Faux & their proud teabaggng
Cliff
Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
http://www.conservativeblogwatch.com/2009/12/05/rachel-maddow-shows-video-of-man-being-teabagged-in-gay-bar/
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagging
]
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:j2slh5h0taf9l8t1i...@4ax.com...
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
> instead of having to deal with the facts.
The fact that they are fringe wackos
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>instead of having to deal with the facts.
http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
"Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media to task for
their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the repeated use of
the term "teabagging" ..."
<Snicker>
Great research department they have, right?
As usual.
No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
what to call them.
Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
--
Cliff
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them instead
> of having to deal with the facts.
Actually the term was around years prior to the radical right wackos
adopting the it. Gotta love their ignorancy...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Mark, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Q Public
<Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> said:
Gee, fringe, wackos....
See how well those words gag in your widdle throats when the 2010
whupass descends
on the left now marginilizing the majority of America!
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>
>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>instead of having to deal with the facts.
http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
"Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media to task for
their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the repeated use of
the term "teabagging" ..."
"As we've noted, CNN's Anderson Cooper and MSNBC's David Shuster and Rachel
Maddow have been having been saying "teabagging" a lot�over and over and over
again!�in reference to yesterday's attempt by Fox News and its slackjawed
audience to re-enact Mike Judge's 2006 film Idiocracy at festivals nationwide
(think of it as their Rocky Horror Picture Show)."
<Snicker>
Great research department they have, right?
As usual.
No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
what to call them.
Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
"Moogs, would you buy it for a quarter?"
http://www.wattpad.com/111513-The-Marching-Morons-C-M-Kornbluth
"The Marching Morons" by C. M. Kornbluth
--
Cliff
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>
> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
> facts.
But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use facts.
They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other nonsense.
Cliff
>You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>facts.
First wingers would have to actually have facts instead of
stale old lies.
Will any of us live long enough for any of them to find any even by
accident?
Jeff M
> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
> heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
>
> However.
>
> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
> Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a leftist winger
> attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
The Boston Tea Party wasn't corporate sponsored.
Curly Surmudgeon
wrote:
> Curly Surmudgeon <CurlySu...@live.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>Actually the term was around years prior to the radical right wackos
>>adopting the it. Gotta love their ignorancy...
>
> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never heard
> it, but I'll accept your statement.
>
> However.
>
> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
> Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a leftist winger
> attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
Actually it was "Fox News" who recoined the term which went viral:
"Thousands of protesters -- some dressed in colonial wigs with tea bags
hanging from their eyeglasses -- showed up in states from California to
Kentucky to Massachusetts, holding signs and reading speeches lambasting
the Obama administration's tax-and-spend policies."
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/15/thousands-anti-tax-tea-party-
protesters-turn-cities/
"While conservatives have taken offense at the use of the term “tea-
baggers” to refer to members of the Tea Party Movement, they seem to have
lost sight of the fact that it was Fox News reporter Griff Jenkins who
first made the connection between the protests and that particular bit of
sexual parlance. Now, it seems that the mainstream media’s sophomoric
overkill has crept into the mind of Fox News analyst Charles Krauthammer,
bringing the term full circle to its birthplace."
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-news-charles-krauthammer-references-tea-
bag-protests/
"Score one for the tea baggers. Those silly folks with their silly
protests and their often silly signs and silly outfits and silly rants.
Who's silly now?"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,520899,00.html
Then there are these:
http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/files/2009/04/teabag.jpg
http://teabagparty.org/images/teabagparty-widget-120.gif
http://lookatthisfuckingteabagger.com/archive
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Bobby, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John R. Carroll
>
> instead of having to deal with the facts.
Actually it's a term they took to themselves.
You might be able to argue that Glenn Beck branded them as such, however.
He began promoting the term as part of his, well, I'm not sure what.
Perhaps it was his self promotion at your expense.
Beck/Palin 2012!
Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
LOL
--
John R. Carroll
Mullah Fuqu'ar
>[
>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
Yes. That's what inspired my tagline.
>
>http://www.conservativeblogwatch.com/2009/12/05/rachel-maddow-shows-video-of-man-being-teabagged-in-gay-bar/
Maddow knows what it is. She and her fellow dykes love to do it even
though they have to use prosthetics to do it.
>http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagging
>
Keith Dopeymann is fascinated with teabagging. I must come from those
days when he stalked locker rooms as a sports reporter to sniff jock
straps.
Anderson Cooper had David Gergen, director of the Center for Public
Leadership, on his show on the eve of tax day, April 15, and they were
talking about Republicans when Gergen said, "They still haven't found
their voice, Anderson. This happens to a minority party after it's
lost a couple of bad elections, but they're searching for their
voice."
And Cooper said: "It's hard to talk when you're teabagging."
The Girly Man 360 should know.
-
"More bad news for the Taliban. Remember how
they are promised 72 virgins when they die?
Turns out that it's only one 72-year-old virgin."
Mullah Fuqu'ar
Teabagging has to be a Liberal activity since so many queers are
Liberal and it is the Dummycrats that pander them.
