Re: O&A's funniest moment ever
pyster
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwBeY-ABb4
>
> Yes, watch as the two latest idiots who said they would make everyone
> forget about Howard Stern say goodbye to their only remaining FM
> station...K-Rock. Couldn't happen to nicer guys!
>
> O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
> XM, shitheads!
I heard today they are off the air again... I guess the asperger
demographic isnt all that profitable.
So Sapper, what will you be listening to now that your hero's failed
(just as we all said they would).
lab~rat >:-)
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwBeY-ABb4
>
>Yes, watch as the two latest idiots who said they would make everyone
>forget about Howard Stern say goodbye to their only remaining FM
>station...K-Rock. Couldn't happen to nicer guys!
>
>O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
>XM, shitheads!
Was that their show, or were they just hanging out bullshitting?
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
KK
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwBeY-ABb4
>
> Yes, watch as the two latest idiots who said they would make everyone
> forget about Howard Stern say goodbye to their only remaining FM
> station...K-Rock. Couldn't happen to nicer guys!
>
> O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
> XM, shitheads!
Keep repeating the stupid 50K line. Even *you* don't believe it, dummy.
And, whether or not they hada part in it, everybody *has* forgotten
Howard Stern.
KK
They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to hold
up the rest of the station.
Drumrboy
> O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
> XM, shitheads!
That's still 49,999 more listeners than the Big Dumbass Broadcast ever had.
lab~rat >:-)
>We could have done as well as they did. They could have put anyone in
>that slot and they would have done as well.
And you could have played bass for DEVO.
KK
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:44:19 -0400, Drumrboy <dru...@aql.com> wrote:
>
> We could have done as well as they did. They could have put anyone in
> that slot and they would have done as well.
Again you remarkably lower the bar on stupid statements.
Do you really believe that they currently have only ~50K listeners?
lab~rat >:-)
>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:50:50 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>wrote:
>No I couldn't. Jerry Casale is Devo. Mark is the frontman but Jerry
>is the driving force.
Oh god, don't get all erect and blowjobby on us here...
Drumrboy
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:50:50 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> >>>On 2009-03-09 21:21:40 -0400, JimmyM <m...@nnn.com> said:
>
> >>>> O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
> >>>> XM, shitheads!
>
> >>>That's still 49,999 more listeners than the Big Dumbass Broadcast ever had.
>
> >>We could have done as well as they did. They could have put anyone in
> >>that slot and they would have done as well.
>
> >And you could have played bass for DEVO.
>
> is the driving force.
I'm getting douche chills.....
KK
>>
>>And you could have played bass for DEVO.
>
> No I couldn't. Jerry Casale is Devo. Mark is the frontman but Jerry is
> the driving force.
Uh, looking at their recent decade or two, maybe they need some more
"driving force".
dtom...@aol.com
everybody? does that include the obsessed Stern haters who think about
and post about Howard every day?
dtom...@aol.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
for the clones.
KK
> They're what, the 15th most listened to channel in satellite? That's
> shit for the show that was supposed to make us all forget about Stern.
> Hell. you're an O&A fan and you can't stop listening to Stern.
Who said they'd "make us all forget about Stern"?
Oh, and you didn't answer the question. Do you really believe that they
KK
>> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
>> hold up the rest of the station.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
> classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
> for the clones.
Check again, dummy. They're changing format.
KK
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:13:48 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>>Who said they'd "make us all forget about Stern"?
>
> They did, fucktard. How many times did they say that Stern was old and
> irrelevant and they were the new younger guard ready to take over,
> despite being only about 5 or 6 years younger?
I listen to them every day and didn't hear them say that. When did *you*
hear it, on a show you don't get?
>
>>Oh, and you didn't answer the question. Do you really believe that they
>>currently have only ~50K listeners?
>
> Actually, no. I think they have 2 + 2 listeners. How many is that,
> Kenneth Keith?
Do you really think they have only 50,000 listeners? Yes or no?
lab~rat >:-)
KK
> Whatever. Bottom line is O&A were a failure.
Um, no, they weren't. The station was a failure. They were doing well,
ratings-wise.
KK
>>Do you really think they have only 50,000 listeners? Yes or no?
>
> I could give two shits.
