Others have pointed out that RemarQ did this first (shame, shame on
you, deja.com! first you fuck up the IPO, now this). What's really
missing here, though, is some selfrighteous deja.com engineering twink
defending both the technology and the decision to use it. Double
shame on you!
rone
hi, mike belshe! how are your CPTH corporate masters?
--
WILL BATMAN TAKE PORT OUT, STARBOARD HOME, OR WILL HE STAY FOR UNLAWFUL CARNAL
KNOWLEDGE? WILL ROBIN ESCAPE THE CLUTCHES OF THE DASTARDLY FOLK ETYMOLOGER OR
WILL HE BE FORCED TO READ WILLIAM SAFIRE'S OLD NIXON SPEECHES? - Kibo
>What's really
>missing here, though, is some selfrighteous deja.com engineering twink
>defending both the technology and the decision to use it. Double
>shame on you!
That reminds me. Whatever happened to Canter & Siegel? I've
barely heard any mention of them in years, but it used to be
that you couldn't pace through any part of Usenet without
tripping over someone's invective aimed at them.
JM
--
Joe Manfre, Hyattsville, Maryland. http://manfre-land.com
"It had become a little too uncomfortable for them sitting on
all that classified data once they had been explicitly fingered."
-- Carol Paliwoda, regarding "those bastards"
They're with me now.
-dp.
Have you tried something as simple as, say, a Google search?
rone
And also with me.
Dave "requiescat in pacem doidiem" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://panacea.phys.utk.edu/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ/ I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.