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>
>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
LOTS more !!!
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagging&btnG=Google+Search
Ever hear of a winger thinking or researching?
Or anybody with Faux "news"?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagger&btnG=Search
HTH
--
Cliff
Cliff
>There are only so many words in any language.
>And fewer contractions, abbreviations, and nicknames.
So CLEARLY you would choose teabagger & teabagging (being
simple words for simple wingers) !!
The words were taken but what does that matter?
Ever hear of a winger (or Faux "news" being defamed as being "literate"?
OTOH many there DID manage to pass HS. Somehow. Someplace. Sometime.
--
Cliff
Aratzio
Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> got double secret probation for
writing:
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>
>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
All sources are biased, you use it as a derogatory term only when they
disagree with you.
So, how stupid does that make you?
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>news:85ulh5lmi8sebllnr...@4ax.com...
>> "ArmyOfDorkness" <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
>>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>
>>>> Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>> instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>
>>>The fact that they are fringe wackos
>>
>> You forgot "haters", "deniers", "wingnuts", and other derisive terms
>> the leftist wingers use when they don't have anything to use to rebut
>> facts.
>
>But those things are true about todays republicans. The party of NO. Just
>obstruct. Nothing constructive or in any way helpful. They don't use facts.
>They try to keep people scared with talk of death panels and other nonsense.
>
Seems that the far left extermists have started denying their agendas
and calling what they wish to put into place..to be nonsense.
Doesnt speak well for the far left extremists does it?
Gunner
Aratzio
>Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
>>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>
>Cliff wrote
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>>All sources are biased,
>
>Agreed, at least all most all of them.
Wow, one sentence and you contradict yourself. No sense in actually
taking a definitive stance when waffling is available.
>
>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>
>I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT derogatory?
Yes, you did, yes I did and no, my use wasn't, you illiterate.
>
>>when they disagree with you.
>
>What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
The dismissal of the source, by you. Or is your understanding of the
English language even less than I surmised?
>
>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>
>Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
>proves ones point, doesn't it?
What attack, I asked you a question in hopes you could describe how
you see your stupidity. Is there anything in the relatively simple
English I used that did not confuse you?
ArmyOfDorkness
"Winston_Smith" <not_...@bogus.net> wrote in message
news:ef1mh5h1s68rp0fhd...@4ax.com...
> So says the leftist wingers. Bush's right whackos said his critics
> were Osama lovers and Terrorist lovers. Are you? Does the majority
> party saying it make it true?
>
> It's pretty hard to be constructive when you are excluded from the
> bill writing process. The only avenue that leaves is offering
> amendments.
Oh bullshit. Boehner was out there talking about party unity and promising
no YES votes long before there was any bills to look at.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gun...@lightspeed.net> wrote in message
news:jq5mh5pn3eet13055...@4ax.com...
If you still believe in death panels you're even more of an idiot than I
thought.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> [
> Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>
>
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=teabagging
> ]
Anderson Cooper must, since he first used it
tankfixer
CurlySu...@live.com says...
>
> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
> wrote:
>
> > Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
> >
> >
> > of having to deal with the facts.
>
> adopting the it. Gotta love their ignorancy...
Anderson Cooper is a right wing wacko ?
Who would have known..
Gunner Asch
If you still believe in death panels.. you will be killed by the People
in less than 3 yrs.
And I hope you do.
Gunner
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>> "Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media to task for
>>their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the repeated use of
>>the term "teabagging" ..."
>>
>> <Snicker>
>>
>> Great research department they have, right?
>> As usual.
>>
>> No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
>>what to call them.
>>
>> Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
>
>They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
>Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simple a leftist winger
>attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear. Damn, you guys
>ARE good at what you do.
Cliff
>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>> LOTS more !!!
>
>Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources.
Google is now a "leftist wingers "news" source" just
like a dictionary or a fact?
>I'm quite sure
>you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to rule them
>all.
YOU asked for more.
I then gave you lots more and yet you still whine like a busted winger.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagging&btnG=Google+Search
Ever hear of a winger thinking or researching?
Or anybody with Faux "news"?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=teabagger&btnG=Search
THEN you got confused about
http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2003/f_lorw-p1.php
--
Cliff
Cliff
Not hard to be smarter than a winger & know about the meaning of "words"
(clearly a liberal invention/plot them "words" thingies).
Have you guys discovered the rock or the club yet?
--
Cliff
�n�hw��f
thought with news:fvulh55pkk6g03vgg...@4ax.com:
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>
>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>>>instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-learns
>>-the-definition-of-teabagging
>> "Foxnews.com has published a screed taking the mainstream media
>> to task for
>>their "orally charged" coverage of the tea parties: Namely, the
>>repeated use of the term "teabagging" ..."
>>
>> <Snicker>
>>
>> Great research department they have, right?
>> As usual.
>>
>> No checking before planning their "parties" & deciding
>>what to call them.
>>
>> Or were they just trying to steal & lie again?
>
> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the
> American Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simple a
> leftist winger attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a
> smear. Damn, you guys ARE good at what you do.