You keep making the claim over and over, dumbass. I'm calling you out on
it. Do you think they have only 50,000 listeners? If you do, say so.
If you don't - and you know fucking well they have more than that - and
you're too much of a pussy to say so, then don't repeat it. Unless
you're a lying chunk of shit whose word is worth less than a Rocky and
the Rollers concert bootleg 8-track.
When you do, I'll repost this.
dtom...@aol.com
Today was classic rock, maybe tomorrow will be top 40. Either way, the
same old music is more profitable than a boring clone show.
If they followed Howard's advice a few years ago you wouldn't be
trying to spin this embarrassing failure today.
lab~rat >:-)
<dtom...@aol.com> puked:
Funny how the clone show is considered boring, as it is a clone of
Howard's show.
KK
> On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:35 -0700, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>> >> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
>> >> hold up the rest of the station.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> > they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
>> > classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
>> > for the clones.
>>
>> Check again, dummy. They're changing format.
>
> Today was classic rock, maybe tomorrow will be top 40. Either way, the
> same old music is more profitable than a boring clone show.
You're as dishonest as Jimmy. They were taken off a day early because
they were talking about the "surprise" when they weren't supposed to.
> If they followed Howard's advice a few years ago you wouldn't be trying
> to spin this embarrassing failure today.
Keep repeating that. Maybe you'll believe it eventually.
Boo Radley
"KK" <_K...@furburger.net> wrote in message
news:0Fttl.14109$3S3....@newsfe22.iad...
you mean the station that is next to last in NY?
0.0
Boo Radley
2nd to last is GREAT RATINGS? Your fake mensa membership is about to expire.
Drumrboy
Speaking of fakes.... Where's my $10,000, deadbeat?
dtom...@aol.com
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:05:01 -0400, JimmyM wrote:
>
> >>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:35 -0700, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>
> >>>> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
> >>>> hold up the rest of the station.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>> they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
> >>> classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
> >>> for the clones.
>
> >>Check again, dummy. They're changing format.
>
> > Whatever. Bottom line is O&A were a failure.
>
> Um, no, they weren't. The station was a failure. They were doing well,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Brilliant spin. Do you really believe that the station would fire a
show that was doing well or making them any money? They failed again.
dtom...@aol.com
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:40:10 -0700, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
> > On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:35 -0700, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
> >> >> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
> >> >> hold up the rest of the station.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
> >> > classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
> >> > for the clones.
>
> >> Check again, dummy. They're changing format.
>
> > Today was classic rock, maybe tomorrow will be top 40. Either way, the
> > same old music is more profitable than a boring clone show.
>
> You're as dishonest as Jimmy. They were taken off a day early because
> they were talking about the "surprise" when they weren't supposed to.
>
Yet not nearly as dishonest as you. They were taken off the air
because they failed again. They weren't profitable and made themselves
expendable. Canned music that you can get on 2 or 3 other stations in
NY is more profitable than their show. That is a giant failure.
Boo Radley
"Drumrboy" <dru...@aql.com> wrote in message
news:49b6b453$0$5898$607e...@cv.net...
I don't owe you $10000 because you've never provided your address
Drumrboy
Yes I did. Show up with my $10,000 pussy. Sell that fucking private jet
and give me my money.
KK
Yes. The ratings for the rest of the station blew.
KK
Read slowly: *their ratings* were good. Those of the other 23 hours of
programming *weren't*.
KK
Yes. Thay can't well have dick jokes on a CHR station they want teen
girls to listen to at work in the mall.
KK
> Yet not nearly as dishonest as you. They were taken off the air because
> they failed again.
> They weren't profitable and made themselves
> expendable. Canned music that you can get on 2 or 3 other stations in NY
> is more profitable than their show. That is a giant failure.
Show my their "failing" ratings.
KK got owned
> Read slowly: *their ratings* were good. Those of the other 23 hours of
> programming *weren't*.
Read super slowly. 19th place overall mornings in NY. 1/4 of what Stern did
on the same station on his worst book.
MORNINGS: WINS (6.9), WHTZ (5.6), WSKQ (5.4), WBLS (4.2), WRKS (3.8), WCBS-
AM (3.7), WPAT-FM & WABC (3.4), WLTW (3.3), WCBS-FM (3.1), WQHT (3.0), WWPR
(2.7), WAXQ (2.6), WADO & WOR (2.5), WQCD, WKTU & WPLJ (2.4), WXRK (2.1),
WFAN (2.0).
