Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Natalie's Pubic Hair: A Serious Debate

445 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike Jenner

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 5:44:34 PM4/19/01
to
Okay, those of u who claim not to be interested in Nat's bod can ignore this
post. But for others here who think she is a damn fine sexy lady.........

What do you think Natalie's pubic hair is like? I reckon very dark and
abundant but I'm open to other opinions. So lets open this up as a serious
topic.


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 7:27:01 PM4/19/01
to

I think Nat has a sexy body, yeah. But I'm not interested in ANYone's
pubic hair.

prevert.

Get out of our chatrum.

--
aufan-deux

AJR

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 9:13:34 PM4/19/01
to
> What do you think Natalie's pubic hair is like? I reckon very dark and
> abundant but I'm open to other opinions. So lets open this up as a
serious
> topic.

Play with your own pubs, then you may have a basic understanding of what
they look and feel like.

-AJR


Geek Mystique

unread,
Apr 19, 2001, 6:57:17 PM4/19/01
to

"Mike Jenner" <mike....@btinternet.com> wrote in message

I have only a small sample of her pubic hair, but i can tell you its pink
with blue dots, my sample is about 5 inches long.


Aaron Matthews

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 7:02:03 AM4/20/01
to
> But I'm not interested in ANYone's
> pubic hair.

<sigh>

and just when i thought i had found u the perfect christmas gift....

--
~
sigless

http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~cantona
~

--


"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3adf7418...@news.alltel.net...


> On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:44:34 +0100, "Mike Jenner"
> <mike....@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> >Okay, those of u who claim not to be interested in Nat's bod can ignore
this
> >post. But for others here who think she is a damn fine sexy
lady.........
> >
> >What do you think Natalie's pubic hair is like? I reckon very dark and
> >abundant but I'm open to other opinions. So lets open this up as a
serious
> >topic.
>

>
>
>

Sascha Smitskamp

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 8:21:26 AM4/20/01
to

>I think Nat has a sexy body, yeah. But I'm not interested in ANYone's
>pubic hair.

Yes, Natalie is beautiful. But she's is indeed sexy, but not in a commercial
way. She has a very natural beauty. She doesn't need silicone or make-up.
She's basicly a very normal girl who doesn't really care about the whole
glamour of Hollywood. And she's also very....very smart.

So Let's awnser the bsic question. Natalie is a brunette. Anything lighter
then brown hair is not her own color. Notice in WTHI, she has red hair, in
Leon she has black hair.
Oh yeah, and her hair is very curly. In an interview she said it, and that
her hair has a life of it's own. Notice in Beatiful girls and Heat, that
this is indeed so. This is sorta common amoungst Jewish girls.

I was reading the paper yesterday, and there was an article about the Miss
Israel. So i said to a friend: There is only one real Miss Israel!;)

Mike Jenner

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 5:44:31 PM4/20/01
to
You calling me a "prevert" (I assume u mean pervert, moron) is absurd and
inaccurate.

Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman and at
least 50% will say pubic hair. It is quite natural, not "preverted" you
pleb. I can only assume that you are only 10 years old and do not really
know about such things.

The bottom line (pun intended) here is that the vast majority of males in
this newsgroup hunted the web high and low as soon as those topless pics
came about and would do exactly the same if ever full frontal nudes of
Natalie became available. So please, stop this pathetic winging about those
of us who happen to think she is sexy AND would like to see her naked.


"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3adf7418...@news.alltel.net...

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 7:41:44 PM4/20/01
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:02:03 +1200, "Aaron Matthews"
<aaronmat...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> But I'm not interested in ANYone's
>> pubic hair.
>
><sigh>
>
>and just when i thought i had found u the perfect christmas gift....

Sorry to disappoint, dood. But you're actually going to have to pay
money for my present.

--
aufan-deux

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 7:45:11 PM4/20/01
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 22:44:31 +0100, "Mike Jenner"
<mike....@btinternet.com> wrote:

>You calling me a "prevert" (I assume u mean pervert, moron) is absurd and
>inaccurate.

