Re: Aggie Melts Down!!! Film at 11 Re: To Trace Eurasian flood myths to astronomical imagery associated with the precession of the equinoxes

Message has been deleted

Agamemnon

unread,

Mar 12, 2010, 1:25:17 AM3/12/10

to

"Fred Hall" <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kbjjp55ei7a94l2lc...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:26:02 -0000, "Agamemnon"
> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>
>>TALKING OUT OF YOUR TROLLING ARSE AGAIN YOU LYING IMBECILE!
>>YOU ARE A TOTALLY CLUELESS PIECE OF SHIT WHO IS TOTALLY OUT OF YOUR DEPTH
>>TRYING TO DISCUSS SUBJECTS YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT, NOT EVEN THE
>>BASICS!
>>
>>STOP MAKING A FOOL OF YOURSELF YOU MORON!
>
> 'tis you appearing the fool, Aggie. Where is the proof of your
> assertions?

If you do not know where the proof is then YOU ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO DISCUSS
THE SUBJECT!

STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THIS DISCUSSION!

Message has been deleted

Agamemnon

unread,

Mar 12, 2010, 2:16:40 AM3/12/10

to

"Fred Hall" <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:kvnjp5p2n3v51k9un...@4ax.com...

> Request denied, kook.
>
> Post proof of your assertions or follow your own advice (advise for
> the foreigners)
>

GET LOST YOU INSANE CLUELESS TROLL!

pbo...@aol.com

unread,

Mar 12, 2010, 2:35:07 AM3/12/10

to

Aggy, it's not a discussion when you refuse to talk to anyone other
than yourself.

Phil

Kadaitcha Man

unread,

Mar 12, 2010, 2:57:39 AM3/12/10

to

"Agamemnon", thou dim-witted anointed sovereign of sighs and groans. O
you beast, o faithless coward, o dishonest wretch. Wilt thou be made a
man out of my vice. Ye sickened:

> "Fred Hall" <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:kbjjp55ei7a94l2lc...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:26:02 -0000, "Agamemnon"
>> <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>>> TALKING OUT OF YOUR TROLLING ARSE AGAIN YOU LYING IMBECILE! YOU
>>> ARE A TOTALLY CLUELESS PIECE OF SHIT WHO IS TOTALLY OUT OF YOUR
>>> DEPTH TRYING TO DISCUSS SUBJECTS YOU KNOW ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
>>> ABOUT, NOT EVEN THE BASICS!

>>> STOP MAKING A FOOL OF YOURSELF YOU MORON!

>> 'tis you appearing the fool, Aggie. Where is the proof of your
>> assertions?

> LUST SHAFT! FUCKING BARE-BUM! If you do FUCKING ASS-WIPER! not know
> where FUCKING COUNTERFEIT STIFF SAUSAGE! BROWN HOLE! the proof is
> ARSE BANDIT! BALLBAG! then YOU ARE FUCKING LOVE JUICE! NOT QUALIFIED
> TO COMMON TART! HICK! DISCUSS THE SUBJECT! FUCKING FEED THE BEAVER!

> FUCKING BLEEDING JOYBUZZER! FUCKING BUTT! GOOD-FOR-NOTHING
> STUMBLEBUM! STAY THE FUCK OUT FUCKING STUMBLING MILK SHAKES! FUCKING
> PIECE OF CRUMPET! OF THIS DISCUSSION!

How rude.

--
I have defined no god. And when I do need to define some god for the
purposes of discussing its nature with atheists I always define the
supposed some god in the very same concrete and arbitrary terms, without
variation:

God = Metaphysical X

Watching you idiot atheists witlessly pinning your own lunatic
assumptions and irrational perceptions onto it then attempting to argue
against your very own deranged Frankenstein-like creation with utterly
b0rked illogic is a never-ending source of great hilarity.

Message has been deleted

spooge

unread,

Mar 13, 2010, 12:39:06 PM3/13/10

to

"Agamemnon" <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in
news:xI6dnWhvpsvWQwTW...@eclipse.net.uk:

I too would like to join this discussion. Is the liberal use of all caps
words mandatory, or are you following the Usenet standard that he who is
the kookiest &/or losing the debate uses the most caps?

Please respond at your earliest convenience. Many thanks in advance.

--
I'm a romantic adventure
And I'm a reptile, too