KK got owned again
>
20k listeners AQH says Arbitron.
KK
>> Read slowly: *their ratings* were good. Those of the other 23 hours
>> of programming *weren't*.
>
> Read super slowly. 19th place overall mornings in NY. 1/4 of what Stern
> did on the same station on his worst book.
Give me the M demos 18-25 and the next older one. That's what they were
paid to get.
Drumrboy
I don't see Hoo Hoo in there. What a loser.
dtom...@aol.com
>
> - Show quoted text -
What about all the other CBS stations? They are all geared for teens
now? How about all the other stations they lost over the past year or
2? All format changes/children's programming/religious stations now?
Do you get pest points for every idiot who can be convinced that these
giant failures aren't as embarrassing as they are? Face the facts,
they can't make money for their company so their company dumps them
everytime they can.
Boo Radley
so the station fired it's top talent?
D is for DELUSION
Drumrboy
> "KK" <_...@furburger.net> wrote in message
>
> news:Csztl.113753$xK6....@newsfe12.iad...
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:00:52 -0400, Boo Radley wrote:
>
> >>news:0Fttl.14109$3S3....@newsfe22.iad...
> >>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:26:50 -0700, pyster wrote:
>
> >>>> On Mar 9, 9:21 pm, JimmyM <m...@nnn.com> wrote:
> >>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwBeY-ABb4
>
> >>>>> Yes, watch as the two latest idiots who said they would make everyone
> >>>>> forget about Howard Stern say goodbye to their only remaining FM
> >>>>> station...K-Rock. Couldn't happen to nicer guys!
>
> >>>>> O&A always win in the end? Yeah, OK. Enjoy those 50,000 listeners on
> >>>>> XM, shitheads!
>
> >>>> I heard today they are off the air again... I guess the asperger
> >>>> demographic isnt all that profitable.
>
> >>>> So Sapper, what will you be listening to now that your hero's failed
> >>>> (just as we all said they would).
>
> >>> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
> >>> hold up the rest of the station.
>
> >> you mean the station that is next to last in NY?
>
> >> 0.0
>
> > Yes. The ratings for the rest of the station blew.
>
> so the station fired it's top talent?
> D is for DELUSION
D is for DEADBEAT.
You do have $10,000 don't you?
KK
Listen, angry dolt:
I didn't claim they rocketed to #1 in every market they were in. Most of
them, they did well in.
The radio industry has gone through huge changes in past years, and most
of those stations have changed hands or changed format to something
incompatible or cheaper.
dtom...@aol.com
>
> Listen, angry dolt:
>
> I didn't claim they rocketed to #1 in every market they were in. Most of
> them, they did well in.
>
Sorry delusional nitwit, they did crap in every market they were
removed from, that is why they got removed. No station is going to
dump a show that is doing well or making money. They have now been
removed from EVERY market they were on in. Sorry to be the one who has
to explain this to you.
> The radio industry has gone through huge changes in past years, and most
> of those stations have changed hands or changed format to something
> incompatible or cheaper. - Hide quoted text -
>
HAHAHAHAA, good one. Radio has gone through changes that require them
to dump programs that earn money in favor of bland music that 2 other
stations are already playing. Your spin is obvious and weak, they
failed miserably again and no longer have the radio gig. They were the
19th rated morning show on regular radio and they are somewhere in the
20s on sat radio.
When you say "doing well" do you mean they managed to do their show
without shitting themselves? You can't be talking about ratings and
revenue, because they are a failure in those departments.
Boo Radley
"Drumrboy" <drum...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:99611ebf-75cc-46e8...@g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
D is for DUMMRBOY
I do not owe you $10000 because you haven't provided your address.
I never said I have a Private Jet.
You can prove that you provided your address and that I said I have a
Private Jet but you can't because neither happened. Isn't Google great?
Now spend the rest of your life trolling this newsgroup, it's all you have
and it's all that keeps you from doing the honorable thing and killing your
pathetic self. Goddamn, your pathetic existence is just so damn funny!