And you calling me a "moron" (I assume YOU ment "moroon") is ironic,
sence you are the looser!!!11

>Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman and at
>least 50% will say pubic hair. It is quite natural, not "preverted" you
>pleb. I can only assume that you are only 10 years old and do not really
>know about such things.

My age has nothing to do with it. My brother says that pubic hare is
GROSE and I believe him!!!!1!1!!!!!1

>The bottom line (pun intended) here is that the vast majority of males in
>this newsgroup hunted the web high and low as soon as those topless pics
>came about and would do exactly the same if ever full frontal nudes of
>Natalie became available. So please, stop this pathetic winging about those
>of us who happen to think she is sexy AND would like to see her naked.

I would like to see her neked to, but pubic hare is GROSE and anyone
who likes it is a PREVERT!!!!!!!


HAHAHAQHAHHAHAHAHA!!!!11 YOUR'E SO STUPID!!!!!!1111111QQ

--
aufan-deux

S.Newin

unread,
Apr 20, 2001, 9:01:17 PM4/20/01
to
>at least 50% will say pubic hair

dood?
the hair?
break on through to the otherside.......

"Mike Jenner" <mike....@btinternet.com> wrote in message

news:9bqajm$q0o$1...@plutonium.btinternet.com...


> You calling me a "prevert" (I assume u mean pervert, moron) is absurd and
> inaccurate.
>

> Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman and .

generic

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 12:55:10 AM4/21/01
to
some dumnarse said:
> Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman and at
> least 50% will say pubic hair. It is quite natural, not "preverted" you
> pleb. I can only assume that you are only 10 years old and do not really
> know about such things.
>

um.. i'm quite well over 16 years old and i can honestly say pubic hair has
never turned me on. your 50% mark is totally offbase. in fact, if you
really asked, most "normal" guys would most likely say shaved, or barely
any, or something to that effect would be more of a turn on.

maybe you should like, actually see a real girl naked or something before
you say stuff like that.

--chris

burn2shine

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 1:32:56 AM4/21/01
to
Dood, you must not follow this group that much...no one talks about Natalie
Portman in here...sheesh.

Seriously though, while I'm sure that most of us do find Natalie incredibly
attractive and sexy, I personally can say that until this topic sprung up
(no pun intended...god I can already see where this thread is going) I had
never even thought about it. Natalie's face is probably the most enchanting
part of her body, her eyes especially. But I think a more mature "natural"
person as you put it wouldn't be hung up on thinking about Natalie's pubes.
And as far as the nudes go, we didn't have to hunt: lamers like you posted
them here and all over the binaries group. At this point I've seen them so
much thanks to unwanted postings that any sexual allure they might have had
is totally gone (sun burned breasts just don't do it for me, dunno about any
one else.)

The irony in this whole thread is that the idea of her pubic hair color in
and of itself simply couldn't be a serious topic, at least here.


burn2shine
http://www.twistid.com/nat

Mike Jenner <mike....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9bqajm$q0o$1...@plutonium.btinternet.com...

Aaron Matthews

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 2:52:44 AM4/21/01
to
> Sorry to disappoint, dood. But you're actually going to have to pay
> money for my present.

thats ok.. i have a back up...

the good thing about enj's mother being so large... is that i get a bulk
discount...

--
~
sigless

http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~cantona
~

--


"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message

news:3ae0c91c...@news.alltel.net...


> On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 23:02:03 +1200, "Aaron Matthews"
> <aaronmat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> But I'm not interested in ANYone's
> >> pubic hair.
> >
> ><sigh>
> >
> >and just when i thought i had found u the perfect christmas gift....
>

>
> --
> aufan-deux


Aaron Matthews

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 2:57:49 AM4/21/01
to
> You calling me a "prevert" (I assume u mean pervert, moron) is absurd and
> inaccurate.
>

i think he was right on the money....

> Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman and at
> least 50% will say pubic hair. It is quite natural, not "preverted" you
> pleb. I can only assume that you are only 10 years old and do not really
> know about such things.
>

most guys will say "boobies" or words to that effect.

the hair isn;t the goal.....

u don;t go through all the trouble of pulling, just to sniff her pubes

dork.

> The bottom line (pun intended) here is that the vast majority of males in
> this newsgroup hunted the web high and low as soon as those topless pics
> came about

i repeat...

BOOBIES!

> and would do exactly the same if ever full frontal nudes of
> Natalie became available. So please, stop this pathetic winging about
those
> of us who happen to think she is sexy AND would like to see her naked.

she is undeniably sexy... but her pubes are no more special than the next
person's

Aaron Matthews

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 3:06:04 AM4/21/01
to
> (sun burned breasts just don't do it for me, dunno about any
> one else.)

any breasts do it for me/


--
~
sigless

http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~cantona
~

--


"burn2shine" <burn2...@NOSPAMPLEASE-twistid.com> wrote in message
news:cY8E6.2987$J74.3...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...


> Dood, you must not follow this group that much...no one talks about
Natalie
> Portman in here...sheesh.
>
> Seriously though, while I'm sure that most of us do find Natalie
incredibly
> attractive and sexy, I personally can say that until this topic sprung up
> (no pun intended...god I can already see where this thread is going) I had
> never even thought about it. Natalie's face is probably the most
enchanting
> part of her body, her eyes especially. But I think a more mature "natural"
> person as you put it wouldn't be hung up on thinking about Natalie's
pubes.
> And as far as the nudes go, we didn't have to hunt: lamers like you posted
> them here and all over the binaries group. At this point I've seen them so
> much thanks to unwanted postings that any sexual allure they might have
had
> is totally gone >

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 4:34:53 PM4/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001 18:52:44 +1200, "Aaron Matthews"
<aaronmat...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> Sorry to disappoint, dood. But you're actually going to have to pay
>> money for my present.
>
>thats ok.. i have a back up...
>
>the good thing about enj's mother being so large... is that i get a bulk
>discount...

ture, ture. And you won't have to pay a lot for her. Nice call,
dood!

--
aufan-deux

Sascha Smitskamp

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 5:51:54 PM4/21/01
to

>she is undeniably sexy... but her pubes are no more special than the next
>person's

Oh no. You're wrong there. They are much more special then the next person's
BECAUSE they are NATALIE'S pubes!

I'd prefer to see someone i actually have a crush on nude, rather then
someone unknown. Even if that unknown person has a more beautiful body.

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 21, 2001, 10:22:24 PM4/21/01
to

> Oh no. You're wrong there. They are much more special then the next
person's
> BECAUSE they are NATALIE'S pubes!
>


Oh come on people, we're talking about pubes. lol

If you put one of my pubes on a plate and one of hers right next to mine you
probably wouldn't even tell the difference.
What's the big deal?

(Even though this is the closest thing to an on topic discussion I've
replied to in a while)

Kyle


Mike Jenner

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 5:10:14 AM4/22/01
to
If your logic is correct, please tell me why mags like Playboy etc are so
popular, since these feature pics of women who in the main have pubic hair.

Also, if guys are not interested in it as you claim then why, in the celeb
nude news groups etc., do people go NUTS if there is a new pic of a female
celebrity doing a full frontal???

When it comes down to it I conceed it is just personal preference but I'm
fed up with getting dissed by you Chris just because you don't agree. And
just for the record, if Natalie ever does a full frontal nude scene just
watch this group go mad with requests for caps!


"generic" <cr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9br3t6$oqq$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...

damnfine

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 6:20:05 AM4/22/01
to
Mike Jenner wrote:
> So lets open this up as a serious topic.

Yeah I'm sure that'll happen.

--
/^\damnfine/^\
"Never mind who I am. I know who I am. Do you know who you are?"

damnfine

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 6:21:51 AM4/22/01
to
Mike Jenner wrote:
> You calling me a "prevert" (I assume u mean pervert, moron)

No, he means prevert. Moron.

