anyone for a 9/11 investigation?
VFW
> I dont claim to know what happened. I have claimed not to know, and
> given all the reports of eye witnesses recorded on video, of them
> talking about explosions in the building, it seems an investigation
> would be in order. Yet Al, says he's never seen any eye witness speak of
> explosions. Maybe he has a different set of TV channels.
>
> But if you are familiar with Janis' work on group think, you can see how
> people will quite literally not believe their own eyes in order to go
> along with what they think the group thinks. Only about 15% of subjects
> tested can actually think for themselves.
>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2004/may/27/research.highereducation4
"Better to go along than not be "accepted."
> I'm not a Truther; I dont claim to know the truth, which is not the same
> as knowing the media has lied to us. Which if you recall the Goldwater
> campaign, you know has been going on forever.
>
> Even the 911 commissioners saying, on camera, that "We were lied to."
> did not trigger a new investigation. Remarkable. The government's own
> officials were lied to, and there are no calls for investigation. Well,
> well, there are more pressing issues.
>
> Is Obama the first president who lied to us? And do you recall the
> marvelous success of Carter, who said he would not lie to us? Is there a
> lesson there? YOu want the truth? You cant handle the truth.
>
Our world is run by psychopaths.
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/146708-Twilight-of-the-Psychopaths
> With a population this stupid, ignorant, and neurotic, you humor them
> with lies as you would with any other mental defectives. And you have
> the self control to never call them morons.
"When I saw the first plane hit the building I thought, what a
terrible pilot."
G.W.Bush.
"The air is ok to breath."
C.T Whitman
"USAma bin Laden did it."
Take your pick....
"You've been lied to about 9-11"
Al Dykes
time for a real investigation?
--
money; what a concept!
VFW
VFW <geor...@toast.net> wrote:
and ;
These are the facts:
1. The NTSB claims the data they are providing through the
FOIA is from N644AA. This claim has not been proven - Fact.
2. The Data provided by the NTSB does not support the govt
story in several instances and the list is growing - Fact
and proven.
3. The NTSB Flight Path Study conclusions conflict with the
data Warren has provided - Fact and Proven.
4. The NTSB/FBI refuse to comment on the growing mountain of
conflicting information/data they provide. - Fact and
Proven.
5. More forthcoming.
These are the claims which remain to be proven by those who
make excuse for the govt story, in order for them to hold
onto their impact theory.
1. Proof that the data provided
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=11066
(came from N644AA).
2. Proof that the Flight Deck Door was open in flight for a
hijack to take place.
3. The
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=18239&view=find
post&p=10778240
(Pressure Altitude), required by the FAA, and confirmed by
the NTSB, must be proven to be in error in excess of 120+
feet.
4. Proof of the object from which Radar altitude is
measuring.
5. Proof a
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/dutch_simulation_debunked (757
can be precisely maneuvered )at more than 110 knots over its
max operating limit to hit a target with a 33' margin for
error by a pilot who cannot control a 172 at 65 knots.
5. Proof that http://citizeninvestigationteam.com/ (more
than 13 independently corroborated and verified witnesses)
are mistaken all in the same manner.
6. Attempt to get the NTSB to
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=18247
(amend their Flight Path Study) and admit their possible
error of not being able to decode a complete FDR data set,
perhaps setting in motion a complete audit of every Flight
Path Study and Final Report the NTSB has produced and drawn
conclusions based on Flight Data. Amend regulation as
necessary.
7. Proof/Positive ID that N644AA is responsible for the
damage at the Pentagon.
These are just a few off the top of my head.
To date, there hasnt been one person who has made excuse for
the govt story of 9/11, able to provide proof for any of
their above claims/excuses. Most of these people are
anonymous or cannot be verified. Most use libel or
personally attack us as their debate style in an obvious
unhealthy daily obsession with our work and organization.
Most probably
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=11687
(work for the Pentagon). Every single one of them refuses to
debate civilly in a recorded venue using their real name.
These are the facts. They are undisputed.