On May 25, 1:22 am, tubby <
btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 24, 5:02 pm, Serena Nordstrup <
s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 23, 1:53 am, tubby <
btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 22, 9:58 pm, Serena Nordstrup <
s_nordst...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 19, 12:50 pm, tubby <
btono...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 19, 6:09 am, Ellen <
ellena...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > This deserves its own thread.
>
> > > > > > One wonders if the "coach's" first obligation is to the "client" or to
> > > > > > Landmark. And how do they come to terms with that conflict in their
> > > > > > own mind.
>
> > > > > > Wat do they charge for this "service," Bruno?
>
> > > > > You liked the coaching bit . Yes!!!!!
>
> > > > I can't decide whether to classify this gem as wanton delusion or as
> > > > willful delusion...
>
> > > My Baroness Norsdstrup, as your loyal servant I am only bringing to
> > > your attention
> > > what I have discovered to be a latent desire of yours Yes?????
>
> > So why did you post your gem to someone else?
So why did you post your gem to someone else, Bruno?
> > > > > I bet you would like to try some
>
> > > > I bet wild horses couldn't dredge up a skerrick of enthusiasm
>
> > > Thats just you saying that because you are modest.
> > > I know you love frothing at the mouth when these matters are raised
> > > and so I urge you to take a bite.
>
> > The more you claim to know, the greater my suspicions of the limits of
> > your knowledge...
>
> Perhaps in regards to who you really are.
I find the implication that something ~is~ really me weird if not
offensive.
Take a step backwards. How do you know that I "love frothing at the
mouth"?
> Whether you Baroness have any experience
> or first hand knowledge about Landmark is also debatable.
... and not worth debating, because of its irrelevance to discussions
on alt.fan.landmark
> > > It won't harm you and you may find out that you actually enjoy it.
>
> > > > > but you just can't get yourself to
> > > > > accept it may
> > > > > work for you. The genteel baroness is probably frothing at the mouth
> > > > > in excitement also.
>
> > > > > Caligari told you what they charge for the service. I think its a bit
> > > > > steep but just like any
> > > > > product , the market will sort it out whether it survives or not.
>
> > > > Or the market will crash. Or distort. Or both. Not necessarily in that
> > > > order.
>
> > > Does that really matter.
>
> > Yes: we might need some more reliable mechanism to "sort it out".
>
> > > We can all resort to bartering if need be.
>
> > You'd still have a market.
>
> > > The technology and the products won't disappear.
>
> > > > > I don't know whether the coach would be having any conflict, he or she
> > > > > most probably
> > > > > believes that the service they are providing works.
>
> > > > A poor excuse for ignoring potential conflict.
>
> Just a mere opinion don't you think Baroness???
No. Many bodies have rules for declaring/avoiding conflict of
interest. Think lawyers. Think pharmaceutical researchers...
> > > > > Caligari may better answer that question because he was in the inner
> > > > > sanctum of the
> > > > > organisation and most probably knew the coaches at a more personal
> > > > > level.
>
> > > > .. and they haven't changed in personnel or in dedication since the
> > > > day ...
>
> > > > > However I think coaching in any situation is beneficial as it helps to
> > > > > direct you to your
> > > > > blind spots that you are not aware of.
>
> > > > I think direction to blind spots in any situation may cause loss of
> > > > focus and dissipation of ~commitment~.
>
> Really.
> May I ask for more clarification how you come to that viewpoint???
Distractions can militate against single-mindedness.
> > > What. That "s bullshit Baroness
>
> > Why do you suspect direction to blind spots in any situation might
> > not cause loss of focus and dissipation of ~commitment~, Bruno?
>
> Will answer after you have clarified what you mean?
You wrote the phrases "direction to blind spots" and "in any
situation" yourself. What needs clarification to you?
> > > > >This information could be valuable if you decide to use it.
>
> > > > You may find any information useful whether or not you ~choose~ to use
> > > > it ...
>
> > > So??
>
> > So why the "if you decide to use it" tag ?
>
> Because I know Muses are a capricious lot and with the aristocratic
> image you have to uphold
> and your genteel preference to playing to the crowd, namely Patty and
> the passionate Ellen.
> I thought a choice for you would have been lets say democratic??
You didn't write the "if you decide to use it" tag to me. Your
explanation doesn't hold water.
> > > > > In a way we are all coaches here in this newsgroup, some better than
> > > > > others.
>
> > > > ... whereas outside of alt.fan.landmark we all just take action...
>
> > > > > Lots of anguish though which I find not very helpful.
>
> > > > Readers of alt.fan.landmark will long have noted your aversion to
> > > > things emotional, Bruno.
>
> > > > > But yes Ellen you and Baroness Nordstrup are coaches.
>
> > > > They became so at birth, but will wean themselves off this addiction
> > > > real soon now...
>
> > > Not that easy Baroness.
> > > The frothing at the mouth gives you away!!
>
> > Transformation, though. The Bible recommends it sometimes.
>
> Ah that' s where we can rely on Patty for his interpretation of what
> the Bible
> really says.
... as opposed to those things which the Bible says, but not
really ...
Hey Bruno, do ~landmark~ so-called ~education~ still call their