Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Texas worst draught - right now
45 views
Skip to first unread message
Barbarian Mutual
Jan 8, 2012, 3:17:50 PM1/8/12
to
-- http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
See the original story on NBCDFW.com
“It is a challenging time, especially to bring awareness to our
consumers and businesses how critical our drought has impacted our
reservoirs,” said Denise Hickey, spokesperson for the North Texas
Municipal Water District. “As we're planning to move through this
drought period, we're also planning and initiating additional
strategies to bring additional sources online.”
The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
under water restrictions indefinitely.
The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
should continue watering them.
“A lot of trees are dormant and a lot of trees go dormant early when
there's a drought situation. And they kind of do that for a defense
mechanism,” said Matt Grubisich, urban forester for the Texas Trees
Foundation. “Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.”
Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
“It's going to get worse before it gets better,” said Grubisich.
In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
See the original story on NBCDFW.com
“It is a challenging time, especially to bring awareness to our
consumers and businesses how critical our drought has impacted our
reservoirs,” said Denise Hickey, spokesperson for the North Texas
Municipal Water District. “As we're planning to move through this
drought period, we're also planning and initiating additional
strategies to bring additional sources online.”
The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
under water restrictions indefinitely.
The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
should continue watering them.
“A lot of trees are dormant and a lot of trees go dormant early when
there's a drought situation. And they kind of do that for a defense
mechanism,” said Matt Grubisich, urban forester for the Texas Trees
Foundation. “Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.”
Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
“It's going to get worse before it gets better,” said Grubisich.
Christopher Helms
Jan 8, 2012, 3:41:57 PM1/8/12
to
On Jan 8, 2:17 pm, Barbarian Mutual
<barbarianfinancialservi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-...
I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not
do his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
<barbarianfinancialservi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-...
do his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
2849 Dead
Jan 8, 2012, 5:48:17 PM1/8/12
to
find any.
--
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable” -JFK
--
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution
inevitable” -JFK
Dawlish
Jan 8, 2012, 5:48:47 PM1/8/12
to
any longer!
2849 Dead
Jan 8, 2012, 6:11:26 PM1/8/12
to
Wally W.
Jan 8, 2012, 7:06:27 PM1/8/12
to
report, did you?
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Jan 9, 2012, 11:15:36 AM1/9/12
to
AGWFacts
Jan 10, 2012, 6:45:40 PM1/10/12
to
who voted for Perry?
--
"I'd like the globe to warm another degree or two or three... and CO2 levels
to increase perhaps another 100ppm - 300ppm." -- cato...@sympatico.ca
AGWFacts
Jan 10, 2012, 6:45:44 PM1/10/12
to
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:
Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
wrote:
far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
2849 Dead
Jan 10, 2012, 7:44:35 PM1/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org>
wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>
>> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
>> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>
>> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
>> find any.
>
>Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
>some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
--
"So called payroll taxes aren't taxes at all" -- Steve Canyon, trying to explain
why millionaires don't actually pay less taxes than median income families.
wrote:
>On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>
>> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
>> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>
>> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
>> find any.
>
>Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
>some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
--
"So called payroll taxes aren't taxes at all" -- Steve Canyon, trying to explain
why millionaires don't actually pay less taxes than median income families.
Steve
Jan 10, 2012, 9:30:24 PM1/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:35 -0800, 2849 Dead <de...@dead.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>>
>>> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
>>> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>>
>>> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
>>> find any.
>>
>>Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>>far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
>>some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
>
>Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
>that they had in 2007.
The Sky is not falling.
>On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>>
>>> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
>>> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>>
>>> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
>>> find any.
>>
>>Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>>far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
>>some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
>
>Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
>that they had in 2007.
> In America, of course. In the free world,
>concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
First. Post
Jan 10, 2012, 10:20:08 PM1/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org>
wrote:
Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
More is expected later in the week.
And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
fucking idiot?
And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
evidence that you're full of shit.
Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
wrote:
More is expected later in the week.
And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
fucking idiot?
And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
evidence that you're full of shit.
Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
Unum
Jan 10, 2012, 10:35:00 PM1/10/12
to
On 1/10/2012 9:20 PM, First. Post wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>
>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>
>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>
>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>
>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>
>>> �It is a challenging time, especially to bring awareness to our
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>
>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>
>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>
>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>
>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>
>>> consumers and businesses how critical our drought has impacted our
>>> reservoirs,� said Denise Hickey, spokesperson for the North Texas
>>> Municipal Water District. �As we're planning to move through this
>>> drought period, we're also planning and initiating additional
>>> strategies to bring additional sources online.�
>>>
>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>
>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>
>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>> should continue watering them.
>>>
>>> �A lot of trees are dormant and a lot of trees go dormant early when
>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>
>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>
>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>> should continue watering them.
>>>
>>> there's a drought situation. And they kind of do that for a defense
>>> mechanism,� said Matt Grubisich, urban forester for the Texas Trees
>>> Foundation. �Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
>>> that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.�
>>>
>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>
>>> �It's going to get worse before it gets better,� said Grubisich.
>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>
>>
>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>> who voted for Perry?
>
> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>
> More is expected later in the week.
Wow, it rained a little in some places. That are still in severe
>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>> who voted for Perry?
>
> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>
> More is expected later in the week.
drought conditions.
http://www.plantmaps.com/interactive-texas-drought-monitor-map.php
> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
> fucking idiot?
answer to the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding
to volunteer fire departments from $30 million to $7 million.
He cut the Texas Forest Service budget by one-third.
> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
> no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
> evidence that you're full of shit.
>
> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
2849 Dead
Jan 10, 2012, 10:46:04 PM1/10/12
to
held on taxpayer money last summer?
And it's going to take a helluva lot more than an inch of rain to break
this drought.
>
> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
Liar. He did nothing of the sort.
> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
>
> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have no
> problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
> evidence that you're full of shit.
>
The sub-zero temps that are, in fact, 10-20 degrees above historic
> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have no
> problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
> evidence that you're full of shit.
>
norms? Those far northern Canadian temperatures?
> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
First. Post
Jan 10, 2012, 10:56:32 PM1/10/12
to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:35:00 -0600, Unum <non...@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
>On 1/10/2012 9:20 PM, First. Post wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>>
>>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>>
>>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>>
>>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>>
>>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>>
>>>> �It is a challenging time, especially to bring awareness to our
>>>> Municipal Water District. �As we're planning to move through this
>>>> Foundation. �Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
>>>> that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.�
of story, Texas is doomed yadda yadda yadda
alleviated any water shortage?
The stupid fuckwit didn't say shit about any funding issues. He
simply stated there was a drought and implied it was because people
elected Perry.
Nowhere in the article did it refer to anything you refer to thus that
cannot be assumed to be the intent of the poster you stupid uneducated
inbred zombie.
comprehension dumbshit. Back into the killfile with your stupid
trolling ass.
wrote:
>On 1/10/2012 9:20 PM, First. Post wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>>
>>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>>
>>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>>
>>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>>
>>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>>
>>>> consumers and businesses how critical our drought has impacted our
>>>> reservoirs,� said Denise Hickey, spokesperson for the North Texas
>>>> Municipal Water District. �As we're planning to move through this
>>>> drought period, we're also planning and initiating additional
>>>> strategies to bring additional sources online.�
>>>>
>>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>>
>>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>>
>>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>>> should continue watering them.
>>>>
>>>> �A lot of trees are dormant and a lot of trees go dormant early when
>>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>>
>>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>>
>>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>>> should continue watering them.
>>>>
>>>> there's a drought situation. And they kind of do that for a defense
>>>> mechanism,� said Matt Grubisich, urban forester for the Texas Trees
>>>> Foundation. �Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
>>>> that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.�
>>>>
>>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>>
>>>> �It's going to get worse before it gets better,� said Grubisich.
>>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>>> who voted for Perry?
>>
>> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>>
>> More is expected later in the week.
>
>Wow, it rained a little in some places. That are still in severe
>drought conditions.
>http://www.plantmaps.com/interactive-texas-drought-monitor-map.php
As is typical the fanatic has convinced themself that all is lost, end
>>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>>> who voted for Perry?
>>
>> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>>
>> More is expected later in the week.
>
>Wow, it rained a little in some places. That are still in severe
>drought conditions.
