Gary Roselles' Self-Avowed Poster-Child Of Uneducated, Bitter, Unreconstituted RACISM
pyjamarama
> On 10 Feb 2007 08:22:50 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
>
>
>
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 9, 9:49 pm, C...@Knicklas.com wrote:
> >> On 9 Feb 2007 13:29:45 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> >> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Feb 9, 12:52 pm, C...@Knicklas.com wrote:
> >> >> On 9 Feb 2007 11:28:54 -0800, "pyjamarama"
> >> >> The issue is YOU not hiring blacks because you're a
> >> >> racist, homophobe, bigot and a major idiot.
>
> >> >Sounds like more of your fuckwitted "innuendo", numbnuts...
>
> >> >Got anything other than you just "saying so?"
>
> >> Your silence ! !
>
> >According to your previous posts on the subject, you claim I was
> >anything but silent:
>
> You still are.
>
> You've not answered.
>
That's not what you said HERE, asswipe:
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
Why the sudden change?
Hmmm??
Amazing how often you're made to look foolish, isn't it, Roselles?
Not to mention racist.
______________________________________
Gary "Click" Roselles, poster child for stupid, uneducated, old-
schoole RACISM:
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
pyjamarama
> On 11 Feb 2007 06:00:07 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> You still are.
>
> >> You've not answered.
>
> >That's not what you said HERE, asswipe:
>
> It's not about what "I say", stupid
'Course it is, asswipe...
You made (and continue to make) a series of statements that you know
have absolutely NO basis in fact.
You know this because you made them up out of whole cloth.
This is why you're completely unable to provide even a shred of
corraborating evidence as to their veracity.
That makes you a LIAR and a post forger, plain and simple, case
closed.
Why would anyone see fit to "answer" someone who's so brazenly and
recklessly lied about the very subject he now ask questions about?
Hmmmm???
I don't need to ask you questions to prove beyond all doubt that
YOU'RE a racist...
I simply repost your own words...
Like THESE:
Gary "Click" Roselles, poster child for stupid, uneducated, old-
schoole RACISM:
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
Checkmate, asshole.
pyjamarama
> On 11 Feb 2007 09:08:29 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
>
>
>
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 11, 8:07 am, C...@Knicklas.com wrote:
> >> On 11 Feb 2007 06:00:07 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> >> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> You still are.
>
> >> >> You've not answered.
>
> >> >That's not what you said HERE, asswipe:
>
> >> It's not about what "I say", stupid
>
> >'Course it is, asswipe...
>
>
> I know YOU"D like it to be
Oh, but it is...
You owe us some cites, asswipe...
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
When we gonna see 'em?
Maybe you'll post 'em after you show us that incoming call
"statement?"
<SNICKER>
> Your political ideology is clearly racist
Gary Roselles' racist political ideology:
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles
<C...@KNICKLAS.COM>wrote:
"What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished black
scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a day
in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
Amazing how often you're made to look foolish, isn't it?
Heh heh
pyjamarama
> On 12 Feb 2007 09:13:44 -0800, "pyjamarama"> The "cites" are Crickets when it comes to YOU
> answering:
Don't speak babble, Roselles...
Get back to us after you've stopped drinking.
Gary Roselles' drunken, babbling racist :
pyjamarama
> On 12 Feb 2007 13:15:36 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Feb 12, 12:29 pm, C...@Knicklas.com wrote:
> >> On 12 Feb 2007 09:13:44 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> >> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >You owe us some cites, asswipe...
>
> >> The "cites" are Crickets when it comes to YOU
> >> answering:
>
> >Don't speak babble, Roselles...
>
>
> Answer the question
Okay -- you're a stupid, babbling racist...
Here's the proof:
Gary Roselles, stupid, babbling racist:
pyjamarama
> On 12 Feb 2007 16:49:28 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Answer the question
>
> >Okay -- you're a stupid, babbling racist...
>
> How does that answer the question of your racist views,
> POOPY-JAMAS?
Still waiting for you to cite a single "racist view" I've posted,
numbnuts.
So far (re: many years) you've completely failed to do so.
YOUR racist views, OTOH, are fairly thick on the ground...
Here are but a few of the more vile ones:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles
<C...@KNICKLAS.COM>wrote:
"What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished black
scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a day
in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles
<rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
Amazing how often you're made to look foolish, isn't it?
Heh heh
Sick fucker.
>
> All you're doing is desperately trying to change the
> subject.
The subject is now and has always been your disgusting brand of hate-
filled racism and bigotry.
I've stuck to that "subject" rather faithfully, wouldn't you say?
SMACK!!!
pyjamarama
> On 13 Feb 2007 08:14:10 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Still waiting for you to cite a single "racist view" I've posted,
> >numbnuts
>
> you----avowed racists like Barta, LeftWing Skank,
> Silliary, is proof
>
> Your continued silence in answering your racist hiring
> practices
>
> Your continued attempt to shift the issue from YOUR
> character to those who tell the truth about you
>
> Your continual support and embracing a racist,
> homophobic, lying, bigoted political party
IOW, you still can't cite a single racist view I've posted...
Just your ususal ill-reasoned supposition, innuendo and nonsensical
babble...
Yet I've got no shortage of racist views YOU'VE posted, asswipe...
