Re: Asia is NOT attacking The USA and NATO: Millions are Dying because the United Snakes and Europe are Attacking the Innocent People of the Middle East
John Smith
> In article<e9d15dcd-f7d9-4287-b868-6b14e31d1a50
> @l18g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, joetu...@yahoo.com says...
>> On May 17, 11:42 pm, BDK<Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>>> In article<8325c27e-08a1-47ad-a66f-e6bdff1983ac@
>>> 24g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>, joeturn2...@yahoo.com says...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 17, 8:46 pm, BDK<Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article<6e2bffd8-15eb-4ea7-b42d-62f0b3082a80
>>>>> @c41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, joeturn2...@yahoo.com says...
>>>>>> On May 17, 8:06 pm, BDK<Cont...@Worldcontrol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> In article<5afd8443-45cf-43d5-987b-1ef3b2b8d0d6
>>>>>>> @s2g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, joeturn2...@yahoo.com says...
>>>>>>>> On May 13, 9:14 pm, "zayton"<zay...@newwavecomm.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> joeturn wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 4:46 pm, raven1<quoththera...@nevermore.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 12 May 2011 09:59:27 -0700, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2011 8:04 AM, raven1 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 May 2011 20:42:41 -0700, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/11/2011 8:04 PM, zayton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, you think the CIA can project a hologram in a clear sky with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no medium to project it on, but can't sync sound to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projection. The combination of credulity and stupidity required
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to entertain both of those notions at the same time is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> astounding.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When you consider that the SR-71 Blackbird was first flown in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> late 1950s, when such a plane was widely still considered to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> science fiction ... I would, naturally, suspect they now have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something just as amazing and we would consider still in the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> realm of science ... especially since the billions or even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trillions which have been thrown at black op development projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps here, it would be wise to never say never ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps it would be wise to distinguish wild speculation from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> actual evidence.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wild speculation?
>>>>>>>>>>>> What part? That the SR-71 was designed and built in the 1950s.
>>>>>>>>>>>> That most scientists, back then, were unaware that such technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> had actually went beyond theory and had been implemented and was in
>>>>>>>>>>>> use?
>>>>>>>>>>> I think you're playing fast and loose with the word "theory" here.
>>>>>>>>>>> The SR-71 was more a feat of engineering than theory.
>>>>>>>>>>>> That an analogy of this, being made to suggest what is most likely
>>>>>>>>>>>> occurring today, is in error?
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you know what is likely occurring today? Based on what
>>>>>>>>>>> evidence?
>>>>>>>>>>> I was thinking along the lines of "So, you think the CIA can project
>>>>>>>>>>> a hologram in a clear sky with no medium to project it on"
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any evidence to suggest that this can be done, or is
>>>>>>>>>>> this, again, speculation? And quite frankly, which is a more likely
>>>>>>>>>>> explanation? That airplanes were used, or holograms? What happens if
>>>>>>>>>>> the hologram equipment fails in mid-attack, and the plane just
>>>>>>>>>>> vanishes?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Funny, I think it all either absolute fact, or highly probably and
>>>>>>>>>>>> based in reality!
>>>>>>>>>>> Again, based on evidence, or speculation?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>>>> The hologram did fell in mid flight and the plane lost its wings and
>>>>>>>>>> grew them back twice before impact as captured by Evan Fairbanks film!
>>>>>>>>> and on nobody else's?
>>>>>>>>> It takes a special kind of insanity to hang your delusions on one other
>>>>>>>>> nutcase's doctored footage!- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>> Here is what Evan Fairbanks captured on film watch the wings come and
>>>>>>>> go.
>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ek-Q0T9wK2g
>>>>>>> It's because of him using a shitty video camera, you idiot.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>> Why would a professional photographer jeopardise his career with a
>>>>>> crappy camera?
>>>>> Don't ask me, ask him. Who says he's a pro anyway? A kooksite? Only a
>>>>> total idiot wouldn't see instantly that your "disappearing wings" are
>>>>> nothing more than video artifacts.
>>>>> --
>>>>> BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>> Look at that one winged plane at1:03 such beautiful footage nothing
>>>> but a professional camera can capture such beauty!
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JwTXEJSr4A&NR=1
>>> No, only an artifacting camera can picture it that way.
>>>
>>> --
>>> BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>> Your confusing the added footaged the CIA put in his documentary to
>> make it look fake.Now their camera was most likely too sophisticated
>> for them to operate or they to used a pocket cam!