KK
They absolutely did. No other daypart at the station came anywhere close
to their ratings.
The other factor in this is that Karmazin has said he opposes sharing
Sirius/XM talent with terrestrial radio, so it can be assumed that when
their contract was to be up for renewal in a few months, they would no
longer be available anyway.
KK
> You can't be talking about ratings and revenue, because they are a
> failure in those departments.
Their ratings were good.
dtom...@aol.com
Good for a clone show. Not so good for a show that was supposed to
draw fans, bring in ads and support a radio station.
FYI if they did any one of those 3 things they would still be on the
radio.
dtom...@aol.com
>
> They absolutely did. No other daypart at the station came anywhere close
> to their ratings.
>
They got a 2.1, the rest of the station must have been in negative
numbers to be far below that shitty rating.
> The other factor in this is that Karmazin has said he opposes sharing
> Sirius/XM talent with terrestrial radio, so it can be assumed that when
> their contract was to be up for renewal in a few months, they would no
> longer be available anyway.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
More bullshit. If they made any money for the station they would have
kept them on somewhere, somehow. The fact that they performed
miserably just made it easy to take them off every station.
Drumrboy
> You can prove that you provided your address and that I said I have a
> Private Jet
I know stupid, that's why I want my $10,000. You made a bet and you
lost. Deal with it.
You do have my $10,000 don't you?
KK
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:07:40 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>
>>I didn't claim they rocketed to #1 in every market they were in. Most
>>of them, they did well in.
>
> Howard did well in his slot and K-Rock never did all that great the rest
> of the day. They kept him. So your stupid logic ain't gonna fly.
You're not one to jusge logic, Jimmy.
Stern's ratings were better than O&A's. Nobody's claimed otherwise. And
K-Rock never changed format to one incompatible with Stern.
>
>>The radio industry has gone through huge changes in past years, and most
>>of those stations have changed hands or changed format to something
>>incompatible or cheaper.
>
> Sure they did....suuuuuuure! That valuable 19th place finish and their
> badass 2 + 2 ra...er...2.2 rating. No wonder you think they did
> well...you can't even add and subtract single digit numbers.
And you can, stock man? And no, they weren't 19th. The station might
have been. And their rating in their demo was over 5.
Drumrboy
> Is that what they told you to think? Nah, it can't be...even they
> aren't that delusional and stupid.
Kind of like when your boss Rocky said he wouldn't cum in your mouth.
lab~rat >:-)
>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:47:21 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT), "X...@XXX.COM"
>><dtom...@aol.com> puked:
>>
>>>On Mar 10, 12:54 pm, KK <_...@furburger.net> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:35 -0700, X...@XXX.COM wrote:
>>>> >> They didn't fail - their numbers were good. Just not good enough to
>>>> >> hold up the rest of the station.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>> > they did shit. KRock decided that an extra 4 hours of the same old
>>>> > classic rock would be more profitable. Chalk up another giant failure
>>>> > for the clones.
>>>>
>>>> Check again, dummy. They're changing format.
>>>
>>>Today was classic rock, maybe tomorrow will be top 40. Either way, the
>>>same old music is more profitable than a boring clone show.
>>>
>>>If they followed Howard's advice a few years ago you wouldn't be
>>>trying to spin this embarrassing failure today.
>>
>>Funny how the clone show is considered boring, as it is a clone of
>>Howard's show.
>
>Well Ratty, there are good clones and bad clones, mostly bad. Howard
>is the original, and he's a million times funnier on his worst day
>than O&A are on their best day. That's why he's got the number one
>rated show on satellite now, and that's why he could immediately
>re-establish himself on terrestrial and be as big as he ever was if he
>chose, which he doesn't. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a delusional
>idiot, just like O&A fans.
You used to be able to pull that shit with me, but now that I can
listen to Howard whenever I want to, I know the truth. And the truth
is that Howard is NOT funny. I tune in a couple of times a day
waiting for something good, and without fail I shut it off within 5
minutes.
Today I was listening to some godawful discussion about a guy that was
married to the Til Tuesday singer and he was seemingly intentionally
torturing the audience playing some music that in the past he would
have called "music fags have sex to". The discussion was just plain
banal in every respect that the show didn't go on a second time.