>http://www.plantmaps.com/interactive-texas-drought-monitor-map.php
of story, Texas is doomed yadda yadda yadda
>
>> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
>> fucking idiot?
>
>Hey dumbass, nobody said it changes the weather. But Perry's
>answer to the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding
>to volunteer fire departments from $30 million to $7 million.
>He cut the Texas Forest Service budget by one-third.
And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought? Or
>> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
>> fucking idiot?
>
>Hey dumbass, nobody said it changes the weather. But Perry's
>answer to the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding
>to volunteer fire departments from $30 million to $7 million.
>He cut the Texas Forest Service budget by one-third.
alleviated any water shortage?
The stupid fuckwit didn't say shit about any funding issues. He
simply stated there was a drought and implied it was because people
elected Perry.
Nowhere in the article did it refer to anything you refer to thus that
cannot be assumed to be the intent of the poster you stupid uneducated
inbred zombie.
>
>> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
>
>Didn't say it was proof of anything did he.
It was implied by his statements.
>> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
>
>Didn't say it was proof of anything did he.
>
>> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
>> no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
>> evidence that you're full of shit.
>>
>> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
>
>Can't read, dumbass?
Apparently my reading is much better than your complete lack of
>> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
>> no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
>> evidence that you're full of shit.
>>
>> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
>
>Can't read, dumbass?
comprehension dumbshit. Back into the killfile with your stupid
trolling ass.
2849 Dead
Jan 10, 2012, 11:56:15 PM1/10/12
to
They stand to lose about a half a billion trees, and crop and ranch
losses will be in the tens of billions.
>>
>>> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
>>> fucking idiot?
>>
>>Hey dumbass, nobody said it changes the weather. But Perry's answer to
>>the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding to volunteer fire
>>departments from $30 million to $7 million. He cut the Texas Forest
>>Service budget by one-third.
>
> And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought? Or
> alleviated any water shortage?
Who said anything about throwing money around, moron? Toss that straw!
>>> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
>>> fucking idiot?
>>
>>Hey dumbass, nobody said it changes the weather. But Perry's answer to
>>the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding to volunteer fire
>>departments from $30 million to $7 million. He cut the Texas Forest
>>Service budget by one-third.
>
> And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought? Or
> alleviated any water shortage?
> The stupid fuckwit didn't say shit about any funding issues. He simply
> stated there was a drought and implied it was because people elected
> Perry.
the fuck you want to call it failed to stop the drought.
You sure are one stupid mother fucker, aren't you?
> Nowhere in the article did it refer to anything you refer to thus that
> cannot be assumed to be the intent of the poster you stupid uneducated
> inbred zombie.
>>
>>> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
>>
>>Didn't say it was proof of anything did he.
>
> It was implied by his statements.
>>
>>> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
>>> no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
>>> evidence that you're full of shit.
>>>
>>> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
>>
>>Can't read, dumbass?
>
> Apparently my reading is much better than your complete lack of
> comprehension dumbshit. Back into the killfile with your stupid
> trolling ass.
Unum
Jan 11, 2012, 1:02:16 AM1/11/12
to
On 1/10/2012 9:56 PM, First. Post wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:35:00 -0600, Unum<non...@yourbusiness.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2012 9:20 PM, First. Post wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>>>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>>>
>>>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>>>
>>>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>>>
>>>>> �It is a challenging time, especially to bring awareness to our
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:35:00 -0600, Unum<non...@yourbusiness.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/2012 9:20 PM, First. Post wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:40 -0700, AGWFacts<AGWF...@ipcc.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 12:17:50 -0800 (PST), Barbarian Mutual
>>>> <barbarianfina...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/07/10038669-in-texas-worst-drought-on-record-trees-dying-by-the-millions
>>>>>
>>>>> In Texas' worst drought on record, trees dying by the millions
>>>>>
>>>>> By Julie Tam, NBCDFW.com
>>>>> The National Weather Service has officially declared last year as the
>>>>> driest on record in Texas and the second hottest. Meteorologists
>>>>> predict the situation won't improve much this year. That means water
>>>>> restrictions will continue, and we'll lose millions of trees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Record-setting heat and little rain in 2011 has left North Texas in a
>>>>> severe drought. The water level at Lake Lavon is down 12 feet.
