Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Republicans Should Start Their Comeback By Getting Rid Of Iowa And New Hamphire As The First Two Primary States
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Seneca
Nov 10, 2012, 11:25:30 AM11/10/12
to
Why should two Blue states which almost always vote Democrat lead off the
Republican nomination campaign?
In these states it is the often the most left-leaning, populist candidates
that win giving them an advantage to win the nomination.
Even though the eventual winner may not have won either the Iowa caucuses or
the New Hampshire vote, the Republican nominating process is skewed up
leading to the election of an inferior candidate. Also these Democrat states
are financially awarded by the campaigns obtaining the revenue generated by
the many candidates, their entourages and the media. Better that
this money should go to a Republican- leaning state.
I would suggest as an alternative that the primaries begin in Red States
such as Kansas, Oklahoma or South Carolina. The problem
could be solved by having any Red state declare it will hold its primary on
a date one day before either Iowa or New Hampshire.
However, the best solution to this problem would have all fifty states hold
their primaries on the same day. Much money would be saved in candidates'
costs and expenses and the Republicans would not be hurt as they were this
year by a delay in receiving much of their funding which gave the Democrats
a strategic advantage.
Republican nomination campaign?
In these states it is the often the most left-leaning, populist candidates
that win giving them an advantage to win the nomination.
Even though the eventual winner may not have won either the Iowa caucuses or
the New Hampshire vote, the Republican nominating process is skewed up
leading to the election of an inferior candidate. Also these Democrat states
are financially awarded by the campaigns obtaining the revenue generated by
the many candidates, their entourages and the media. Better that
this money should go to a Republican- leaning state.
I would suggest as an alternative that the primaries begin in Red States
such as Kansas, Oklahoma or South Carolina. The problem
could be solved by having any Red state declare it will hold its primary on
a date one day before either Iowa or New Hampshire.
However, the best solution to this problem would have all fifty states hold
their primaries on the same day. Much money would be saved in candidates'
costs and expenses and the Republicans would not be hurt as they were this
year by a delay in receiving much of their funding which gave the Democrats
a strategic advantage.
Bible Studies with Satan
Nov 11, 2012, 3:41:02 PM11/11/12
to
Seneca wrote:
> Why should two Blue states which almost always vote Democrat lead off the
> Republican nomination campaign?
> In these states it is the often the most left-leaning, populist candidates
> that win giving them an advantage to win the nomination.
>
> Even though the eventual winner may not have won either the Iowa caucuses or
> the New Hampshire vote, the Republican nominating process is skewed up
> leading to the election of an inferior candidate.
Yah, you stoopit fuckwits would have done a lot better if you had nominated Newt
> Why should two Blue states which almost always vote Democrat lead off the
> Republican nomination campaign?
> In these states it is the often the most left-leaning, populist candidates
> that win giving them an advantage to win the nomination.
>
> Even though the eventual winner may not have won either the Iowa caucuses or
> the New Hampshire vote, the Republican nominating process is skewed up
> leading to the election of an inferior candidate.
Gringrich or Rick Santorum!
BWAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA.
> Also these Democrat states
> are financially awarded by the campaigns obtaining the revenue generated by
> the many candidates, their entourages and the media. Better that
> this money should go to a Republican- leaning state.
>
> I would suggest as an alternative that the primaries begin in Red States
> such as Kansas, Oklahoma or South Carolina. The problem
> could be solved by having any Red state declare it will hold its primary on
> a date one day before either Iowa or New Hampshire.
> However, the best solution to this problem would have all fifty states hold
> their primaries on the same day. Much money would be saved in candidates'
> costs and expenses and the Republicans would not be hurt as they were this
> year by a delay in receiving much of their funding which gave the Democrats
> a strategic advantage.
Republicans new national anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR2BiH_GmDs
Ezekiel 23:20
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Nov 10, 2012, 6:28:37 PM11/10/12
to
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:25:30 -0500, "Seneca" <sen...@microsoft.com>
wrote:
>Why should two Blue states which almost always vote Democrat lead off the
>Republican nomination campaign?
It's not that Iowa and New Hampshire are blue states. It's that they
are small states, little population, of no real importance. They have
no business deciding who will be the nominee for either party.
wrote:
>Why should two Blue states which almost always vote Democrat lead off the
>Republican nomination campaign?
are small states, little population, of no real importance. They have
no business deciding who will be the nominee for either party.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 10, 2012, 6:45:42 PM11/10/12
to
Here's an even better idea. I have been telling this for a while, as a
friendly warning, to Republicans:
Get rid of the electoral college, or else Hispanics will be electing
the President the remainder of the century.
Just some friendly advice...
-Ramon
0 new messages