Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Superman is dead.

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Noel Friesen

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 1:44:51 AM2/15/07
to
God and superman both dead. Only the last men are left behind to suffocate
on their own putrescence. Hope the ending, when it comes, doesn't recur
after all...


Übermann

unread,
Feb 15, 2007, 10:45:31 AM2/15/07
to
On Feb 15, 11:44 am, "Noel Friesen" <noel.*delete*frie...@shaw.ca>
wrote:

> God and superman both dead. Only the last men are left behind to suffocate
> on their own putrescence. Hope the ending, when it comes, doesn't recur
> after all...

----------
Superman is yet to born... not died yet... where there is no beginning
there can not be any end... the recurrence of all event happens in
Time-Space curvature...

Noel Friesen

unread,
Feb 21, 2007, 3:08:27 AM2/21/07
to
When the time of the Superman arrives he'll end up being just another bridge
to a new state of being.

Just as we are a bridge between the ape and the Superman. So too the
Superman will be a bridge between us and something else. Connecting us
with nothing in the beginning and nothing in the future.

This is why Nietzsche conceived of the eternal recurrence. He believed that
only with an eternal recurrence can the Superman justify all of existence.

Otherwise, he'd be just a bridge to nowhere.

"Übermann" <mano...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171554331.5...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Message has been deleted

ernobe

unread,
Mar 1, 2007, 9:22:26 PM3/1/07
to
On Feb 21, 2:08 am, "Noel Friesen" <noel.*remove*frie...@shaw.ca>
wrote:

> When the time of the Superman arrives he'll end up being just another bridge
> to a new state of being.
>
> Just as we are a bridge between the ape and the Superman. So too the
> Superman will be a bridge between us and something else. Connecting us
> with nothing in the beginning and nothing in the future.
>
> This is why Nietzsche conceived of the eternal recurrence. He believed that
> only with an eternal recurrence can the Superman justify all of existence.
>
> Otherwise, he'd be just a bridge to nowhere.
>

Yea, he would have been Sartre, who wrote a book called "Being and
Nothingness".

Bryan Finken

unread,
Apr 1, 2007, 8:32:10 PM4/1/07
to
On Feb 15, 12:44 am, "Noel Friesen" <noel.*delete*frie...@shaw.ca>
wrote:

> God and superman both dead. Only the last men are left behind to suffocate
> on their own putrescence. Hope the ending, when it comes, doesn't recur
> after all...

it would have to, no?

0 new messages