>>>>>
>>>>> See the original story on NBCDFW.com
>>>>>
>>>>> consumers and businesses how critical our drought has impacted our
>>>>> reservoirs,� said Denise Hickey, spokesperson for the North Texas
>>>>> Municipal Water District. �As we're planning to move through this
>>>>> drought period, we're also planning and initiating additional
>>>>> strategies to bring additional sources online.�
>>>>>
>>>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>>>> should continue watering them.
>>>>>
>>>>> �A lot of trees are dormant and a lot of trees go dormant early when
>>>>> The diminished water supply forced many counties to put residents
>>>>> under water restrictions indefinitely.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Texas Forest Service says the drought may have killed as much as
>>>>> 10 percent of the state's trees. That's 500 million trees.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some trees in your yard might look dead, but tree experts say don't
>>>>> cut them down yet. They still might come back in the spring and you
>>>>> should continue watering them.
>>>>>
>>>>> there's a drought situation. And they kind of do that for a defense
>>>>> mechanism,� said Matt Grubisich, urban forester for the Texas Trees
>>>>> Foundation. �Most municipalities still let you use a soaker hose, and
>>>>> that is a very adequate way to be able to still water your trees.�
>>>>>
>>>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>>>
>>>>> �It's going to get worse before it gets better,� said Grubisich.
>>>>> Forecasters expect the drought to last through at least June.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>>>> who voted for Perry?
>>>
>>> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>>>
>>> More is expected later in the week.
>>
>> Wow, it rained a little in some places. That are still in severe
>> drought conditions.
>> http://www.plantmaps.com/interactive-texas-drought-monitor-map.php
>
> As is typical the fanatic has convinced themself that all is lost, end
> of story, Texas is doomed yadda yadda yadda
Merely pointing out that an inch of rain didn't affect
>>>> How is that praying for rain working out for you Texas fucktards
>>>> who voted for Perry?
>>>
>>> Biggest portion of the state got around an inch of rain today.
>>>
>>> More is expected later in the week.
>>
>> Wow, it rained a little in some places. That are still in severe
>> drought conditions.
>> http://www.plantmaps.com/interactive-texas-drought-monitor-map.php
>
> As is typical the fanatic has convinced themself that all is lost, end
> of story, Texas is doomed yadda yadda yadda
the drought. Not interested in your whining.
>>> And just how does voting for Perry cause any change in the weather you
>>> fucking idiot?
>>
>> Hey dumbass, nobody said it changes the weather. But Perry's
>> answer to the drought is to pray for rain. He reduced funding
>> to volunteer fire departments from $30 million to $7 million.
>> He cut the Texas Forest Service budget by one-third.
>
> And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought? Or
> alleviated any water shortage?
that run the Texas government don't care if the whole state
burns down. Meanwhile, nobody said it changes the weather
you sad little shit.
> The stupid fuckwit didn't say shit about any funding issues. He
> simply stated there was a drought and implied it was because people
> elected Perry.
> Nowhere in the article did it refer to anything you refer to thus that
> cannot be assumed to be the intent of the poster you stupid uneducated
> inbred zombie.
weather" dumbass, but voting for him sure did hurt Texas.
>>> And why are you citing a weather event as proof of climate change?
>>
>> Didn't say it was proof of anything did he.
>
> It was implied by his statements.
>>> If you can use that as some kind of horseshit evidence then you have
>>> no problem with the folks that cite the sub zero temps in Canada as
>>> evidence that you're full of shit.
>>>
>>> Or you're just another fanatical hypocrite.
>>
>> Can't read, dumbass?
>
> Apparently my reading is much better than your complete lack of
> comprehension dumbshit. Back into the killfile with your stupid
> trolling ass.
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Jan 11, 2012, 11:17:26 AM1/11/12
to
Message has been deleted
Transition Zone
Jan 12, 2012, 4:39:31 PM1/12/12
to
On Jan 11, 5:59 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> What's a draught?
> Like a ships tonnage?
Something to do with beer, I think.
>
> What's a draught?
> Like a ships tonnage?
Something to do with beer, I think.
Harry Merrick
Jan 13, 2012, 5:56:05 AM1/13/12
to
amount of displacement a ship causes in water, monitored by the
Plimsol Line to make sure the ship is not overloaded.