No, pinhead. Whats *funny* is that as usual the repugs tried to co-
opt a word that had a meaning already assigned to it in modern
parlance without researching it before hand. You dumb fucks charge
ahead blindly. Always.
Jus Sayin[tm]
--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
tankfixer
nos...@nothanks.org says...
>
> Winston_Smith wrote:
>
> > The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
> > heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
> >
> > However.
> >
> > attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
>
You are wrong.
"Colonial merchants, some of them smugglers, played a significant role
in the protests. Because the Tea Act made legally imported tea cheaper,
it threatened to put smugglers of Dutch tea out of business.[42]
Legitimate tea importers who had not been named as consignees by the
East India Company were also threatened with financial ruin by the Tea
Act.[43] Another major concern for merchants was that the Tea Act gave
the East India Company a monopoly on the tea trade, and it was feared
that this government-created monopoly might be extended in the future to
include other goods."
42) Labaree, Benjamin Woods. The Boston Tea Party. Originally published
1964. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-930350-05-7.
also
John W. Tyler, Smugglers & Patriots: Boston Merchants and the Advent of
the American Revolution (Boston, 1986).
43) Labaree, Benjamin Woods. The Boston Tea Party. Originally published
1964. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1979. ISBN 0-930350-05-7.
44) Knollenberg, Bernhard. Growth of the American Revolution, 1766?1775.
New York: Free Press, 1975. ISBN 0-02-917110-5.
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> Beck/Palin 2012!
> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>
> LOL
A fine example of leftist hate speech....
�n�hw��f
> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>> LOTS more !!!
>
> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
> rule them all.
>
Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
LULZ
�n�hw��f
> Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of
>>alt.usenet.kooks, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>
> Cliff wrote
>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>
>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>
>>All sources are biased,
>
> Agreed, at least all most all of them.
>
>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>
> I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT
> derogatory?
>
>>when they disagree with you.
>
> What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
>
>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>
> Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
> proves ones point, doesn't it?
>
Said the pinhead watching Fox Noise.
LULZ!
Aratzio
"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> got double secret probation for
writing:
>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>thought with news:8k4mh5lggg3904obg...@4ax.com:
>
>> Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, in the land of
>>>alt.usenet.kooks, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>>
>> Cliff wrote
>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>
>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>
>>>All sources are biased,
>>
>> Agreed, at least all most all of them.
>>
>>>you use it as a derogatory term only
>>
>> I did? YOU just said they are all biased. And that's NOT
>> derogatory?
>>
>>>when they disagree with you.
>>
>> What was it I said that they "agree/disagree" with?
>>
>>>So, how stupid does that make you?
>>
>> Ah, yes, personal attacks, vilification, and name calling ALWAYS
>> proves ones point, doesn't it?
>>
>
>Said the pinhead watching Fox Noise.
>
>LULZ!
Republicans are the eternal irony generator.
Cliff
>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>thought with news:cf4mh591gtqv7h520...@4ax.com:
>
>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-lear
>>>>>ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>
>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>
>>> LOTS more !!!
>>
>> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
>> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
>> rule them all.
>>
>
>Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
>
>So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
>
>LULZ
Faux "invented" teabaggers, right?
--
Cliff
Cliff
Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
Palin is funny!
And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
you what to do & think).
--
Cliff
John R. Carroll
> In article <8KGdnbVamJ6Ln4bW...@giganews.com>,
> nos...@nothanks.org says...
>>
>> Winston_Smith wrote:
>>
>>> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
>>> heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
>>>
>>> However.
>>>
>>> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the
>>> American Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a
>>> leftist winger attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
>>
>> The Boston Tea Party wasn't corporate sponsored.
>
>
> You are wrong.
>
> "Colonial merchants, some of them smugglers, played a significant role
> in the protests. Because the Tea Act made legally imported tea
> cheaper,
Yeah, it was a tax cut.
That's the really funny part of all of this.
Today's TeaBaggers have patterned their protests unwittingly after a
movement that was protesting a TAX CUT.
LOL
--
John R. Carroll
Gray Ghost
news:wradnV1nOf5pqIbW...@giganews.com:
That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
the Repubs in on it.
--
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent Global Warming.
"Hide the Decline"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEiLgbBGKVk
31,486 American scientists, including 9,029 with PhDs, don't agree the
science is settled.
http://www.petitionproject.org/
What it appears to be all about
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEZszGJHbK4&feature=video_response
Gray Ghost
news:8frlh55dafsrajnmg...@4ax.com:
> [
> Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
No, for the most part they are decent folks. And frankly it looks
uncomfortable.
Gray Ghost
news:5qmnh55euci6il02j...@4ax.com:
Indeed I'm sure liberals invented teabagging.
Curly Surmudgeon
<Ayat...@Islamo-Nazi.com> wrote:
> Teabagging has to be a Liberal activity since so many queers are Liberal
> and it is the Dummycrats that pander them.
Another alias of the cockroach. Off to the Bozo Bin with you, too...
