Jesus came to forgive us our sins. If he can, why can;t we? Oh yea, were
human. Thats a laugh.
Americans are vry fortunate to have Bill Clinton for President. It wasn't many
years ago we suffered several vry bad recessions....none since the President.
Be thankful! Let the Lord make the judgements.
Lucile
Lucile
>All of the 10 commandments are equally abhorrent before God. One is using his
>name in vain. Another is remember the Sabbath. Thou Shalt not covet they
>neighbors wife...or goods...Have you all kept them equally? I doubt it.
Actually, some of "us" are Buddhists, Hindus, Shamanists, Confucians,
Atheists and even Mormons. Your mythology isn't everyone's idea of
a good time.
>Jesus came to forgive us our sins. If he can, why can;t we? Oh yea, were
>human. Thats a laugh.
>Americans are vry fortunate to have Bill Clinton for President. It wasn't many
>years ago we suffered several vry bad recessions....none since the President.
>Be thankful! Let the Lord make the judgements.
The best thing about Bill Clinton is that he's
really pretty harmless. You and Jesus can "forgive"
him if you want to, but some of us really don't care
what he does as long as he keeps his wife quiet.
>Lucile
I didn't know you were such a religious wacko. Now that I know, here's a
story you will like. I think it comes from the Bible - chapter 13 of the
lost Book of Baal-peor ("Lord of the opening"), which was actually named
after this incident.
Peter, the main disciple or whatever, goes into the tavern where
Jesus and those twelve bums that hung out with him spent most of
their afternoons and evenings. He sees Jesus sitting alone at a
table in a dark corner, with an even darker expression on his face,
and a couple of dozen empty wine glasses in fron of him.
So Peter asks Paul what's going on. Paul says "He won't talk to
anyone - he just sits there drinking and muttering to himself. I'm
sure as shit not going to be the one that tries to talk to him - you
try it!"
Finally, Peter works up enough courage and he strolls over and sits down.
He asks Jesus what the fuck is bothering him. No answer; just a scowl.
Peter is persistent, and after a couple of hours and a hell of a lot more
wine, he asks Jesus why he keeps buying another glass instead of just
keeping the old one full like in that other fable. This breaks the
tension. Jesus slaps himself upside the head, grins sheepishly and
finally tells Pete what's causing his foul mood.
"Okay, pete, here's the deal...Thy Lord and thy Master hath been one horny
Messiah for the last couple of weeks. So, I came in here last night, and
sure as hell there's this foxy bimbo with a downright heavenly set of
mammaries sitting at the bar. I walked over and introduced myself."
Peter is horrified at this. "Jesus H. Christ!" he exclaimed. "You didn't
give her your real name, didst thou?!"
Jesus spake and saith, "No, not by a long shot, fool - I wanted to impress
her, so I told her I was Merlin the Magician."
"Whew! Good thinkin', boss!" said Peter.
Jesus continued, "I did a few of those tricks my dad taught me, and she
was really impressed. We hit it off well, and pretty soon we were in her
house ripping our clothes off. In a few minutes we were bare-assed naked,
rolling around on the floor. Everything was going just the way I wanted
it, but then I put my hand between her legs and that sucker healed
over!!!!"
* -------------------The alt.fan.oj-simpson FAQ--------------------- *
*Q1: Did that lying, wife-beating, illiterate scumbag Simpson do it? *
* A: Yes. *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
O.J. definitely didn't keep the ones about killing and bearing false witness.
But you know that, deep down, don't you?
>Jesus came to forgive us our sins. If he can, why can;t we? Oh yea, were
>human. Thats a laugh.
Well, SOME of us are humans. I'm not sure about O.J. or some of his mindless
followers.
>
>Americans are vry fortunate to have Bill Clinton for President. It wasn't
>many
>years ago we suffered several vry bad recessions....none since the President.
Oh and Bill Clinton was responsible for ALL that? Uh huh. Tell me, is he also
responsible when big corporations cut thousands of jobs and ship them overseas?
Or when smoking is down among teenagers and drug use is up? Does he get ALL the
credit?
>Be thankful! Let the Lord make the judgements.