I figure if I tune in enough, chances are I'll stumble upon a golden
moment where I see what you see, that Howard is hilarious, but so far
I haven't seen it.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
Drumrboy
That's because Hoo Hoo won't play Jocko's "bits".
lab~rat >:-)
>> You used to be able to pull that shit with me, but now that I can
>> listen to Howard whenever I want to, I know the truth. And the truth
>> is that Howard is NOT funny. I tune in a couple of times a day
>> waiting for something good, and without fail I shut it off within 5
>> minutes.
>>
>> Today I was listening to some godawful discussion about a guy that was
>> married to the Til Tuesday singer and he was seemingly intentionally
>> torturing the audience playing some music that in the past he would
>> have called "music fags have sex to". The discussion was just plain
>> banal in every respect that the show didn't go on a second time.
>>
>> I figure if I tune in enough, chances are I'll stumble upon a golden
>> moment where I see what you see, that Howard is hilarious, but so far
>> I haven't seen it.
>
>That's because Hoo Hoo won't play Jocko's "bits".
To be honest, I haven't really heard him play many bits at all. Not
much of anything but sitting around talking about nothing. It used to
be funny when he did that, but I guess Jackie made it funny...
lab~rat >:-)
>On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:12:02 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
>That ain't my problem.
Yeah, I'm sure with all the ones you have, this one is at the bottom
of the list.
Drumrboy
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:12:02 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
> That ain't my problem.
No, remembering the chord changes while in a drunken stupor, so your
boss Rocky doesn't slap you in the back of your bald skull, is your
problem.
Sing me a song, Jocko.....
Boo Radley
"Drumrboy" <dru...@aql.com> wrote in message
news:49b80437$0$20287$607e...@cv.net...
Then simply provide the link to where you posted your address and to
validate your idiocy about a private jet, post that link as well.........
As always, YOU LOSE! No spin needed, no reason to reply unless you have the
non-existent link to your post and my post. Now would be the perfect time to
kill yourself.
Drumrboy
> Then simply provide the link to where you posted your address
If I do are you going to show up with my $10,000? Or are you going to
pussy out, run away and change your screen name again?
Tell you what, retard, I bet you $20,000 you pussy out again.
Drumrboy
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:11:32 -0400, Drumrboy <drum...@aql.com> wrote:
> >On 2009-03-11 15:30:23 -0400, JimmyM <m...@nnn.com> said:
>
> >> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:12:02 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:11:30 -0400, JimmyM <m...@nnn.com> puked:
>
> >>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:47:21 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT), "X...@XXX.COM"
> making you a sandwich at Subway or making copies at some broke-dick
> print shop.
So sing me a song, Jukebox Boy. I'll even send you a buck if you wear
that homo gold bowling shirt while you sing to me.
Boo Radley
$10000 in your pocket but so sad for you that there is no such link.
Of course you could save yourself from a busy day of searching and just post
your address.
Still waiting on that link, don't say you don't have time because everyone
knows you have no life, no one to love and no prospects of ever making your
life better.
dtom...@aol.com
>
> Still waiting on that link, don't say you don't have time because everyone
> knows you have no life, no one to love and no prospects of ever making your
> life better.
That wasn't nice ..... maybe you should apologize.
lab~rat >:-)
>I'd rather be seen singing you some lame oldies song than be seen
>making you a sandwich at Subway or making copies at some broke-dick
>print shop.
Even if it means you could be hit in the face with a loaded Depends
diaper at the Villages while doing it?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
Last night I helped my dad transfer his music collection from his old
mp3 player to his iPhone. I was looking at those shitty 50s songs
thinking that he should send his old mp3 player to Gitmo for torturing
prisoners...
lab~rat >:-)
>The truth hurts for Shitfoot.
LOL I was thinking that comment may have struck a chord with YOU...
Boo Radley
"lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in message
news:83vhr45ncl9nnb76o...@4ax.com...
because you have no life, lie about being in construction and will never be
loved? Reply and prove me correct.
Drumrboy
>
> "Drumrboy" <dru...@aql.com> wrote in message
> news:49b81e79$0$20294$607e...@cv.net...
