Re: M,I`5 Persecutio n ' Comparing the M I5 Persecuti on wit h Germ an Fina l So lution

[Dan C]

efm...@bigfoot.com wrote:
> MI5 Persecution Update:. Friday 16 April, 1999
>
> If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This
> Please..... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will
> be deleted. without being read.
>
> BBC newscaster Nicholas. Witchell cant stop himself laughing
>
> During 1990-91 there were. very many instances of "interactive
> television" where newscasters. and other TV presenters saw on a screen
> before them what was happening in my. home, and reacted, frequently by
> laughing at me. During this period I. unfortunately did not record these
> programmes. For the last year or two, I have been recording everything. I
> watch, and there. has been a drastic decrease in such incidents.
>
> However, on occasion, television presenters do. still engage in
> "interactive watching" and react. to what they see. This has been evident
> with Jon Snow of Channel Four. News recently - a particularly interesting
> case, since it has been established that he cannot. be corrupted by money
> (it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free. salary and he
> turned them down). I wonder. what device MI5 are using to encourage him to
> do the "interactive. watching"?
>
> On. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted
> when he. saw that I was watching the programme, and I have his reactions
> stored safely on videotape. I have watched. this tape several times and I
> am entirely. confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct. For
> several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth. as he attempted to keep a
> straight face. Then. finally his self-control evaporated through the excuse
> of a weak. joke and his face collapsed into a grin.
>
> The strange thing is that I dont know why he was laughing. at me, what I
> had done recently to. "deserve" to be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors
> usually manage to invent. some justification as to why people should laugh
> at and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was. so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell
> could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found. the
> views I have been expressing. in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre
> paid enough. money and ordered to laugh then even the most innocuous thing
> becomes. funny.
>
> Jon Snow of Channel. Four News cant stop himself smirking, either.
>
> On 12 February 1999 I. was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon
> Snow.. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if anything out of
> the ordinary happened, Id be able to go back and watch. it again.
>
> Now,. Jon Snow, by his own claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned down
> an offer of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they. wanted to make
> him their mouthpiece, and he told them where to get. off.
>
> So you will be. most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively
> watched" me that evening, and on many other. evenings. Approximately
> fifteen minutes into the programme, he announced. that the US President
> would be making. a live appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock
> on the mantelpiece;. and Snow saw me looking at the clock, and visibly
> tried to suppress a. smirk.
>
> Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why are. you
> watching me, Mister Snow? Are. they forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn
> the monitor off,. Mister Snow?
>
> Keith Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected. representative, as ever
> refuses. to help.
>
> Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German. "Final Solution"
>
> It might seem offensive to compare the mass murder of millions. of
> civilians. in wartime with the peacetime persecution of merely one
> person. Yet the comparison has been. coursing through my mind for several
> years now, because the brutality of. German intent to "sub-humans" is very
> much. comparable to the brutality of British intent to someone they
> vituperate and term "not up to British. standards". The methods may differ,
> but the persecutors. mindset is the same.
>
> The Germans first targeted. the mentally disabled, too
>
> During WW2 millions. of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies
> and other minorities were rounded up and murdered. in purpose-built camps
> by the German regime, in. the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on,
> the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign of. mass
> hysteria; but in their cowardice, limited their. activities to one single
> victim.
>
> It is instructive to note that the early German "cleansing" effort. was
> directed primarily not at Jews, but at the mentally ill. The Nazis. set up
> the T4 project in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally. disabled
> people, including schizophrenics. and epileptics. After WW2 the Jews with
> their media influence. used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back
> anti-semitism in the Western countries;. however, the mentally ill are
> today still. a persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were
> under the Nazis. (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK intends to
> bring in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for. some
> mentally ill people - he protects his own minority,. but does nothing for
> the other. minorities in todays society), and this continuing bias forms a
> central cause for the current. acts of persecution in the UK.
>
> Widespread knowledge of what is happening to the. "un-British" minority
>
> In both the German persecution of the thirties and. early forties, and the
> current British persecution, many,. many people are well aware of whats
> happening.. There is widespread complicity through inaction of
> populace;. and in a substantial proportion of the mainstread population,
> the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic support; yet. in both the
> German case in the 1940s and the British today, the. existence of
> persecution is. a mass secret which must be never admitted out loud. In the
> recent Lawrence case this. "secret bigotry" has been termed
> "institutionalised racism", and that is a. very good word for what the
> British are doing today The. persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding
