On Ronald Reagan's "Racism" - A single mistake does not a racist make.

[Ubiquitous]

There’s a provocative article by NYU professor Tim Naftali in the Atlantic
titled “Ronald Reagan’s Long-Hidden Racist Conversation With Richard Nixon.”
It reports an insulting statement made by Gov. Ronald Reagan to President
Richard Nixon in October 1971. Naftali lays out the context and the exchange:

The day after the United Nations voted to recognize the People’s
Republic of China, then-California Governor Ronald Reagan phoned
President Richard Nixon at the White House and vented his frustration
at the delegates who had sided against the United States. “Last
night, I tell you, to watch that thing on television as I did,”
Reagan said. “Yeah,” Nixon interjected. Reagan forged ahead with
his complaint: “To see those, those monkeys from those African
countries — damn them, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes!”
Nixon gave a huge laugh.

The statement is bad. No question. As you can imagine, it’s getting a lot of
traction among race-obsessed liberals who discern white-hooded “dog whistles”
in endless remarks from Republicans but can’t find space within their
mental-ideological makeup to even mention something as shameful as, oh,
Margaret Sanger’s May 1926 speech to the Silverlake, New Jersey, women’s
chapter of the KKK, or any number of racially offensive zingers from a
President like Lyndon Johnson or Woodrow Wilson. Their hypocrisy never ceases
to outrage.

Make no mistake: They will never let Ronald Reagan escape this one. This line
will be hoisted on a progressive petard as an eternal symbol of his views on
race. Liberals will apply it unforgivingly and uncharitably in a manner
they’d never do with their Democrat pals.

That said, as a Reagan biographer and historian, one who has published eight
books and countless articles on the man, I’ve been asked to respond. What to
make of this? How to interpret it?

To begin with, I personally cannot defend that statement. It needs to be
condemned, certainly as written.

It’s very important to know, however, that Ronald Reagan was not a racist.
This is the only — and I mean _only_ — statement that I’ve ever read from him
like this (and I’ve read just about everything). It’s so out of the norm that
I find it hard to believe. Unlike nasty statements from the likes of LBJ and
Harry Truman and Woodrow Wilson or even from Hillary Clinton (who jokes of
Cory Booker and Eric Holder: “I know, they all look alike”) and Bill Clinton.

Naftali himself concedes, “Reagan’s racism appears to be documented only once
on the Nixon tapes, and never in his own diaries.”

Why did Ronald utter this on this one occasion, which was completely out of
character for him amid a very public life in which we have billions of on-
the-record words from him, including thousands of private letters? Naftali
says that Reagan was angry and frustrated in this instance, and thus
expressed himself in a way that was insensitive and offensive. He says that
Reagan “vented his frustration at the [African UN] delegates who had sided
against the United States.”

I can’t say that I fully agree with that interpretation. I’ve carefully
listened to the audio multiple times. Reagan doesn’t sound angry at all. It
sounds like he might be mocking a racist stereotype. I honestly can’t tell
for certain. Given that Reagan never spoke this way, and didn’t think this
way, one ought to be inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. (Click
and listen for yourself. The comment comes around the halfway point of a 12-
minute conversation. https://www.nixonlibrary.gov/white-house-tapes/013 )

To repeat, Ronald Reagan was absolutely no racist. This can be demonstrated
at length in actions and statements literally from the time of his childhood.
There are so many actions and statements that I’ve considered doing a book on
Reagan and race, simply to show how unusual he was for his times — i.e.,
there wasn’t a racist bone in his body. I have a box, stuffed with folders,
labeled “Reagan and race.” It’s loaded with examples that show Reagan to have
been completely against racial prejudice and highly supportive of black
Americans and their struggles, especially black actors in Hollywood when he
ran the Screen Actors Guild. The problem, frankly, with responding to charges
like this in a single article is that you just can’t begin to sufficiently
respond, especially when the jury is packed with emotional liberals who want
to see a racist under every Republican bed. Where to start? Where to end?

“I’ve lived a long time,” President Reagan told the National Council of Negro
Women at the White House in July 1983, “but I can’t remember a time in my
life when I didn’t believe that prejudice and bigotry were the worst of
sins.”

He meant that literally. Racism, to Ronald Reagan, was a sin. Reagan learned
that at home, as a boy, from his devout Christian mother and from his father.

Any Reagan biographer can tell you of an anecdote from a cold evening in
Dixon, Illinois, in the early 1930s, when a young “Dutch” Reagan brought home
two African American teammates from his college football team. The boys,
William Franklin “Burgie” Burghardt and Jim Rattan, had been denied access to
a local hotel because of the color of their skin. Burgie was Reagan’s best
friend on the team; he played right next to Reagan on the offensive line.
Reagan assured them they would be welcomed at his home. The two boys weren’t
so certain. Sure, their friend seemed like an amiable guy, but these boys
knew what it was like to be black in those days of rampant discrimination.
Would the parents of this nice kid, Dutch, be as kind as he was?

