Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Dr. Sam Sheppard--Exonerated?

13 views
Skip to first unread message

doug haire

unread,
Mar 10, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/10/96
to
Greg Lang (spi...@winternet.com) wrote:
: On the bottom of the front page of the Sunday (3-10-96)
: Minneapolis Star Tribune is a story by Brian McGrory of the
: Boston Globe about how Dr. Sam Sheppard may indeed have been
: innocent. Final forensic tests on old blood samples hould be
: completed in a few weeks. He was convicted in 1954 and in 1966
: F. Lee Bailey obtained a new trail that resulted in a "not guilty"
: verdict. Shepard died a pauper 4 years later with the bulk of
: the public thinking him guilty. His case inspired the TV show
: "The Fugitive".
:
: The key suspect is Richard Eberling, now 65, now wheelchair
: bound and in (NY?) state prison. He was a window washer who
: worked for/on the Sheppard Home and is currently in jail for
: murder. Carmen Marino, the first assistant prosecutor in
: Cuyahoga County said of Eberling. "He seems to be a window washer
: to all of these women who died violently. And he has a lot of hangups."
:
:
: A very intruiging article. Read it if you can find it.

I read a similar article down here several weeks ago. Whenthe DNA results
come back, then we can speculate. In the meantime, it means that
Sheppard's son is intent on proving his father's innocence and nothing
more. I admire the man's (Sheppard's son) tenacity and doggedness but I
don't form opinions based on what might be found.

kg wiles

unread,
Mar 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/11/96
to
dha...@gate.net (doug haire) wrote:

I'll also be very interested in the DNA results and will withhold
judgment either way until all the info is in.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Don't expect to build up the weak by
pulling down the strong." - Calvin Coolidge


mtsfl...@msn.com

unread,
Dec 10, 2012, 3:36:27 AM12/10/12
to
Information from a 1996-2000 research of DNA proved that Dr. Sam Sheppard was innocent.
The evidence from a seimen sample was linked to a patient of Dr. Sheppard who was undergoing
psycological treatment and was looking for drugs from the doctors office and residence. The information
being suppressed and at the civil trial brought on by his son for the estate it was ordered that a wrongful
imprisonment award could only be given to the defendant that was imprisoned even though his had spent
a great deal of money to get the evidence needed to exonorate his father.
Message has been deleted
0 new messages