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2012 Run, Mark, Run! 2012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray Ghost
news:lcmdnXSs3Nlmc4bW...@giganews.com:
So this is what passes for education today? Fucking pathetic.
I'm not going waste a lot of time on this. Just put "Boston Tea party" into
your favortite search engine and have at it.
In sum, The Tea Act was an act by Paliament to save the East India Tea
company which was about to go out of business bacuase noone would buy the
taxed tea. The idea was to lower the prince of tea with the tax still on it
enough to make it cheaper than the smuggled tea. The colonists, unlike modern
liberals, were not girly men and would not be so easily bought off. it was
the principle of the thing.
Miseducating the citizenry should be a death penalty offense as an act of
treason.
Curly Surmudgeon
Which Republicans wanted to participate that the Democrats refused to
"let in on it"?
Curly Surmudgeon
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
> Indeed I'm sure liberals invented teabagging.
--
John R. Carroll
You mean you'd rather remain an ignorant poseur.
In order to help the East India Company compete with smuggled Dutch tea, in
1767 Parliament passed the Indemnity Act, which lowered the tax on tea
consumed in Great Britain, and gave the East India Company a refund of the
25% duty on tea that was re-exported to the colonies.[10] To help offset
this loss of government revenue, Parliament also passed the Townshend
Revenue Act of 1767, which levied new taxes, including one on tea, in the
colonies.[
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party
--
John R. Carroll
John R. Carroll
When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
What then?
I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in America the
freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
--
John R. Carroll
Gray Ghost
lkIHWnZ2dn...@giganews.com:
None of which contradicts what I said. it didn't matter if the tea was
cheaper, they weren't going to pay the tax. It's called principles. Something
you are clearly unaware of.
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
Actually they were protesting a government sanctioned monopoly....
It's not suprising you leftist don't understand..
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:00:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >
> >
> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> >A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>
> Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
I don't "hate" anyone...
> Palin is funny!
> And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
> to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
> you what to do & think).
Care to answer an honest question ?
If they are so irrelevant then why do they scare you so much ?
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >
> >
> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>
> >> LOL
> >
> > A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>
> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> What then?
His family will continue to care for him.
You have a better solution ?
Perhaps a final one ?
>
> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in America the
> freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
pay for it.
�n�hw��f
> Well, now that you have definitively proven your point
> I'm forced to believe you. You credibility is
> just that high now.
Sure, the Tea Party shtick was all just astroturf:
"Tea Party: The Documentary" -- Attending a Bizarre Movie Premiere
for Right-Wingers in Washington
By Adele M. Stan, AlterNet. Posted December 4, 2009.
Presented by FreedomWorks, the front group that organized the 9/12
March, a new documentary on the tea parties attempts to suggest that
the protests were spontaneous.
The movement's stars were out in force at the Washington D.C.,
premiere of "Tea Party: The Documentary." Before the Wednesday night
screening, presentations by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey,
Senator Jim DeMint and Rep. Joe "You Lie" Wilson of South Carolina,
Rep. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Rep. Tom Price of Georgia --
all Republicans -- got the half-full auditorium in the Ronald Reagan
Building humming.
Price, who chairs the Republican Study Committee, presented each of
the film's "stars" -- five movement participants characterized as
"regular citizens" by director Pritchett Cotten -- with a plaque
bearing the text of a resolution introduced in the House of
Representatives thanking Tea Party activists for their participation
in the September 12th march on Washington.
The film conveys the stories of five activists chosen to represent
the movement's everyman and everywoman -- the kind of people who were
motivated by Washington D.C.-based lobbying groups to shout down
members of Congress at town-hall meetings in their districts this
summer. "I think it's a compelling story," Matt Kibbe, president of
FreedomWorks, told me after the screening. "Here's real people in it
with real beliefs. It sort of debunks the whole astroturf thing."
What Astroturfing?
Kibbe apparently saw no irony in his comments, or in the fact that
the premiere was sponsored by FreedomWorks, an organization chaired
by Armey that's known as an astroturfing outfit for its campaign to
foment discontent among those regular citizens nationwide.
FreedomWorks was instrumental in orchestrating the disruption of
town-hall meetings on health care reform called by members of
Congress during the August recess. (You can find the FreedomWorks
town-hall action kit here in a PDF file; this famous memo [PDF] on
how to disrupt a town-hall meeting was distributed by the Tea Party
Patriots Google Groups listserv, which was managed at the time by
FreedomWorks staffer Florida State Chairman Tom Gaitens
Also involved in creating our summer of discontent was Americans For
Prosperity, whose consultant, Joel Aaron Foster, wrote the script for
the Tea Party documentary, and is listed as the press contact on the
movie media kit [PDF]. Throughout the film, AFP's ubiquitous "Hands
Off My Health-Care" signs, which feature a bloody handprint, bob up
and down at Tea Party rallies. Despite circumstantial evidence that
the two groups work together, I've never seen their two logos on the
same event at the same time; they function like the alter-egos of
some malevolent superhero. (UPDATE: FreedomWorks Press Secretary Adam
Brandon told me that AFP was not invited to participate in the
September 12 march because of AFP's support for the Troubled Assets
Relief Program, or TARP.)