Right HERE:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles
<C...@KNICKLAS.COM>wrote:
"What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished black
scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a day
in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote:
"They talk in black english"
Amazing how often you're made to look stupid, isn't it, Roselles?
pyjamarama
> On 13 Feb 2007 14:42:00 -0800, "pyjamarama"
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Your silence in letting your friend defend
> >> you----avowed racists like Barta, LeftWing Skank,
> >> Silliary, is proof
>
> >> Your continued silence in answering your racist hiring
> >> practices
>
> >> Your continued attempt to shift the issue from YOUR
> >> character to those who tell the truth about you
>
> >> Your continual support and embracing a racist,
> >> homophobic, lying, bigoted political party
>
> >IOW, you still can't cite a single racist view I've posted...
>
Your ill-reasoned, uneducated suppositions, outright lies and
fuckwitted implications don't constitute "racial views" on my part,
you stupid asshole...
So, again -- cite a single racist view I've posted...
Betcha can't, ya stupid fucker...
<snicker>
Gary Roselles' racist views:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>
wrote: "brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles
<C...@KNICKLAS.COM>wrote:
"What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished black
scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a day
in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote
(of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles
<rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
Amazing how often you're made to look stupid, isn't it, Roselles?
SMACK!
Topaz
argument with a liberal."
Peter Brimelow, Alien Nation (1996)
by Thomas Jackson
There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater
horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of
offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press
and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and
arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as
part of the inevitable texture of American life. "Racism" is never
shrugged off. For example, when a White Georgetown Law School student
reported earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as
White students, it set off a booming, national controversy about
"racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would have
attracted far less attention and criticism.
Racism is, indeed, the national obsession. Universities are on full
alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach
against it, America is said to be racked with it, but just what is
racism?
Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the
word. They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock
is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are
rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal
more than this. Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a
clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American
meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are
equal. Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have been
declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and anyone who
questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.
The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important. If
blacks, for example, are equal to Whites in every way, what accounts
for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation? Since any theory of
racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation
for black failure is White racism. And since blacks are markedly poor,
crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive
racism. Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state.
All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic.
Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on White
wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of
racial differences. Thus, even if today's Whites can find in their
hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's Whites must have
oppressed them. If Whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must
oppress them Unconsciously. If no obviously racist individuals can be
identified, then societal institutions must be racist. Or, since
blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be
millions of White people we do not know about, who are working day and
night to keep blacks in misery. The dogma of racial equality leaves no
room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion,
an indictment of White people.
The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to
believe that the only explanation for non-White failure is White
racism, every time a non-White is poor, commits a crime, goes on
welfare, or takes drugs, White society stands accused of yet another
act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-Whites is standing
proof that White society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For
precisely so long as non-Whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the
same level as Whites, Whites will be, by definition, thwarting and
oppressing them. This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange
conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be
committed almost exclusively by White people. Indeed, a black
congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black
mayor of Detroit, have argued that only White people can be racist.
Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State
Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she
explained that all Whites are racist and that only Whites can be
racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without
flirting with the possibility of racial inequality?
Although some blacks and liberal Whites concede that non-Whites can,
perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-Whites have been
forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of White
oppression. What appears to be non-White racism is so understandable
and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not
an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. What would
surely be called racism when done by Whites is thought to be normal
when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true.
Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost
tedious to list them: When a White man kills a black man and uses the
word "nigger" while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and
the nation beats its collective breast; when members of the black
Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random Whites, the media are
silent (see AR of March, 1991). College campuses forbid pejorative
statements about non-Whites as "racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks
on Whites.
At election time, if 60 percent of the White voters vote for a White
candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black
opponent, it is Whites who are accused of racial bias. There are 107
"historically black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be
preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically White
colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of... the same thing.
To resist would be racist.
"Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything
that could be construed as an expression of White pride is a form of
hatred. It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect
school instruction and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas
for native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist.
Blatant anti-White prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is
now the law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if
practiced in favor of Whites, would be attacked as despicable
favoritism.
All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses
are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club
or association expressly for Whites is by definition racist. The
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
campaigns openly for black advantage but is a respected "civil rights"
organization. The National Association for the Advancement of White
People (NAAWP) campaigns merely for equal treatment of all races, but
is said to be viciously racist.
At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have
set up student unions for Whites, analogous to those for blacks,
Hispanics, etc, and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently,
when the White students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found
themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club
like the ones that non-Whites have. They were turned down in horror.
Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a
White enclave but whose members simply happen all to be White is
branded as racist.
Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality
of American racism is "celebration of diversity." It has begun to dawn
on a few people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of
Whites (and sometimes men), and never the other way around. No one
proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting
Whites, Hispanics, or Asians. No one ever suggests that National
Hispanic University in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity
of having non-Hispanics on campus. No one suggests that the Black
Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the
Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack
of diversity. Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to
celebrate homogeneity. And yet any all-White group - a company, a
town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a
crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as
possible. Only when Whites have been reduced to a minority has
"diversity" been achieved.
Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we
are so often asked to do, is no different from deploring an excess of
Whites. In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess
of Whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that
approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are
non-White. The several million illegal immigrants that enter the
country every year are virtually all non-White. It would be racist not
to be grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity." It is,
of course, only White nations that are called upon to practice this
kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any
other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind.
What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated
citizens across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into
thinking that Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the
state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor Whites
who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on
celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if
they weren't citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs
and schooling?
Would Mexico - or any other non-White nation - tolerate this kind of
cultural and demographic depredation? Of course not. Yet White
Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians
entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. They are supposed
to "celebrate" their own loss of influence, their own dwindling
numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be
hopelessly racist.