Let's let EVERYONE out of prison......including Charles Manson and the cops who
beat Rodney King senseless...........and let's give Mark Furhman his badge
back...............after all, .who are WE to judge them?
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Nice try, dingie.
****************************************
****************************************
"You got what you wanted, tiger........how does it taste?"
- Charlton Heston, 1968
The cops who beat Rodney King are already out of prison. So
are the two cops in Detroit who were convicted of beating
Malice Green to death.
>All of the 10 commandments are equally abhorrent before God. One is using his
>name in vain. Another is remember the Sabbath. Thou Shalt not covet they
>neighbors wife...or goods...Have you all kept them equally? I doubt it.
Actually, some of "us" are Buddhists, Hindus, Shamanists, Confucians,
Atheists and even Mormons. Your mythology isn't everyone's idea of
a good time.
>Jesus came to forgive us our sins. If he can, why can;t we? Oh yea, were
>human. Thats a laugh.
>Americans are vry fortunate to have Bill Clinton for President. It wasn't many
>years ago we suffered several vry bad recessions....none since the President.
>Be thankful! Let the Lord make the judgements.
The best thing about Bill Clinton is that he's
> > Let's let EVERYONE out of prison......including Charles Manson and the cops who
> > beat Rodney King senseless.
>
> The cops who beat Rodney King are already out of prison. So
> are the two cops in Detroit who were convicted of beating
> Malice Green to death.
THE "RACISTS DOGS" ARE INDEED" BACK ON THE STREETS.
THERE WILL COME A TIME SOON,WHEN "FASCISTS" LIKE THESE WILL TAKEN BEFORE AN
INTERNATIONAL COURT.]WE SEEEN THIS HAPPENING IN THE EAST NOW.
THE "PIGS" IN THE KING AND GREENE CASE SHOULD BE TAKEN BEFORE A WORLD
BODY AND GIVE THE DEATH SENTENCE!
MA FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER........................................................!
Monkey dog, your postings are still coming through
news1.ibm.net!129.37.92.152. You never denied MA's assertion that you
were kicked off of pacbell's news servers. If it is true, have you
checked the internet useage policy of your new news host? You've slipped
back into forgery mode instead of labeling your publications "parodies".
ibm.net might not like forgery either. You wouldn't want to be "whipped
like a dog" off of another ISP's news server, would you?
[I am reminded of the Lyle Lovett song that goes, "That's
the difference between God and me." Still, if I'm going to
oppose Clinton, it's for MAI, GATT and NAFTA, not any
fantasies of hankypanky that keep Kenneth Starr awake at
night.]
Don't forget, Clinton was president during the ENTIRE Simpson murder
case....if "big brother" framed poor Mr. Simpson, then Clinton must be the
mastermind, right? HE ordered the deaths of Ron and Nicole......and let's
not stop there, what about those Heaven's Gate people SLAUGHTERED by the
Clinton administration just to create a subliminal advertisement for Nike
Shoes?
Hey, this is fun. If you completely detach yourself from reality and
common sense you can come up with all kinds of crazy conspiracies.......
Thanks Mr. Miller.
:-)
--
------------------------------------------------------------
"Collecting action figures is a lot like collecting stamps, except they taste terrible when you lick them."
It's aliens, isn't it? Damn sneaky scaly slimy bug-eyed E.T.s from another
galaxy messing with our justice system, raising gas prices, spreading
racial discord and taking Quisp and Mr. T cereal off the market!
I KNEW IT!
Thanks, Mr. Miller, your secret is safe with me.
And they were, to a man, afraid to even mention same in their memoirs.
rotfl.
Actually, most of us are aware that the president's powers are limited, unlike
your capacity for paranoia.
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading
Bob, aren't you forgetting that under your theory the plot
began at least as far back as the Bush administration?
Given that Bush was once head of the CIA, do you think
he would have been in on the conspiracy?
[If you look at the Vice President's task force on counter-
terrorism, I forget the exact title but it was something
like that, you'll see that Bush was creating a structure
within the government to handle covert ops, etc. Certainly,
Bush's recent history with the CIA is established, and
there was a two-part article in Covert Actions Information
Bulletin and a couple of pieces in The Nation back in the
eighties about Bush's long history of intelligence involvement.