> them are so deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they. define the
> national. mood
>
> During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing,. and through
> inaction quietly. condoned their government's mass murder of
> "un-German" minorities and. inferior "foreigners"; and in the 1990s,
> similarly, many English people know what. the MI5 British Secret Police
> have been doing, and not only condone it, but. actively take part, because
> of. xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that is the target of
> "British" actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has. been made
> explicit through the. words "he's not up to British standards"; the British
> seem to have found their very. own "untermenschen" to victimise.
>
> Why these obsessive "holy wars". happen
>
> This type of aggression occurs when the majority is. threatened or
> humiliated in some way, economically, militarily or culturally.. In pre-WW2
> Germany. the threat was primarily economic and military, following
> Germany's humiliating defeat in the. first world war and the reparations it
> was forced to. pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority
> English who. are behind the persecution feel pressured by the swiftly
> diminishing status of Britain in the world,. and the rapidly increasing
> coloured colonisation of their country, which in time will see the. ethnic
> English a minority in their own land, and their more antisocial. elements,
> unable to reply to the obvious threat, instead project their. aggression
> onto. another, weaker, unit minority
>
> In both cases there is a whiff. of "holy war" or irrational obsession with
> the. persecution. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years ago bordered
> on the not-quite-sane,. and the current British behaviour towards their
> chosen. victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the
> choices open to the victims are the same,. since MI5 will never allow me to
> escape them, "if he tries to run away we'll find him", just. like the
> commandant of Auschwitz telling the new. arrivals, "the only escape is
> through. the chimney".
>
> The Victim Will Destroy Us if. We Dont Destroy Him First
>
> The persecutors propaganda. is the same. Fifty years ago the Germans said,
> "if we don't do it to the Jews then the Jews. will do it to us"; and MI5's
> propaganda in the early nineties concentrated on. their victim as a
> "monster". aesome "untermenschen" minority.
>
> "We are decent fellows" say. the Brutal Persecutors
>
> During the course of. researching this article I read part of the very
> interesting book, "Hitler - A Study in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock.. This
> volume contains. a quote from Himmler on the "Final Solution";
>
> "Most of you. know what it means when a hundred corpses are lying side by
> side, or five hundred. or one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at the
> same time. .... to have remained decent fellows, that is what has made us
> hard. This is a page of glory in our history which has. never been written
> and is never to. be written."
>
> In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a. thread of deliberate brutality to
> the sick and vulnerable, while the persecutors. maintain that "we are
> decent fellows". There is almost a conscious schizophrenia. in the
> self-attitudes of the Security Service operatives and. those in the public
> who they employ against me, which reflects the contradiction evident. in
> the German attitude above. On the. one hand, they stoop to the lowest and
> most base behaviour; yet at the same time, the MI5 operatives. tell
> themselves that since. they are civilised British people, then surely they
> must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency is made the fault. of
> the victim; "hes making us. persecute him, so we need feel no guilt".
>
> Yet the conduct is atypical of. the way these peoples see their normal
> modes of behaviour. Befslaughter was not. typical of normal German
> behaviour up to that point. Similarly, the current MI5 abuse. goes against
> the grain of British self-image. as being "reserved" and "decent", since
> they are using terms of abuse which are common among. blacks and other
> supposedly less-developed. races, but not among the English.
>
> Conclusion
>
> The ultimate aim of. both persecutions is the humiliation and physical
> extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very direct
> way; the British Secret Police MI5 are. acting indirectly and relying on
> self-extinction of their target, because in peacetime and in. the current
> somewhat false. climate of "political correctness" more direct methods are
> impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct action the. mass "omerta" would be
> broken.
>
> I have written this. article with sincerity to show how a historically
> recent persecution in. another country parallels what is being done in this
> country today. In both cases, the evil-doers are of their. countries
> establishments, and rely on widespread tacit support to maintain. the
> persecution and. omerta around it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the
> greater evil, it. is important to be aware of the fact that had the Germans
> not been defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have gone through. to
> total completion. In Britain today no force threatens the. "permanent
> government" of which the Security Service. forms a part; and it looks very
> unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated by the MI5 secret police will. ever be
> revealed to public view, and the. British secret state brought to justice
> for its evil. actions.
>
> 116
>
Why do you post this here. I am sorry for your problems,
but this is inappropriate. And I would venture a big
guess that noone here is interested......

[TheCroW]

> Why do you post this here. I am sorry for your problems, but this is
> inappropriate. And I would venture a big guess that noone here is
> interested......
>

....... and why do you post it AGAIN then in your reply!!??

[mm]

On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:29:52 GMT, Dan C <dan...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
>Why do you post this here. I am sorry for your problems,
>but this is inappropriate. And I would venture a big
>guess that noone here is interested......

So why do you repost the whole thing? The delete key is our friend.

If you are inclined to email me
for some reason, remove NOPSAM :-)