> You're confused, you think you're sane. You aren't.
>
ROFLOL!!!
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> It's great when kooks try to out kook the other.
>
kook?
ROFLOL
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> Attention Please:
>
> To anyone responding to the idiot known as John Smith:
> Please remove rec.sport.golf from the list of news groups.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ___,
> \o
> |
> / \
> .
> “I LIKES ME POT!!!”
> bk
(WARNING: Above edited for truthful content.)
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> Why is it that kooks don't think things through :(
> There are a number of very solid assemblies on an aircraft.
> Like engines and undercarriage.
> One engine was located a distance from the building.
> What you see coming out with the fireball is the engine....
> And why are you attempting to piss golf players off ?
Are your little golf balls itching too?
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> YEAH RIIIGHT.
> All that video does is give another view of the second airliner
> impacting the Tower.
> And it (the video) has been around for a long time
>
> And you trust the word of a godbotherer?
> How about giving me all your property because after Saturday you wont
> need it according to a godbotherer :)
Even this slut/whore probable told the truth now and then:
http://www.bloggernews.net/126565
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> [shouting] NOTICE HOW THE PRO OFFICIAL STORY APOLOGISTS ARE NOT CASUAL
> POSTERS, BUT TRAINED IN MANIPULATION AND KNOWLEDGABLE TO THE UTMOST
> DEGREE IN EVERY ASPECT OF DEBUNKING 911 TRUTH! THIS IS PART OF AN
> OPERATION OF DISINFORMATION BY GOVERNMENT SHILLS, NOT HONEST DEBATE BY
> DISINTERESTED PARTIES.
Really? Huh?
They just look like persistent morons who repetitively repeat the same
lines with the same results, but offer no concrete support of their
suppositions and opinions -- one could interpret that to be insanity! I
do ...
Regards,
JS
Joe from Kokomo
> They just look like persistent morons who repetitively repeat the
> same lines with the same results, but offer no concrete support of
> their suppositions and opinions -- one could interpret that to be
> insanity! I do ...
Huh?
You've just described...YOURSELF!
* persistent moron (2362 posts and counting)
* repetitively repeat the same lines with the same results
* offer no concrete support of their suppositions and opinions
This describes YOU to a "T".
> one could interpret that to be insanity!
And your point is...?
John Smith
> In article<a750a709-eeda-47ac-a1d8-
> df1d41...@p13g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, joetu...@yahoo.com
> says...
>> On May 18, 11:09 pm, arthrny...@webtv.net wrote:
>>> On May 18, 1:15 pm, joeturn<joeturn2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On May 18, 12:15 am, arthrny...@webtv.net wrote:
>>>>> On May 17, 11:46 pm, george<gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On May 18, 1:09 pm, joeturn<joeturn2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Look at that one winged plane at1:03 such beautiful footage nothing
>>>>>>> but a professional camera can capture such beauty!
>>>>>> You haven't watched that video have you
>>>>> He probably thinks of the 'flying wings' of the 3rd reich .
>>>> You have nailed it did you know the late great Peter Jennings from CNN
>>>> was a [poor source as told by BDK?
>>> Peter Jennings worked at ABC for many years . He never worked at CNN-
>>> it was at CTV (Canada TV) where his career started .He was a very good
>>> man . May he rest in Peace .- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Thanks for the correction ,They killed him off with cancer because of
>> his knowlege of the 911 coverup.
> He got cancer because he smoked a shitload of cigarettes, that's why. He
> wasn't crazy, stupid, or gullible enough to belive in 911 troof.
>
I think if you check your statistics, more people are getting lung
cancer than ever before, and smoking has never been lower ...
The cig cover story is beginning to fall apart ...
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> On May 30, 6:47 pm, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com> wrote:
>> On 5/30/2011 1:48 PM, joeturn wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> Same as you we are both smoking the UCC but you cant see it.Our old
>>> constitution does not apply to anyone that is a citizen of the USA.We
>>> are simply worker bees to pay off the USA Bankrutcy debt.Our Solvern
>>> Queen Mom owns the USA and calls all the shots and she does not apply
>>> the constitution she goes by the UCC.
>>
>>> You forgot the creature from Jekyll Island.Ga.
>>
>>> You are living in a bubble John Smith you concentrate on small issues
>>> such as politics when you should be looking at the big picture. At
>>> least you dont have a grammar hangup that overides your thought
>>> prossess but it is some else that causes you not to be able to grasp
>>> reality.
