Re: i have now.

[ah]

On 8/10/2010 11:14 PM, Hachiroku ハチロク wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:12:49 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>
>>>Which is fine as long as they have a like-minded fool like Obama in charge.
>>>What would happen if, after the progressives get their way and everything
>>>is controlled by the government, another ROnald Reagan type gets elected.
>>
>> WOOO HOOO
>> New Red Herring, "It is Obama's fault"
>>
>> Ronald Reagan signed into law the largest tax increase in history.
>
> Ronald Reagan had the tax base to do it with, numbskull. People in the US
> were actually /working/, remember? Even with unemployment at 8%, companies
> were actually producing goods in the US.

Cool.

So, therefore, muggers convicted back then can now be vindicated, right?

I LOVE THIS GUY'S LOGIC!!1!

>
> Now, we are hardly producing anything at all, unemployment is at 15% and
> Obungler thinks he can tax his way to prosperity.
>
> Can you say "Hoover". And, I know you suck, but we aren't talking vacuums
> here. (Speaking of vacuous, how's your hangover today?)
>
> Tool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5sIXUbMgF0
--
a "http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Nv28lunRSY" h

[Hachiroku ハチロク]

On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:07:55 -0400, ah wrote:

>> Ronald Reagan had the tax base to do it with, numbskull. People in the US
>> were actually /working/, remember? Even with unemployment at 8%, companies
>> were actually producing goods in the US.
>
> Cool.
>
> So, therefore, muggers convicted back then can now be vindicated, right?
>
> I LOVE THIS GUY'S LOGIC!!1!

Where the fuck did that come from?

Did you even understand what I said?