C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

[John Doe]

Has this happened before?

Thursday, May 17, 2012, C-SPAN had a call-in program about the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and it prohibited men from
calling in.

[Eddie Haskell]

"John Doe" <jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
news:jpcrgc$os3$1...@dont-email.me...

It's a left-wing war on men!

-Eddie Haskell

[2966 Dead]

On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:40:12 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:

> Well---one thing fer sure
>
> That doesn't affect you....

I wonder if Doe whined when the Senate had its panel and women's
reproductive health and allowed no women on the panel.

[Eddie Haskell]

"2966 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:jpe318$9su$2...@dont-email.me...

It wasn't about reproductive heath. It was about Hussein's war on the
catholic church and religious freedom, you fascist liar.

"Aw. Poor little rich cunts."

-2966 Dead, Monday, May 07, 2012 10:41 AM

"Oh, my, it must be so rough growing up white and male in America."

-2966 Dead, Friday, April 27, 2012 2:20 PM

"Well, he [Zimmerman] just shot and killed a kid for no reason at all."

-2915 Dead, Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:59 PM

"Oh, I think he [Zimmerman] should be convicted of manslaughter."

-2960 Dead, Saturday, April 14, 2012 7:40 PM

-Eddie Haskell




-Eddie Haskell

[John Doe]

2966 Dead <dead gone.com> wrote:

> Yoorghis wrote:
>> "Eddie Haskell" <rghrhhc sasas.com> wrote:
>>> "John Doe" <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote

>>>> Has this happened before?

Nobody knows?

>>>> Thursday, May 17, 2012, C-SPAN had a call-in program about
>>>> the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and it prohibited men
>>>> from calling in.
>>>
>>>It's a left-wing war on men!

> I wonder if Doe whined when the Senate had its panel and women's
> reproductive health and allowed no women on the panel.

Are you from the United States?

Accusing ordinary men of being "diseased" with violence against
women reeks of tyranny.

--













> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: 2966 Dead <dead gone.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
> Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
> Lines: 22
> Message-ID: <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Injection-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:54:33 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="FAJ5oENKWUEA40ifQTWuPw"; logging-data="10142"; mail-complaints-to="abuse eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX183S0lKHnaRNiFRt2x7wk6HhY6+7IqAG6g="
> User-Agent: Pan/0.137 (The Mattel and Mars Bar Quick Energy Chocobot Hour; GIT 9a6aef1 git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:ahkTDH7Ah7qwnsgGCIk2ujG2E7w=
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171480 alt.politics.liberalism:394437 alt.politics.democrats:354359 alt.society.liberalism:441867 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1071460
>

[John Doe]

Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:

> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:

>> Accusing ordinary men of being "diseased" with violence against
>> women reeks of tyranny.
>

> Oh?

It stinks.

> THen you have no problem with a state law requireing a
> un-necessary vaginal probe rammed up a woman's vagina as a means
> to deter a woman from excercising a right under the
> constitution?

Which state law? What are you talking about? I would ask about the
"rammed" part, but obviously you are lying (as usual). If you are
talking about killing an unborn child, point to that "right" in
our constitution.

So you aren't knowledgeable enough about C-SPAN to know whether
they have ever prohibited men from commenting on the subject of a
call-in program? I am familiar with C-SPAN, I don't recall that
happening before.

--












"No-archive" author

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-14.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Yoorghis Jurgis.net
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,free.UseNet

> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

> Message-ID: <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 17
> X-Complaints-To: abuse easynews.com
> Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
> X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 22:07:37 -0600
> X-Received-Bytes: 1761
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171544 alt.politics.liberalism:394543 alt.politics.democrats:354546 alt.society.liberalism:441993 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1071712
>

[John Doe]

A cannibal-left liberal who is so much of a coward, he uses the
"no archive" switch to prevent the UseNet archive from storing his
posts, so that he can run away from all of his lies.

Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-14.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
> From: Yoorghis Jurgis.net
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,free.UseNet
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

> Message-ID: <ec9nr71hmunk4hfmi3f93vkmdcso6sa7b2 4ax.com>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me>

> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 47

> X-Complaints-To: abuse easynews.com
> Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
> X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.

> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 08:46:03 -0600
> X-Received-Bytes: 2830
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171570 alt.politics.liberalism:394624 alt.politics.democrats:354616 alt.society.liberalism:442076 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1071972
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 05:19:56 +0000 (UTC), John Doe

> <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
>>Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>> Accusing ordinary men of being "diseased" with violence against
>>>> women reeks of tyranny.
>>>
>>> Oh?
>>
>>It stinks.
>>
>>> THen you have no problem with a state law requireing a
>>> un-necessary vaginal probe rammed up a woman's vagina as a means
>>> to deter a woman from excercising a right under the
>>> constitution?
>>
>>Which state law? What are you talking about? I would ask about the
>>"rammed" part, but obviously you are lying (as usual). If you are
>>talking about killing an unborn child, point to that "right" in
>>our constitution.
>

> At least two states now require vaginal ultrasound
> procedures---totally unnecessary for any known reason.
>
> "rammed" is appropriate--it is FORCED and against the will of the
> woman(citizen).
>
> A fetus has no individual rights, you loony fuckwit. A fetus has
> EVERY right a female citizen has. You have to be a citizen (required)
> to have "rights" under the constitution. A state MAY have "compelling
> reasons" to mitigate some of those rights---but not to enforce
> screwball religious beliefs of Some dingbats.

>
>>So you aren't knowledgeable enough about C-SPAN to know whether
>>they have ever prohibited men from commenting on the subject of a
>>call-in program?
>

> Happens all the time
>
> The screen has clear parameters of who calls on what line, what issue,
> including men/women.
>
> IDIOT
>
>
>

[Dänk 42Ø]

Liberals objected to what they said were not enough women being allowed
to testify at a recent House committee hearing on mandated insurance
coverage of birth control. Had Democrats controlled the committee, I'm
sure they would prohibited men from speaking.

Anyway, it's pathetic that Democrats are trying to make the "Violence
Against Women" Act a campaign issue. If the law is not renewed, does
this mean assaulting women becomes legal? Of course not, but this is
what they are implying. The law is also unconstitutional, violating the
14th Amendment's guarantee of EQUAL protection of the law. Men are not
included in the Violence Against Women act, and there is no corresponding
Violence Against Men Act.

A quick search reveals that Republican opposition to renewal of VAWA
stems from Democrats' attempt to include same-sex couples. As a gay man
myself, I find it bizarre that gays who demand marriage "equality" would
expect preferential treatment in their marital disputes. I'm not even
sure how this would work, with two MEN getting into a fight and each one
trying to sue the other under the Violence Against WOMEN law.

[John Doe]

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject
to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and
of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce
any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of
citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any
person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws."

There is no way that our founders intended government to strip men
of their natural greater physical ability and authority in
marriage. But apparently the 14th amendment ended up doing that. A
way around that would have been to provide a distinction between
marriage and state, so that a wife and children would not be
within government jurisdiction.

Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
household.

And now thanks to the Internet, kids are going to be unbelievably
intelligent. And with more than enough nuclear weapons to destroy
the world several times over, we will be too big to fail. So we
will find some way out of any mess ever-expanding government gets
us into...

[Eddie Haskell]

"Dänk 42Ø" <da...@purpleurkle.org> wrote in message
news:BLCdnateatlLfibS...@earthlink.com...