There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non-
Whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of
"hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and
Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and
hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can
come only at the expense of whites. They can demand preferential
treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are
"anti-white."
Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to
affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial
policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called
racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the
company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy
the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked
and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race
relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their
own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct
from those of the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. None
of this is thought to be racist. At the same time, whites must also
champion the racial interests of non-whites. They must sacrifice their
own future on the altar of "diversity" and cooperate in their own
dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the
displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and
cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, White people are
cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and
cultural suicide. To refuse to do so would be racism.
Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is
perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to
love one's people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and
El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by
setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative
action preferences over native-born whites, but can they be blamed for
accepting them? Is it surprising that they should want their
languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take
possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? If the once-great
people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is
prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for
it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?
No, it is the White enterprise in the United States that is unnatural,
unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let
themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to
dispossession, much less to work for their own interests. Never in the
history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to
strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a
people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in
surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in
history. Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked
into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only
whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow
"hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own
kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their
families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they
hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no
ill will towards non-whites. They only wish to be left alone to
participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies.
What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly
unnatural. They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests
of other races and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like
asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his
neighbors, since to do otherwise would be "racist."
What then, is "racism?" It is considerably more than any dictionary is
likely to say. It is any opposition by whites to official policies of
racial preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for
their own people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the
idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be
pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of
people-hood that have defined nations since the beginning of history -
but only so long as the aspirations are those of whites.
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
gringo
> "The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
> argument with a liberal."
> Peter Brimelow, Alien Nation (1996)
>
> by Thomas Jackson
> There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater
> horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of
> offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press
> and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and
>
Sorry, that was wasted. Few of us trouble to read 500-word paragraphs.
Separate the paras a little better.
Topaz
>
>Sorry, that was wasted. Few of us trouble to read 500-word paragraphs.
>Separate the paras a little better.
"The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
argument with a liberal."
Peter Brimelow, Alien Nation (1996)
by Thomas Jackson
There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater
horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of
offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press
and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and
Topaz
>>"The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
>>argument with a liberal."
>
>How does that figure?
All liberals have is meaningless buzz words. They call people
racists. Whatever. They don't have anything meaningful to say.
>
>Conservatives lost their racist argument and have been
>whining ever since
Who cares about conservatives.
>
>The migration of racist conservatives to the GOP was
>specifically done to TRY and win the argument that
>Racism was okay as long as it was the result of a vote
>by States----that the Federal government had NO right
>to interfere
>
>Today that "argument" is still being argued by
>conservatives
>
Portugal was once a great nation. It might have been the greatest
nation on earth at one time. But now it is almost like a third world
country. What happened? Race-mixing is what happened. They let a lot
of Black people in and of course the result was racial inter-marriage.
Now the Portuguese people are not as White as they were. We need to
preserve the White race. Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its
technical developments and discoveries, are the products of the
creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their
first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of
civilization is wholly dependant on such peoples. Should they perish,
all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the
grave."
"All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the
originally creative race died out, as a result of the contamination on
the blood."
"Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, science
and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost
exclusively the product of the Aryan creative power. This very fact
fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who founded
a superior type of humanity"
"The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of the
native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external
features of the country, which features strike the eye of European
observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but the
real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous
scientific and technical achievements of Europe and America, that is
to say, of Aryan peoples."
"A people that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood
thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in all its
manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable
consequence of the process of disintegration in the blood. And the
change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of a
people is only an effect of the change that had modified its racial
substance."
"For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and Negroid all
ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized
future for our humanity would be lost forever."
"It is especially the cultural creativeness which disappears when a
superior race inter-mixes with an inferior one."
"There may be hundreds of excellent States in this earth, and yet if
the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual
needs of the superior nations to-day would also disappear."
"We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a
revolutionary stand in the world to-day and that we are branded as
revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be determined
by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only
by our duty to follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing
this we have reason to believe that posterity will have a clearer
insight"
"Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the
State. In face of the ridiculous phrase that the State should do no
more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquility, so that
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high
mission indeed to preserve and encourage the highest type of humanity
which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth."
Stu Gotz
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jg3et2lc6f418dgu3...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:09:01 -0700, Cl...@Knicklas.com wrote:
>
>
>>>"The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
>>>argument with a liberal."
>>
>>How does that figure?
>
> All liberals have is meaningless buzz words. They call people
> racists. Whatever. They don't have anything meaningful to say.
>
nothing, Toecheese.
gringo
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:09:01 -0700, Cl...@Knicklas.com wrote:
>
>
>
>>> "The modern definition of a racist: someone who is winning an
>>> argument with a liberal."
>>>
>> How does that figure?
>>
>
> All liberals have is meaningless buzz words. They call people
> racists. Whatever. They don't have anything meaningful to say.
>
>
>> Conservatives lost their racist argument and have been
>> whining ever since
>>
>
> Who cares about conservatives.
>
>
never thought I'd say something like this. But there are worse groups
in the US than conservatives. You picked a good nym. Topaz, you're
chickenshit yellow, with a slight brownish cast to your eyes because
you're so full of shit.
--
*fas-cism* (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism.
-- The American Heritage Dictionary
"Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is...I think it's also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn."
------George W. Bush to the Houston Chronicle, April 9th, 1999
Topaz
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
Topaz
The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second
world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.