> Ask any normal guy over the age of 16 what turns him on in a woman

Hahaha... Mike hit puberty at 16.

> and at least 50% will say pubic hair.

Not really. It's more to do with what's underneath it. But you're getting
close.

Sascha Smitskamp

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 8:43:36 AM4/22/01
to

Well. All i know is that i'd prefer a woman WITH pubic hair rather then a
shaved one. God decided that at a certain age girls and boys schould get
pubic hair. Now, with those people who shave it all away... It's just not
the natural way of things. If a girl shaves her Bikiniline, i'm ok with
that. It actually looks really sexy, but a fully shaved pussy is
disguesting. It just looks to much like a little girl's pussy. And those of
you who prefer shaved ones, probably have a secret dark desire for little
girls;)

S.Newin

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 7:54:42 AM4/22/01
to
> Well. All i know is that i'd prefer a woman WITH pubic hair rather then a
> shaved one.

dood, he said it's to do with what is under the hair.......

> God decided that at a certain age girls and boys schould get
> pubic hair. Now, with those people who shave it all away... It's just not
> the natural way of things. If a girl shaves her Bikiniline, i'm ok with
> that. It actually looks really sexy

the bikini is from god?

> disguesting.

i am happy to guest there...

> It just looks to much like a little girl's pussy.

seems a bit freudient

"Sascha Smitskamp" <sas...@gotham.demon.nl> wrote in message
news:987939734.23304....@news.demon.nl...
>


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 4:26:44 PM4/22/01
to
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:50:05 +0930, "damnfine"
<raoul...@journalist.comFOUL-YEAR-OF-OUR-LORD> wrote:

>Mike Jenner wrote:
>> So lets open this up as a serious topic.
>
>Yeah I'm sure that'll happen.
>
>--
>/^\damnfine/^\


lol....ikik

--
aufan-deux

Sascha Smitskamp

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 7:53:54 PM4/22/01
to


>dood, he said it's to do with what is under the hair.......

Nevertheless, it's Natalie Portman's pussy. I'd prefer to see Natalie's
pussy rather then someone unknown.
If there ever come pics of Natalie Portman tottally nude, i'll go to the
Synagogue and read the Thora from beginning to the end!!!!

>the bikini is from god?

Whoops;) Uhh yeah... did't think about that. God creates Dinosaur, God
destroys Dinosaur, God creates man, man destroys God, man creates Dinosaur.

You could say that the bikini is a gift from God :D

By the way, did you know that the word "dood" means Death in the
Netherlands. Check out the end of my E-mail adress:)


MazzelTov!

Sascha


generic

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 10:42:36 PM4/22/01
to
Mike Jenner wrote:
> If your logic is correct, please tell me why mags like Playboy etc are so
> popular, since these feature pics of women who in the main have pubic
hair.
>

it's the norm. i will say some people would rather see pubic hair than not,
just b/c some people don't like shaven girls. but it doesn't mean that they
are completely turned on by pubic hair.

> Also, if guys are not interested in it as you claim then why, in the celeb
> nude news groups etc., do people go NUTS if there is a new pic of a female
> celebrity doing a full frontal???
>

b/c most celebs are willing to show breasts all the time. i highly doubt
that people from a celeb nude news group are a representative sampling of
the male race. a full frontal brings more things to discuss, share, etc.
but to get the most basic, people like to see females totally nude. ask
yourself why totally nude strip joints are so much more popular than regular
strip joints. i'm almost willing to bet most of the stippers are clean
shaven.

> When it comes down to it I conceed it is just personal preference but I'm
> fed up with getting dissed by you Chris just because you don't agree.

for one thing, i do believe this is the one of the few times i've expressed
my opinion about much on this ng, period. so get fed up all you want about
one (maybe two, i'm too lazy to look) posts. i really don't think a
"serious debate" can be held about pubic hair. and let me know what i'm fed
up with, newbies who come in here, express opinions, then refuse to listen
to other people who have been on this ng for some time. yes, most of us
share a common interest in natalie, but don't come bursting in, let out a
few posts about stuff like, of all things, pubic hair, and expect the whole
newsgroup to take you seriously. but yes, for the most part, it will be a
matter of personal preference.