His father and maternal grandfather were involved in the
trans-Atlantic corporate/banking interests that brought
Hitler to power, operating in the same Wall Street swill
as the Dulles.
[But, again, your presumption that the President knows and
condones everything that happens under his watch is false.
Bush was unusual because you could actually trace his back
to some of the real powers in this country, but even Bush
is a front man. Which is not to say that the elements of
the intelligence/military community involved in this psy-op
aren't in some way operating as a kind of fifth column.
Like the OK City bombing, there are fingers pointing across
the Atlantic. Considering that a fifth of the CIA payroll
in the late forties consisted of Gehlen's Org, this should
not be terribly surprising.]
Your presumption about what I presume is false. I just
asked you the question.
Was there another set of corporate/banking interests in
America that opposed Hitler once he was brought to power?
Was World War II really a war between the opposing
corporate/banking interests? How come you never tell us
about the people who financed the war against Hitler?
> [But, again, your presumption that the President knows and
> condones everything that happens under his watch is false.
[Then it was either a dumb question, a misleading question, or
just another attempt to insult me by trying to put words in
my mouth. Why did you ask the question?]
[At the time, there was enough anti-fascist sentiment in the
US that much of the industrial leaders reluctantly got
behind the war effort. You might see Higham's TRADING WITH
THE ENEMY for more information. Simply, the warning that
Eisenhower gave about the military-industrial complex was
about twenty years too late. The very industrial base that
the US used to fight fascism became the means by which
fascism conquered the US. Now the question is whether your
allegiance is to German or American corporations.]
>
> > [But, again, your presumption that the President knows and
> > condones everything that happens under his watch is false.
The question was, do you think Bush knew about your alleged
plot by US intelligence to kill Nicole. Why is that a dumb
question? He *was* a former director of the CIA. What words
was I trying to put in your mouth?
I asked the question because I want you to make it a little
more clear who you think was behind the murders. A couple of
days ago you were wondering why people don't ask more
questions. Now you call my questions "dumb." That's just
plain rude Bob. I though you held yourself to a higher
standard.
So you think America was fighting facism? It was more
like America was fighting the enemies of communism. Have
you forgotten that America was allied with communist Russia?
With our help, the communists won the war and all of eastern
Europe became communist. Many of the communist refugees came
to America and during the cold war some of them sold our
atomic secrets to the Russians. How was America threatened
by facism in Eurpoe? We didn't need to fight a war for
freedom in America. We didn't have freedom at that time.
Don't you remember that America was segregated, including the
armed forces, and the Indians were living on reservations?
We didn't need to fight Germany to preserve our freedom.
> > > [But, again, your presumption that the President knows and
> > > condones everything that happens under his watch is false.
Thomas P. Jabine wrote:
> The question was, do you think Bush knew about your alleged
> plot by US intelligence to kill Nicole. Why is that a dumb
> question? He *was* a former director of the CIA. What words
> was I trying to put in your mouth?
>
> I asked the question because I want you to make it a little
> more clear who you think was behind the murders. A couple of
> days ago you were wondering why people don't ask more
> questions. Now you call my questions "dumb." That's just
> plain rude Bob. I though you held yourself to a higher
> standard.
[I do not know if Bush knew anything about the murders. I wouldguess that it was
planned and carried out by the Nazi elements
within the national security apparatus. Bush and his elders were
certainly familiar with that milieu, stretching back to pre-WWII.
There were Nazi allies and admirers on Wall Street before, during
and after WWII. There were a number of links surrounding the
JFK assassination which lead to Nazis and Nazi supporters,
which means that those elements were in some control of the
government, probably through the military, by 1963. The Watergate
scandal suggests a sort of counterrevolution. The October Surprising
of Carter which led to twelve years of Reagan and Bush was
another counterrevolution of sorts. I would guess that Clinton
represents the Eastern old money interests as much as they can be
differentiated from the Oil Money, which were certainly aligned
with the military in overthrowing JFK. Of course, there are overlaps,
the Rockefellers are both eastern old money and oil. The irony is
that the oil interests, who have been leaning towards the Nazis, are
the very powers who may find themselves running against Germany
over the oilfields in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
as well as the Mideast.