It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than
the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the
people in India.
All IQ tests have proven that Whites are on average much more
intelligent than Blacks. White people invented just about everything
important. Most leftists admit that Whites on average score higher on
the tests. They have their excuses for it, but all of their excuses
are demolished in "My Awakening" by David Duke. Here is an example:
"One of the most powerful direct studies of race and environment
was conducted by psychologists Sandra Scarr, Richard Weinberg and I.
D. Waldman. All three were quite well-known for their environmental
opinions. The study analyzed White, Black, and Mixed-race adopted
children in more than 100 White families in Minnesota. The study was
an egalitarian's dream, because the children's adoptive parents had
prestigious levels of income and education and were anti-racist enough
to adopt a Black child into their own family. Scarr is a strong
defender of racial equality and maintained that environment played an
almost exclusive role in IQ differences between the races. Scarr
supports the importance of heredity in causing individual differences
within a race, but she has argued that between-race differences are
mostly environmental.
The children in the study included Whites, Blacks, and Mulattos as
well as the biological children of the White adoptive couples. At the
age of 7, the children were tested for IQ, and all of the groups
including the Blacks and Mulattos, scored above average in IQ. Scarr
and Weinberg published a paper claiming to have proven the almost
exclusive power of environment over race in IQ, even though they had
to admit that the White children, whether adopted or not, scored well
above the Black and Mulatto children and that the Mulatto children
scored above the Blacks. (88)
A decade later, when the children reached the age of 17, a
follow-up study was conducted that that again included IQ
measurements. As they matured, Black children had dropped back to an
average of 89 in IQ, which is the average IQ for Blacks in the region
of the United States where the study was done. The White adopted
children scored an average of 106 in IQ, 17 points higher than the
Black children, which is consistant with traditional studies of Black
and White IQ differences. In line with genetic theory the half-White,
half-Black Mulatto adopted children scored almost exactly between the
adopted Whites and Blacks. (89)
RESULTS OF MINNESOTA TRANSRACIAL ADOPTION STUDY
IQ
Parental IQ 115.35
Biological Children 109.4
White Adopted children 105.6
Mulatto parents adopted children 98.5
Black parents adopted children 89.4
Scarr and Wienberg reluctantly published their data from the
follow up survey, but they waited close to four years to do so, almost
as if they were embarrassed by what they had found. Through a tortured
reasoning process, they still argued that environment played a
dominant role in IQ. But in their follow-up survey, unlike their first
paper, they also admitted that genes had an important impact as well.
Both Richard Lynn and Michael Levin effectively showed in their
re-analysis of Scarr's own data, that genes clearly comprise the
dominant role in intelligence levels of those adopted children. (90)
(91)"
(88) Scarr, S, & Weinberg R. A. (1976). IQ Test Perfomance of Black
Children Adopted By White Families. American Psychologist. Vol. 31.
p.26-739
(89) Weinberg, R. A. , Scarr, S., & Waldman, I. D. (1992). The
Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study. A Follow-Up of IQ Test
Performance at Adolescence, Intelligence. Vol 16.
p.17-135
(90) Lynn, R. (1994). Reinterpretations Of The Minnesota Transracial
Adoption Study. Intelligence. Vol. 19. p.1-27
(91) Levin, M. (1994). Comment on The Minnesota Transracial Adoption
Study. Intelligence Vol. 19. p.3-20
Stu Gotz
>
> The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black
> nations and India are the third world.
Your one room cabin in Looneyville is a world of shit, Toecheese.
Topaz
the
Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
pyjamarama
> >=======================================================================================
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:17:12 -0700, rightwinghank
>
> <rightwingh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Yes....Even I get ill reading Gary Roselles sick evil racist comments.
T'would appear that even your hard-core racist playmates are sickened
by your hate-filled missives, Roselles...
Doesn't really say much about your usenet history, does it, sicky?
THIS says VOLUMES, though:
See but a mere sample of the vile hate-speech Gary "Clicky" Roselles'
directs towards African-Americans -- which he says are "90% based in
FACT!" (Source: Google Archives):
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race"
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Patterson): 'Say
"yes Massa",Uncle Tom.'
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
pyjamarama
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:15:25 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >Yes....Even I get ill reading Gary Roselles sick evil racist comments.
>
> >T'would appear that even your hard-core racist playmates are sickened
> >by your hate-filled missives, Roselles...
>
Au contraire, fuckwit...
Two peas in a pod, you guys....
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"They talk in black english"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
SPANK!
pyjamarama
> >=======================================================
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:34:44 -0600, "Doorman" <nos...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Requiring colleges to use Affirmative Action for college entrance
> >qualifications doesn't work because you have to lower the standards to
> >expand participation.
And on Dec 14, 6:04 am, Cl...@Knicklas.com (Gary Roselles, Rapid City
SD) replied with his views on affirmative action:
> Yes, that would explain why Clarance Thomas is such a
> stupid cocksucker.
Another day, another racial slur from Rosieturd...
Just can't help yourself, can you?
__________________________________________________________________
"Then why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys"
--
Gary Roselles, self-described "liberal/progressive" offers his views
on miscegenation.
"Both are traitors to their race" -- Gary Roselles, self-described
"liberal/progressive" on the primacy of race loyalty.
pyjamarama
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:12:10 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Yes, that would explain why Clarance Thomas is such a
> >> stupid cocksucker.
>
> >Another day, another racial slur from Rosieturd...