> just for the record, if Natalie ever does a full frontal nude scene just
> watch this group go mad with requests for caps!
>

i highly doubt it. most people on here would find it, and quietly
distritbute it. no one here is a public pervert except aaron.

--chris


generic

unread,
Apr 22, 2001, 10:44:11 PM4/22/01
to

actually, it's more a matter of not having to floss after a night of um...
activity.

--chris


V01TeK

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 8:26:27 AM4/23/01
to

"Mike Jenner" <mike....@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:9bu75h$b5s$1...@uranium.btinternet.com...

> If your logic is correct, please tell me why mags like Playboy etc are so
> popular, since these feature pics of women who in the main have pubic
hair.
>

Oh you poor deluded soul. If you wanted to see pron, you wouldnut be looking
in Playboy. Playboy is only for the articles and incisive reviews.
Any idot who looks at pron knows that pubic hair is passe.
Syl.
--
"I Stand to modify
This world I see is so untrue
And I'm dreaming
Of AK47s and you.
Policies of peace contradict
These violent means I choose to use
And I'm dreaming
Of AK47s and you."
C. Dubrow


V01TeK

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 8:30:47 AM4/23/01
to
Well. All i know is that i'd prefer a woman WITH pubic hair rather then a
> shaved one.

Idot. The advantages of shaving are manyfold, and not all are aesthetic.

God decided that at a certain age girls and boys schould get
> pubic hair.

Where's the relevance of this?

Now, with those people who shave it all away... It's just not
> the natural way of things. If a girl shaves her Bikiniline, i'm ok with
> that. It actually looks really sexy, but a fully shaved pussy is
> disguesting.

Sure. I suppose "disguesting" things are what "perverts" (whatever they are)
like looking at.

>It just looks to much like a little girl's pussy.

Not really. Any idiot who's done sex ed knows that puberty causes a vulva to
change shape slighlty.

And those of
> you who prefer shaved ones, probably have a secret dark desire for little
> girls;)

Along with the vast majority of the male population on earth? (Well, except
for maybe the Polacks)
When in Rome, do as the Romans do.
Idot.

V01TeK

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 8:31:53 AM4/23/01
to
> You could say that the bikini is a gift from God :D
>

You could also say that some foam and a pack of Gillettes are gifts from God
too.

V01TeK

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 8:32:56 AM4/23/01
to
> actually, it's more a matter of not having to floss after a night of um...
> activity.

Lol... if this guy is taking the "God gave people pubic hair tack," then
he'll probably use the "Sex is only for reproduction" angle too.
Oral sex is evil, right?

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 10:36:02 AM4/23/01
to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 00:53:54 +0100, "Sascha Smitskamp"
<sas...@gotham.demon.nl> wrote:

>
>
>
>>dood, he said it's to do with what is under the hair.......
>
>Nevertheless, it's Natalie Portman's pussy. I'd prefer to see Natalie's
>pussy rather then someone unknown.
>If there ever come pics of Natalie Portman tottally nude, i'll go to the
>Synagogue and read the Thora from beginning to the end!!!!

I think you misplet "Torah." Thora is a chick with nice boobies.

>>the bikini is from god?
>
>Whoops;) Uhh yeah... did't think about that. God creates Dinosaur, God
>destroys Dinosaur, God creates man, man destroys God, man creates Dinosaur.

hehe....I'm really starting to like this guy....

>You could say that the bikini is a gift from God :D
>
>By the way, did you know that the word "dood" means Death in the
>Netherlands. Check out the end of my E-mail adress:)

I did no that actually....what do you take us for, a bunch of idots?
;)

>MazzelTov!

bork bork!!1

>Sascha

--
aufan-deux

generic

unread,
Apr 23, 2001, 10:49:00 PM4/23/01
to
"V01TeK" <pal...@acay.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ae41...@news.acay.com.au...