[Back to the Bundy murders. If, as I have opined, it was a psy-op
with the cooperation of most of the media, there would have to have
been tentacles extending into our government's national security
apparatus (thus my interest in the RIT connection), but that does
not necessarily mean that the ultimate authors were American.]
The General wrote:
> > > > Bush was unusual because you could actually trace his back
> > > > to some of the real powers in this country, but even Bush
> > > > is a front man. Which is not to say that the elements of
> > > > the intelligence/military community involved in this psy-op
> > > > aren't in some way operating as a kind of fifth column.
> > > > Like the OK City bombing, there are fingers pointing across
> > > > the Atlantic. Considering that a fifth of the CIA payroll
> > > > in the late forties consisted of Gehlen's Org, this should
> > > > not be terribly surprising.]
[All very interesting, but my wife is calling me to bed.]
If it was the Nazis who conspired to kill JFK, how do
you explain their choice of Jack Ruby (real name Jack
Rubenstein) to take Oswald out after they used him as
their patsy?
> The Watergate
> scandal suggests a sort of counterrevolution. The October Surprising
> of Carter which led to twelve years of Reagan and Bush was
> another counterrevolution of sorts. I would guess that Clinton
> represents the Eastern old money interests as much as they can be
> differentiated from the Oil Money, which were certainly aligned
> with the military in overthrowing JFK. Of course, there are overlaps,
> the Rockefellers are both eastern old money and oil. The irony is
> that the oil interests, who have been leaning towards the Nazis, are
> the very powers who may find themselves running against Germany
> over the oilfields in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
> as well as the Mideast.
>
> [Back to the Bundy murders. If, as I have opined, it was a psy-op
> with the cooperation of most of the media, there would have to have
> been tentacles extending into our government's national security
> apparatus (thus my interest in the RIT connection), but that does
> not necessarily mean that the ultimate authors were American.]
>
> >
> >
> > >>
>[I do not know if Bush knew anything about the murders. I wouldguess that it was
>planned and carried out by the Nazi elements
>within the national security apparatus. Bush and his elders were
>certainly familiar with that milieu, stretching back to pre-WWII.
>There were Nazi allies and admirers on Wall Street before, during
>and after WWII. There were a number of links surrounding the
>JFK assassination which lead to Nazis and Nazi supporters,
>which means that those elements were in some control of the
>government, probably through the military, by 1963. The Watergate
>scandal suggests a sort of counterrevolution. The October Surprising
>of Carter which led to twelve years of Reagan and Bush was
>another counterrevolution of sorts. I would guess that Clinton
>represents the Eastern old money interests as much as they can be
>differentiated from the Oil Money, which were certainly aligned
>with the military in overthrowing JFK. Of course, there are overlaps,
>the Rockefellers are both eastern old money and oil. The irony is
>that the oil interests, who have been leaning towards the Nazis, are
>the very powers who may find themselves running against Germany
>over the oilfields in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union
>as well as the Mideast.
>
>[Back to the Bundy murders. If, as I have opined, it was a psy-op
>with the cooperation of most of the media, there would have to have
>been tentacles extending into our government's national security
>apparatus (thus my interest in the RIT connection), but that does
>not necessarily mean that the ultimate authors were American.]
Bob,
You're kidding, right? Please tell me what you wrote here is a joke.
Are you sure Norway and Hawaii really are not next to each other? How
much money did you get as a consultant for the movie Conspiracy
Theory?
I'm speechless,
Mitch
Mitch Farmer wrote:
[I'll be away from the internet for a week or so, but here's some homework.Go read
about Reinhard Gehlen. See what you can find. Good luck.]
The General wrote:
> If it was the Nazis who conspired to kill JFK, how do
> you explain their choice of Jack Ruby (real name Jack
> Rubenstein) to take Oswald out after they used him as
> their patsy?
>
[Actually, you should read some of the things that Ruby wrote
in prison. Ruby was a gangster, as a boy he was a messenger
for Al Capone. He did what he had to do. He was given orders.
It was after he was in prison that he began figuring out what
was happening around him. You should read what he says to
Earl Warren when he's begging him to be taken to Washington,
DC to testify.]