:
>
>> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
>> What have you heard?
>>
>> Reportedly, Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
>> information on the search habits of certain individuals.
>>
>> Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
>> to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.
>>
>> What do you think about Google's politics?
>
> I wouldn't say "ultra" left wing, but Google blatently refuses to
> recognize patriotic holidays on their front page, no matter how many
> times vets and patriotic conservatives complain.

Why should an international company cater to the
"patriotic holidays" of just one country?

[Mitchell Holman]

bolivar <bol...@simontheman.com> wrote in
news:8dadnaKBs48VHEDN...@giganews.com:

Who is Hugh Chavez?

[Mitchell Holman]

Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in news:2227bf8d-0beb-4ffa-925b-
7a0766...@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com:

http://betanews.com/2012/06/19/google-stands-against-government-spying-and-
censorship/

[duke]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:30:23 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>

wrote:

>On Dec 28, 4:05 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Any group that has much higher than average intelligence, tends to be
>Liberal.

Compared to what - your left big toe?

>-Ramon


The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************

[Kicking Ass and Taking Names]

Google's "politics" have one single motivation: Make more money.

Money is neither liberal nor conservative.

Tracey12, on the other hand, is brain dead.

[Ramon F Herrera]

On Dec 28, 7:45 am, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:30:23 -0800 (PST), "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
> wrote:
>
> >On Dec 28, 4:05 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> >> What have you heard?
>
> >> Reportedly,  Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
> >> information on the search habits of certain individuals.
>
> >> Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
> >> to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.
>
> >> What do you think about Google's politics?
>

>> Any group that has much higher than average intelligence,
>> tends to be Liberal.
>
> Compared to what - your left big toe?
>

Tendencies are self-referenced.

De nada,

-Ramon

[George Kerby]

On 12/28/12 6:07 AM, in article
5MCdnWT5ipkVFkDN...@giganews.com, "good progressive"

Oh Yes! I particularly remember him holding up his private jet for an hour
so he could get a $400 haircut from a Beverly Hills bimbo.

How thoughtful of him...

[bolivar]

If you don't know who Hugh Chavez ( a world leader ) is, I don't know that
I can tell you... LOOK IT UP..

(I did Americanize his name... a little, and don't know how to do accent
marks.. higher ASCII.)

And NO - I don't want to know how to do that... or Unicode, whatever.. I
do FINE with what I know... lower ASCII.

Most people I think would KNOW who Hugh Chavez is....

He'd likely know if he were here... and somebody called him that..
This is AMERICA... We embrace Hugos or Hughs. BOTH...

(Although - we don't like COMMIES - hint HINT to DEMONRATS... and to
Hugh..)

[Amanda Williams]

bolivar <bol...@simontheman.com> wrote in
news:8K-dnZq2g_oMQkLN...@giganews.com:

> Actually we could more usefully ask.... are rightards really as dumb as
they sound ??? I would answer yes !!! hard as it is to comprehend how any
(allegedley) sentient animal could be that terminally stupid and
survive....you heard it here first lmao
>



--
Amanda williams – Small but dangerous

[Bret Cahill]

> >> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> >> What have you heard?
>
> >> Reportedly,  Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
> >> information on the search habits of certain individuals.
>
> >> Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
> >> to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.
>
> >> What do you think about Google's politics?
>
> > I wouldn't say "ultra" left wing, but Google blatently refuses to
> > recognize patriotic holidays on their front page, no matter how many
> > times vets and patriotic conservatives complain.
>
>     Why should an international company cater to the
> "patriotic holidays" of just one country?

They could take the other approach and do every nationalist holiday in
every major country.

[Tom Sr.]

On Dec 30, 8:17 am, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Someone said:
> > > I wouldn't say "ultra" left wing, but Google blatently refuses to
> > > recognize patriotic holidays on their front page, no matter how
> > > many times vets and patriotic conservatives complain.

Exactly where are you? Because in the US I have seen Google repeated
change their logo ("doodle") for holidays, patriotic and otherwise, as
well as many other events.

> >     Why should an international company cater to the
> > "patriotic holidays" of just one country?