> > actually, it's more a matter of not having to floss after a night of
um...
> > activity.
>
> Lol... if this guy is taking the "God gave people pubic hair tack," then
> he'll probably use the "Sex is only for reproduction" angle too.
> Oral sex is evil, right?
> Syl.


it's still officially illegal in the state of georgia (hey to aufan!)

darned blue laws, make me a criminal.

--chris


Sascha Smitskamp

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 8:23:51 AM4/24/01
to

>> actually, it's more a matter of not having to floss after a night of um...
>> activity.
>
>Lol... if this guy is taking the "God gave people pubic hair tack," then
>he'll probably use the "Sex is only for reproduction" angle too.
>Oral sex is evil, right?
>Syl.

Sex is for repruduction and fun. Just don't ever say that humanity can't
live without sex. People take sex to serious sometimes. Just like we're
discussing pubic hair right now.
Some of us like it, some of us don't. There's no reason for a debate. It's a
matter of opinion. It doesn't make sense.
It's like saying "70% of the male population thinks Natalie Portman is more
beautiful than Anna Paquin. And the other 30% think Anna is prettier then
Natalie. Therefore Natalie is officially prettier" That's bullshit! Some
like Anna, some like Natalie. I like them both. Natalie is more populair
then Anna. that's all it proves

So you don't have to go and throw with numbers, cause it won't proove
anything. Even if the majority of males prefer shaved pussies. It just says
that it might be more populair. But it does NOT say "That's what men are
supposed to like" You just can't accept that not all people like the same
thing.

If you really think that all men schould like shaved pussies, and that pubic
hair is grose, then "Heill Fucking Hitler" to you my friend!

V01TeK

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 7:59:31 AM4/24/01
to

>
> Sex is for repruduction and fun. Just don't ever say that humanity can't
> live without sex. People take sex to serious sometimes. Just like we're
> discussing pubic hair right now.

Ok... one tool took the bait... but it wasn't the one THIS angler was hoping
for.


> It's like saying "70% of the male population thinks Natalie Portman is
more
> beautiful than Anna Paquin. And the other 30% think Anna is prettier then
> Natalie. Therefore Natalie is officially prettier" That's bullshit!

WTF are you on about?

>
> So you don't have to go and throw with numbers, cause it won't proove
> anything. Even if the majority of males prefer shaved pussies. It just
says
> that it might be more populair. But it does NOT say "That's what men are
> supposed to like" You just can't accept that not all people like the same
> thing.
>
> If you really think that all men schould like shaved pussies, and that
pubic
> hair is grose, then "Heill Fucking Hitler" to you my friend!

Fucking tool.

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 10:57:19 AM4/24/01
to
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:49:00 -0400, "generic" <cr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

That's just hilarious, though. How can they legislate something that
people do mostly in private anyway? It's like saying that it is
illegal for guys to pee sitting down if they don't have to crap. How
are they gonna know?

--
aufan-deux

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 24, 2001, 10:58:55 AM4/24/01
to

So are you saying that each has his own opinion, and each opinion is
as valuable as the next?


--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 25, 2001, 9:22:12 AM4/25/01
to
> bork bork!!1
>

isn't that what the muppet chef used to say?

Kyle


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 25, 2001, 9:44:43 PM4/25/01
to

Indeed. He was svedish.

The Svedish Chef [tm].

--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 26, 2001, 8:36:41 AM4/26/01
to

"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3ae77d6d...@news.alltel.net...

He was pretty cool.
I remember when he had his own cereal.

Kyle


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 26, 2001, 10:49:09 PM4/26/01
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:36:41 -0400, "De'shende'"
<bled...@wright.edu> wrote:

>
>"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
>news:3ae77d6d...@news.alltel.net...
>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:22:12 -0400, "De'shende'"
>> <bled...@wright.edu> wrote:
>>
>> >> bork bork!!1
>> >>
>> >
>> >isn't that what the muppet chef used to say?
>> >
>> >Kyle
>>
>> Indeed. He was svedish.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Svedish Chef [tm].
>>
>> --
>> aufan-deux
>
>He was pretty cool.
>I remember when he had his own cereal.
>
>Kyle

I donut remember that. Was it as tasty as the Svedish Chef was funny?