> On Mon, 21 May 2012 07:39:56 +0000, John Doe wrote:
>
>> Has this happened before?
>>
>> Thursday, May 17, 2012, C-SPAN had a call-in program about the Violence
>> Against Women Act (VAWA), and it prohibited men from calling in.
>
> Liberals objected to what they said were not enough women being allowed
> to testify at a recent House committee hearing on mandated insurance
> coverage of birth control. Had Democrats controlled the committee, I'm
> sure they would prohibited men from speaking.
>
> Anyway, it's pathetic that Democrats are trying to make the "Violence
> Against Women" Act a campaign issue. If the law is not renewed, does
> this mean assaulting women becomes legal? Of course not, but this is
> what they are implying. The law is also unconstitutional, violating the
> 14th Amendment's guarantee of EQUAL protection of the law. Men are not
> included in the Violence Against Women act, and there is no corresponding
> Violence Against Men Act.
>
> A quick search reveals that Republican opposition to renewal of VAWA
> stems from Democrats' attempt to include same-sex couples. As a gay man
> myself,

Barrrfff..

Cough! Cough!

BARRRFFFF!!!

Cough! Cough! Cough!

-Eddie Haskell

[John Doe]

Nobody forges or alters posts in the UseNet archive.
Admit it, by posting "no archive", you're running away
from all of the lies you've told.

Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews!core-easynews-01!easynews.com!en-nntp-11.dc1.easynews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail

> From: Yoorghis Jurgis.net
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,free.UseNet
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

> Message-ID: <fg6or7dde83s27i58eaq9cm4s7jq5q88og 4ax.com>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me> <ec9nr71hmunk4hfmi3f93vkmdcso6sa7b2 4ax.com> <jpgn9p$g6p$2 dont-email.me>

> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
> X-No-Archive: yes
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 7

> X-Complaints-To: abuse easynews.com
> Organization: Forte Inc. http://www.forteinc.com/apn/
> X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.

> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 16:58:45 -0600
> X-Received-Bytes: 1588
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171601 alt.politics.liberalism:394771 alt.politics.democrats:354746 alt.society.liberalism:442233 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072427

>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:52:41 +0000 (UTC), John Doe
> <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
>>A cannibal-left liberal who is so much of a coward, he uses the
>>"no archive" switch
>

> Does it piss you off you cant forge and alter them?
>
>

[John Doe]

Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:

> John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Nobody forges or alters posts in the UseNet archive.
>

> Sure they do
>
> They include the forgery and the relevant headers, post, then
> someone replies.

No, they don't. In fact, not long ago I raised the subject in an
appropriate technical group. Lots of discussion, that all of it
pointing to the fact that forging a post/thread is pretty near
impossible. Even if it weren't, hiding your posts wouldn't stop it
from happening.

[RichTravsky]

It's "Violence Against Women Act", not "Violence Against Men Act"

[RichTravsky]

Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:20:22 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
> <rgh...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
> >

> Well---one thing fer sure
>
> That doesn't affect you....

Post of the Day!

[RichTravsky]

John Doe wrote:
>
> 2966 Dead <dead gone.com> wrote:
>
> > Yoorghis wrote:
> >> "Eddie Haskell" <rghrhhc sasas.com> wrote:
> >>> "John Doe" <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote
>
> >>>> Has this happened before?
>
> Nobody knows?

Nobody cares.

> >>>> Thursday, May 17, 2012, C-SPAN had a call-in program about
> >>>> the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and it prohibited men
> >>>> from calling in.
> >>>
> >>>It's a left-wing war on men!
>
> > I wonder if Doe whined when the Senate had its panel and women's
> > reproductive health and allowed no women on the panel.
>
> Are you from the United States?
>
> Accusing ordinary men of being "diseased" with violence against
> women reeks of tyranny.

But of course you do. If a wife is nagging her husband to death,
and the husband uses reasonable force to maintain order in his own
home - You

[RichTravsky]

John Doe wrote:
>
> Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> > John Doe <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> Accusing ordinary men of being "diseased" with violence against
> >> women reeks of tyranny.
> >
> > Oh?
>
> It stinks.