>
Rosieturd finally "gets it"...
> Yet YOU can't post a single thing that supports your
> position on race---
You mean YOU can't cite a single thing that "supports" what YOU SAY is
my position on race...
Can you?
Yet I can cite PLENTY on your "position"...
Here are but a few:
pyjamarama
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:15 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Yet YOU can't post a single thing that supports your
> >> position on race---
>
> >You mean YOU can't cite a single thing that "supports" what YOU SAY is
> >my position on race...
Rosieturd gets another harsh reminder that him merely "saying so"
doesn't amount to jack, thusly:
>
> I say your "position on race"
"you say?"
"YOU SAY????"...
"YOU SAY" doesn't mean shit, numbnuts...
YOU are a 66-year old, uneducated twat who lives in low-income
government housing and spends what little time he has left on this
planet posting racial slurs, advocating murder, making threats,
rummaging through sex ads and posting pedophiliac fantasies.
YOU have proven to be one of the sickest fucks to ever log on to
usenet...
Why would anyone give a flying fuck what "YOU SAY" about anything?
Hmmm???
'Specially when "YOU'VE SAID" all this shit:
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race"
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson): 'Say
"yes Massa", Uncle Tom.'
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net>
wrote:"You actually think that placing blackskinned, white thinking
people is going to gain anything with real minorities?"
On 2 Jul 2005 10:43:03 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
"because of their rap speech"
On 18 Dec 2000 20:26:48 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (of
Colin Powell): "It's apparant[sic] he's being an uncle tom to appease
voters."
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001 06:43:37 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@rapidnet.com>
wrote (of Michael Steele): "GOP Poised to Pick Uncle Tom in MD"
On 30 Jun 2005 8:51:19 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> wrote:
pyjamarama
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:21:50 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
>
>
>
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 15, 1:05=A0pm, Cl...@Knicklas.com wrote:
> >> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:15 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> >> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> Yet YOU can't post a single thing that supports your
> >> >> position on race---
>
> >> >You mean YOU can't cite a single thing that "supports" what YOU SAY is
> >> >my position on race...
>
> >Rosieturd gets another harsh reminder that him merely "saying so"
> >doesn't amount to jack, thusly:
>
> >> I say your "position on race"
>
> >"you say?"
>
Once again Roselles gets a harsh reminder about the worthlessness of
what "he says":
>
> I say your "position on race"
"you say?"
"YOU SAY????"...
What "YOU SAY" doesn't mean shit, numbnuts...
pyjamarama
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:49:04 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yes, I'll say it again.......
>
> >Once again Roselles gets a harsh reminder about the worthlessness of
> >what "he says":
>
Zzzzzz...
STILL waiting....
"(You're) someone who mocks blacks, babbles endlessly and
pathologically about being a "big businessman", brags about not hiring
blacks" -- Gary Roselles Dec 17 2006
Please provide link...
"I don't hire no steenking blacks CLAIMS Pajamaloon" -- Gary Roselles,
Oct, 10 2005
Please provide link...
"You're the big businessman who claims not to hire blacks" -- Gary
Roselles, Nov, 13 2005
Please provide link...
"You claimed to be a "big businessman" and mocked black speech and
claimed you didn't hire any blacks" -- Gary Roselles, May 6th 2006
Please provide link...
Still waiting....
________________________________________________
pyjamarama
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 08:51:32 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >Once again Roselles gets a harsh reminder about the worthlessness of
> >> >what "he says":
>
> >> DO YOU HIRE BLACKS?
>
> >Zzzzzz...
>
> >STILL waiting....
>
Sooooo -- you'll finally provide the links, asswipe?
'cause we're STILL waiting....
Topaz
Here is part of David Duke's newsletter:
"Entering my old neighborhood of Gentilly Woods in New Orleans had
a profound effect upon me. My once tidy and well-kept neighborhood was
now mostly Black and disheveled. It once sported many homes that
seemed to always have a fresh-painted look. Now they were adorned with
peeling paint an unkempt lawns of weeds and trash. In talking to some
old holdouts in the neighborhood, they told me that the once rare
burglary, vandalism and assault had now become commonplace. The
diehard White remnants who remained had adapted to the changes and
found a way to endure each indignity and violation the best they
could. The change had been so gradual that they were no longer shocked
by new instances of crime, just resigned to them.
"The streets had scattered groups of hard-featured Black men
standing around dilapidated cars giving hostile stares to an obviously
unknown White person trespassing in their neighborhood.
"Even though it had been many years since my last visit, my
memories became more vivid as I entered the boundaries of the
neighborhood. It seemed as though I had only been away a few scant
hours. Now those memories crashed against the images of the present
causing me to feel off balance. It was akin to visiting a healthy
friend and then after a few short weeks to see him wasting away with
cancer. Afraid that perhaps me recollection was more idealized than it
really was--as soon as I returned home, I ferreted out my old
photographs.
"Those photos clearly portrayed a community even more attractive
than I had remembered. Well-kept homes filled the album, often
accented with blooming flowers and finely trimmed shrubbery, sidewalks
edged closely, and many homes had a fresh paint look. Polished autos
dotted the clean streets. Even more dramatic were the Tom Sawyer and
Becky Thatcher-like bright faces of the children with whom I spent so
many happy hours of childhood.