> --

> They could take the other approach and do every nationalist holiday in
> every major country.

Okay, clearly there is confusion here.

First off, there is MORE than just one Google website in the world;
there are over 100+.

For example, there is a US Google (www.google.com) and a Canadian
Google (www,google.ca).

Google recognizes holidays and other occasions for the nation each
site covers.

For example, both the US and Canada have Thanksgiving, but they are
not near each other in date. Google.ca recognize on it's site
Thanksgiving in Canada when it happens, while Google.com recognizes it
when it takes place in the USA.

This has been going on for years.

[Ramon F. Herrera]

On Dec 28, 4:05 am, Tracey12 <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:

[Alan Ferris]

On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 02:05:48 -0800 (PST), Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com>
wrote:

I think you need to put the tinfoil hat back on your head and stop believing all
the crap you hear and make up your own mind for once.
--
Ferrit

()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.

[jmas...@cox.net]

DEFINATELY LEFTIST!!!

[jmas...@cox.net]

On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 4:05:48 AM UTC-6, Tracey12 wrote:

[apour...@gmail.com]

Sure. The Bible even says so:

"The rich man had to admire the dishonest rascal for being so shrewd. And it is true that the children of this world are more shrewd in dealing with the world around them than are the children of the light."
Luke 16:8

So, indeed, evil/darkness is smarter than good/light, and Lord willing, the children of light will pray for and love the children of darkness, until they come to Jesus, and are saved from their sins which would take them to Hell, forever.

Jesus Christ forgives all sins, so we live victoriously as we follow Jesus, so we go to Heaven and not Hell http://holyrestoration.weebly.com/the-gospel.html

[Rudy Canoza]

On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 2:05:48 AM UTC-8, Tracey12 wrote:
> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> What have you heard?

Google is not "left-wing", and you're a fuckwit.

[Tom Sr.]

On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 4:25:35 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 2:05:48 AM UTC-8, Tracey12 wrote:
> > I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> > What have you heard?

> --

>
> Google is not "left-wing", and you're a fuckwit.

And YOU are replying to a post that was made nearly 5 years ago, Ruby. GEES.

Now have your ravings while you stomp your little feet.

. . .

[Mellakon]

Rudy Canoza wrote

I hate left wing socialist Billionaires because they're all richer
than Trump and could hire him as a Butler.

Bill Gates
Steve Ballmer
George Soros

Steve Jobs (now, his widow)

Steve Wozniak
Jeff Bezos
The Google Boys
Mark Zuckerberg
etc.

[£Æ§RÐÄ$$©]

Mellakon wrote

Just how can they be real American Billionaires if they didn't
inherit their money the traditional way, like Trump?

Those stupid assholes started from scratch and are self made
Billionaires, when Donald did it the old fashioned way! Money
from Daddy!

There was a nearly $1 million loan from Trump’s father that was
part of the deal — Fred Trump’s Village Construction Corp.
provided the loan to help repay draws on a Chase Manhattan
credit line that Fred Trump had arranged for his son as he
built the hotel. But that loan was only a small part of the
father’s involvement in the deal.

Trump’s father — whose name had been besmirched in New York
real estate circles after investigations into windfall profits
and other abuses in his real estate projects — was an essential
silent partner in Trump’s initiative. In effect, the son was
the front man, relying on his father’s connections and wealth,
while his father stood silently in the background to avoid
drawing attention to himself.



Fred Trump — along with the Hyatt hotel chain — jointly
guaranteed the $70 million construction loan from Manufacturers
Hanover bank, “each assuming a 50 percent share of the
obligation and each committing itself to complete the project
should Donald be unable to finish it,” according to veteran
Trump chronicler Wayne Barrett in his 1992 book, “Trump: The
Deals and the Downfall.”

Fred Trump’s signature on the guarantee ensured the new hotel
would get built. “No document in the long paper trail attached
to the Commodore deal better demonstrated the lack of bank
confidence in the Donald or the project, and none made clear
the limits of his promoter role,” Barrett wrote. Trump simply
did not have the credit or connections to obtain such financing
on his own. “It was Fred’s two-decade-old relationship with a
top Equitable officer, Ben Holloway, that had helped entice
them to do the project.”