“Come in, boys,” said Reagan’s mother, Nelle, with a warm smile as she
greeted the boys. They spent the night. I doubt that the typical home in
America was like that. The Reagan home was.

“She was absolutely color-blind,” said Reagan of his mom, recounting the
story. “These fellows were just two of my friends. That was the way she and
Jack [Reagan’s father] had always raised my brother and me.”

Ronald Reagan had learned racial, ethnic, and religious tolerance from his
parents. It had been part of him since his early childhood.

While this anecdote about the two young black men, of which many more could
be given from Reagan’s rich life and experiences, reflects Reagan’s hatred of
racism, it also underscores his respect for the inherent humanity of all
people, regardless of their skin color, their ethnic background, their
religious beliefs. For Reagan, these were matters of basic human dignity.

I promise you that I could go on and on with heartwarming stories of Reagan’s
love and kindness toward African Americans. There was his relationship with
the likes of celebrities from Muhammad Ali to Rosie Grier to Meadowlark
Lemon, to name only three off the top of my head. I could name names you’ve
never heard of, with stories that would make you cry — Reagan and Rudy Hines,
Joe Bullock, Willie Sue Smith, Mildred Jefferson. Again, there are too many
to adequately describe here. These are touching relationships that few self-
righteous liberals or any of us have experienced.

Even in his Evil Empire speech, famous for calling out the USSR, Ronald
Reagan paused to call out his own country, the United States of America, for
its past sins of racism.

“There is sin and evil in the world,” said Reagan, “and we’re enjoined by
Scripture and the Lord Jesus to oppose it with all our might.” That applied,
he said, to “our nation,” which had a “legacy of evil with which it must
deal…. There is no room for racism, anti-Semitism, or other forms of ethnic
and racial hatred in this country.”

This wasn’t something that Reagan was expected to say in a foreign-policy
speech. He expressed it because he felt it, he believed it.

Ask anyone who knew Ronald Reagan and they will tell you that he was not a
racist, period.

As for the author of the piece in the Atlantic, Tim Naftali, he deserves some
criticism, not for reporting this remark from Reagan, but for how, in turn,
he thus speaks conclusively of “Reagan’s racism” (a phrase he used twice), as
if this one comment can allow us to judge Reagan as a whole and as a person.
The fuller picture of the man shows the opposite. In fact, I would advise
Naftali to be careful about constructing such a standard. Naftali, a
biographer of John F. Kennedy, notes, “As I write a biography of JFK, I’ve
found that this sort of racism did not animate President Kennedy.”

Naftali seems to have chosen his words carefully there, prompting me to ask
him here: Has he encountered racially offensive remarks from JFK? Or other
Kennedy family members?

Hey, I like JFK, too. Naftali better be careful, however. He may well come
across something similar from the annals of the Kennedy clan that he doesn’t
like — and far more than one example. Liberals create such standards to apply
them mercilessly to Republicans, not realizing that such standards will come
back to bite them when they find untidy skeletons among their progressive
icons. This they learned with their black-face campaign. Beware the Democrat,
dear progressive, who donned black-face.

As for Reagan, it is really unfair to take one statement from a man’s past —
one that goes against every statement he ever made about black people — and
try to argue that it makes him a racist, especially when the man is no longer
alive to explain the remark. It’s a bad remark, but it’s far from the total
picture. It’s like looking at Harry Truman’s offensive statements about Jews
(more than one of those) and ignoring his wonderful work ensuring that
America recognize the new nation of Israel, which Truman pursued against his
entire cabinet. (For a genuinely ugly track record of statements and actions
against Jews and a homeland for them in Palestine, see Franklin Roosevelt.)

To liberals, I say this: Don’t be hacks. Don’t smear a decent man and his
long life of decency, including on race, because he’s a Republican and not
one of your Democrat buddies. Have the decency to treat a decent man with
decency.

To Reagan admirers, I say this: Let your hero — a man who is a human being,
not without sin — take his falls. No one is perfect. Ronald Reagan wasn’t,
and this remark from October 1971 certainly seems like it’s probably an
indicator of that.

--
Watching Democrats come up with schemes to "catch Trump" is like
watching Wile E. Coyote trying to catch Road Runner.

[Byker]

"Ubiquitous" wrote in message news:qi1shp$429$3...@dont-email.me...

>
> Make no mistake: They will never let Ronald Reagan escape this one.

And every time the MSM brings up the subject,
the audience will reach for the remote...