"In my time they were the ruddy faces that filled our streets
yards and parks. They were all gone now, replaced by dark, angry
teenagers, with scarred skin and boomboxes; often with pistols and
crack in their pockets, menacing the streets where children now fear
to venture. A picture repeated, I believe, all over the United States
of America. For the current White residents of Gentilly Woods their
story is much like the story fo the frog that is put in a pot of warm
water while the temperature is slowly increased until the poor
creature is boiling and it is too late to save itself. Is the
traditional American already too lulled by the tepid water to realize
what is ahead?
"Amercians can glimpse the future in the inner cities of
America. The political corruption, failing schools, drug problems,
crime, the run down housing and even the trash in the streets- all
hold a preview of the coming attractions of 21st century America. When
all of America is of the same racial proportion as that of the inner
cities, there will be no White infrastructure, and no white cornucopia
of tax revenue mitigating the Third Worldism. Criminals will no longer
be held in check by White police, prosecutors, juries and judges. The
shrinking White tax base will be inadequate to the costs of the
criminal justice system and jails needed to house lawbreakers. The
housing, food, medical care, and schooling of those who cannot provide
their own--will no longer be able to live off the support of the aging
and diminishing European population."
The address for this newsletter is David Duke Report, Box 88,
Covington, LA 70434
http://www.duke.org
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
Topaz
By David Duke
European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO), National
President
There is no escape from the terror of the future.
You can run away for a while.
But the terror will catch up to you.
It will destroy you and everything you love.
No, I am not talking about a new Hollywood horror movie. I am talking
about America. America is changing from the land of our forefathers to
a place where we are no longer at home in spirit, and where our
families are no longer safe in their own homes.
New Orleans has become increasingly like Haiti since the 1960's Civil
Rights movement integrated the schools. Since then, White civil rights
have steadily disappeared.
First the schools deteriorated into cesspools of violence, drugs,
ignorance, barbarity and venereal disease. Blacks always had access to
public schools, but now, almost all Whites were driven from them. They
went from a majority, to less than four percent today. Whites were
driven from the buses and streetcars. In the buses where Blacks once
rode in the back, now Whites dare not ride at all! To do so is just
too dangerous. Friendly and tidy White neighborhoods discovered the
true joys of forced racial integration: junk cars, prostitutes and
drug dealers on the streets. The only Whites remaining in many
neighborhoods fearfully live now behind bars in homes that have become
reverse jails meant to keep the criminals out.
Black political power transformed New Orleans into a corrupt Black
banana republic. Taxes went up, services went down. The condition of
the streets wrecks the cars. Housing projects are so strewn with trash
they look as though they belong in a Third World Country. Rape, murder
and robbery are daily occurrences in the same city where I could once
walk anywhere as a child. Of course, traditional American values and
culture are gone now also. America founding fathers names such as
George Washington's are removed from schools by the Black school board
because he is, "an immoral example for the children." Kwanzaa, a Black
pagan celebration, has replaced Christmas celebrations in schools.
For the last forty years, Whites have steadily fled the city of New
Orleans. They left thousands of the beautiful and stately homes; many
of the beautiful, oak-lined boulevards; and the intangible history and
charm of what was once America's most romantic city. Now its old charm
can only be found in a few heavily policed areas that the tourists
visit or where the very richest live. Yet, frequently a tourist will
veer from the protected areas and find themselves robbed, raped, or
murdered by denizens that would be more at home in the most primitive
tribes of Africa.
The White refugees first fled mostly to Jefferson Parish, a White
redoubt where they could regain the semblance of a normal life. But,
then, Jefferson began its demographic darkening, so the Whites again
packed up their belongings once more and moved even further away. Some
ended up across Lake Ponchartrain, willing to drive three hours a day
to get to and from work, all so their families would be safe.
Some even pretended that they came to North Shore for the trees. But
they certainly didn't move to the now Black areas in New Orleans where
flourish live oaks, some of the most magnificent and beautiful trees
in the world. Most of the new North Shore residents knew, at least
somewhere deep inside, why they fled and why they came to the area
where I now live. I was candid about my choice of Mandeville. I like
the demographics. I like being among my own kind, living in the kind
of clean and beautiful environment our people create. In the last
election for U.S. Congress, I warned my neighbors on the North Shore.
I told them that conditions of New Orleans would eventually come to
them unless a great political change happened in America. A week ago,
a graphic example of what I had warned them about, occurred.
Just a mile from where I live and work, in a subdivision called
Woodridge, a beautiful 25-year-old mother of four, Samantha Jaume, was
brutally murdered in her home by a Black intruder who had followed her
home from a shopping center. He apparently wanted to steal her new
vehicle. The quick thinking of her seven-year-old son, Jason, almost
saved his mother and probably prevented the murder of his sisters and
himself. He hid himself under a desk and called the police.
Samantha lost all of her civil rights including her right to live. Her
husband's civil rights were also violated, and her four children
suffered loss of their Civil Rights more than any Black person in the
1960's who had to use separate water fountains. This family lost wife
and mother for the rest of their lives. If you want to know the true
cost of integration, it is White lives. If Mandeville were truly the
White area so many seek, Samantha would still be alive. Do we dare to
discuss the other hundreds of victims who have suffered a similar fate
over the years on the North Shore? Or the millions of White victims of
Black crime across America. And, it can only get worse. When the North
Shore population goes the way of New Orleans, Jefferson, and of the
new America of the 21st century, the loss of Samantha will be replayed
so many times that Whites will become refugees once more. But, where
will they go? Massive non-white immigration, differential birthrates,
and intermarriage will make our people a rapidly shrinking minority.