"Tea Party: The Documentary" may not earn a nod from Oscar, but it's
a slickly produced piece of cinema that will likely serve as an
effective organizing tool for FreedomWorks and other like-minded
organizations -- and make a bit of dough for its producers, Ground
Floor Video, the company owned by executive producer Luke Livingston,
and Riddled With Bullets, director Cotten's production company.
Ground Floor Video is selling DVDs of the film. When you consider
that 70,000 people came to the march, and tens of thousands more are
involved in the movement, DVD sales could yield a pretty penny. This
is, after all, a movement that purports to be all about capitalism.
FreedomWorks' Kibbe is quick to say that the film is an enterprise
separate from his organization, though FreedomWorks is listed as a
"contributor" to the film, as are Americans For Prosperity, Tea Party
Patriots and Tea Party Express.
The film's everyperson stars all hail from the Atlanta area, which is
also home base to Americans For Prosperity President Tim Phillips,
whose last gig was as a partner with Ralph Reed in the Atlanta-based
Century Strategies, an astroturfing and lobbying group implicated in
the Jack Abramoff bribery scandal. The main characters are identified
on screen only by their first names. There's Jenny Beth -- that's
Jenny Beth Martin, a former GOP consultant, who leads Tea Party
Patriots, a group that names FreedomWorks as a partner on its Web
site. Dr. Fred makes an appearance -- that's Dr. Fred Shessel, vice
president of a group called Docs For Patient Care that opposes health
care reform, and a partner in Georgia Urology. William Temple, an
historical reenactor, provides what comic relief there is in the
film. Temple was chosen to lead the 9/12 March dressed in full
Revolutionary War regalia, which he also donned for the premiere.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Next time dont play post edit with me, boyo.
^_^
�n�hw��f
of pure thought with
news:m9rnh5h910mp0f6dq...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 06 Dec 2009 11:02:15 -0600, "�n�hw��f"
> <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net> clouded the waters of pure
>>thought with news:cf4mh591gtqv7h520...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 18:02:35 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith
>>>>>><not_...@bogus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit
>>>>>>>them instead of having to deal with the facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://gawker.com/5215126/oh--thats-what-that-means-fox-news-le
>>>>>>ar ns-the-definition-of-teabagging
>>>>>
>>>>>Nice unbiased reference you dug up there.
>>>>
>>>> LOTS more !!!
>>>
>>> Yes, lots and lots of leftist wingers "news" sources. I'm quite
>>> sure you are right about that. Seven "news sources" and one to
>>> rule them all.
>>>
>>
>>Nice conspiracy theory, k00ky.
>>
>>So whos this alleged "ruler-of-news"?
>>
>>LULZ
>
> Faux "invented" teabaggers, right?
The concept was a FreedomWorks idea AFAIK:
"sponsored by FreedomWorks, an organization chaired by Armey that's
known as an astroturfing outfit for its campaign to foment discontent
among those regular citizens nationwide. FreedomWorks was
instrumental in orchestrating the disruption of town-hall meetings on
health care reform called by members of Congress during the August
recess. (You can find the FreedomWorks town-hall action kit here in a
PDF file;
http://www.freedomworks.org/files/FW_July%204%20Recess%20Action%
20Kit_6-26-09.pdf
this famous memo [PDF]
http://thinkprogress.org/wp-
content/uploads/2009/07/townhallactionmemo.pdf
on how to disrupt a town-hall meeting was distributed by the Tea
Party Patriots Google Groups listserv, which was managed at the time
by FreedomWorks staffer Florida State Chairman Tom Gaitens"
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/08/anti-health-care-reform-
group-yeah-were-packing-and-disrupting-the-health-care-town-halls.php
�n�hw��f
with news:u6qnh55mmgrdv38o4...@4ax.com:
The Wingnut Wurlitzer.
^_^
Jeff M
> Jeff M <nos...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>> Winston_Smith wrote:
>>
>>> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
>>> heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
>>>
>>> However.
>>>
>>> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
>>> Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a leftist winger
>>> attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
>> The Boston Tea Party wasn't corporate sponsored.
>
> sponsored. Including every last one of our beloved elected officials.
But today's Olympians at least know their event is corporate sponsored
and don't try to deny it, and their sponsors don't try to conceal their
manipulations and their real agendas.
Many teabaggers are sadly misinformed, intentionally misled, willfully
ignorant, irrationally angry and pathetically gullible.
Jeff M
>>
>>> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
>>> heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
>>>
>>> However.
>>>
>>> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
>>> Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a leftist winger
>>> attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
>> The Boston Tea Party wasn't corporate sponsored.
>
>
>
> "Colonial merchants, some of them smugglers, played a significant role
> in the protests. Because the Tea Act made legally imported tea cheaper,
> Legitimate tea importers who had not been named as consignees by the
> East India Company were also threatened with financial ruin by the Tea
> Act.[43] Another major concern for merchants was that the Tea Act gave
> the East India Company a monopoly on the tea trade, and it was feared
> that this government-created monopoly might be extended in the future to
> include other goods."