Harry Merrick.
Dawlish
Jan 13, 2012, 6:51:05 AM1/13/12
to
On Jan 13, 10:56 am, Harry Merrick <Homes...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:39:31 -0800 (PST), Transition Zone
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:39:31 -0800 (PST), Transition Zone
>
> <mogu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 11, 5:59 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >> What's a draught?
> >> Like a ships tonnage?
>
> >Something to do with beer, I think.
>
> Correct! Draught Bitter. Beer brewed in vats. Also, draught means the
> amount of displacement a ship causes in water, monitored by the
> Plimsol Line to make sure the ship is not overloaded.
>
> Harry Merrick.
>
>
It's just another stupid denier's idea of intelligent posting. A bit
> >On Jan 11, 5:59 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> >> What's a draught?
> >> Like a ships tonnage?
>
> >Something to do with beer, I think.
>
> Correct! Draught Bitter. Beer brewed in vats. Also, draught means the
> amount of displacement a ship causes in water, monitored by the
> Plimsol Line to make sure the ship is not overloaded.
>
> Harry Merrick.
>
>
lke another stupid denier saying that lobsters couldn't have populated
the Antarctic shelf, because they'd never have been able to walk there
along the sea bottom. Oh! Hang on, that was you lobster, wasn't it? Go
crawl back into your undersea deniers hole, would you - like a good
crustacean?
Harry Merrick
Jan 13, 2012, 11:52:14 AM1/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 03:51:05 -0800 (PST), Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Actually, NO. It wasn't me. It was you, in your usual muddle of
editing incorrectly. You do talk a whole lot of shite Dawshit!
LOL!!
Harry Merrick.
wrote:
editing incorrectly. You do talk a whole lot of shite Dawshit!
LOL!!
Harry Merrick.
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Jan 13, 2012, 1:03:04 PM1/13/12
to
On Jan 10, 11:56 pm, 2849 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:56:32 -0600, First. Post wrote:
>
> > And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought?
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:56:32 -0600, First. Post wrote:
>
> > And throwing a lot of money around is going to prevent a drought?
>
> Who said anything about throwing money around, moron? Toss that straw!
Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming,
so it can get us out !!
(whether rightturds like it or not)
2849 Dead
Jan 13, 2012, 5:15:49 PM1/13/12
to
Alastair
Jan 13, 2012, 6:42:39 PM1/13/12
to
On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
wrote:
> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming,
> so it can get us out !!
Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
solve Global Warming?
Cheers, Alastair.
wrote:
> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming,
> so it can get us out !!
Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
solve Global Warming?
Cheers, Alastair.
First. Post
Jan 13, 2012, 7:28:29 PM1/13/12
to
you would controlling a tornado.
All the money in the world will never prevent the climate from
changing as it has since the beginning of the planet.
Phlip
Jan 13, 2012, 7:31:18 PM1/13/12
to
On Jan 13, 4:28 pm, First. Post <OccupiersDumberThanD...@invalid.net>
wrote:
> You idiots have as much of a chance at ever controlling the climate as
> you would controlling a tornado.
Aaand we are back to explaining the difference between "climate" and
"weather".
wrote:
> You idiots have as much of a chance at ever controlling the climate as
> you would controlling a tornado.
"weather".
BeamMeUpScotty
Jan 13, 2012, 7:46:08 PM1/13/12
to
--
A little Liberalism like a little alcohol, can be a good thing but when
either of them take control, they become self destructive.
2849 Dead
Jan 13, 2012, 8:33:28 PM1/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:46:08 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming, so
>>> it can get us out !!
>>
>> Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>>
>> Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
>> solve Global Warming?
>>
>>
> Selling Global Glacier water...?
The American west will be paying top dollar--and then some.
> On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
>> On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming, so
>>> it can get us out !!
>>
>> Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>>
>> Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
>> solve Global Warming?
>>
>>
> Selling Global Glacier water...?
2849 Dead
Jan 13, 2012, 8:35:13 PM1/13/12
to
spread out over three million years doesn't have any down side, does it?
What could possibly go wrong.
You have to wonder if this clown's parents had any children who lived...