>>
>> I am simply no reason for you to deny and ignore Constitutional law, the
>> only legal law of the land ...
>>
>> I am afraid your reasons will have to stand on their own.
>>
>> Regards,
>> JS
>
> WAKE UP JOHN! smell the coffee its a litterbox!
>
> http://www.freedom-school.com/ucc-and-you.pdf
>
> http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread555233/pg1
>
You seem to feel that because the criminals do not obey the constitution
there is now no reason for anyone else to.
I don't, we simply imprison and hang the criminals and return the law to
the land.
This is the TRUE reason the forefathers gave us weapons for!
I think Jefferson said it best:
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood
of patriots and tyrants. It is it’s natural manure."
It is no different than any other war, in this case it is just more
personal and involves domestic enemies, as opposed to foreign.
It amazes me, back when in school in the 60's, this was standard fare
and you were taught to protect your country -- because if you lose it,
you don't have a country to live in ... I guess the school system has
failed many, again ...
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> See what I mean John you were taught to protect your country from an
> invisable foe.The only countrys that need to learn to defend
> themselves are people that are afraid the USA will attack them.Soo far
> every World War has had the USA at the helm,they financed Hitlers
> Regiem,then sneaked him out of harms way when the USA joined forces
> against him.These madd Nazi Scientist are still in command of the
> government of the USA this is their 4th Reich
Some do claim, the THC in the smoke burns their eyes, from good bud ...
Maybe Corsi will release an audio version of his book:
"Where's the Birth Certificate?: The Case that Barack Obama is not
Eligible to be President"
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> what is in effect now that US Constitution was replaced.
>>
>> Regards,
>> JS
>
Strange every service man takes an oath to uphold and defend the
Constitution, isn't?
Should they decide to uphold that oath, and actually read the
Constitution, and the wisdom to read the forefathers and know their true
intent, the shadow government should have hell-to-pay!
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
> Strange every service man takes an oath to uphold and defend the
> Constitution, isn't?
>
> Should they decide to uphold that oath, and actually read the
> Constitution, and the wisdom to read the forefathers and know their true
> intent, the shadow government should have hell-to-pay!
>
> Regards,
> JS
>
And, of course, you know what they are sworn to defend the Constitution
from, right?
Every school boy knew, in grammar school, when I was but a child ...
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> ...
Have you been asleep? Are you just going to go on repeating what I have
always been saying here?
Of course the criminals are in charge. That is simply why all my posts
have been about wresting government by the people, and for the people,
back from the criminals and restoring Constitutional law.
This is why republicrats = democans.
Money is the control mechanism which allows them to salt the ballots
with only criminals they have chosen ... the 1%, the richest elite have
"the button" which decides the elections. They own both sides before
"the race" begins. It is simply a fixed game which they always win ...
Them always winning is getting quite tiring, don't you think?
When enough have had enough, expect changes, not before ... you attempt
to call the race before a STRONG attempt is made to "change horses" ...
all the horses we have seen, for decades now, all have the same owners
-- puppet masters!
Regards,
JS
John Smith
>
> ...
While it is true, I am speaking of myself, it is not true "they" own the
USA. I did not sell them the country, and I do not believe most of my
fellow citizens sold them their country.
If a crime has been committed, and someone has falsely promised "them"
the USA in exchange for money, then those people should be delivered up
to "them" for punishment -- and, "they" will have to look to "them" for
the recovery of their monies ... I mean, it is like, DUH!
Put simply, it is like this, if I create fraudulent documents, and
negotiated the sale of YOUR house to someone, and they come to collect,
would you expect me to be delivered up for punishment and to make
restitution to "them?" Or would you willingly give them your house, or
else give them the money they paid me? I mean, again, like, DUH!
Your logic and reasoning is rather faulty, you need to refine that a
bit, or else be willing to lose your home ...
Regards,
JS
John Smith
> On Jun 1, 4:29 am, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com> wrote:
>> On 5/31/2011 9:34 PM, joeturn wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 31, 11:45 pm, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com> wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/2011 8:43 PM, John Smith wrote:
>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>> Strange every service man takes an oath to uphold and defend the
>>>>> Constitution, isn't?
>>
>>>>> Should they decide to uphold that oath, and actually read the
>>>>> Constitution, and the wisdom to read the forefathers and know their true
>>>>> intent, the shadow government should have hell-to-pay!