You are mistakenly conflating the specific instance of dumping tea in
Boston Harbor, i.e., the "Boston Tea Party" with the entire spectrum of
opposition to the Tea Act.
Lib Loo
"tankfixer" <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2584feb...@news.bytemine.net...
> In article <hfetqi$1md$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> CurlySu...@live.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>> >
>> > Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them
>> > instead
>> > of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>> Actually the term was around years prior to the radical right wackos
>> adopting the it. Gotta love their ignorancy...
>
> Anderson Cooper is a right wing wacko ?
> Who would have known..
LOL, Anderson who? His ratings are almost as low as Obama's!
Anderson Cooper’s Ratings Fading Faster than a Spray Tan
Thursday, December 4, 2009
Anderson Cooper, the closeted gay son of Upper Eastside socialite Gloria
Vanderbilt, is fading in the ratings faster than a spray tan.
His 10PM show, “Anderson Cooper 360,” has declined 62% in total viewers and
70% in adults 25-54 from November 2008, according to Nielsen figures.
Last month, in Cooper’s time slot, Fox News’ “On the Record” attracted an
average viewership of 1.9 million while “360″ averaged a paltry 672,000;
reruns of MSNBC’s “Countdown” and HLN’s Nancy Grace show averaged 655,000
and 458,000, respectively.
But in the all important 25-54 demographic, those same repeats won out over
Cooper with 224,000 (MSNBC) and 214,000 (HLN).
The question now for Cooper is, despite the fact that his “mummy” sits on
the board of Time-Warner (the owner of CNN), how much longer will the cable
TV provider let this stinker of a show drag on before they pull the plug and
put it out of its misery?
http://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2009/12/03/anderson-coopers-ratings-fading-faster-than-a-spray-tan/
tankfixer
nos...@nothanks.org says...
Really, the quote doesn't back up that assertion.
It states they merchants were involved in the protests, thats plural you
know...
Why not just admit the original claim was wrong and move on to something
else...
Jeff M
But history does back up my assertion. What the quote doesn't back up
is an assertion that the original Boston Tea Party was corporate sponsored.
> It states they merchants were involved in the protests, thats plural you
> know...
Yes, merchants, farmers, politicians, clerks, laborers, and others, too,
I suppose. But nothing in the quote states the Boston Tea Party was
corporate sponsored, does it?
> Why not just admit the original claim was wrong and move on to something
> else...
Because the original Boston Tea Party was not corporate sponsored. You
tried to show otherwise, but failed. Why not just admit that your claim
was wrong and move on to something else?
Jeff M
> Jeff M <nos...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>> Winston_Smith wrote:
>>> Jeff M <nos...@nothanks.org> wrote:
>>>> Winston_Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The term "teabagger" may have been around a long time. I've never
>>>>> heard it, but I'll accept your statement.
>>>>>
>>>>> However.
>>>>>
>>>>> They call them "tea parties". Just like the event during the American
>>>>> Revolution. Shifting that to "teabaggers" is simply a leftist winger
>>>>> attempt to spin the patriotic reference into a smear.
>>>> The Boston Tea Party wasn't corporate sponsored.
>>> Neither were the original Olympics. Everything today is corporate
>>> sponsored. Including every last one of our beloved elected officials.
>> But today's Olympians at least know their event is corporate sponsored
>> and don't try to deny it, and their sponsors don't try to conceal their
>> manipulations and their real agendas.
>
> Do they disclose their agendas? Or are they just good citizens
> without any agenda? Do they disclose their manipulations or does
> candidate A get the nomination over candidate B by luck - just after a
> few phone calls are made and a few promises sealed? What about the
> "Citizens for ...." commitees that are always industry shills when the
> funding is disclosed.
Political contributions are largely reportable and/or traceable, which
makes the situation slightly better. Astroturfing is all about avoiding
disclosure.
>> Many teabaggers are sadly misinformed, intentionally misled, willfully
>> ignorant, irrationally angry and pathetically gullible.
>
> Yup. Fully agreed on that. Same can be said of many Obama lovers.
> Neither extreme is very bright.
Extremists often are damaged or vulnerable figures.
John R. Carroll
Yes, you are.
the quote doesn't back up that assertion.
> It states they merchants were involved in the protests, thats plural
> you know...
>
> Why not just admit the original claim was wrong and move on to
> something else...
Integrity, Intellectual honesty.
You know, stuff like that.
--
John R. Carroll
John R. Carroll
> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>
>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>
>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>> What then?
>
> His family will continue to care for him.
Did they discuss this matter and agree?
That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
Selfish even.
> You have a better solution ?
> Perhaps a final one ?
>
>>
>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
>
> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
> pay for it.
Great.
Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't feel
put out, will you.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer wrote:
> >>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL
> >>>
> >>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>
> >> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> >> What then?
> >
> > His family will continue to care for him.
>
>
>
> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
I don't know if they did or not.
But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
So is old age.
What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
that burden ?
> Selfish even.