Does this stink?
\

But of course you do. If a wife is nagging her husband to death,
and the husband uses reasonable force to maintain order in his own
home - You

Does beating women make you feel like a man?

[RichTravsky]

A cannibal-rightwing moron (which is redundant) who is so much of a coward,
she uses a fake name to hide behind

[RichTravsky]

Marriage is not mentioned in the Constitution, you idiot.

> marriage. But apparently the 14th amendment ended up doing that. A

How?

> way around that would have been to provide a distinction between
> marriage and state, so that a wife and children would not be
> within government jurisdiction.
>
> Democracy is great until its filthy hands reach beyond the head of
> household.

So, this means what? You're not allowed to beat your wife?

[John Doe]

Nope, I take plenty of risks in the real world.

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4FBC6811.DCF830B hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:31:13 -0600
> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me> <ec9nr71hmunk4hfmi3f93vkmdcso6sa7b2 4ax.com> <jpgn9p$g6p$2 dont-email.me>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 10
> X-Received-Bytes: 1449
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171651 alt.politics.liberalism:394835 alt.politics.democrats:354798 alt.society.liberalism:442305 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072651

[John Doe]

I take plenty of risks in the real world, Travesty, how bout you?

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad!post01.iad!not-for-mail

> Message-ID: <4FBC6786.E7966665 hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:28:54 -0600

> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com

> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 40
> X-Received-Bytes: 2178
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171650 alt.politics.liberalism:394834 alt.politics.democrats:354797 alt.society.liberalism:442304 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072650

[John Doe]

Travesty's Church of an Ever Expanding Government uses police
officers with billy clubs and guns to keep order everywhere else
in society, even for stifling speech. But cannibal-left liberals
like Travesty dictate that marriage must be a fairy tale happily
ever after relationship. Or else government will force it to be
that way. How ironic.

It's called "legislating morality". But they only enforce the
morality that is politically correct for themselves. They don't
really give a damn about the people they are supposed to be
helping.

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4FBC6748.73CC5CAF hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:27:52 -0600

> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com

> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 31
> X-Received-Bytes: 1812
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171649 alt.politics.liberalism:394833 alt.politics.democrats:354796 alt.society.liberalism:442303 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072649

[John Doe]

A cannibal-left liberal "concerned" about women...

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.glorb.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4FBC66F6.F7E17CD5 hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:26:30 -0600

> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 21
> X-Received-Bytes: 1411
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171648 alt.politics.liberalism:394832 alt.politics.democrats:354795 alt.society.liberalism:442302 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072648

>
> Yoorghis Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 21 May 2012 12:20:22 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"

>> <rghrhhc sasas.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >"John Doe" <jdoe usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message
>> >news:jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me...

[John Doe]

In that case, one should ask the cannibal-left liberal Travesty
what happened to the 14th amendment...

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4FBC66E2.EEA761E1 hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:26:10 -0600

> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

> Subject: So? Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me>

> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Lines: 9
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171647 alt.politics.liberalism:394831 alt.politics.democrats:354794 alt.society.liberalism:442301 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072647

[BillyBobMarley]

Like when Gary(yoorghis) threatened to blow up Mt Rushmore and said he
could make it look like a mining accident ? He wishes to God he never
posted that and will haunt his radical ass until the day he dies.

[MattB]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:26:38 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Wed, 23 May 2012 04:10:37 +0000 (UTC), John Doe
><jd...@usenetlove.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> They include the forgery and the relevant headers, post, then
>>> someone replies.
>>
>>No, they don't. In fact, not long ago I raised the subject in an
>>appropriate technical group.
>

>THat makes a difference how---when 99.9% of all you nutjobs have no
>clue about the "technical" component---and only use forgery,
>alteration as a means of trolling?
>
>IDIOT

I don't believe you could have said so much BS. You Yoorghis that
is continually editing post to change a poster original totally into
another meaning to support your racism and Progressive Agenda.