[Rudy Canoza]

On 8/4/2017 2:19 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
> On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 4:25:35 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza wrote:
>> On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 2:05:48 AM UTC-8, Tracey12 wrote:
>>> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
>>> What have you heard?
>> --
>>
>> Google is not "left-wing", and you're a fuckwit.
>
>
> And YOU are replying to a post that was made nearly 5 years ago

What's it to you, fucktard? *Still* not getting any, fatso?

So Saturrday, today. A guy I have been in touch with says he will
come over around 3pm. Get call; he has been called into work. Can
come tonight around 8pm. Okay. 8pm he calls and says he is close. I
tell him to be careful where he parks as some areas here are strickly
resident parking. He says he is out front of my building. I go down
to meet in and bring him in. He isn't there. I call him because all I
have is a simple fucking cell phone that takes me 5 minutes to write
1 fucking message. He keeps sending me texts saying he knew I really
didn't want him to come. I send him a text telling me to ANSWER MY
CALLS. He answers. He won't come back. He says he knows I don't want
to really see him. I tell him I came downstairs to meet him him and
he wasn't there. How long dfid he wait? :"Long enough." He won't come
back. WHY THE FUCK TO GUYS DO THIS TO ME???

Franklin Homo Hummel, "feeling LIKE SHIT"
September 24, 2016

[all misspellings - "Saturrday", "strickly", "dfid" - as in the original]

You need more one-time queer "hookups" like you need (another) hole in
the head, Hummel.

[dr yacub]

Rudy Canoza wrote

> On 8/4/2017 2:19 PM, Tom Sr. wrote:
>> On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 4:25:35 PM UTC-4, Rudy Canoza
>> wrote:
>>> On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 2:05:48 AM UTC-8, Tracey12
>>> wrote:
>>>> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical
>>>> left wing. What have you heard?
>>> --
>>>
>>> Google is not "left-wing", and you're a fuckwit.
>>
>>
>> And YOU are replying to a post that was made nearly 5 years
>> ago
>
> What's it to you, fucktard? *Still* not getting any, fatso?

We are not a nation of fatsos. We're just well fed and
prosperous, and the airlines continue to reduce our seat size
because they're trying to keep us slim for our own good.

Trump needs to stop the government from interfering!


‘Incredible shrinking airline seat’ forces FAA to reconsider
regulating seat size.'


http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2017/07/31/incredible-shrinking-
airline-seat-forces-faa-to-reconsider-regulating-seat-size.html

Why does the FAA they hate capitalism?

[ghers...@gmail.com]

On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 3:05:48 AM UTC-7, Tracey12 wrote:
> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> What have you heard?
>

> Reportedly, Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
> information on the search habits of certain individuals.
>
> Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
> to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.
>
> What do you think about Google's politics?

just read there news google could not be more left

[tehthund...@gmail.com]

@the Good Progressive
You're idea of "progress" sounds a lot more like socialistic totalitarianism. What in your right mind makes you think suppressing business is a good thing? Who the Hell are you to propose more taxes on already taxed goods? How would this in any way help the current state of our economy? Are you really so fascist as to suggest that wealthy Americans restrict their business to the soil it was made on as if that would not ultimately stifle and cripple entire economic sectors?
You need to take a more critical view point of your stance there. You're thinking is highly unrealistic.

[tehthund...@gmail.com]

Google is left wing, you fucking twit

[ohte...@gmail.com]

On Friday, December 28, 2012 at 5:05:48 AM UTC-5, Tracey12 wrote:
> I have heard many times that Google is part of the radical left wing.
> What have you heard?
>
> Reportedly, Google works with Obama's intel agencies to hand over
> information on the search habits of certain individuals.
>
> Any company that supplies info on its users to the Obama admin has got
> to be a radical left wing org, in my opinion.
>
> What do you think about Google's politics?

They hate Jesus, babies, and America.