So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>
> > You have a better solution ?
> > Perhaps a final one ?
> >
> >>
> >> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
> >> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
> >
> > I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced to
> > pay for it.
>
> Great.
> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you won't feel
> put out, will you.
You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
lives when you claim to support choice..
tankfixer
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
You can learn it, perhaps..
Until then you can remain a leftist stooge
Jeff M
That's funny, my position hasn't changed one iota.
John R. Carroll
> In article <L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com>,
> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>
>>>> tankfixer wrote:
>>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
>>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>>>
>>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
>>>> What then?
>>>
>>> His family will continue to care for him.
>>
>>
>>
>> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
>
> I don't know if they did or not.
> But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
Because if they didn't discuss and agree, this kid will end up as a
responsibility of the public.
That means I'll pay.
>
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
> So is old age.
> What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
> that burden ?
Let him die, alone and miserable. That would teach the Palin's of the world
a lesson.
>
>> Selfish even.
>
> So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
I am old .
>
>>
>>> You have a better solution ?
>>> Perhaps a final one ?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
>>>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
>>>
>>> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced
>>> to pay for it.
>>
>> Great.
>> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you
>> won't feel put out, will you.
>
> You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
> lives when you claim to support choice..
I'd just like all factors to be considered when that choice is made is all.
Sarah Palin is little more than a contestant.
She competes for the accolades, not the job.
It's the real work without glamour that she abhor's and that's what her life
looks like.
She isn't really a quitter, she's just in it for Sarah.
--
John R. Carroll
tankfixer
>
> tankfixer wrote:
> > In article <L6qdnTmIYPfl2oHW...@giganews.com>,
> > nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>
> >> tankfixer wrote:
> >>> In article <dq-dnZotNvtRkIHW...@giganews.com>,
> >>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>>
> >>>> tankfixer wrote:
> >>>>> In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >>>>> nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >>>>>> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> LOL
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>>>
> >>>> When Trig Palin is 35, Sarah will just be dead.
> >>>> What then?
> >>>
> >>> His family will continue to care for him.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Did they discuss this matter and agree?
> >
> > I don't know if they did or not.
> > But regardless what business is it of yours or mine ?
>
>
> Because if they didn't discuss and agree, this kid will end up as a
> responsibility of the public.
Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
condition.
> That means I'll pay.
Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
>
> >
> >> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
> >
> > So is old age.
> > What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
> > that burden ?
>
> Let him die, alone and miserable. That would teach the Palin's of the world
> a lesson.
So your mock compassion for the pregnant is just another example of
leftist hypocrisy.
>
> >
> >> Selfish even.
> >
> > So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>
> I am old .
So you complain all the while you impose the burden of old age on your
children and onto society..
>
> >
> >>
> >>> You have a better solution ?
> >>> Perhaps a final one ?
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I also don't understand why Palin wants to deny every woman in
> >>>> America the freedom of choice she herself enjoyed.
> >>>
> >>> I don't have a problem with choice, just as long as I am not forced
> >>> to pay for it.
> >>
> >> Great.
> >> Trig can move in with you and yours when he's middle aged and you
> >> won't feel put out, will you.
> >
> > You sure are one to tell other people how and what to do with their
> > lives when you claim to support choice..
>
> I'd just like all factors to be considered when that choice is made is all.
You don't know that didn't occur, you just assume so.
> Sarah Palin is little more than a contestant.
> She competes for the accolades, not the job.
>
> It's the real work without glamour that she abhor's and that's what her life
> looks like.
> She isn't really a quitter, she's just in it for Sarah.
YOu sure are judgemental of others, for a leftist..
Cliff
NOW they want quickie death panels.
Well, not panels, exactly. Just deaths (of others, naturally), as usual.
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&source=hp&q=republican+%22long+term+care%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
They tried to ban long term medical care.
Perhaps all the sick non-rethugs get at a hospital would be
an asprin (US$ 10,000) and a band-aid (US$ 15,000) before
being sent home or kicked out on the streets to die ....
Meanwhile the RNC gets full coverage including abortions on
demand.
--
Cliff
Cliff
Ghost) wrote:
>That would be because the Dems were still writing the bills and not letting
>the Repubs in on it.
The same rethugs saying "No" while taking all
that special interest money?
The same ones that tried to exempt States with the letter "U" in their name?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>No, pinhead. Whats *funny* is that
>
>>You dumb fucks charge
>
>Well, now that you have definitively proven your point with ad hominid
>attacks, I'm forced to believe you. You credibility is just that high
>now.
Way better than any rethug's or winger's !!!
--
Cliff
Cliff
>Presented by FreedomWorks, the front group that organized the 9/12
>March, a new documentary on the tea parties attempts to suggest that
>the protests were spontaneous.
Like the Faux "news" "million doctor march" which
actually was about three off-duty nurses (perhaps looking
for an icecream stand)?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
>So is old age.
>What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
>that burden ?
The rethugs have the answer for you !!!
The Quickie !!
NOW the rethugs want quickie death panels.
Cliff
>> That's quite a burden to put on your kids wouldn't you say?