Our racial enemies will not stop their darkening of America until
there is no refuge for our people, only annihilation.
This is no movie. This is real life. There is no escape from the
coming terror. It is time we turn around and fight. We must wrest
control of our political system from those who would obliterate our
people. It is too late for Mrs. Samantha Jaume, but not too late for
her children, and for our children if we begin our road back today. My
life is consecrated to that task. How about yours?
Visit our website at www.whitecivilrights.com
pyjamarama
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:59:14 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
Yes, we ARE still waiting, numbnuts....
pyjamarama
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:14:31 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 17, 7:10=A0am, Nick...@Click.com wrote:
> >> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:59:14 -0800 (PST), pyjamarama
>
> >> <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> DO YOU HIRE BLACKS?
>
> >> >> >Zzzzzz...
>
> >> STILL waiting....
>
> >Yes, we ARE still waiting, numbnuts..
>
> Glad you agree
'Course I agree, cockslap...
You've had YEARS to prove you're not a lying, homophobic racist and
you've completely FAILED...
Still no cites, no links, no evidence, no nuthin'...
Why is that?
<snickerz>
pyjamarama
Gary "Nick" Roselles on blacks (Source: Google Archives):
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford, never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson): 'Say
"yes Massa", Uncle Tom.'
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
pyjamarama
Gary "Nick" Roselles on blacks (Source: Google Archives):
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
pyjamarama
Gary "Nick" Roselles lists why he doesn't hire blacks (Source: Google
Archives):
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race"
On 18 Feb 2007 14:05:28 -0700 Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com> "Then
why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black guys?"
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford,never having worked a
pyjamarama
Gary "Nick" Roselles lists the reasons why he doesn't hire blacks
pyjamarama
Rural, low-income white Gary "Nick" Roselles lists the reasons why he
hates blacks (Source: Google Archives):
pyjamarama
>
Oh fuck, just when you think he can't get any more racist, he
surprises you:
>
> THose who stand up for their race, their issues, their
> causes are those you hate.
That's another keeper...
So how do YOU "stand up for YOUR race" you slimy piece of racist shit?
Oh wait -- you've already told us:
pyjamarama
On Apr 30, 2:40 pm, Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com> wrote: "Those
who stand up for their race, their issues, their causes are those you
hate."
Christ, Roselles, why didn't you just post that in German?
So tell us -- Hou do YOU "stand up for YOUR race?"
Hmmmm??
pyjamarama
Rural, low-income white RACE LOYALIST Gary "Nick" Roselles on why he
don't hire blacks (Source: Google Archives):
On Apr 30, 2:40 pm, Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com> wrote: "Those
who stand up for their race, their issues, their causes are those you
hate."
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
Rightwinghank
Gary "Nick" Roselles is not someone I agree with.....
and is sometimes and asshole.
Well...most of the time.
But on the issue of blacks....most belong in jail.
Sub humans need to stay in Africa...in their mud huts.
look at the damage they have done to our cities....
look at what they have brought to England and other European
countries...
crime, murder, drugs...
Its just a fact.
love
hank
Not racist...just factual....like Mr. Pyjama boy is a jerkoff.
pyjamarama
Rural, low-income white RACE LOYALIST Gary "Nick" Roselles' views on
blacks (Source: Google Archives):
On May 6, 7:18 am, Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com> wrote:"Group
Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coon, coconut headed hater"
pyjamarama
> On Mon, 5 May 2008 08:43:14 -0700 (PDT), Rightwinghank
> <rightwingh...@hotmail.com> wrote defending POOPY:
>
>
>
>
>
> >But on the issue of blacks....most belong in jail.
>
> >Sub humans need to stay in Africa...in their mud huts.
>
> >look at the damage they have done to our cities....
>
> >look at what they have brought to England and other European
> >countries...
>
> >crime, murder, drugs...
>
> >Its just a fact.
>
> >love
> >hank
>
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 08:37:00 -0700, rightwinghank Skank Defended PAJAMALOON:
>
>
>
> >On Jul 14, 11:27 am, pyjamarama <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Yeah I know....
>
> >That Idiot gets on my case for a few of my harmless jokes about
> >negros...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Citing the amazing Usenet "intellect" of Gary Roselles:
----------Gary Roselles' left-wing ultra-violence-------------
"She (K. Harris) should be at least shot" -- Gary Roselles on killing
Katherine Harris Dec 1st 2001
"I call Kathering Harris a nazi/fascist right wing ideologue whore.
What did we do to German nazis right wing whores?" -- Gary Roselles,
Jan 8 2001
On 16 Dec 2000 13:22:43 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19@idt...> wrote: "My
wanting Harris dead isn't a threat -- it's advocacy"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Who gives a shit what these nuts (religious
groups) want or don't want -- KORESH THEM ALL!"
"Hinckley TRIED to do a good thing" -- Gary Roselles praises would-be
presidential assassin John Hinckley
On 12 Sept 2001 08:42:54 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19@idt...> wrote
"That slut Barbara Olsen (9/11 victim) is dead? GOOD!"
On 22 Oct 2001 09:51:09 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19@idt...> "He (God)
turned Olsen into jelly"
"May a real american have the honor of putting a bullet between her
eyes." -- Gary Roselles on what he'd like to do Rob Robertson's
teenage daughter. 11/14/2000
On 22 May 2001 22:40:40 GMT Gary Roselles <rosell19@rapidn2t...>
wrote: "Go Ahead and put his face there. I ain't blowed a mountain up
today. I can make it (blowing up Mt. Rushmore) look like a mining
accident" -- Ex-miner <chuckle> and Rapid City resident Gary Roselles
threatens to blow up Mt. Rushmore.