>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> JS
>>
>>>> And, of course, you know what they are sworn to defend the Constitution
>>>> from, right?
>>
>>>> Every school boy knew, in grammar school, when I was but a child ...
>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> JS
>>
>>> Your talking to your self John. Read this when you get a chance!
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> While it is true, I am speaking of myself, it is not true "they" own the
>> USA. I did not sell them the country, and I do not believe most of my
>> fellow citizens sold them their country.
>>
>> If a crime has been committed, and someone has falsely promised "them"
>> the USA in exchange for money, then those people should be delivered up
>> to "them" for punishment -- and, "they" will have to look to "them" for
>> the recovery of their monies ... I mean, it is like, DUH!
>>
>> Put simply, it is like this, if I create fraudulent documents, and
>> negotiated the sale of YOUR house to someone, and they come to collect,
>> would you expect me to be delivered up for punishment and to make
>> restitution to "them?" Or would you willingly give them your house, or
>> else give them the money they paid me? I mean, again, like, DUH!
>>
>> Your logic and reasoning is rather faulty, you need to refine that a
>> bit, or else be willing to lose your home ...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> think your a home owner you need take a closer look at your bill of
> sale!
> The only way to keep them from taking the house you live in is to have
> a lien put against it for lots more money than what its worth.
>
> Then Great Britain can over power your lien since they own all the
> land and dwellings built on their property,They wont do this because
> every one would quit paying property taxes and income taxes if the
> public knew they were but slaves paying rent to the Queen of England
> and making moneies off her majesties property to repay the USAs
> Bankruptcy note!
>
> There was once a problem that cut Great Britains profits down on
> taxation and slavery.
>
> So they created a massive population killoff by pitting the North
> against the South and financed both sides of the revolution just to
> teach us peasants a lesson.Most people today and back then thought it
> was to free the Slaves,this is farther from the truth because they had
> the market of the slave trade.
>
> Old Christopher Columbus was the son of Vlad the Impaler and took over
> his Slave Trade business and called it a Westward Route to India so
> Span could finance his voyages to collect slaves in the black-
> market .This was the birth of the term Black-Market a continued slave
> market after Europe said no more slaves!
>
> Now we are all their SLAVES and have not been freed to purchase to own!
Here we go, AGAIN!
You begin telling me what I have pointed out to many before you, as if
you just discovered it, or somehow think you are thinking thoughts never
before developed, before your existence!
Funny to watch, by annoying ...
Yes, the taxes are unfair, yes, these are taxes now being levied by
criminals -- in the past we got something for our taxes, now we continue
paying the taxes "they" are using, BUT "they" have either cut the
services, or are cutting the services, YET, "they" still expect us to
continue on paying the taxes!
"They" have over taken our military, which is supported by OUR taxes,
and use it as "their" own personal military to steal the resources of
the world and punish those who stand in their way of corporate profits
-- as, but, one example of "their" crimes!
Yeah, this is why I am saying, "WE MUST THROW OUT THE CRIMINALS BEFORE
WE CAN EVER, DO YOU GET THAT "EVER?", EXPECT ANYTHING TO CHANGE!" Until
this is done, progress will be small or none -- all energy needs to be
focused on the illegal public servants and their puppet masters ...
The criminals need thrown out, and we need to return to the forefathers
meaning of what they wrote in the Constitution -- NOT falsely
interpreted "meanings" delivered to us by nine appointed criminals to
the supreme court. If you elect a criminal president, expect him to
appoint criminals -- AND, remember, the ballot only contains candidates
which are loyal to the shadow government -- this is done by causing a
candidate to need tens or hundreds of millions, or more, then the shadow
powers only giving these large sums to their candidates ...
Regards,
JS
RHF
> On 6/13/2011 1:32 AM, RHF wrote:
>
> > On Jun 12, 7:49 pm, "Brenda Ann"<newsgro...@fullspectrumradio.org>
> > wrote:
> >> "John Smith" wrote in messagenews:it3pqa$na8$5...@dont-email.me...
>
> >> On 6/12/2011 6:37 PM, Colanth wrote:
>
> >>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:22:05 -0700 (PDT), RHF
> >>> <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >>> 281 lines of bullshit snipped.
>
> >>> EXACTLY what crime, in what state, did Weiner commit?
>
> >>> (That's not to say that the sleazebag shouldn't resign.)