--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 26, 2001, 11:52:25 PM4/26/01
to

"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3ae8de0e...@news.alltel.net...

I don't remember ever eating any of it, (or even the name of it for that
matter) I just remember seeing the commercials for it when I watched my
Saturday morning cartoons.

Kyle


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 27, 2001, 11:57:06 AM4/27/01
to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 23:52:25 -0400, "De'shende'"
<bled...@wright.edu> wrote:

That was back when Saturday morning cartoons didn't suck. I miss the
Looney Toon days.....*sigh*

--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 27, 2001, 4:07:18 PM4/27/01
to

"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3ae996ad...@news.alltel.net...

I agree.
Looney Toons will always still be around though.

Kyle


generic

unread,
Apr 27, 2001, 8:33:42 PM4/27/01
to
"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3ae59401...@news.alltel.net...

the cameras dood. the cameras.

--chris


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 28, 2001, 12:59:15 AM4/28/01
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 20:33:42 -0400, "generic" <cr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Er...uh oh.

Now I'm gonna have to go kick some legislators in the seeds.

--
aufan-deux

generic

unread,
Apr 28, 2001, 8:11:25 AM4/28/01
to
"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3aea4dfe...@news.alltel.net...

<butthead laugh> you said....kick.

--chris


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 28, 2001, 9:10:15 PM4/28/01
to
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:07:18 -0400, "De'shende'"
<bled...@wright.edu> wrote:

ture, ture. I think they still come on the cartoon network, but I
don't no when.

--
aufan-deux

aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 28, 2001, 9:10:52 PM4/28/01
to
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 08:11:25 -0400, "generic" <cr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

<beavis laugh> yeh. <beavis laugh again>


--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 29, 2001, 8:13:13 PM4/29/01
to

"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3aeb69d9...@news.alltel.net...

There's usually an acme hour late at night, after toonami the Midnight run I
think, so that's probably about 1am.
I'm sure they're on other times too.

Kyle


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 10:07:48 AM4/30/01
to
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:13:13 -0400, "De'shende'"
<bled...@wright.edu> wrote:

At 1am, I'm normally talking to my looser ICQ friends. :)

--
aufan-deux

De'shende'

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 3:21:17 PM4/30/01
to

"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3aed719a...@news.alltel.net...

Speaking of loosers, why are we keeping this thread alive? :)

Kyle


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 4:33:43 PM4/30/01
to
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:21:17 -0400, "De'shende'"
<bled...@wright.edu> wrote:

The answer is in the question, dood. :)

--
aufan-deux

generic

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 11:17:30 PM4/30/01
to
"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3aedcc12...@news.alltel.net...

b/c it says pubic hair. DUH. why else to keep this goofy ass thread open?
or alive, or whatever. i have to go to work tomorrow morning. can we say
to coding webpages? then i get to study for computer architecture, then
comparitive languages!!!!!! oh deer joy of my life.
ARGHGGHGHGLKSHDEGLKWJEFGo;wihag;ndfvdfn

*cough*

--chris


aufan-deux

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 11:58:00 PM4/30/01
to
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:17:30 -0400, "generic" <cr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Dood, are you okay??

*pops generic-dood on the back*


*gurgle*

What was that?

--
aufan-deux

generic

unread,
May 1, 2001, 7:54:55 AM5/1/01
to
"aufan-deux" <au...@pipeline.com> wrote in message
news:3aee3423...@news.alltel.net...

probably a LISP or PROLOG program. thanks though dood.

--chris


aufan-deux

unread,
May 1, 2001, 6:03:35 PM5/1/01
to
On Tue, 1 May 2001 07:54:55 -0400, "generic" <cr...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

No prob.


*hug*

--
aufan-deux

0 new messages