"Hating RIGHT WINGERS is doing God's work, Dumbapropyl" -- Gary
Roselles, Jan 8 2001
"I consider hating RIGHT WING nazi/fascist fucks like you a God
inspired emotion." Gary Roselles, Jan 8 2001
-Various and sundry Roselles' quotes on "political orientation" -:
"Che (Guevara) was a conservative ideologue" - Gary Roselles
"Marx and Engels were RIGHT-WINGERS you dumb cocksucker" -- Gary
Roselles
"The United States is obligated to follow the DEMOCRATIC rule of the
UN" -- Gary Roselles
"The Soviet Union should've kept Afghanistan" -- Gary Roselles
--------------- Roselles on blacks and gays---------------------
On Wed, 18 Feb 2007 09:48:34 GMT Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com>
wrote: "Then why was you mother stupid enough to fuck all them black
guys?"
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: You actually think that placing blackskinned,
white thinking people is going to gain anything with real minorities?
On 23 Aug 2006 04:29:00 -0700, Gary Roselles <C...@KNICKLAS.COM>
wrote: "What the fuck would a dumb cocksucker like (distinguished
black scholar) Sowell, who sits out at Stanford,never having worked a
day in his Uncle Tom life, know anything?"
On Jun 6, 09:33:41, C...@Knicklas.com wrote of distinguished African-
American scholars Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams: "Both are
traitors to their race
On May 6, 7:18 am, Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com> wrote: "Group
Negro Poster Pyjamarma admits to being a coon, coconut headed hater"
On Apr 30, 2:40 pm, Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com> wrote: "Those
who stand up for their race, their issues, their causes are those you
hate."
On 30 Oct 2006 11:13:21 -0800, Gary Roselles <C...@Knicklas.com>wrote:
"brown niggers need to be taken out"
On 24 Apr 2001 17:43:01 GMT Gary Roselles <rosel...@idt.net> wrote (in
reply to an Op-Ed by African-American Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson):
'Say"yes Massa", Uncle Tom.'
On Thu, 28 Dec 2000 19:27:54 GMT, Gary Roselles
<rosel...@idt.net>wrote: "Bush's Uncle tom Cabinet is good first step
for GOP"
"His appointment will bridge nothing. It's apparant he's being an
uncle tom to appease voters." Gary Roselles on Gen. Colin Powell Dec
18 2000
"Hilliary has more intellect and balls than you do, you racist
faggot." -- Homophobe Gary Roselles with another of his patented slurs
May 8 2007
"Yeah, there's a real fucking credible authority----Hitchens a faggot
socialist" -- Homophobe Gary Roselles, Apr 20 2006
"Faggot just describes a gay person" -- Homophobe Gary Roselles Mar 7
2001
__________________________________________________________
GARYLOON defends his racist prick buddy EVERLOON, thusly...
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:58:07 -0800 (PST) everonlyn...@yahoo.com wrote
and on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:12:58 -0800 (PST), knicklas@click (Gary
Roselles) DEFENDED:
"Yeah, they sold out their own in an attempt to be a minority in the
GOP so they could achieve to places they never would have elsewhere.
Ironically, Ward Connerly and Thomas Sowell say they are against race
quotas, and theyalso say they are against political correctness. Since
they are liars and scandals, and don't like political correctness, I
will call them niggers right here and now.NIGGERS,NIGGERS, NIGGERS"
pyjamarama
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 00:10:25 -0500, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
> >The only thing I've said about blacks and whites dating is of the
> >consequence they must accept as a result. Cultures differ no matter how
> >liberal you think. People identify with their culture and multicultural
> >families, as exotic and diverse political correctness may paint them, are
> >inherently dysfunctional in sharing hereditary identities.
>
> .
On Wed, 18 Feb 2007 09:48:34 GMT Gary Roselles <Nick...@Click.com>
wrote on "miscegenation": "Then why was you mother stupid enough to
fuck all them black guys?"
Citing the amazing Usenet "intellect" of left-winger Gary Roselles:
pyjamarama
pyjamarama
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 00:10:25 -0500, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
> >The only thing I've said about blacks and whites dating is of the
> >consequence they must accept as a result. Cultures differ no matter how
> >liberal you think. People identify with their culture and multicultural
> >families, as exotic and diverse political correctness may paint them, are
> >inherently dysfunctional in sharing hereditary identities.
>
> .
Citing the amazing Usenet "intellect" of left-winger Gary Roselles:
pyjamarama
You mean your racist pal who called me a "stupid, smelly N*gger"?
We couldn't help but notice you didn't call him on that one,
asswipe.....why?
Could it have anything to do with you writing all this shit?
Citing the amazing Usenet "intellect" of left-wing sicko Gary Roselles
(aka "click@nick):
pyjamarama
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:01:15 -0700, Cl...@Knickkers.com
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 00:10:25 -0500, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote:
>
> >>The only thing I've said about blacks and whites dating is of the
> >>consequence they must accept as a result. Cultures differ no matter how
> >>liberal you think. People identify with their culture and multicultural
> >>families, as exotic and diverse political correctness may paint them, are
> >>inherently dysfunctional in sharing hereditary identities.
>
> - Show quoted text -
--------------- Roselles on blacks and gays---------------------