>> On 2009-03-11 16:14:18 -0400, "Boo Radley" <Kil...@mockingbird.com> said:
>>
>>> Then simply provide the link to where you posted your address
>>
>> If I do are you going to show up with my $10,000? Or are you going to
>> pussy out, run away and change your screen name again?
>>
>> Tell you what, retard, I bet you $20,000 you pussy out again.
>>
>
> $10000 in your pocket but so sad for you that there is no such link.
> Of course you could save yourself from a busy day of searching and just
> post your address.
Really? You spent a busy day searching, didn't you, retard? It was
posted many times, it's not my fault your to stupid to find it.
>
> Still waiting on that link, don't say you don't have time because
> everyone knows you have no life, no one to love and no prospects of
> ever making your life better.
I bet you $20,000 I'll post my address again and you'll pussy out
again. Wadda ya say, tough guy?
Drumrboy
He can stick his apology up his ass, I'll take the $10,000 he owes me.
Drumrboy
> On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:06:11 -0700 (PDT), "X...@XXX.COM"
> <dtom...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> The truth hurts for Shitfoot.
The truth? You wouldn't know the truth if it slapped you in the back of
your bald skull, Jocko.
Drumrboy
LOL!
douchebagrepliestothispost.
Boo Radley
still wagging that tongue but no link? Your little world is crashing in on
you isn't it?
I will pay you $200,000 for your address. post it now
I do not expect an address because you are too stupid to provide it. Or Post
the non-existent link, either way.
Reply again without a link or an address, this is funny and no loser, I
haven't searched at all because I know you didn't post your address and I
know I never said I have a private jet. Reply without a link or your address
and prove me correct AGAIN!
lab~rat >:-)
<Kil...@mockingbird.com> puked:
Yeah. You're correct. I made up an elaborate lie about being in
construction because I think that's the most glamorous job there is.
It has made people far and wide the envy of me on usenet, so I would
appreciate it if you keep it quiet that I made the whole thing up.
Retard.
lab~rat >:-)
<Kil...@mockingbird.com> puked:
>
I may be wrong, but I'm thinking you could use a laxative...
Boo Radley
is that what you pay those cuban boys to do?
lab~rat >:-)
<Kil...@mockingbird.com> puked:
I don't have any Cubans working for me. I have a couple of island
brothers that have been working for me for about 15 years though.
Drumrboy
> "Drumrboy" <drum...@aql.com> wrote in message
>
> news:49b90ca1$0$5933$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
> > On 2009-03-11 20:18:31 -0400, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com> said:
>
> >> "Drumrboy" <drum...@aql.com> wrote in message
> >>news:49b81e79$0$20294$607e...@cv.net...
> >>> On 2009-03-11 16:14:18 -0400, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com>
> >>> said:
>
> >>>> Then simply provide the link to where you posted your address
>
> >>> If I do are you going to show up with my $10,000? Or are you going to
> >>> pussy out, run away and change your screen name again?
>
> >>> Tell you what, retard, I bet you $20,000 you pussy out again.
>
> >> $10000 in your pocket but so sad for you that there is no such link.
> >> Of course you could save yourself from a busy day of searching and just
> >> post your address.
>
> > Really? You spent a busy day searching, didn't you, retard? It was posted
> > many times, it's not my fault your to stupid to find it.
>
> >> Still waiting on that link, don't say you don't have time because
> >> everyone knows you have no life, no one to love and no prospects of ever
> >> making your life better.
>
> > I bet you $20,000 I'll post my address again and you'll pussy out again.
> > Wadda ya say, tough guy?
>
> still wagging that tongue but no link? Your little world is crashing in on
> you isn't it?
> I will pay you $200,000 for your address. post it now
Let me try to jog your memory, pussy.
My address was posted many times. You lost the bet, claimed to have
killfiled me, ran away and changed your screen name. Remember now?
I trusted you last time and you stiffed me, It's not going to happen
again.
Tell ya what, pussy, put the $200,000 in escrow, post the link here
and I'll post my address again or post the link, your choice, faggot.
> I do not expect an address because you are too stupid to provide it. Or Post
> the non-existent link, either way.
You lost the bet and refuse to pay me, asshole. I'm not going to do
your work for you. I've provided it many times, look it up. Besides,
you can save yourself $190,000 by finding it yourself.