"alteration as a means of trolling"

Yes you are that. Hypocrite. LOL

[Dänk 42Ø]

Barf all you want. I'm the one arguing that giving gays special status
under VAWA contradicts their demands for marriage equality.

But I feel I must amend my earlier statement, where I said that gay
rights advocates were behind the attempt to expand VAWA to cover same-sex
couples. What I see is an attempt by Democrats to exploit gays by
including the provision, knowing that Republican opposition to it will
allow them to brand them as "homophobic" and especially "anti-women."

Including same-sex couples in VAWA is absurd and does nothing to protect
gay rights, and actually harms them by making it appear gays want special
rights. Either gays and their personal relationships are equal to
everyone else, or they are not. Democrats can exploit gays this way
because they know most members of the gay community are too high on crack
to notice the contradiction, and will vote for them anyway even if they
do notice.

[Lamont Cranston]

On 5/22/2012 4:03 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Nobody forges or alters posts in the UseNet archive.
> Admit it, by posting "no archive", you're running away
> from all of the lies you've told.

QUIT YOUR FUCKING TOP POSTING, YOU BRAIN-DEAD MORON.

[Lamont Cranston]

On 5/22/2012 10:54 PM, John Doe wrote:
> Nope, I take plenty of risks in the real world.

You also top post, a sure sign of rampant stupidity.

[John Doe]

A cannibal-left liberal netcop wannabe...

Lamont Cranston <Friend Umbra.org> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!not-for-mail
> From: Lamont Cranston <Friend Umbra.org>

> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,free.UseNet
> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act

> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:12:43 -0700
> Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de
> Lines: 40
> Message-ID: <jpjqt7$tqd$6 news.datemas.de>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me> <ec9nr71hmunk4hfmi3f93vkmdcso6sa7b2 4ax.com> <jpgn9p$g6p$2 dont-email.me> <fg6or7dde83s27i58eaq9cm4s7jq5q88og 4ax.com> <jph5vc$ggg$1 dont-email.me>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> X-Trace: news.datemas.de cpzIZPKlXXEBTxy298Ir6RVJRDRYK12wpOOdJY+ioUE5kFpbo98rzITuU2zxiENggESwxLl2K9XfWRtd/dw8uirMJLM18YInXJa86MyP2UIyJTPOiTwN9K/ZNqoDboyTR94KGjpDB9ZiGZwAvz5YQQhEnh0fbAey+3PB1HpkW0btwexI1iZ/bg==
> X-Complaints-To: abuse datemas.de
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:12:39 +0000 (UTC)
> In-Reply-To: <jph5vc$ggg$1 dont-email.me>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171697 alt.politics.liberalism:394936 alt.politics.democrats:354856 alt.society.liberalism:442411 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1073084

[John Doe]

Cope with it...

Lamont Cranston <Friend Umbra.org> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.datemas.de!news.datemas.de!not-for-mail
> From: Lamont Cranston <Friend Umbra.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

> Subject: Re: Travesty butt-rapes his own mother
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:49 -0700
> Organization: Datemas.de http://www.news.datemas.de
> Lines: 41
> Message-ID: <jpjqv9$tqd$7 news.datemas.de>
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <qPuur.19421$cO5.18037 unlimited.newshosting.com> <pv2lr7pbom5363s7e91vsftknnk1n5k4q3 4ax.com> <jpe318$9su$2 dont-email.me> <jpebpq$6n4$3 dont-email.me> <p54mr7ptvgoma7qsl7bq6crkshg89l9k53 4ax.com> <jpf7ls$po1$1 dont-email.me> <ec9nr71hmunk4hfmi3f93vkmdcso6sa7b2 4ax.com> <jpgn9p$g6p$2 dont-email.me> <4FBC6811.DCF830B hotmMOVEail.com> <jphu25$h5$3 dont-email.me>

> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> X-Trace: news.datemas.de QI1/VYv2SuyGvbMgOxr6Eh+D7ieA6RNyODhFXQULhAFhkL1Y8Yy4CRnlMj25aaw86Rec5iivvHsx2G5dvD4UeY0x4kx9gBVS2JtPUYrTrxdHH76uUUhCBJnKX9TO+1wEVIS1dBcJpya0ZEFIh/+0VjB1pqu/OGxeknEMRk2xtfVMqNlPYW2NJQ==
> X-Complaints-To: abuse datemas.de
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:13:45 +0000 (UTC)
> In-Reply-To: <jphu25$h5$3 dont-email.me>

> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1

> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171698 alt.politics.liberalism:394937 alt.politics.democrats:354857 alt.society.liberalism:442413 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1073088

[MattB]

On Wed, 23 May 2012 22:47:34 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>What you get is a reflection of what you really are inferring---minus
>the bullshit evasion

Yes like you can read minds. Satan your master? Tell me oh
powerful one. What is my middle name?

I mean if you can read minds...........

Face it your just a lying Democrat saying only racist are republican.
That is pure BS.


>
>You cannot be "against racism"---when you admit that you support a
>racist party.

Why you do?. I will not become a lying democrat like you. Sorry
neither will I be racist have to many Black friends. Then again the
word they have called you I can't. LOL

The Black Klan or NBPP is very racist.




>
>IDIOT

[Dänk 42Ø]

And yet leftards are trying to portray it as a constitutional right.

I personally believe that the government has no business recognizing
personal relationships. Marriage "equality" means getting the government
out of the marriage business completely, and letting religious and
secular markets determine what "marriage" is.

Leftarded gays shot themselves in the foot when they decided to protest
Proposition 8 by insulting the polygamous faction of Mormons. Actually,
it was the ANTI-polygamous LDS faction that supported Proposition 8,
because it feared that legalization of same-sex marriage would set a
precedent for legalization of polygamy. The "mainstream" LDS faction's
moral superiority over the FLDS stems from the fact that polygamy is
illegal, keeping the polygamous FLDS on the fringes of Utah society.

If polygamy were legalized, the moral superiority of the LDS would
evaporate, leading to a theological battle where the "heretical" FLDS
would try to reclaim its title as the true heir of Joseph Smith and his
teachings. Blah blah blah, but now you see why the "mainstream" Mormon
church is so hellbent on opposing same-sex marriage.

The simple solution is to ban government recognition of ALL types of
marriage. Consenting adults of any gender and number should be allowed
to form relationships of their choosing and describe them with whatever
words they want, but it is none of the government's business.

"Marriage" is a generic term, but churches could trademark terms for
their version of marriage, such as "Catholic Married" (no divorce
permitted), "Episcopalian Married" (divorce only permitted after wife's
head is cut off), or "United Church of Christ Married" (divorce mandated
after spouse renounces Barack Obama as his/her personal savior).

[John Doe]

A homosexual acting like he loves women?
What a novel concept...

RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:

> Path: eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad!not-for-mail
> Message-ID: <4FBC689D.52671A78 hotmMOVEail.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 22:33:33 -0600

> From: RichTravsky <traRvEsky hotmMOVEail.com>
> Organization: Banzai Institute
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
> X-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.society.liberalism,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

> Subject: Re: C-SPAN prevents men from commenting on the Violence Against Women Act
> References: <jpcrgc$os3$1 dont-email.me> <BLCdnateatlLfibSnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d earthlink.com> <jph0au$g21$1 dont-email.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Lines: 64
> X-Received-Bytes: 3804
> Xref: mx04.eternal-september.org alt.politics.usa.republican:171652 alt.politics.liberalism:394836 alt.politics.democrats:354799 alt.society.liberalism:442306 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1072652
>
> John Doe wrote:

[RichTravsky]

John Doe wrote:
>
> A homosexual acting like he loves women?
> What a novel concept...

How's that working out for you?