>
>So is old age.
>What solution do you propose the government should impose to alieviate
>that burden ?
The rethugs have the answer for you !!!
Cliff
Cliff
>
>> Selfish even.
>
>So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
Like all those elderly teabaggers protesting against their socialized medicare
& socialized social security & socialized VA medical care & socialized pension
plans?
--
Cliff
Cliff
>> That means I'll pay.
>
>Seems fair if that happens, you are free with others money..
Like you claim Palin is with her kids & their futures & earnings?
--
Cliff
pandora
"�n�hw��f" <snuh...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CD98DFC6CA3F...@216.196.97.142...
> Aratzio <a6ah...@sneakemail.com> clouded the waters of pure thought
> with news:u6qnh55mmgrdv38o4...@4ax.com:
LOL!!!
> ^_^
>
> --
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COaoYqkpkUA
> cageprisoners.com|www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.eyeonpalin.org
> _____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
> / __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
> _\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
> /___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
Cliff
>In article <1crnh5h8oug946op5...@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>>
>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:00:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
>> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
>> >
>> >
>> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
>> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
>> >>
>> >> LOL
>> >
>> >A fine example of leftist hate speech....
>>
>> Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
>
>I don't "hate" anyone...
>
>
>> Palin is funny!
>> And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
>> to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
>> you what to do & think).
>
>Care to answer an honest question ?
>If they are so irrelevant then why do they scare you so much ?
Since when are clowns & fools irrelevant?
Have you ever tried telling a clown that?
--
Cliff
Mullah Fuqu'ar
>On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:43:04 -0800, Mullah Fuqu'ar
><Ayat...@Islamo-Nazi.com> wrote:
>
>> Teabagging has to be a Liberal activity since so many queers are Liberal
>> and it is the Dummycrats that pander them.
>
>Another alias of the cockroach. Off to the Bozo Bin with you, too...
Can't deny my assertion. Poor baby.
-
"More bad news for the Taliban. Remember how
they are promised 72 virgins when they die?
Turns out that it's only one 72-year-old virgin."
Mullah Fuqu'ar
>In article <hfetqi$1md$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>CurlySu...@live.com says...
>>
>> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:45:14 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Cliff <Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Do the right-wing nuts really know what teabagging means???
>> >
>> > Yeah. It's a term the leftist wingers made up to discredit them instead
>> > of having to deal with the facts.
>>
>> Actually the term was around years prior to the radical right wackos
>> adopting the it. Gotta love their ignorancy...
>
>Anderson Cooper is a right wing wacko ?
>Who would have known..
Naw. Cooper is a closet teabagger. That means he is a left wingnut.
tankfixer
>
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 12:45:26 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <1crnh5h8oug946op5...@4ax.com>,
> >Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
> >>
> >> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 09:00:54 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <UO2dnXRa7qktmIbW...@giganews.com>,
> >> >nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Beck/Palin 2012!
> >> >> Downs Syndrome soon to follow.
> >> >>
> >> >> LOL
> >> >
> >> >A fine example of leftist hate speech....
> >>
> >> Why do YOU hate Beck & Palin?
> >
> >I don't "hate" anyone...
> >
> >
> >> Palin is funny!
> >> And Beck is just another lying winger idiot that claims
> >> to have a HS diploma (and is hence qualified to tell
> >> you what to do & think).
> >
> >Care to answer an honest question ?
> >If they are so irrelevant then why do they scare you so much ?
>
> Since when are clowns & fools irrelevant?
> Have you ever tried telling a clown that?
I figured you couldn't/wouldn't answer that question honestly.
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
When did I claim any such thing ?
tankfixer
Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
can you answer the question ?
Or are you just full of meaningless slogans your handlers send you ?
John R. Carroll
"Not necessarily, one or more of his siblings may very well take care of
him, just as has happened for countless other persons with his
condition."
Right there.
--
John R. Carroll
Cliff
>In article <auooh5938ro4chd3i...@4ax.com>,
>Clhuprich...@aoltmovetheperiodc.om says...
>>
>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:40:04 -0800, tankfixer <paul.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> Selfish even.
>> >
>> >So do you intend to let your kids off the hook when you grow old ?
>>
>> Like all those elderly teabaggers protesting against their socialized medicare
>> & socialized social security & socialized VA medical care & socialized pension
>> plans?
>
>can you answer the question ?
Can you gibber in English?
>Or are you just full of meaningless slogans your handlers send you ?
You must have missed Faux "news" & their teabaggers.
And Palin fans being asked what it's all about <VBG>.
--
Cliff
tankfixer
nu...@bidness.dev.nul says...
I said may.. not must..
Why are you leftists so concerned about others lives ?
Is it because yours are so miserable ?
Cliff
Just how mentally impaired are you?
Perhaps she already has him on socialized care though.
Seen her nursing on any private plane flights or at
any book nursings?
BTW, She stopped calling me (I'm on the DO NOT CALL lists !!!)
asking that I come to see her & buy her book.
Is she still in Texas or AZ?
--
ClIff