Herschel Shmoikel Pinchas Yerucham
Jan 13, 2012, 8:54:00 PM1/13/12
to
On Jan 13, 8:33 pm, 2849 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:46:08 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> > On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
> >> On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming, so
> >>> it can get us out !!
>
> >> Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>
> >> Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
> >> solve Global Warming?
>
> > Selling Global Glacier water...?
>
> The American west will be paying top dollar--and then some.
We'll ferry icebergs from Canada overland by Hummer and flatbed to
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:46:08 -0500, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> > On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
> >> On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming, so
> >>> it can get us out !!
>
> >> Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>
> >> Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
> >> solve Global Warming?
>
> > Selling Global Glacier water...?
>
> The American west will be paying top dollar--and then some.
Texas and melt them so we have water, but that will only happen if
that big oil pipeline from Alberta Canada goes through and we have the
fuel to do it.
It's all about good old fashioned Texas perseverance and rugged
independence.
Texas never needed anybody, and never will.
2849 Dead
Jan 13, 2012, 9:20:39 PM1/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:54:00 -0800, Herschel Shmoikel Pinchas Yerucham
wrote:
That's OK. Nobody needs Texas, either.
wrote:
Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars
Jan 14, 2012, 10:50:31 AM1/14/12
to
On Jan 13, 7:46 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming,
> >> so it can get us out !!
>
> > Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>
> > Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
> > solve Global Warming?
>
> Selling Global Glacier water...?
Toughen regulations.
> On 1/13/2012 6:42 PM, Alastair wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 6:03 pm, Repubs Lost Unpaid Wars <walter_even...@post.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Even so, throwing a lot of money around got us into Global Warming,
> >> so it can get us out !!
>
> > Where did that money come from? I'll tell you, burning oil!
>
> > Peak oil has been and gone, so where are we going to get the money to
> > solve Global Warming?
>
> Selling Global Glacier water...?
AGWFacts
Jan 14, 2012, 2:17:29 PM1/14/12
to
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org>
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
> >
> >> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
> >> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
> >> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
> >> find any.
> >Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
> >far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
> >some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
> Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
> that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
> concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
In the USA, what Taylor Swift had for dinner is vastly more
> wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
> >
> >> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy not do
> >> > his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
> >> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they can
> >> find any.
> >Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
> >far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and
> >some how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
> Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
> that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
> concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
important than every crisis that threatens American citizens'
lives.
--
"I'd like the globe to warm another degree or two or three... and CO2 levels
to increase perhaps another 100ppm - 300ppm." -- cato...@sympatico.ca
2849 Dead
Jan 14, 2012, 3:12:55 PM1/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 12:17:29 -0700, AGWFacts wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:35 -0800, 2849 Dead <de...@dead.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy
>> >> > not do his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>
>> >> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they
>> >> can find any.
>
>> >Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>> >far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and some
>> >how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
>
>> Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
>> that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
>> concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
>
> In the USA, what Taylor Swift had for dinner is vastly more important
> than every crisis that threatens American citizens' lives.
And if it was reported that Swift ate roast polar bear, some of these
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:35 -0800, 2849 Dead <de...@dead.net> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:45:44 -0700, AGWFacts <AGWF...@ipcc.org> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:48:17 +0000 (UTC), 2849 Dead <de...@gone.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 08 Jan 2012 12:41:57 -0800, Christopher Helms wrote:
>> >
>> >> > I'll have to tune in to Fox & Friends tomorrow to see Steve Doocy
>> >> > not do his smirking little 'Paging Al Gore' line.
>
>> >> They'll be covering record cold in Siberia instead, assuming they
>> >> can find any.
>
>> >Notice how quiet the hysterical alarmists have been this winter so
>> >far: they only post weather reports when the weather is cold, and some
>> >how forget to post weather reports when the weather is warm.
>
>> Mainstream media had one fifth the stories on global warming last year
>> that they had in 2007. In America, of course. In the free world,
>> concentration on the looming crisis is growing.
>
> In the USA, what Taylor Swift had for dinner is vastly more important
> than every crisis that threatens American citizens' lives.
brainwashed morons would cheer.
BeamMeUpScotty
Jan 16, 2012, 3:38:00 AM1/16/12
to
0 new messages