> Reply again without a link or an address, this is funny and no loser, I
> haven't searched at all because I know you didn't post your address
You said yesterday you searched and couldn't find it. Were you lying
then or now?
> and I know I never said I have a private jet. Reply without a link or your address
> and prove me correct AGAIN!
Where is a 12 year old going to get $200,000 to put in escrow?
Drumrboy
> "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in message
>
> news:6d8ir41i9h4o5em2k...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:27:10 -0400, "Boo Radley"
>
> >>"Drumrboy" <drum...@aql.com> wrote in message
> >>news:49b90ca1$0$5933$607e...@cv.net...
> >>> On 2009-03-11 20:18:31 -0400, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com>
> >>> said:
>
> >>>> "Drumrboy" <drum...@aql.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:49b81e79$0$20294$607e...@cv.net...
> >>>>> On 2009-03-11 16:14:18 -0400, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com>
Do you pay cuban boys to wash the translucent windshield on your
private jet?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On Mar 12, 11:43 am, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com> wrote:
He pays them 10 grand.
Drumrboy
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Drumrboy <drumr...@aol.com>
That's pocket change. He's willing to pay $200,000 for a guys address.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On Mar 12, 12:46 pm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
That might be gay.
Drumrboy
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT), Drumrboy <drumr...@aol.com>
> puked:
>
>
>
> >On Mar 12, 12:46Êpm, "lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT), Drumrboy <drumr...@aol.com>
> >> puked:
>
Of course it's gay but who cares? I'll take his $200,000, shoot him in
the balls and send him on his way.
Boo Radley
"Drumrboy" <drum...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:7bbec65a-0ed6-4d35...@c11g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 12, 10:27 am, "Boo Radley" <Kill...@mockingbird.com> wrote:
> "Drumrboy" <drum...@aql.com> wrote in message
World crashed in on you AGAIN!
No link, No Address = LOST AGAIN!
Drumrboy
> "Drumrboy" <drumr...@aol.com> wrote in message
No money in escrow = PUSSY LOSER!
Run away Junior, go ask your dad to lend you $200,000 so you can get
some dudes address. Let us know what he says.
BWAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAA!!!!
Boo Radley
<snip crying>
What escrow? CASH MONEY IN YOUR HAND
Post the link or the address. Any reply that does not include a link or your
address is admission that there is no link because you never posted your
address and I never said I have a private jet.
You are a pathetic loser and your bubble has burst. You have nothing. Kill
yourself and all of your pain will go away. DO IT!
lab~rat >:-)
>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:07:33 GMT, KK <_K...@furburger.net> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:01:41 -0400, JimmyM wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>And you could have played bass for DEVO.
>>>
>>> No I couldn't. Jerry Casale is Devo. Mark is the frontman but Jerry is
>>> the driving force.
>>
>>Uh, looking at their recent decade or two, maybe they need some more
>>"driving force".
>
>Yeah, scoring major films, TV shows, commercials and video games, plus
>directing tons of music videos and commercials...yep, their out really
>sucked as Devo, but they're a money making machine for Hollywood.
>
>And good news for you and Shitfoot, Kenneth Keith...Devo will release
>their first album of new music in 19 years this fall!
You ejaculated while typing that, didn't you?
>
>Sorry...missed this post the first time around, and while I was
>laughing again at how O&A are out on their asses at K-Rock and your
>ridiculous claims that their ratings were great, I saw this post and
>just had to reply to let you know the great news!
Drumrboy
> What escrow? CASH MONEY IN YOUR HAND
Look stupid, let me explain this to you again. You offered $200,000 for
my address, I took the offer. Put the money in escrow so I know you
can't stiff me again and I'll post my address.
It's fucking simple, retard.
Let me guess, your daddy said he's not lending you the money because
he's embarrassed his son is fucking gay, right?
Ask Mommy for it, put it in escrow and get back to me.
Drumrboy
> Yeah, scoring major films, TV shows, commercials and video games, plus
> directing tons of music videos and commercials...yep, their out really
> sucked as Devo, but they're a money making machine for Hollywood.
DOUCHE CHILLS!!!
>
> And good news for you and Shitfoot, Kenneth Keith...Devo will release
> their first album of new music in 19 years this fall!
Wipe the cum off your chin, Jocko.