>
> >> Sending sexually suggestive material to a child?
>
> >> --
>
> >> That would indeed be a crime, if he had done so. There is absolutely nothing
> >> at this point to show that he has. The police were at the home of the girl
> >> after a report of her e-mailing with Weiner, but both the girl and her
> >> parents denied that anything like sexting occurred, and that only legitimate
> >> correspondence was made between the girl and the representative.
>
> > BAD : So You Defend Internet Pedophiles Like
> > The 'Sicko' Weiner -sicko-sicko-sicko-sicko-
> > -serious-allegations- -serious-allegations-
> > =Requires=A=Complete=Independent=Investigation=
> > -'no'-obama-regime-cover-up- : WaterGate !
> > -'no'-doj-ag-holder-cover-up- : WaterGate !
> > -'no'-fbi-mueler-cover-up- : WaterGate !
> > .
>
> I think what Brenda pointed out is correct, there seems to be no proof
> of weiners weiner having done anything inappropriate.
>
> Do you have any links claiming to have any evidence? I don't think
> there is any problem in us going where the evidence leads, but like
> Brenda, I think we should first view evidence and establish it is valid
> before jumping to conclusions ... I mean there is that bit of troubling
> ethics and moral requirements, "... innocent until proven guilty ..."
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> JS
> “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
> the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
> government.” -- Patrick Henry
.
John Smith -here-is-more-proof-that-
*News*Flash*More*Weiner*Sexting*Photos*@*Work*
Weiner is a Total 'Sicko' Weiner !
Making Pelosi a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Making Reid a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Making Obama a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Just Say 'NO' To 'Sicko' Weiners in 2012 !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/9a4704f707e0084a
.
*News*Flash*More*Weiner*Sexting*Photos*@*Work*
TMZ Reveals Weiner Sexting Photos On-the-Job in
The House GYM : That's a Clear Ethics Violation !
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/weiner_trapped_gym_rat_fQgQvnOm8vo65NdfnZBFeO
The 11 More 'Sexting' Photos from GYM in the
'Rayburn' US House Office Building.
http://newsone.com/newsone-original/ggaynor/busted-weiner-gym-photo/
.
WeinerGate© : 'Sicko' Weiner [D-NY] Admits to Being
a Real 'Weiner' a Lying "Sexting" Jerk-Off-in-Office !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/092606c0bf7bc23f
.
? So Why Hasn't The DOJ-FBI Opened A Case File
On 'Sicko' Weiner's Sexting To A Teenage Girl !
-obama-cover-up- -holder-cover-up- -mueller-cover-up-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5218105c66d5f19f
.
So Why Hasn't The DOJ-FBI Opened A Case File
On 'Sicko' Weiner's Sexting To A Teenage Girl !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/82ef28a285023499
.
WeinerGate© Liberal Democrat Internet Pedophiles
Like The 'Sicko' Weiner -sicko-sicko-sicko-sicko-
-serious-allegations- -serious-allegations-
=Requires=A=Complete=Independent=Investigation=
-'no'-obama-regime-cover-up- : WaterGate !
-'no'-doj-ag-holder-cover-up- : WaterGate !
-'no'-fbi-mueler-cover-up- : WaterGate !
.
Weiner the 'Sicko' Liberal !
-just-like- Obama : Pelosi : Reid
Liberals All -sicko-liberals-sickos-
Just Say 'NO' To Sickos In 2012 !
WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate©
.
Weiner the 'Sicko' Democrat !
-just-like- Obama : Pelosi : Reid
Democrats All -sicko-democrats-sickos-
Just Say 'NO' To Sickos In 2012 !
WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate©
.
WeinerGate© : 'Sicko' Weiner [D-NY] Admits
to Being a Real 'Weiner' a Lying "Sexting"
Jerk-Off-in-Office !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/e064b7e88a9fa47f
.
.
baracking weiner = weinering barack
-bringing-down-the-regime-in-2012-
.
Oops... President Obama Continues To Support
'Sicko' Weiner Staying In-Office !
WeinerGate© Is The 'Sicko' Gift That Keeps
On Giving All The Way To 2012 ! -with- More
New 'Sicko' Weiner On-the-Job Sexting Photos
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/527b3f74d30b40d3
.
.
John Smith
> ...
Yanno'?
It does seem a bit strange, now that you mention it, that he has run off
to therapy to get help, or is that just me?